November 2026 Edition · The permanent record of this edition. The unqualified address always carries the latest edition.
Index › GTM › GTM data and infrastructure › Web analytics › Enterprise · November 2026 Edition

Web analytics for enterprise buyers

Asked as “web analytics platform”, and as “website traffic analytics tool”, on behalf of an enterprise B2B company. 48 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each. Added to the November 2026 Edition.
Standing · first-choice share
35%
Contested · Google Analytics 360 25%
35Adobe Analytics25Google Analytics 36012Matomo27others

35% of first choices, contested.

Since October 2026▼−6Since October 2026: 41% → 35%, −6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Adobe Analytics held the lead, −6 points on 41%, inside the 11-point floor.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.

The standing

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for an enterprise B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01Adobe Analytics35%30%64criticized default▼−6Since October 2026: 41% → 35%, −6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.41% → 35%
02Google Analytics 360 Lab in the set25%16%37accepted challenger▲+9Since October 2026: 16% → 25%, +9 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.16% → 25%
03Matomo12%11%38accepted challenger▲+10Since October 2026: 2% → 12%, +10 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 12%
04Mixpanel4%22%45accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 4% → 4%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 4%
05Google Analytics 4 Lab in the set4%44%41criticized challenger▼−6Since October 2026: 10% → 4%, −6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.10% → 4%
06PostHog2%17%12accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%
Show the six products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
11Plausible Analytics0%35%17criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
12Heap0%33%12criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
10Fullstory0%27%11criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
08Amplitude0%23%43accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
09Contentsquare0%14%14accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
07Piwik PRO Analytics Suite0%4%25accepted challenger▼−4Since October 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 0%

The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured

Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.

Google Analytics 360 is made by Google, whose model Gemini 3.5 Flash is in the set. On the four share prompts that model made it the first choice one time of 4; the other thirteen models eleven times of 52. Google Analytics 4 is made by Google, whose model Gemini 3.5 Flash is in the set. On the four share prompts that model made it the first choice zero times of 4; the other thirteen models two times of 52. Lab treatment is defined on the method page; the row is marked, not excluded.

Head to headHead-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not enterprise.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each

Recommended versus criticized

Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.

Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01
02
03
04
05
06
P07
08
09
10
11
12
Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative50%
Key
01Adobe Analytics35%
02Google Analytics 36025%
03Matomo12%
04Mixpanel4%
05Google Analytics 44%
06PostHog2%
07Piwik PRO Analytics Suite0%
08Amplitude0%
09Contentsquare0%
10Fullstory0%
11Plausible Analytics0%
12Heap0%

What they warned about

Six of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5 and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Google Analytics 4
44%
18 of 41 labels negative · 13 of 14 models · 6 hard negative
“Google Analytics 4 (GA4) / GA360 — *Approach with high caution* ... Multiple EU bans: GA4 has been ruled non-compliant with GDPR” DeepSeek V4 Flash, negative prompt
Adobe Analytics
30%
19 of 64 labels negative · 11 of 14 models · 4 hard negative
“Avoid unless the organization can support substantial implementation, specialist skills, governance, and licensing costs.” Perplexity Sonar, negative prompt
Amplitude
23%
10 of 43 labels negative · 8 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“All price on monthly tracked events (MTUs/events), which scales unpredictably with traffic.” DeepSeek V4 Flash, budget prompt
Mixpanel
22%
10 of 45 labels negative · 8 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“All price on monthly tracked events (MTUs/events), which scales unpredictably with traffic.” DeepSeek V4 Flash, budget prompt

What they cite

Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.

