Index › HR › Workforce planning and analytics › Employee monitoring › Small business · November 2026 Edition
Employee monitoring for small business buyers
Asked as “employee monitoring tool”, and as “workforce productivity analytics software”, on behalf of a small B2B company. 49 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each. Added to the November 2026 Edition.
Standing · first-choice share
39%
Contested · Hubstaff 20%
39ActivTrak20Hubstaff10CleverControl31others
39% of first choices, contested.
Since October 2026↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: ActivTrak (39%) replaces Hubstaff (23% then, 20% now), 19 points clear, past the 13-point floor.ActivTrak leads at 39%, replacing Hubstaff, which led at 23% and stands at 20% now: 19 points clear, past the floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
ActivTrak39%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: ActivTrak (39%) replaces Hubstaff (23% then, 20% now), 19 points clear, past the 13-point floor.This pageMid-marketActivTrak47%Clear leader▲+14Since October 2026: 33% → 47%, +14 points. Past the 13-point floor: movement.Standing →Enterprise
Teramind27%Contested▲+1Since October 2026: 26% → 27%, +1 point. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.Standing →
ActivTrak39%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: ActivTrak (39%) replaces Hubstaff (23% then, 20% now), 19 points clear, past the 13-point floor.This pageMid-marketActivTrak47%Clear leader▲+14Since October 2026: 33% → 47%, +14 points. Past the 13-point floor: movement.Standing →EnterpriseTeramind27%Contested▲+1Since October 2026: 26% → 27%, +1 point. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.Standing →The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a small B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01ActivTrak39%2%66endorsed leader▲+24Since October 2026: 15% → 39%, +24 points. Past the 13-point floor: movement.15% → 39%
ActivTrak39%2%66endorsed leader▲+24Since October 2026: 15% → 39%, +24 points. Past the 13-point floor: movement.15% → 39%02
Hubstaff20%8%65accepted challenger▼−3Since October 2026: 23% → 20%, −3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.23% → 20%
Hubstaff20%8%65accepted challenger▼−3Since October 2026: 23% → 20%, −3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.23% → 20%03
CleverControl10%22%18accepted challenger▲+10Since October 2026: 0% → 10%, +10 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 10%
CleverControl10%22%18accepted challenger▲+10Since October 2026: 0% → 10%, +10 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 10%04
Desklog8%0%10accepted challenger▲+5Since October 2026: 3% → 8%, +5 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.3% → 8%
Desklog8%0%10accepted challenger▲+5Since October 2026: 3% → 8%, +5 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.3% → 8%05
Insightful4%3%33accepted challenger▲+1Since October 2026: 3% → 4%, +1 point. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.3% → 4%
Insightful4%3%33accepted challenger▲+1Since October 2026: 3% → 4%, +1 point. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.3% → 4%06
Time Doctor2%12%41accepted challenger▼−6Since October 2026: 8% → 2%, −6 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.8% → 2%
Time Doctor2%12%41accepted challenger▼−6Since October 2026: 8% → 2%, −6 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.8% → 2%07
Clockify2%0%19accepted challenger▼−5Since October 2026: 7% → 2%, −5 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.7% → 2%
Clockify2%0%19accepted challenger▼−5Since October 2026: 7% → 2%, −5 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.7% → 2%08
DeskTime2%4%26accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.2% → 2%
DeskTime2%4%26accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.2% → 2%Show the three products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
11Teramind0%42%43criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Teramind0%42%43criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%10
Monitask0%6%16accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Monitask0%6%16accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%09
Toggl Track0%0%15accepted challenger▼−3Since October 2026: 3% → 0%, −3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.3% → 0%
Toggl Track0%0%15accepted challenger▼−3Since October 2026: 3% → 0%, −3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.3% → 0%The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
Head to headHead-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not small business.
