Proposal software
Asked as “proposal software”, and as “sales proposal and quote document tool”, on behalf of a mid-market B2B company. 46 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
78%
Clear leader
78PandaDoc09Better Proposals04Prospero09others
78% of first choices, clear leader.
Since October 2026▲+13Since October 2026: 65% → 78%, +13 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.PandaDoc held the lead, +13 points on 65%, past the floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
PandaDoc74%Clear leader▲+7Since October 2026: 67% → 74%, +7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →Mid-marketPandaDoc78%Clear leader▲+13Since October 2026: 65% → 78%, +13 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.This pageEnterprisePandaDoc30%Contested▲+11Since October 2026: 19% → 30%, +11 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →
PandaDoc74%Clear leader▲+7Since October 2026: 67% → 74%, +7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →Mid-marketPandaDoc78%Clear leader▲+13Since October 2026: 65% → 78%, +13 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.This pageEnterprisePandaDoc30%Contested▲+11Since October 2026: 19% → 30%, +11 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01PandaDoc78%6%71endorsed leader▲+13Since October 2026: 65% → 78%, +13 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.65% → 78%
PandaDoc78%6%71endorsed leader▲+13Since October 2026: 65% → 78%, +13 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.65% → 78%02
Better Proposals9%19%42accepted challenger▼−1Since October 2026: 10% → 9%, −1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.10% → 9%
Better Proposals9%19%42accepted challenger▼−1Since October 2026: 10% → 9%, −1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.10% → 9%03
Proposify2%17%58accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%
Proposify2%17%58accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%04
Bonsai2%0%13accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 2%
Bonsai2%0%13accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 2%Show the seven products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
09
Responsive0%14%21accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Responsive0%14%21accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%05
Qwilr0%12%51accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Qwilr0%12%51accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
07
GetAccept0%8%24accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
GetAccept0%8%24accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%11
Jotform0%8%12accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%
Jotform0%8%12accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%08
DealHub0%6%18accepted challenger▼−8Since October 2026: 8% → 0%, −8 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.8% → 0%
DealHub0%6%18accepted challenger▼−8Since October 2026: 8% → 0%, −8 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.8% → 0%06
Loopio0%0%24accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Loopio0%0%24accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
All six head-to-head pages: the top four products, each against each
One product takes 78% of first choices here, so the chart would put ten markers in one corner and one at the far edge. The two measurements it plots are columns in the standing above: share, and the negative label rate. Zero products carry a negative rate above 25% in this category.
What they warned about
Eleven of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini and MiniMax M2.5 changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Proposify17%
10 of 58 labels negative · 10 of 14 models · 3 hard negative
“These tools have received negative feedback for buggy editors and clunky interfaces... Some reviews specifically warn against using them” Mistral Small, negative prompt
Better Proposals19%
8 of 42 labels negative · 8 of 14 models · 4 hard negative
“False advertising complaints: Users report the company advertises CRM integrations ... that don't actually work” DeepSeek V4 Flash, negative prompt
Qwilr12%
6 of 51 labels negative · 6 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“Avoid higher-end options like Qwilr ($39+/mo)” Grok 4.20, budget prompt
ChatGPT100%
4 of 4 labels negative · 4 of 14 models · 3 hard negative
“open-source AI tools should not be used for drafting or editing sensitive proposal content” Mistral Small, negative prompt
What they cite
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
71 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 733 links across 184 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 40 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
vendor site · Software Advice30 answers · 37 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Proposify30 answers · 36 citations · 12 models
29 answers · 32 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Zapier27 answers · 27 citations · 10 models
25 answers · 44 citations · 10 models
vendor site · PandaDoc20 answers · 54 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Capterra18 answers · 31 citations · 8 models
17 answers · 22 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Guideflow16 answers · 17 citations · 8 models
vendor site · GetAccept14 answers · 19 citations · 7 models
vendor site · Spotsaas12 answers · 12 citations · 7 models
vendor site · Rework11 answers · 13 citations · 6 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
26 answers · 10 models
20 answers · 10 models
20 answers · 8 models
16 answers · 8 models
12 answers · 8 models
10 answers · 6 models
10 answers · 5 models
9 answers · 6 models
9 answers · 6 models
8 answers · 5 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best proposal software”, “proposal software”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PandaDoc pandadoc.com | 78% | 538 | 60,500 | 510 | 425,196 | $42,516 | 119 | 1 |
| Better Proposals betterproposals.io | 9% | 124 | 1,300 | 65 | 24,251 | 5 | 4 | |
| Prospero goprospero.com | 4% | 15 | 2,400 | 1,178 | 908 | 2 | ||