Sites the answers cite

67 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 13 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 854 links across 271 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. The other 1 model searched through a gateway that returned no source list on this edition. 18 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.

vendor site · Matomo25 answers · 41 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Software Advice25 answers · 34 citations · 10 models
vendor site · LinkedIn24 answers · 25 citations · 9 models
vendor site · GetApp21 answers · 26 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Amplitude19 answers · 23 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Adobe18 answers · 23 citations · 7 models
16 answers · 26 citations · 9 models
16 answers · 17 citations · 8 models
16 answers · 17 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Sealmetrics15 answers · 15 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Mixpanel14 answers · 19 citations · 7 models
vendor site · Capterra13 answers · 20 citations · 5 models

Pages the answers cite

The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.

Search against answers

Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best web analytics platform”, “web analytics platform”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Company and productsShareOwn site citedName searches, GoogleAI search demand, est.Organic visitsPaid search a month, est.Google ads, last 30 days
Adobe parent site
Adobe Analytics 35%, Adobe Customer Journey Analytics 2%
38%1981,220,000117,563
Google parent site
Google Analytics 360 25%
25%582,90046
Matomo matomo.org
Matomo 12%, Matomo On-Premise 4%
17%1601,9008735,0159
Mixpanel mixpanel.com4%46712,10045820,284$45811
Google analytics.google.com
Google Analytics 4 4%
4%4739,900348
PostHog posthog.com2%42033,10027125,936120
Piwik PRO Enterprise piwik.pro
Piwik PRO Enterprise 2%, Piwik PRO Analytics Suite 0%
2%3195,8628
Clics2%
HubSpot parent site
HubSpot Marketing Hub 2%
2%991368,0009,776
Bold BI2%

Google's top ten for the two searches hold 17 sites; 0 of them are among the sites the models cited here. The first result for “best web analytics platform” is databox.com.