All ten head-to-head pages: the top five products, each against each
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
0102030405060708091011Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative50%
Key
01ActivTrak39%
ActivTrak39%02Hubstaff20%
Hubstaff20%03CleverControl10%
CleverControl10%04Desklog8%
Desklog8%05Insightful4%
Insightful4%06Time Doctor2%
Time Doctor2%07Clockify2%
Clockify2%08DeskTime2%
DeskTime2%09Toggl Track0%
Toggl Track0%10Monitask0%
Monitask0%11Teramind0%
Teramind0%What they warned about
Five of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Perplexity Sonar, Mistral Small, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, MiniMax M2.5 and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Teramind42%
18 of 43 labels negative · 12 of 14 models · 6 hard negative
“Most Invasive Tools to Avoid or Seriously Evaluate ... Teramind | Full keystroke logging, live screen monitoring ... Very High” MiniMax M2.5, negative prompt
Time Doctor12%
5 of 41 labels negative · 5 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“frequently criticized for its aggressive screenshot frequency and "cursor tracking"” GLM 4.7 FlashX, negative prompt
Hubstaff8%
5 of 65 labels negative · 5 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“Hubstaff (webcam features), and others that offer webcam/video capture” DeepSeek V4 Flash, negative prompt
CleverControl22%
4 of 18 labels negative · 4 of 14 models · 3 hard negative
“cited as an example of live desktop access: "the CleverControl monitoring system allows employers to connect to an employee's desktop at any time"” Muse Glimmer 30B, negative prompt
What they cite
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
73 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 758 links across 187 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 4 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
vendor site · CleverControl32 answers · 39 citations · 11 models
32 answers · 39 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Insightful26 answers · 35 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Hubstaff25 answers · 33 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Rework24 answers · 25 citations · 9 models
23 answers · 29 citations · 8 models
vendor site · CurrentWare21 answers · 25 citations · 9 models
21 answers · 23 citations · 11 models
vendor site · G217 answers · 22 citations · 10 models
15 answers · 16 citations · 7 models
vendor site · Desklog14 answers · 24 citations · 11 models
vendor site · FirstHR14 answers · 14 citations · 9 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
30 answers · 10 models
26 answers · 10 models
23 answers · 9 models
16 answers · 9 models
15 answers · 7 models
14 answers · 7 models
13 answers · 9 models
12 answers · 7 models
12 answers · 8 models
12 answers · 7 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best employee monitoring tool”, “employee monitoring tool”, “employee monitoring tools”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ActivTrak activtrak.com | 39% | 173 | 8,100 | 156 | 18,356 | $11,550 | 47 | 1 |
| Hubstaff hubstaff.com | 20% | 172 | 18,100 | 202 | 100,097 | 120 | ||
| CleverControl clevercontrol.com | 10% | 26 | ||||||
| Desklog desklog.io | 8% | 35 | ||||||
| Insightful insightful.io | 4% | 101 | 135,000 | 31,732 | 51,763 | $34 | 37 | 6 |
| Time Doctor timedoctor.com | 2% | 94 | 4,400 | 2,638 | 19,456 | 21 | ||
| Clockify clockify.me | 2% | 133 | 60,500 | 1,093 | 2,084,749 | 40 | ||
| DeskTime desktime.com | 2% | 48 | 1,000 | 25 | 9,245 | 5 | ||
| WorkTime worktime.com | 2% | 11 | 3,600 | 17 | 13,333 | 9 | ||
| Apploye apploye.com | 2% | 17 | 480 | 4 | 45,528 | 1 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 21 sites; 2 of them are among the sites the models cited here (insightful.io, peoplemanagingpeople.com). The first result for “best employee monitoring tool” is reddit.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best employee monitoring tool for a small B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which workforce productivity analytics software would you recommend to a small business that sells to other businesses?”Comparative“What are the top employee monitoring tools for a small team and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best employee monitoring tool for a small company with a tight budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 30 person company evaluating an employee monitoring tool. What should we look at?”Negative“Which employee monitoring tools should a small business avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5eMonitorActivTrakChangedCleverControlApploye, DeskTimeno first choicenothing named
Four alternatives
Apploye, DeskTime, Hubstaff, TeramindThree alternatives
DeskTime, Desklog, Microsoft Viva InsightsFive alternatives
ActivTrak, Apploye, Clockify, Hubstaff, MonitaskThree alternatives
ActivTrak, Monitask, TrackpilotsGPT-5.4 miniActivTrakActivTrakHeldTimeCampagainst: TeramindHubstaffno first choicenothing named
Five alternatives
Hubstaff, Monitask, Teramind, Time Doctor, TraqqThree alternatives
Hubstaff, Time Doctor, We360.aiThree alternatives
ActivTrak, Hubstaff, MonitaskTwo alternatives
Teramind, Toggl TrackGemini 3.5 FlashInsightfulActivTrakChangedHubstaff, Time Doctoragainst: TeramindClockify, Jibbleno first choiceagainst: InterGuard, SentryPC, Spyrix
Five alternatives