| Proposify proposify.com | 2% | 259 | 3,600 | 28 | 38,103 | 27 | 2 | |
| Bonsai hellobonsai.com | 2% | 38 | 74,000 | 27,918 | ||||
| Proposable | 2% | 210 | 59,009 | |||||
| Pipedrive pipedrive.com | 2% | 360 | 49,500 | 598 | 418,149 | $55 | 97 | |
| Qwilr qwilr.com | 0% | 196 | 4,400 | 23 | 10,837 | 27 | ||
| Loopio loopio.com | 0% | 250 | 3,600 | 80 | 4,640 | 26 | ||
| GetAccept getaccept.com | 0% | 235 | 590 | 9 | 15,454 | $4,087 | 14 | 6 |
Google's top ten for the two searches hold 15 sites; 5 of them are among the sites the models cited here (capterra.com, getaccept.com, pandadoc.com, proposify.com, zapier.com). The first result for “best proposal software” is grantbite.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best proposal software for a mid-market B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which sales proposal and quote document tool would you recommend to a mid-sized B2B company?”Comparative“What are the top proposal tools and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best proposal software for a company with a limited budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 500 person company evaluating a proposal software. What should we look at?”Negative“Which proposal tools should I avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5PandaDocPipedriveChangedno first choiceBetter Proposals, Prosperono first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
Loopio, ProposifyFour alternatives
HubSpot Sales Hub, PandaDoc, Proposify, QwilrOne alternative
PandaDocGPT-5.4 miniPandaDocPandaDoc, ProposifyChangedProposifyBetter Proposalsagainst: Proposify, Qwilrno first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
Proposify, QwilrTwo alternatives
Qwilr, Salesforce CPQFive alternatives
Better Proposals, DealHub, GetAccept, PandaDoc, QwilrOne alternative
PandaDocGemini 3.5 FlashPandaDocagainst: Better Proposals, Icertis, Salesforce Revenue CloudPandaDocHeldPandaDocProsperono first choiceagainst: Bidsketch, PandaDoc, Proposify, Qwilr
Six alternatives
Conga Composer, DocuSign CLM, Loopio, Proposify, Qwilr, ResponsiveFour alternatives
DealHub, HubSpot Sales Hub, Proposify, QwilrSix alternatives
Better Proposals, DocSend, Loopio, Proposify, Qwilr, ResponsiveFour alternatives
Better Proposals, Canva, PandaDoc, SignWellPerplexity SonarPandaDocPandaDocHeldPandaDocPandaDocagainst: Jotformno first choicenothing named
Four alternatives
DealHub, GetAccept, Loopio, ProposifyTwo alternatives
DealHub, ProposifyTen alternatives
Better Proposals, Bonsai, DealHub, GetAccept, HoneyBook, Loopio, Proposify, Qwilr, Responsive, StorydocThree alternatives
Better Proposals, HoneyBook, ProsperoGrok 4.20PandaDocPandaDocHeldagainst: DealHub, Salesforce CPQPandaDocPandaDocagainst: Proposify, Qwilr, ResponsivePandaDocagainst: Better Proposalsagainst: Bidsketch, ChatGPT, Claude, Fiverr, Gemini, Jasper, Perplexity AI, ProposalKit, Template.net
Three alternatives
GetAccept, Proposify, QwilrFour alternatives
Better Proposals, GetAccept, Proposify, QwilrFour alternatives
Loopio, Proposify, Qwilr, ResponsiveFour alternatives
Bonsai, FreshBooks, HoneyBook, JotformFour alternatives
Loopio, Proposify, Qwilr, ResponsiveMistral SmallPandaDocPandaDocHeldno first choicePandaDocno first choiceagainst: Better Proposals, ChatGPT, Proposify
Two alternatives
Dock, ProposifyFour alternatives
DealHub, Oneflow, Proposify, QwilrTwo alternatives
Better Proposals, BidsketchDeepSeek V4 FlashPandaDocPandaDocHeldagainst: Salesforce Revenue CloudPandaDocPandaDocno first choiceagainst: Better Proposals, Proposify
Five alternatives
Loopio, Proposable, Proposify, Qwilr, ResponsiveThree alternatives
DealHub, Proposify, QwilrEight alternatives
Better Proposals, Bonsai, HoneyBook, Loopio, Nusii, Proposify, Qwilr, ResponsiveThree alternatives
Better Proposals, Bonsai, JotformLlama 4 MaverickPandaDocPandaDocHeldno first choicePandaDocno first choiceagainst: Better Proposals, ChatGPT, Proposify
Four alternatives
Better Proposals, DealHub, Nusii, ProposifyFour alternatives
Better Proposals, DealHub, Proposify, QwilrThree alternatives
Better Proposals, Qwilr, Zoho WriterQwen 3.7 FlashPandaDocPandaDocHeldPandaDocPandaDocno first choiceagainst: Connexity, Microsoft Word, Monday.com, PandaDoc, Proposify, Responsive
Three alternatives
Loopio, Proposify, QwilrTwo alternatives
DealHub, ProposifyNine alternatives
Better Proposals, Bonsai, Jotform, Looio, Loopio, Nusii, Proposify, Qwilr, ResponsiveFour alternatives
Agiled, Canva, Plutio, Zoho WriterKimi K2PandaDocPandaDocHeldPandaDocPandaDocno first choiceagainst: Better Proposals, GetAccept, HoneyBook, PandaDoc, Proposify, Qwilr
Two alternatives
Proposify, QwilrTwo alternatives
Proposify, QwilrSeven alternatives
Better Proposals, Bonsai, GetAccept, Nusii, Proposify, Qwilr, ResponsiveTwo alternatives
Better Proposals, BidsketchGLM 4.7 FlashXPandaDocPandaDocHeldPandaDocBonsaino first choiceagainst: Better Proposals, GetAccept, Paperless Parts, Qwilr, Responsive, Upland Qvidian
Four alternatives
Loopio, Proposify, Qwilr, StorydocThree alternatives
DealHub, Proposify, QwilrFive alternatives
Better Proposals, Bonsai, Loopio, Proposify, QwilrThree alternatives
Better Proposals, HoneyBook, PandaDocMiniMax M2.5PandaDoc, ProposablePandaDocChangedPandaDocBetter Proposalsno first choiceagainst: Proposify, Qwilr
Two alternatives
Proposify, QwilrThree alternatives
GetAccept, Proposify, QwilrFive alternatives
FreshBooks, GetAccept, Proposify, Qwilr, ResponsiveTwo alternatives
Jotform, PandaDocGPT-6 LunaPandaDocPandaDocHeldPandaDocBetter Proposalsno first choicenothing named
Three alternatives
GetAccept, Proposify, QwilrOne alternative
ProposifyFour alternatives
Better Proposals, GetAccept, Proposify, QwilrOne alternative
PandaDocMuse Glimmer 30BPandaDocPandaDocHeldPandaDocPandaDocno first choiceagainst: Better Proposals, ChatGPT, Just Prop, PandaDoc, Proposify
Four alternatives
Better Proposals, GetAccept, Proposify, QwilrTwo alternatives
DealHub, QwilrFive alternatives
Better Proposals, Loopio, Proposify, Qwilr, ResponsiveTwo alternatives
