Contract lifecycle management and e-signature
Asked as “contract lifecycle management platform”, and as “e-signature and contract management tool”, on behalf of a mid-market B2B company. 51 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
29%
Contested · Ironclad 18%
29PandaDoc18Ironclad16Concord37others
29% of first choices, contested.
Since October 2026▲+6Since October 2026: 23% → 29%, +6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.PandaDoc held the lead, +6 points on 23%, inside the 11-point floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
PandaDoc51%Clear leader▲+8Since October 2026: 43% → 51%, +8 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →Mid-marketPandaDoc29%Contested▲+6Since October 2026: 23% → 29%, +6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.This pageEnterprise
Icertis Contract Intelligence22%Contested▲+1Since October 2026: 21% → 22%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →
PandaDoc51%Clear leader▲+8Since October 2026: 43% → 51%, +8 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →Mid-marketPandaDoc29%Contested▲+6Since October 2026: 23% → 29%, +6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.This pageEnterpriseIcertis Contract Intelligence22%Contested▲+1Since October 2026: 21% → 22%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01PandaDoc29%5%42accepted challenger▲+6Since October 2026: 23% → 29%, +6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.23% → 29%
PandaDoc29%5%42accepted challenger▲+6Since October 2026: 23% → 29%, +6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.23% → 29%02
Ironclad18%26%54criticized challenger▲+3Since October 2026: 15% → 18%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.15% → 18%
Ironclad18%26%54criticized challenger▲+3Since October 2026: 15% → 18%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.15% → 18%03
Concord16%3%31accepted challenger▼−3Since October 2026: 19% → 16%, −3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.19% → 16%
Concord16%3%31accepted challenger▼−3Since October 2026: 19% → 16%, −3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.19% → 16%04
ContractSafe6%11%19accepted challenger▲+6Since October 2026: 0% → 6%, +6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 6%
ContractSafe6%11%19accepted challenger▲+6Since October 2026: 0% → 6%, +6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 6%05
LinkSquares6%9%22accepted challenger▲+6Since October 2026: 0% → 6%, +6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 6%
LinkSquares6%9%22accepted challenger▲+6Since October 2026: 0% → 6%, +6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 6%06
DocuSign4%10%20accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 4%
DocuSign4%10%20accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 4%07
ContractWorks4%21%19accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 4%
ContractWorks4%21%19accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 4%08
DocuSign CLM4%36%36criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 4% → 4%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 4%
DocuSign CLM4%36%36criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 4% → 4%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 4%09
Oneflow4%20%10accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 4%
Oneflow4%20%10accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 4%10
Juro2%10%29accepted challenger▼−15Since October 2026: 17% → 2%, −15 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.17% → 2%
Juro2%10%29accepted challenger▼−15Since October 2026: 17% → 2%, −15 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.17% → 2%11
SpotDraft2%0%15accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%
SpotDraft2%0%15accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%Show the four products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
15Icertis Contract Intelligence0%53%34criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Icertis Contract Intelligence0%53%34criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%13
Sirion0%33%21criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Sirion0%33%21criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%14
Conga CLM0%32%28criticized challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%
Conga CLM0%32%28criticized challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%12
Agiloft Contract Management Suite0%27%41criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Agiloft Contract Management Suite0%27%41criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each