ActivTrak, Clockify, Hubstaff, Teramind, Toggl TrackFour alternatives
HubSpot Sales Hub, Insightful, Time Doctor, Toggl TrackThree alternatives
ActivTrak, DeskTime, InsightfulFive alternatives
ActivTrak, Apploye, E-Monitor, Hubstaff, Time ChampSeven alternatives
ActivTrak, DeskTime, Harvest, Hubstaff, Teramind, Toggl Track, VeriatoPerplexity SonarHubstaffagainst: Teramind, Time DoctorDesklogChangedagainst: BambooHR, RipplingActivTrak, Insightfulagainst: TeramindTimeCampno first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
ActivTrak, MonitaskThree alternatives
ActivTrak, Hubstaff, InsightfulThree alternatives
Hubstaff, Jibble, MonitaskThree alternatives
ActivTrak, Hubstaff, MonitaskGrok 4.20ActivTrakagainst: CleverControl, TeramindActivTrakHeldagainst: Teramind, Visier, Workday People AnalyticsHubstaff, Monitaskagainst: Teramind, Time DoctorActivTrakno first choiceagainst: Controlio, CurrentWare, DeskTime, Insightful, Kickidler, Monitask, Teramind, Veriato
Two alternatives
Hubstaff, Time DoctorFour alternatives
Desklog, Hubstaff, Insightful, Microsoft Viva InsightsThree alternatives
ActivTrak, CurrentWare, DeskTimeFour alternatives
CleverControl, Clockify, Hubstaff, Time DoctorFive alternatives
ActivTrak, Desklog, Hubstaff, InterGuard, TeramindMistral SmallCleverControlActivTrak, InsightfulChangedTeramindHanddy Timesheets, WorkTimeno first choicenothing named
Three alternatives
Hubstaff, Teramind, Time DoctorOne alternative
HubstaffSeven alternatives
ActivTrak, Clockify, CurrentWare, Hubstaff Desk, Insightful, Kickidler, Time DoctorThree alternatives
ActivTrak, DeskTime, KickidlerDeepSeek V4 FlashActivTrakActivTrakHeldno first choiceagainst: TeramindHubstaffno first choiceagainst: CleverControl, Hubstaff, Teramind, Time Doctor, Veriato
Four alternatives
DeskTime, Hubstaff, Teramind, Time DoctorThree alternatives
Desklog, Hubstaff, InsightfulSeven alternatives
ActivTrak, CleverControl, Clockify, DeskTime, Hubstaff, Insightful, Time DoctorFour alternatives
ActivTrak, Clockify, Kickidler, WorkTimeLlama 4 MaverickCleverControlDesklogChangedno first choiceCleverControlno first choiceagainst: Controlio, Hubstaff, Teramind
Seven alternatives
ActivTrak, DeskTime, Hubstaff, Insightful, Microsoft Viva Insights, Teramind, Time DoctorSix alternatives
ActivTrak, Handdy Timesheets, HiveDesk, Hubstaff, Time Doctor, WorkTimeQwen 3.7 FlashHubstaffActivTrakChangedagainst: TeramindHubstaff, TimeCampagainst: TeramindHubstaffno first choicenothing named
Three alternatives
ActivTrak, Time Doctor, Toggl TrackTwo alternatives
Desklog, InsightfulTwo alternatives
ActivTrak, ClockifyThree alternatives
ActivTrak, HiveDesk, WorkTimeKimi K2ActivTrakActivTrak, DesklogChangedagainst: Visier, Workday People AnalyticsClockifyActivTrakno first choiceagainst: ActivTrak, Hubstaff, Teramind, Time Doctor
Four alternatives
Hubstaff, Insightful, Monitask, Time DoctorTwo alternatives
Hubstaff, InsightfulFour alternatives
ActivTrak, Hubstaff, Insightful, Time DoctorThree alternatives
CleverControl, Clockify, HubstaffSix alternatives
Asana, Clockify, Harvest, Linear, Monday.com, Toggl TrackGLM 4.7 FlashXHubstaffHubstaffHeldCleverControlActivTrak, Hubstaffno first choiceagainst: CleverControl, Hubstaff, StaffCop, Teramind, Time Doctor
Five alternatives
ActivTrak, Insightful, Teramind, Time Doctor, WebWorkOne alternative
Time DoctorSix alternatives
ActivTrak, Hubstaff, Insightful, Monitask, TMetric, Time DoctorOne alternative
DeskTimeMiniMax M2.5ActivTrak, Time DoctorHubstaffChangedno first choiceagainst: KickidlerHubstaffno first choiceagainst: Controlio, InterGuard, Teramind, Veriato
Two alternatives
Hubstaff, TeramindFour alternatives
ActivTrak, Desklog, Microsoft Viva Insights, Time DoctorFive alternatives
ActivTrak, Clockify, Hubstaff, Insightful, TeramindTwo alternatives
ActivTrak, When I WorkGPT-6 LunaActivTrakActivTrakHeldHubstaffagainst: TeramindActivTrakno first choiceagainst: Controlio, Hubstaff, KeepActive
Two alternatives
Hubstaff, TeramindTwo alternatives
Hubstaff, InsightfulTwo alternatives
ActivTrak, Time DoctorOne alternative
HubstaffMuse Glimmer 30BCleverControlDesklogChangedagainst: Deel HR, Visier, Workday People AnalyticsCleverControlCleverControlno first choiceagainst: CleverControl, InterGuard, Kickidler, SentryPC, Teramind, Veriato
Seven alternatives
ActivTrak, Clockify, CurrentWare, Hubstaff, Insightful, Time Doctor, When I WorkFive alternatives
ActivTrak, Hubstaff, Insightful, Intelogos, Timesheet 365Seven alternatives
ActivTrak, DeskTime, HiveDesk, Hubstaff, Insightful, Teramind, Time DoctorThree alternatives
ActivTrak, Clockify, WorkTimeBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 11:42 | yes | 10 | 7 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 09:12 | yes | 3 | 6 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 09:24 | yes | 7 | 19 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 11:03 | yes | 10 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:06 | yes | 5 | 32 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 11:55 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 09:46 | yes | 17 | 28 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 09:19 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 08:52 | no | 0 | 28 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 09:56 | yes | 13 | 41 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 11:03 | yes | 12 | 87 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 