Index › HR › Workforce planning and analytics › People analytics › Enterprise · November 2026 Edition
People analytics for enterprise buyers
Asked as “people analytics platform”, and as “HR analytics software”, on behalf of an enterprise B2B company. 49 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
65%
Clear leader
65Visier08ChartHop08Crunchr18others
65% of first choices, clear leader.
Since October 2026▲+8Since October 2026: 57% → 65%, +8 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.Visier held the lead, +8 points on 57%, inside the 13-point floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
BambooHR46%Clear leader▼−7Since October 2026: 53% → 46%, −7 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.Standing →Mid-market
ChartHop23%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: ChartHop (23%) replaces Crunchr (22% then, 18% now), 5 points clear, inside the 13-point floor.Standing →Enterprise
Visier65%Clear leader▲+8Since October 2026: 57% → 65%, +8 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.This page
BambooHR46%Clear leader▼−7Since October 2026: 53% → 46%, −7 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.Standing →Mid-marketChartHop23%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: ChartHop (23%) replaces Crunchr (22% then, 18% now), 5 points clear, inside the 13-point floor.Standing →EnterpriseVisier65%Clear leader▲+8Since October 2026: 57% → 65%, +8 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.This pageThe standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for an enterprise B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01Visier65%10%72endorsed leader▲+8Since October 2026: 57% → 65%, +8 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.57% → 65%
Visier65%10%72endorsed leader▲+8Since October 2026: 57% → 65%, +8 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.57% → 65%02
Crunchr8%9%43accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 6% → 8%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.6% → 8%
Crunchr8%9%43accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 6% → 8%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.6% → 8%03ChartHop8%9%33accepted challenger▼−3Since October 2026: 11% → 8%, −3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.11% → 8%
ChartHop8%9%33accepted challenger▼−3Since October 2026: 11% → 8%, −3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.11% → 8%04
One Model6%4%45accepted challenger▲+4Since October 2026: 2% → 6%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.2% → 6%
One Model6%4%45accepted challenger▲+4Since October 2026: 2% → 6%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.2% → 6%05
Workday People Analytics4%17%47accepted challenger▼−7Since October 2026: 11% → 4%, −7 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.11% → 4%
Workday People Analytics4%17%47accepted challenger▼−7Since October 2026: 11% → 4%, −7 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.11% → 4%06
Workday Prism Analytics2%25%12criticized challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%
Workday Prism Analytics2%25%12criticized challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%Show the six products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
12Microsoft Power BI0%46%13criticized challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%
11
SAP SuccessFactors0%42%12criticized challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%
SAP SuccessFactors0%42%12criticized challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%10
Tableau0%33%15criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Tableau0%33%15criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%09
Culture Amp0%20%10accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Culture Amp0%20%10accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%08
SAP SuccessFactors People Analytics0%12%16accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
SAP SuccessFactors People Analytics0%12%16accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%07
Oracle Fusion HCM Analytics0%8%24accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Oracle Fusion HCM Analytics0%8%24accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
Head to headHead-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not enterprise.
All twenty-one head-to-head pages: the top seven products, each against each
ChartHop vs BambooHRChartHop vs LeapsomeChartHop vs RipplingCrunchr vs HiBobCrunchr vs VisierCrunchr vs BambooHRCrunchr vs LeapsomeCrunchr vs RipplingHiBob vs VisierHiBob vs BambooHRHiBob vs LeapsomeHiBob vs RipplingVisier vs BambooHRVisier vs LeapsomeVisier vs RipplingBambooHR vs LeapsomeBambooHR vs RipplingLeapsome vs Rippling
One product takes 65% of first choices here, so the chart would put eleven markers in one corner and one at the far edge. The two measurements it plots are columns in the standing above: share, and the negative label rate. Four products carry a negative rate above 25% in this category.