PandaDoc vs LinkSquaresPandaDoc vs DocuSignPandaDoc vs ContractWorksPandaDoc vs DocuSign CLMIronclad vs ConcordIronclad vs ContractSafeIronclad vs LinkSquaresIronclad vs DocuSignIronclad vs ContractWorksIronclad vs DocuSign CLMConcord vs ContractSafeConcord vs LinkSquaresConcord vs DocuSignConcord vs ContractWorksConcord vs DocuSign CLMContractSafe vs LinkSquaresContractSafe vs DocuSignContractSafe vs ContractWorksContractSafe vs DocuSign CLMLinkSquares vs DocuSignLinkSquares vs ContractWorksLinkSquares vs DocuSign CLMDocuSign vs ContractWorksDocuSign vs DocuSign CLMContractWorks vs DocuSign CLM
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
010203040506070809101112131415Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative40%
Key
01PandaDoc29%
PandaDoc29%02Ironclad18%
Ironclad18%03Concord16%
Concord16%04ContractSafe6%
ContractSafe6%05LinkSquares6%
LinkSquares6%06DocuSign4%
DocuSign4%07ContractWorks4%
ContractWorks4%08DocuSign CLM4%
DocuSign CLM4%09Oneflow4%
Oneflow4%10Juro2%
Juro2%11SpotDraft2%
SpotDraft2%12Agiloft Contract Management Suite0%
Agiloft Contract Management Suite0%13Sirion0%
Sirion0%14Conga CLM0%
Conga CLM0%15Icertis Contract Intelligence0%
Icertis Contract Intelligence0%What they warned about
Zero of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.20, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5, GPT-6 Luna and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Ironclad26%
14 of 54 labels negative · 11 of 14 models · 3 hard negative
“Avoid enterprise solutions – Platforms like DocuSign CLM, Ironclad, or Icertis start at much higher price points” Kimi K2, budget prompt
DocuSign CLM36%
13 of 36 labels negative · 10 of 14 models · 3 hard negative
“Dated user interface described as "reminiscent of designs from 2005"... Integration errors between CLM and signature workflows” Kimi K2, negative prompt
Agiloft Contract Management Suite27%
11 of 41 labels negative · 9 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“Avoid enterprise platforms like Ironclad, Icertis, or Agiloft” DeepSeek V4 Flash, budget prompt
Conga CLM32%
9 of 28 labels negative · 9 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“Avoid if you're not Salesforce-native or want a vendor-agnostic stack.” Muse Glimmer 30B, negative prompt
What they cite
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
74 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 820 links across 202 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 8 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
vendor site · Bind25 answers · 39 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Concord22 answers · 34 citations · 10 models
vendor site · PandaDoc20 answers · 34 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Software Advice20 answers · 27 citations · 8 models
18 answers · 40 citations · 8 models
18 answers · 18 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Oneflow17 answers · 17 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Capterra15 answers · 23 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Albato15 answers · 16 citations · 8 models
vendor site · SpotDraft14 answers · 19 citations · 9 models
vendor site · ContractSafe14 answers · 17 citations · 6 models
14 answers · 17 citations · 9 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
18 answers · 9 models
15 answers · 8 models
14 answers · 9 models
13 answers · 7 models
11 answers · 9 models
11 answers · 8 models
10 answers · 3 models
9 answers · 5 models
9 answers · 6 models
8 answers · 8 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best contract lifecycle management platform”, “contract lifecycle management platform”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PandaDoc pandadoc.com | 29% | 538 | 60,500 | 510 | 425,196 | $42,516 | 119 |
| Ironclad ironcladapp.com | 18% | 137 | 49,500 | 3,365 | 128,319 | 120 | |
| Concord concord.app | 16% | 89 | 246,000 | 58,369 | 18,445 | ||
| DocuSign docusign.com DocuSign 4%, DocuSign CLM 4% | 8% | 104 | 1,000,000 | 9,641 | 2,280,470 | $20 | 120 |
| ContractSafe contractsafe.com | 6% | 59 | 1,000 | 7 | 38,687 | $687 | 120 |
| LinkSquares linksquares.com | 6% | 32 | 2,900 | 46 | 2,984 | 20 | |
| ContractWorks contractworks.com | 4% | 44 | 720 | 3 | 1,720 | 1 | |
| Oneflow oneflow.com | 4% | 32 | 1,000 | 11 | 39,547 | 13 | |
| Juro juro.com | 2% | 63 | 2,900 | 536 | 44,442 | $168 | 120 |
| SpotDraft spotdraft.com | 2% | 44 | 1,300 | 17 | 5,760 | 4 |