09:14 | yes | 5 | 29 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 09:37 | yes | 4 | 13 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 10:32 | yes | 9 | 16 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 12:16 | yes | 10 | 7 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 11:00 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 12:46 | no | 0 | 21 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 12:45 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:03 | yes | 5 | 38 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 09:06 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 10:33 | yes | 24 | 28 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 12:55 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 12:45 | yes | 5 | 25 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 10:04 | yes | 10 | 18 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 09:44 | yes | 25 | 42 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 11:31 | yes | 16 | 74 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 12:40 | yes | 3 | 12 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 09:46 | yes | 13 | 21 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 10:32 | yes | 10 | 9 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 10:58 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 09:33 | yes | 7 | 22 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 11:06 | yes | 10 | 5 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:15 | yes | 5 | 32 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 11:04 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 10:38 | yes | 21 | 32 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 12:20 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 10:41 | no | 0 | 30 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 10:58 | yes | 10 | 20 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 08:44 | yes | 19 | 44 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 12:22 | yes | 11 | 32 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 12:04 | yes | 5 | 20 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 11:24 | yes | 14 | 25 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 08:58 | yes | 10 | 8 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 12:48 | yes | 3 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 11:09 | yes | 11 | 18 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 09:27 | yes | 10 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:28 | yes | 8 | 32 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 11:26 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 09:34 | yes | 23 | 25 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 12:04 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 12:22 | yes | 5 | 22 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 08:49 | yes | 8 | 21 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 09:14 | yes | 15 | 35 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 12:53 | yes | 5 | 36 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 11:24 | yes | 3 | 13 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 09:47 | yes | 15 | 30 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 09:18 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 08:54 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 12:12 | no | 0 | 16 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 09:32 | yes | 10 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:14 | yes | 15 | 39 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 08:57 | no | 0 | 9 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 11:51 | yes | 20 | 29 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 09:23 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 11:59 | no | 0 | 26 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 10:44 | no | 0 | 73 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 09:47 | yes | 15 | 23 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 10:47 | no | 0 | 18 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 09:59 | yes | 2 | 12 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 12:40 | yes | 15 | 18 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 12:05 | yes | 18 | 11 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 11:03 | yes | 4 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 08:56 | no | 0 | 20 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 12:04 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:14 | yes | 19 | 35 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 10:09 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 10:08 | yes | 24 | 36 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 09:18 | yes | 7 | 6 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 09:29 | yes | 5 | 24 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 09:35 | yes | 20 | 33 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 10:51 | yes | 23 | 50 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 08:44 | yes | 20 | 48 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 08:44 | yes | 5 | 18 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 10:34 | yes | 22 | 29 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Toggl read as Toggl Track
Workday read as Workday People Analytics
Unresolved, counted raw
EmpTrakr
Hubstaff Desk
Jamf/InTune
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.