Better Proposals, BidsketchBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 10:28 | yes | 10 | 7 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 16:56 | yes | 3 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 16:22 | no | 0 | 15 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 08:55 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 17:36 | yes | 14 | 16 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 08:39 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 14:36 | yes | 24 | 30 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 10:39 | yes | 6 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 14:45 | no | 0 | 27 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 12:27 | yes | 10 | 30 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 10:48 | yes | 13 | 29 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 09:37 | yes | 5 | 21 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 15:41 | yes | 4 | 18 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 12:05 | yes | 21 | 27 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 09:20 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 13:59 | yes | 4 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 17:24 | no | 0 | 14 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 15:47 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 17:31 | yes | 5 | 10 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 16:16 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 11:44 | yes | 25 | 26 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 09:09 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 12:57 | yes | 5 | 14 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 13:44 | yes | 20 | 25 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 11:07 | yes | 14 | 47 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 13:01 | yes | 5 | 18 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 15:28 | yes | 2 | 18 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 10:41 | yes | 14 | 15 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 10:12 | yes | 9 | 8 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 16:22 | yes | 4 | 6 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 15:24 | no | 0 | 13 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 12:03 | yes | 10 | 5 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 15:59 | yes | 5 | 13 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 15:47 | yes | 5 | 7 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 09:54 | yes | 25 | 26 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 16:23 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 11:24 | yes | 5 | 16 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 10:32 | yes | 15 | 31 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 10:54 | yes | 25 | 36 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 11:10 | yes | 5 | 28 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 11:03 | yes | 6 | 22 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 16:09 | yes | 14 | 27 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 11:59 | yes | 10 | 7 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 09:00 | yes | 4 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 09:34 | yes | 13 | 21 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 17:19 | yes | 10 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 17:23 | yes | 5 | 34 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 09:27 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 12:17 | yes | 23 | 28 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 11:33 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 09:42 | yes | 5 | 20 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 17:01 | yes | 10 | 17 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 08:52 | yes | 23 | 32 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 13:42 | yes | 5 | 21 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 14:00 | yes | 2 | 12 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 11:15 | yes | 13 | 18 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 14:47 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 16:47 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 12:20 | no | 0 | 20 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 13:43 | yes | 10 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 14:38 | yes | 10 | 18 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 16:14 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 15:44 | yes | 24 | 40 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 13:21 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 09:23 | no | 0 | 29 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 13:42 | yes | 15 | 21 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 13:39 | yes | 14 | 161 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 09:26 | yes | 9 | 47 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 08:36 | yes | 1 | 18 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 09:16 | yes | 14 | 24 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 11:41 | no | 0 | 2 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 17:26 | yes | 4 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 15:15 | yes | 8 | 21 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 11:03 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 14:06 | yes | 5 | 13 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 09:11 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 10:17 | yes | 24 | 25 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 08:48 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 13:48 | no | 0 | 30 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 12:03 | yes | 25 | 38 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 09:52 | yes | 15 | 33 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 08:45 | yes | 10 | 45 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 12:25 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 17:23 | yes | 15 | 18 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Conga read as Conga Composer
Unresolved, counted raw
Connexity
EndNote
Just Prop
Looio
ProposalKit
Template.net
Wave Financial
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.