Google's top ten for the two searches hold 17 sites; 1 of them are among the sites the models cited here (g2.com). The first result for “best contract lifecycle management platform” is reddit.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best contract lifecycle management platform for a mid-market B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which e-signature and contract management tool would you recommend to a mid-sized B2B company?”Comparative“What are the top contract lifecycle management platforms and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best contract lifecycle management platform for a company with a limited budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 500 person company evaluating a contract lifecycle management platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which contract lifecycle management platforms should I avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5LinkSquaresagainst: Ironcladno first choiceChangedno first choicePandaDocno first choiceagainst: Agiloft Contract Management Suite, Conga CLM, DocuSign CLM, Ironclad, LinkSquares, Oneflow
Three alternatives
Concord, ContractSafe, DocuSign CLMNine alternatives
Concord, Conga Contracts, DocuSign CLM, Icertis Contract Intelligence, Ironclad, Juro, PandaDoc, Sirion, Workday CLMTwo alternatives
Agiloft Contract Management Suite, ConcordGPT-5.4 miniIroncladDocuSignChangedno first choiceContractSafeagainst: Icertis Contract Intelligence, Ironcladno first choicenothing named
Six alternatives
Conga CLM, DocuSign CLM, Juro, LinkSquares, Salesforce Revenue Cloud, SpotDraftThree alternatives
Adobe Acrobat Sign, Concord, IroncladThree alternatives
Concord, PandaDoc, Zoho ContractsGemini 3.5 FlashIroncladagainst: Icertis Contract Intelligence, SirionPandaDocChangedagainst: DocuSignIroncladConcordagainst: Agiloft Contract Management Suite, DocuSign CLM, Ironcladno first choiceagainst: Icertis Contract Intelligence, SAP/Ariba CLM
Four alternatives
Conga CLM, Juro, Malbek, SpotDraftTwo alternatives
Ironclad, JuroFive alternatives
Agiloft Contract Management Suite, Conga CLM, DocuSign CLM, Icertis Contract Intelligence, SirionFour alternatives
ContractSafe, Juro, PandaDoc, Zoho ContractsPerplexity SonarJuroOneflowChangedIcertis Contract Intelligence, IroncladPandaDocagainst: DocuSign CLM, Ironcladno first choiceagainst: Agiloft Contract Management Suite, Concord, Conga CLM, ContractSafe, ContractWorks, ContractZen, DocuSign CLM, Icertis Contract Intelligence, Ironclad, PandaDoc, Sirion
Four alternatives
ContractSafe, Ironclad, Oneflow, PandaDocEight alternatives
ContractSafe, DocuSign CLM, GetAccept, Ironclad, Juro, PandaDoc, Zoho Contracts, fynkTen alternatives
Agiloft Contract Management Suite, Conga CLM, ContractSafe, DocuSign, Gatekeeper, Juro, LinkSquares, PandaDoc, SAP Ariba Contracts, SirionOne alternative
ConcordGrok 4.20Ironcladagainst: Agiloft Contract Management Suite, Icertis Contract Intelligence, SAP Ariba Contracts, SirionPandaDocChangedagainst: Dropbox Sign, signNowIcertis Contract Intelligenceagainst: DocuSign CLMContractSafe, ContractWorksagainst: Icertis Contract Intelligence, IroncladDocuSign CLM, Ironclad, Malbekagainst: Icertis Contract Intelligenceagainst: Conga CLM, DocuSign CLM, Gino, Icertis Contract Intelligence, SharePoint add-ons, Sirion
Five alternatives
CobbleStone Software, Conga CLM, ContractSafe, DocuSign, LinkSquaresTwo alternatives
Adobe Acrobat Sign, DocuSignThree alternatives
Agiloft Contract Management Suite, Ironclad, SirionSix alternatives
Concord, Juro, Microsoft 365 Tools, OpenCLM, PandaDoc, fynkThree alternatives
Agiloft Contract Management Suite, Conga CLM, SirionMistral SmallIroncladConcord, OneflowChangedIcertis Contract Intelligence, IroncladContractSafe, PandaDocno first choiceagainst: Conga CLM, ContractWorks, Ironclad, Juro, Sirion
Four alternatives
Agiloft Contract Management Suite, Juro, PandaDoc, SpotDraftTwo alternatives
DocuSign, PandaDocThree alternatives
DocuSign CLM, LinkSquares CLM, MalbekOne alternative
BindDeepSeek V4 FlashIronclad, LinkSquaresPandaDocChangedIcertis Contract Intelligence, SirionPandaDocagainst: Agiloft Contract Management Suite, Icertis Contract Intelligence, Ironcladno first choiceagainst: Icertis Contract Intelligenceagainst: Agiloft Contract Management Suite, CobbleStone Software, DocuSign CLM, Icertis Contract Intelligence, Ncontracts, Venminder
Three alternatives
Agiloft Contract Management Suite, ContractWorks, DocuSign CLMFive alternatives
Concord, DocuSign, Dropbox Sign, Ironclad, JuroFive alternatives
Agiloft Contract Management Suite, ContractPodAi, DocuSign CLM, Ironclad, Workday CLMFour alternatives
Concord, ContractSafe, ContractZen, OneflowLlama 4 Maverickno first choicePandaDocChangedno first choiceContractWorksno first choiceagainst: Agiloft Contract Management Suite, Conga CLM, ContractWorks, Ironclad, Juro, Sirion
Three alternatives
Bind, Concord, ContractSafeQwen 3.7 FlashDocuSign CLMagainst: Icertis Contract IntelligencePandaDocChangedagainst: Conga CLM, Salesforce CPQno first choicePandaDocagainst: Agiloft Contract Management Suite, DocuSign, Ironcladno first choiceagainst: SAP/Aribaagainst: Agiloft Contract Management Suite, ContractSafe, DocuSign CLM, Icertis Contract Intelligence, LinkSquares
Three alternatives
Cloudfusion, Ironclad, Pactum.ioTwo alternatives