How they answered

Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHide
ModelDirect“What is the best web analytics platform for an enterprise B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which website traffic analytics tool would you recommend to a large B2B company with thousands of employees?”Comparative“What are the top enterprise-grade web analytics platforms and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best web analytics platform for a large company that needs predictable total cost across thousands of users?”Scale-constrained“We are a 5,000 person company with SSO, SOC 2 and procurement review requirements evaluating a web analytics platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which web analytics platforms should a large enterprise avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5HubSpot Marketing Hub
Two alternativesAmplitude, Google Analytics 4
Google Analytics 4Changed
Four alternativesAdobe Analytics, Amplitude, Matomo, Mixpanel
no first choiceGoogle Analytics 360, Mixpanelno first choiceagainst: Google Analytics 4, Matomo, Meta Pixel, Piwik PRO Analytics Suite
GPT-5.4 miniAdobe Analytics
Six alternativesAdobe Customer Journey Analytics, Amplitude, Contentsquare, Google Analytics 360, Mixpanel, Quantum Metric
Adobe AnalyticsHeld
One alternativeContentsquare
Adobe Analytics
Six alternativesAmplitude, Google Analytics 360, Matomo, Mixpanel, Piwik PRO Analytics Suite, Snowplow
Piwik PRO Enterprise
One alternativeMatomo
against: Adobe Analytics / Customer Journey Analytics
no first choiceagainst: Google Analytics 4
Gemini 3.5 FlashAdobe Analytics
Six alternatives6sense, Amplitude, Demandbase, Google Analytics 360, Mixpanel, Piwik PRO Enterprise
Adobe Analytics, Google Analytics 360Changed
Four alternatives6sense, Demandbase, Matomo, Piwik PRO Enterprise
Adobe Analytics, Google Analytics 360
Four alternativesAmplitude, Heap, Mixpanel, Piwik PRO Analytics Suite
Matomo
Six alternativesGoogle Analytics 360, Metabase, Piwik PRO Analytics Suite, RudderStack, Snowplow, Superset
no first choiceagainst: Contentsquare, Fathom, Fullstory, Google Analytics 4, Matomo, Plausible Analytics, Simple Analytics
Perplexity SonarAdobe Analytics
Five alternativesAmplitude, Fullstory, Google Analytics 360, Google Analytics 4, Matomo
Adobe AnalyticsHeld
Four alternativesAhrefs, Factors.ai, Google Analytics 4, Semrush
no first choice
Ten alternativesAdobe Analytics, Amplitude, Contentsquare, Fullstory, Glassbox, Google Analytics 4, Matomo, Mixpanel, Piwik PRO Analytics Suite, PostHog
Matomo
One alternativeGoogle Analytics 4
against: Adobe Analytics, Analytics 360
no first choiceagainst: Adobe Analytics, Amplitude, Fathom, Fullstory, Google Analytics 360, Google Analytics 4, Heap, Hotjar, Matomo, Microsoft Clarity, Mixpanel, Plausible Analytics, PostHog, Umami
Grok 4.20Adobe Analytics
Five alternativesAmplitude, Google Analytics 360, Mixpanel, Piwik PRO Analytics Suite, Usermaven
against: Lucky Orange, Sealmetrics, Semrush
Adobe AnalyticsHeld
Two alternativesGoogle Analytics 4 (GA4) with BigQuery export, Matomo
Adobe Analytics, Google Analytics 4
Three alternativesAmplitude, Matomo, Mixpanel
Matomo On-Premise
One alternativePiwik PRO Enterprise
against: Adobe Analytics, Amplitude, Contentsquare, Google Analytics 360, Google Analytics 4, Mixpanel
no first choiceagainst: Adobe Analyticsagainst: Amplitude, Google Analytics 4, Heap Premier, Mixpanel
Mistral SmallGoogle Analytics 360
Three alternativesAdobe Analytics, Clics, Google Analytics 4
Google Analytics 360Held
Three alternatives6sense, HubSpot Marketing Hub, Similarweb
Google Analytics 360, Google Analytics 4
Six alternativesAdobe Analytics, Amplitude, Contentsquare, Fullstory, Matomo, Mixpanel
Google Analytics 360
One alternativeMatomo On-Premise
against: Adobe Analytics
no first choiceagainst: Adobe Analytics, Fullstory, Google Analytics 4, Hotjar, Mouseflow
DeepSeek V4 FlashGoogle Analytics 360
Three alternativesAdobe Analytics, Dreamdata, HockeyStack
Google Analytics 360Held