What they warned about
Eight of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. GPT-5.4 mini, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Grok 4.20, Mistral Small, Kimi K2 and MiniMax M2.5 changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Workday People Analytics17%
8 of 47 labels negative · 8 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“Avoid Highly Variable Custom Pricing ... like Visier, Workday, and SAP SuccessFactors use custom enterprise pricing” Claude Haiku 4.5, budget prompt
Visier10%
7 of 72 labels negative · 6 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“Avoid Highly Variable Custom Pricing ... like Visier, Workday, and SAP SuccessFactors use custom enterprise pricing” Claude Haiku 4.5, budget prompt
SAP SuccessFactors42%
5 of 12 labels negative · 5 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“Avoid Highly Variable Custom Pricing ... like Visier, Workday, and SAP SuccessFactors use custom enterprise pricing” Claude Haiku 4.5, budget prompt
Microsoft Power BI
46%
6 of 13 labels negative · 5 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“Avoid implementing these as standalone solutions without investing in a "semantic model."” Qwen 3.7 Flash, negative prompt
What they cite
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
73 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 912 links across 270 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 16 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
22 answers · 22 citations · 8 models
vendor site · ThriveSparrow20 answers · 23 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Visier18 answers · 34 citations · 9 models
vendor site · HRBench18 answers · 18 citations · 8 models
18 answers · 18 citations · 10 models
17 answers · 18 citations · 9 models
vendor site · G216 answers · 29 citations · 9 models
vendor site · One Model15 answers · 22 citations · 6 models
vendor site · PeopleStrong14 answers · 14 citations · 9 models
13 answers · 16 citations · 7 models
12 answers · 15 citations · 7 models
11 answers · 13 citations · 7 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
22 answers · 8 models
20 answers · 9 models
17 answers · 8 models
17 answers · 10 models
15 answers · 8 models
13 answers · 9 models
11 answers · 7 models
10 answers · 7 models
9 answers · 7 models
9 answers · 4 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best people analytics platform”, “people analytics platform”, “people analytics platforms”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Visier visier.com | 65% | 192 | 2,400 | 72 | 40,267 | 16 | ||
| Crunchr crunchr.com | 8% | 107 | 390 | 3 | 1,411 | 1 | 7 | |
| ChartHop charthop.com | 8% | 380 | 2,900 | 16 | 6,238 | 0 | ||
| Workday parent site Workday People Analytics 4%, Workday Prism Analytics 2%, Workday HCM 2%, Workday People Analytics / Prism Analytics 0% | 8% | 211 | 1,220,000 | 23,848 | ||||
| One Model onemodel.co | 6% | 82 | 880 | 1,191 | 2,190 | 18 | 2 | |
| Lattice lattice.com | 2% | 625 | 90,500 | 13,900 | 122,123 | $1,328 | 120 | 3 |
| PeopleInsight hireroad.com | 2% | 8 | ||||||
| Oracle Fusion HCM oracle.com Oracle Fusion HCM Analytics 0% | 0% | 38 | 30 | 0 | 7,410,638 company | $247 | 101 | |
| SAP parent site SAP SuccessFactors People Analytics 0%, SAP SuccessFactors Workforce Analytics 0% | 0% | 29 | 135,000 | 74,309 | ||||
| Culture Amp cultureamp.com | 0% | 354 | 14,800 | 121 | 174,918 | 35 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 14 sites; 2 of them are among the sites the models cited here (onemodel.co, peoplemanagingpeople.com). The first result for “best people analytics platform” is peoplemanagingpeople.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best people analytics platform for an enterprise B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which HR analytics software would you recommend to a large B2B company with thousands of employees?”Comparative“What are the top enterprise-grade people analytics platforms and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best people analytics platform for a large company that needs predictable total cost across thousands of users?”Scale-constrained“We are a 5,000 person company with SSO, SOC 2 and procurement review requirements evaluating a people analytics platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which people analytics platforms should a large enterprise avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5VisierVisierHeldVisierCrunchr, Latticeagainst: SAP SuccessFactors, Visier, Workday People Analyticsno first choicenothing named
Three alternatives
One Model, SAP SuccessFactors, Workday People AnalyticsThree alternatives
Oracle Fusion HCM Analytics, SAP SuccessFactors People Analytics, Workday People AnalyticsSix alternatives