DocuSign, Dropbox SignFive alternatives
Agiloft Contract Management Suite, DocuSign CLM, Icertis Contract Intelligence, Ironclad, SirionAIThree alternatives
Bind, Concord, ContractWorksSix alternatives
Conga CLM, DocuSign CLM, Icertis Contract Intelligence, Juro, PandaDoc, SpringCMKimi K2Ironcladagainst: Icertis Contract Intelligence, SirionPandaDocChangedagainst: IroncladIcertis Contract Intelligenceagainst: JuroConcord, PandaDocagainst: DocuSign CLM, Icertis Contract Intelligence, Ironcladno first choiceagainst: Icertis Contract Intelligenceagainst: DocuSign CLM, Icertis Contract Intelligence, Oracle, SAP
Four alternatives
Agiloft Contract Management Suite, Concord, Conga CLM, LinkSquaresThree alternatives
DocuSign CLM, SpotDraft, signNowSix alternatives
Agiloft Contract Management Suite, DocuSign CLM, Ironclad, LinkSquares, Sirion, SpotDraftTwo alternatives
ContractSafe, SignWellGLM 4.7 FlashXLinkSquares, PandaDocConcordChangedSirionConcordno first choiceagainst: Conga CLM, DocuSign CLM, Ironclad, Ncontracts, SharePoint
Two alternatives
Agiloft Contract Management Suite, JuroTwo alternatives
DocuSign CLM, PandaDocNine alternatives
Agiloft CLM Suite, Aline, Coupa CLM, DocuSign CLM, Icertis Contract Intelligence, Ironclad CLM, Ivalua, Malbek CLM, PandaDoc ContractsThree alternatives
ContractWorks, PandaDoc, SignWellMiniMax M2.5ConcordDocuSignChangedAgiloft Contract Management Suite, IroncladConcord, PandaDocno first choiceagainst: ContractWorks, DocuSign CLM
Two alternatives
Agiloft Contract Management Suite, LinkSquaresFour alternatives
Adobe Acrobat Sign, ContractWorks, Gatekeeper, PandaDocSix alternatives
Conga CLM, DocuSign CLM, Icertis Contract Intelligence, LinkSquares, SAP Ariba Contracts, Sirion CLMTwo alternatives
Bind, Grow CRMGPT-6 LunaSpotDraftIroncladChangedIroncladZoho Contractsno first choiceagainst: Agiloft Contract Management Suite, Conga CLM, Icertis Contract Intelligence, SAP Ariba Contracts
Two alternatives
Ironclad, JuroOne alternative
PandaDocEight alternatives
Agiloft Contract Management Suite, Conga CLM, DocuSign, Icertis Contract Intelligence, LinkSquares, SAP Ariba Contracts, Sirion, Workday Contract IntelligenceOne alternative
PandaDocMuse Glimmer 30BIronclad, LinkSquares CLMPandaDocChangedIroncladagainst: Oneflow, PandaDocConcordno first choiceagainst: Agiloft Contract Management Suite, BoloSign, Conga CLM, Contract Cloud / WebCM, DocuSign CLM
Eight alternatives
Agiloft Contract Management Suite, Bind, Concord, Gatekeeper, Juro, Oneflow, PandaDoc, SpotDraftTwo alternatives
DocuSign, IroncladSeven alternatives
Agiloft Contract Management Suite, Conga CLM, DocuSign, Icertis Contract Intelligence, Juro, LinkSquares, SirionFour alternatives
Bind, ContractSafe, PandaDoc, SignWellBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 08:37 | yes | 10 | 8 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 11:37 | yes | 3 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 13:21 | yes | 11 | 21 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 11:48 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 15:43 | yes | 10 | 11 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 14:05 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 11:44 | yes | 22 | 23 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 12:16 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 11:21 | no | 0 | 27 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 16:11 | yes | 13 | 48 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 15:15 | yes | 15 | 23 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 08:55 | yes | 5 | 28 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 16:17 | yes | 3 | 22 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 16:19 | yes | 14 | 22 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 14:22 | no | 0 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 12:58 | yes | 4 | 6 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 10:35 | no | 0 | 13 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 16:41 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 17:03 | yes | 5 | 9 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 11:25 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 12:55 | yes | 25 | 24 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 14:15 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 17:11 | no | 0 | 33 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 11:40 | yes | 15 | 22 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 14:32 | yes | 20 | 160 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 14:44 | yes | 5 | 24 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 15:27 | yes | 3 | 17 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 11:01 | yes | 13 | 23 