Four alternatives6sense, Adobe Analytics, Demandbase, Similarweb
no first choice
Eight alternativesAdobe Analytics, Amplitude, Contentsquare, Fullstory, Google Analytics 360, Matomo, Mixpanel, Piwik PRO Analytics Suite
Matomo On-Premise
One alternativePlausible Analytics
against: Adobe Analytics, Amplitude, Google Analytics 360, Heap, Mixpanel, PostHog
no first choice
Six alternativesAmplitude, Matomo, Mixpanel, Piwik PRO Analytics Suite, PostHog, Statsig
against: Adobe Analytics, Fathom, Google Analytics 4, Plausible Analytics
against: Adobe Analytics, Clicky, GA360, GoAccess, Google Analytics 4, IBM Digital Analytics, Piwik, Umami, Webtrends
Llama 4 MaverickGoogle Analytics 360
Two alternativesAdobe Analytics, Clics
ClicsChanged
One alternativeSimilarweb
no first choiceAdobe Analytics, Google Analytics 360no first choice
One alternativeAdobe Analytics
against: Mixpanel
against: Adobe Analytics, Cloudflare Web Analytics, Simple Analytics
Qwen 3.7 FlashAdobe Analytics
Three alternativesBigQuery, Google Analytics 4, Tealium
Adobe Analytics, Google Analytics 4Changed
Three alternativesDreamdata, Similarweb, ZoomInfo Onsite
Adobe Analytics
Five alternativesAmplitude, Google Analytics 4, Matomo, Mixpanel, Piwik PRO Analytics Suite
Matomo
Two alternativesAdobe Analytics, PostHog
against: Amplitude, Google Analytics 4, Mixpanel
no first choiceagainst: Adobe Analytics, Amplitude, Google Analytics 4, Heap, Mixpanel
Kimi K2Adobe Customer Journey Analytics
Two alternativesAmplitude, Google Analytics 360
Google Analytics 360Changed
Two alternativesAdobe Analytics, Contentsquare
against: Plausible Analytics
no first choice
Eight alternativesAdobe Analytics, Amplitude, Fullstory, Google Analytics 360, Mixpanel, Piwik PRO Analytics Suite, Plausible Analytics, Snowplow
Matomo
One alternativeAmplitude
against: Adobe Analytics, Google Analytics 360
no first choiceagainst: Amplitude, Crazy Egg, Fathom Analytics, Google Analytics 4, Mixpanel, Open Web Analytics, Plausible Analytics
GLM 4.7 FlashXAdobe Analytics
Five alternativesAmplitude, Dreamdata, Google Analytics 360, Matomo, Mixpanel
no first choiceChangedGoogle Analytics 4
Eight alternativesAdobe Analytics, Amplitude, Fathom, Heap, Matomo, Microsoft Clarity, Mixpanel, Plausible Analytics
PostHogagainst: Adobe Analytics, Amplitude, GA 360, Google Analytics 4, Heap, Microsoft Clarity, Mixpanelno first choiceagainst: Adobe Analytics, Google Analytics 4, Webtrends
MiniMax M2.5Google Analytics 360
Four alternativesAdobe Analytics, Dreamdata, Matomo, PostHog
Adobe AnalyticsChanged
Three alternativesGoogle Analytics 4, HubSpot Marketing Hub, Mixpanel
no first choiceBold BI, Reveal BI
One alternativePlausible Analytics
against: Adobe Analytics, Amplitude, Google Analytics 360, Matomo
no first choiceagainst: Google Analytics 4against: Adobe Analytics, Google Analytics 4
GPT-6 LunaAdobe Analytics
Five alternativesAdobe Customer Journey Analytics, BigQuery, Google Analytics 4, Mixpanel, Piwik PRO Analytics Suite
Adobe AnalyticsHeld
Three alternativesAdobe Customer Journey Analytics, Google Analytics 4, Piwik PRO Analytics Suite
Adobe Analytics, Google Analytics 360
Six alternativesAmplitude, Contentsquare, Matomo, Mixpanel, Piano Analytics, Piwik PRO Analytics Suite
Matomono first choice
Four alternativesAdobe Analytics, Amplitude, Google Analytics 4, Mixpanel
against: Adobe Analytics, Amplitude, BigQuery, Google Analytics 4, Mixpanel
Muse Glimmer 30BAdobe Analytics, Google Analytics 360
Three alternativesDreamdata, HockeyStack, Usermaven
Adobe AnalyticsChanged
Two alternativesGoogle Analytics 360, Matomo On-Premise
Adobe Analytics, Google Analytics 360, Google Analytics 4
Five alternativesAmplitude, Matomo Analytics, Matomo On-Premise, Mixpanel, Piwik PRO Analytics Suite
Matomo, Mixpanel
Two alternativesEmbeddable, Qrvey
against: Adobe Analytics, Google Analytics 360
no first choiceagainst: Adobe Analytics, Fathom, Google Analytics 4, Plausible Analytics, Umami, Yandex Metrica
Bold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against