ChartHop, Crunchr, One Model, Oracle Fusion HCM Analytics, SAP SuccessFactors People Analytics, Workday People AnalyticsOne alternative
IntelliHRGPT-5.4 miniVisierWorkday People Analytics, Workday Prism AnalyticsChangedVisieragainst: Eightfold AIVisierno first choicenothing named
Four alternatives
One Model, Orgvue, Workday People Analytics, Workday Prism AnalyticsTwo alternatives
Oracle Fusion HCM Analytics, SAP SuccessFactors HR Analytics / Workforce PlanningFive alternatives
ChartHop, Oracle Fusion HCM Analytics, SAP SuccessFactors People Analytics, UKG analytics / workforce intelligence, Workday People AnalyticsTwo alternatives
Tableau, Workday People AnalyticsGemini 3.5 FlashOne Model, VisierVisierChangedVisierVisieragainst: Microsoft Power BI, Oracle Fusion HCM Analytics, Tableau, Workday Prism AnalyticsVisieragainst: BambooHR, ChartHop, Culture Amp, Gusto, Lattice, Looker, Microsoft Power BI, Namely, Perceptyx, Rippling, SuccessFactors Stories, Tableau, Workday Prism Analytics
Six alternatives
Agentnoon, ChartHop, Crunchr, SAP SuccessFactors Workforce Analytics, Workday People Analytics, Workday Prism AnalyticsSix alternatives
Crunchr, One Model, Qualtrics XM for People Analytics, SAP SuccessFactors Workforce Analytics, Workday People Analytics, Workday Prism AnalyticsSeven alternatives
Crunchr, Microsoft Viva Insights, One Model, Oracle Fusion HCM Analytics, Qualtrics XM for People, SAP SuccessFactors Workforce Analytics, Workday People AnalyticsTwo alternatives
Crunchr, One ModelFour alternatives
Crunchr, One Model, Orgnostic, Workday People AnalyticsPerplexity SonarVisierVisierHeldVisierChartHopno first choiceagainst: ChartHop, Crunchr, Leapsome, Microsoft Viva Insights, Oracle Fusion HCM Analytics, Orgvue, SAP SuccessFactors People Analytics
Three alternatives
ChartHop, Crunchr, Workday People AnalyticsFour alternatives
Crunchr, Oracle Fusion HCM Analytics, SAP SuccessFactors People Analytics, Workday People AnalyticsSeven alternatives
ChartHop, Crunchr, Culture Amp, One Model, SAP SuccessFactors Workforce Analytics, Workday People Analytics, Workday Prism AnalyticsOne alternative
VisierGrok 4.20VisierWorkday People AnalyticsChangedVisierCrunchrVisieragainst: 15Five, Leapsomeagainst: BambooHR add-ons, Humanyze, Leapsome, Microsoft Power BI, Microsoft Viva Insights, Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM, SAP SuccessFactors, Tableau, Workday People Analytics
Three alternatives
Culture Amp, Leapsome, PerceptyxFour alternatives
ADP Workforce Now, Crunchr People Analytics, SAP SuccessFactors, VisierSeven alternatives
Crunchr, Microsoft Viva Insights, One Model, Orgvue, SAP SuccessFactors People Analytics, Workday People Analytics, eqtbleTwo alternatives
Culture Amp, VisierFour alternatives
ChartHop, Crunchr, Culture Amp, Qualtrics People AnalyticsMistral SmallVisierno first choiceChangedVisierVisierno first choiceagainst: BambooHR, ChartHop, Crunchr, Microsoft Power BI, Tableau, Workday People Analytics
Four alternatives
Crunchr, One Model, SAP SuccessFactors People Analytics, Workday People AnalyticsSeven alternatives
ChartHop, Crunchr, Microsoft Power BI, Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM Analytics, SAP SuccessFactors People Analytics, Tableau, Workday People AnalyticsDeepSeek V4 FlashVisieragainst: Workday People AnalyticsVisierHeldVisieragainst: Microsoft Power BI, Microsoft VivaCrunchragainst: One ModelVisieragainst: Crunchr, One Model, Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM, SAP SuccessFactors, Visier
Three alternatives
ChartHop, Crunchr, One ModelFive alternatives
Dayforce, One Model, Oracle Fusion HCM Analytics, SAP SuccessFactors, Workday HCMSix alternatives
ChartHop, Crunchr, One Model, Oracle Fusion HCM Analytics, SAP SuccessFactors People Analytics, Workday People AnalyticsOne alternative
VisierSeven alternatives
Crunchr, Microsoft Viva Insights, One Model, Oracle Fusion HCM Analytics, Orgvue, SAP SuccessFactors, Workday People AnalyticsLlama 4 MaverickVisierVisierHeldno first choiceVisierno first choiceagainst: BambooHR
Four alternatives
ChartHop, Crunchr, One Model, PaycorFour alternatives
ChartHop, Crunchr, One Model, OrgvueQwen 3.7 FlashVisierVisierHeldVisierChartHopagainst: Visier, Workday Prism Analyticsno first choiceagainst: Culture Amp, Microsoft Power BI, SAP SuccessFactors, Tableau, Visier
Three alternatives
Eightfold AI, Microsoft Power BI, Workday Prism AnalyticsThree alternatives
ChartHop, Culture Amp, One ModelFour alternatives
ChartHop, One Model, SAP SuccessFactors Workforce Planning, Workday People AnalyticsThree alternatives
Microsoft Power BI, One Model, TableauKimi K2VisierOne Model, VisierChangedVisierOne Modelagainst: Visierno first choiceagainst: Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM, SAP SuccessFactors, Workday People Analytics