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 14:57 | yes | 10 | 10 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 14:43 | yes | 8 | 10 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 15:33 | yes | 6 | 22 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 16:30 | yes | 10 | 7 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 17:34 | yes | 24 | 19 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 17:29 | yes | 10 | 10 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 10:26 | yes | 25 | 32 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 12:38 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 10:23 | yes | 10 | 30 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 12:08 | yes | 15 | 59 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 15:07 | yes | 10 | 52 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 09:48 | yes | 25 | 46 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 12:07 | yes | 10 | 25 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 12:58 | yes | 15 | 27 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 10:25 | yes | 10 | 7 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 14:21 | yes | 4 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 12:59 | yes | 8 | 18 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 14:57 | yes | 10 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:52 | yes | 19 | 12 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 15:51 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 14:46 | yes | 20 | 43 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 10:23 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 14:58 | yes | 5 | 30 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 14:16 | yes | 12 | 24 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 15:27 | yes | 13 | 43 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 13:17 | yes | 5 | 25 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 17:33 | yes | 2 | 13 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 09:53 | yes | 14 | 22 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 09:02 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 08:44 | no | 0 | 4 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 16:02 | no | 0 | 19 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 15:34 | yes | 10 | 10 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 15:31 | yes | 10 | 19 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 12:22 | no | 0 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 10:35 | yes | 18 | 32 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 08:53 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 14:01 | no | 0 | 28 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 11:12 | yes | 14 | 26 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 17:33 | yes | 10 | 77 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 10:53 | yes | 10 | 45 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 11:45 | yes | 2 | 19 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 09:42 | no | 0 | 1 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 10:51 | yes | 18 | 11 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 14:01 | yes | 2 | 9 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 10:49 | yes | 5 | 17 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 10:10 | yes | 10 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 14:45 | yes | 25 | 19 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 09:11 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 11:31 | yes | 23 | 26 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 15:32 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 11:34 | yes | 5 | 46 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 11:03 | yes | 24 | 25 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 14:43 | yes | 24 | 141 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 17:24 | yes | 15 | 27 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 10:18 | yes | 5 | 19 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 15:42 | yes | 24 | 38 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Agiloft read as Agiloft Contract Management Suite
CobbleStone read as CobbleStone Software
Cobblestone read as CobbleStone Software
Conga read as Conga CLM
Coupa read as Coupa CLM
Icertis read as Icertis Contract Intelligence
SAP Ariba read as SAP Ariba Contracts
Workday read as Workday Contract Intelligence
Zoho read as Zoho Contracts
Unresolved, counted raw
Aavenir
Agiloft CLM Suite
Cloudfusion
Contract Cloud / WebCM
DocJuris
Gino
Google Docs + HelloSign
Grow CRM
Microsoft 365 Tools
Oracle
Pactum.io
PandaDoc Contracts
SAP
SAP/Ariba
SAP/Ariba CLM
SharePoint add-ons
SirionAI
Venminder
Workday Evisort
airSlate SignNow
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.