The record

One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
PromptModelVersion stringTime (UTC)SearchedSourcesLatency
Direct recommendationClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 11:37no05 s
Direct recommendationGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 12:36yes46 s
Direct recommendationGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 12:32no020 s
Direct recommendationPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 08:50yes104 s
Direct recommendationGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 13:53yes512 s
Direct recommendationMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 10:47yes54 s
Direct recommendationDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 11:51yes2527 s
Direct recommendationLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 09:58yes53 s
Direct recommendationQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 10:39no028 s
Direct recommendationKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 11:29yes1523 s
Direct recommendationGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 12:25yes1573 s
Direct recommendationMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 10:07yes2556 s
Direct recommendationGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 09:18yes516 s
Direct recommendationMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 12:54yes1822 s
ParaphraseClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 15:17no05 s
ParaphraseGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 11:13yes25 s
ParaphraseGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 15:09no016 s
ParaphrasePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 12:59yes103 s
ParaphraseGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 16:49yes510 s
ParaphraseMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 11:29yes55 s
ParaphraseDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 13:48yes2220 s
ParaphraseLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 10:06yes52 s
ParaphraseQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 08:35yes532 s
ParaphraseKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 08:51yes2548 s
ParaphraseGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 10:53yes1066 s
ParaphraseMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 09:16no016 s
ParaphraseGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 16:49yes310 s
ParaphraseMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 10:21yes1321 s
ComparativeClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 09:30yes99 s
ComparativeGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 16:33yes79 s
ComparativeGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 12:16no017 s
ComparativePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 09:08yes107 s
ComparativeGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 15:22yes1018 s
ComparativeMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 10:25yes57 s
ComparativeDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 11:52yes2428 s
ComparativeLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 16:44yes52 s
ComparativeQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 17:24yes533 s
ComparativeKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 13:27yes2541 s
ComparativeGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 16:58no045 s
ComparativeMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 14:06no075 s
ComparativeGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 15:53yes824 s
ComparativeMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 09:20yes1323 s
Budget constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 09:29yes2910 s
Budget constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 14:39yes46 s
Budget constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 15:34no017 s
Budget constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 13:39yes103 s
Budget constrainedGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 14:25yes2215 s
Budget constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 16:50yes54 s
Budget constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 09:06yes2422 s
Budget constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 13:03yes53 s
Budget constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 09:03yes2091 s
Budget constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 09:21yes2529 s
Budget constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 15:55yes24113 s
Budget constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 16:28yes2582 s
Budget constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 10:13yes115 s
Budget constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 10:48yes2135 s
Scale constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 13:46no06 s
Scale constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 12:58no07 s
Scale constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 10:19no017 s
Scale constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 16:58yes109 s
Scale constrainedGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 13:57yes514 s
Scale constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 16:42no07 s
Scale constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 17:04yes2466 s
Scale constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 08:52yes53 s
Scale constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 17:03no032 s
Scale constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 11:27yes2531 s
Scale constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 11:59yes2530 s
Scale constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 13:29no015 s
Scale constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 13:13yes226 s
Scale constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 16:46yes1427 s
Negative framingClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 12:36yes199 s
Negative framingGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 13:46yes45 s
Negative framingGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 15:44no018 s
Negative framingPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 12:35yes105 s
Negative framingGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 16:22yes510 s
Negative framingMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 15:29yes55 s
Negative framingDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 13:39yes2547 s
Negative framingLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 13:28yes54 s
Negative framingQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 17:26yes1542 s
Negative framingKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 14:35yes2241 s
Negative framingGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 13:46yes2532 s
Negative framingMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 16:57yes942 s
Negative framingGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 09:13yes327 s
Negative framingMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 08:33yes2437 s

Normalization in this category

Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.

ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
HubSpot read as HubSpot Marketing Hub
HubSpot Analytics read as HubSpot Marketing Hub
Piwik PRO read as Piwik PRO Analytics Suite
Piwik PRO (Matomo) read as Piwik PRO Analytics Suite
Piwik PRO (now part of Matomo) read as Piwik PRO Analytics Suite
Plausible read as Plausible Analytics
Plausible (Enterprise) read as Plausible Analytics
Unresolved, counted raw
AT Internet
Analytics 360
Bold BI
GA 360
GoAccess
Google Analytics 4 (GA4) with BigQuery export
Heap Premier
Piwik
Piwik PRO Enterprise
Windsor
ZoomInfo Onsite
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.
← Tag managementAutomation & iPaaS →