Four alternatives
ChartHop, Crunchr, One Model, Workday People AnalyticsThree alternatives
Crunchr, SAP SuccessFactors People Analytics, Workday People AnalyticsFive alternatives
ADP Workforce Analytics, Crunchr, Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM Analytics, SAP SuccessFactors Workforce Analytics, Workday People Analytics / Prism AnalyticsTwo alternatives
ChartHop, CrunchrGLM 4.7 FlashXVisierVisierHeldVisierChartHopno first choiceagainst: Crunchr, Oracle Global Human Resources Cloud, Visier
Three alternatives
ADP DataCloud, One Model, Workday Prism AnalyticsFive alternatives
Crunchr, One Model, Oracle Fusion HCM Analytics, SAP SuccessFactors People Analytics, Workday People AnalyticsFive alternatives
Crunchr, One Model, SAP SuccessFactors Workforce Analytics, UKG Pro People Analytics, Workday People AnalyticsThree alternatives
Lattice, Visier, Workday People AnalyticsMiniMax M2.5VisierWorkday HCMChangedVisierChartHopVisieragainst: Leapsome, PeopleInsight, SAP SuccessFactors People Analytics, Workday People Analytics
Four alternatives
ChartHop, Crunchr, SplashBI, Workday People AnalyticsFour alternatives
Microsoft Viva, Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM, SAP SuccessFactors, VisierSeven alternatives
ChartHop, One Model, Oracle Fusion HCM Analytics, Orgvue, SAP SuccessFactors People Analytics, SplashBI, Workday People Analytics / Prism AnalyticsTwo alternatives
Visier, Workday People AnalyticsThree alternatives
ADP DataCloud, Solved AI, Workday People AnalyticsGPT-6 LunaVisierVisierHeldOne Model, VisierPeopleInsightno first choiceagainst: Eightfold AI, HireVue, Teramind, Workday People Analytics
Two alternatives
One Model, Workday People AnalyticsThree alternatives
One Model, Oracle Fusion HCM Analytics, Workday People AnalyticsFive alternatives
ADP DataCloud, Oracle Fusion HCM Analytics, SAP SuccessFactors reporting and analytics / People Intelligence, UKG analytics, Workday People AnalyticsTwo alternatives
One Model, VisierMuse Glimmer 30BVisierVisierHeldVisierCrunchragainst: Visier, Workday People Analyticsno first choiceagainst: Leapsome, ThriveSparrow
Three alternatives
Oracle Fusion HCM Analytics, SAP SuccessFactors People Analytics, Workday People AnalyticsThree alternatives
Oracle Fusion HCM Analytics, SAP SuccessFactors People Analytics, Workday People AnalyticsFive alternatives
Crunchr, One Model, Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM Analytics, SAP SuccessFactors People Analytics, Workday People Analytics / Prism AnalyticsOne alternative
ChartHopBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 09:53 | yes | 10 | 8 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 12:47 | yes | 3 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 09:17 | yes | 10 | 21 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 10:17 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:17 | yes | 10 | 33 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 09:40 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 11:57 | yes | 25 | 17 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 09:16 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 10:40 | no | 0 | 24 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 10:39 | yes | 15 | 19 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 10:22 | yes | 25 | 28 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 09:31 | yes | 8 | 47 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 08:49 | yes | 3 | 15 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 12:54 | yes | 13 | 20 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 11:56 | yes | 10 | 7 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 11:37 | yes | 3 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 12:26 | no | 0 | 16 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 08:55 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:28 | yes | 5 | 25 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 12:58 | no | 0 | 21 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 10:00 | yes | 25 | 24 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 10:06 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 11:30 | no | 0 | 25 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 12:45 | yes | 18 | 24 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 09:40 | yes | 19 | 55 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 11:11 | no | 0 | 12 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 08:56 | yes | 4 | 13 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 10:52 | yes | 15 | 19 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 12:07 | yes | 9 | 7 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 09:17 | yes | 9 | 10 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 10:39 | yes | 9 | 23 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 08:48 | yes | 10 | 6 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:12 | yes | 5 | 35 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 10:46 | yes | 5 | 7 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 09:17 | yes | 23 | 30 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 12:50 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 12:27 | yes | 10 | 26 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 09:08 | yes | 18 | 74 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 08:42 | yes | 25 | 72 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 12:03 | yes | 15 | 32 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 11:18 | yes | 7 | 20 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 09:09 | yes | 14 | 27 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 11:40 | yes | 17 | 9 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 12:28 | yes | 6 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 12:07 | yes | 8 | 19 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 08:41 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:28 | yes | 19 | 30 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 10:33 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 12:06 | yes | 21 | 18 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 11:42 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 11:21 | no | 0 | 27 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 09:29 | yes | 13 | 25 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 12:26 | yes | 23 | 75 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 09:44 | yes | 25 | 66 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 09:47 | yes | 2 | 18 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 12:57 | yes | 23 | 35 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 10:47 | yes | 18 | 15 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 09:18 | yes | 2 | 9 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 08:54 | no | 0 | 22 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 11:02 | yes | 10 | 9 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:24 | yes | 10 | 32 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 11:52 | no | 0 | 9 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 12:21 | yes | 24 | 63 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 10:29 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 08:55 | no | 0 | 32 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 10:49 | yes | 15 | 26 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 10:40 | yes | 15 | 21 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 10:49 | no | 0 | 18 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 12:32 | yes | 4 | 24 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 12:58 | yes | 15 | 35 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 09:30 | yes | 18 | 9 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 10:24 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 10:27 | no | 0 | 24 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 09:49 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:15 | yes | 24 | 32 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 11:16 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 11:32 | yes | 24 | 49 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 11:34 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 10:42 | yes | 19 | 52 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 11:25 | yes | 25 | 28 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 10:14 | yes | 15 | 22 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 11:45 | yes | 19 | 61 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 12:28 | yes | 5 | 29 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 12:53 | yes | 23 | 28 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Glint read as Microsoft Viva Glint
Oracle read as Oracle Fusion HCM Analytics
Oracle HCM read as Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM
Oracle HCM Cloud read as Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM
Power BI read as Microsoft Power BI
Workday read as Workday People Analytics
Workday Human Capital Management (HCM) read as Workday HCM
Workday Prism read as Workday Prism Analytics
Unresolved, counted raw
Cognizant's Sentient
Databricks
HeyRamp
IBM's Watsonx
Qualtrics XM for People
Qualtrics XM for People Analytics
Ramco HCM
SAP SuccessFactors HR Analytics / Workforce Planning
SAP SuccessFactors reporting and analytics / People Intelligence
Snowflake
Solved AI
SuccessFactors Stories
Tableau HR Analytics
Ture
UKG Pro People Analytics
UKG Workforce Central Analytics
UKG analytics
UKG analytics / workforce intelligence
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.