Workflow automation and iPaaS for enterprise buyers
Asked as “workflow automation and integration platform”, and as “iPaaS”, on behalf of an enterprise B2B company. 58 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
43%
Clear leader
43Workato19MuleSoft Anypoint Platform12Microsoft Power Automate26others
43% of first choices, clear leader.
Since October 2026▲+1Since October 2026: 42% → 43%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Workato held the lead, +1 point on 42%, inside the 11-point floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
Zapier42%Clear leader↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: Zapier (42%) replaces Make (44% then, 37% now), 5 points clear, inside the 11-point floor.Standing →Mid-market
Workato35%Contested▲+7Since October 2026: 28% → 35%, +7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →EnterpriseWorkato43%Clear leader▲+1Since October 2026: 42% → 43%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.This page
Zapier42%Clear leader↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: Zapier (42%) replaces Make (44% then, 37% now), 5 points clear, inside the 11-point floor.Standing →Mid-marketWorkato35%Contested▲+7Since October 2026: 28% → 35%, +7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →EnterpriseWorkato43%Clear leader▲+1Since October 2026: 42% → 43%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.This pageThe standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for an enterprise B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01Workato43%11%73endorsed leader▲+1Since October 2026: 42% → 43%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.42% → 43%
Workato43%11%73endorsed leader▲+1Since October 2026: 42% → 43%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.42% → 43%02
MuleSoft Anypoint Platform19%11%53accepted challenger▲+7Since October 2026: 12% → 19%, +7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.12% → 19%
MuleSoft Anypoint Platform19%11%53accepted challenger▲+7Since October 2026: 12% → 19%, +7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.12% → 19%03
Microsoft Power Automate12%19%52accepted challenger▲+1Since October 2026: 11% → 12%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.11% → 12%
Microsoft Power Automate12%19%52accepted challenger▲+1Since October 2026: 11% → 12%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.11% → 12%04
Boomi Enterprise Platform9%3%35accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 9% → 9%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.9% → 9%
Boomi Enterprise Platform9%3%35accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 9% → 9%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.9% → 9%05
Tray.ai5%14%14accepted challenger▲+3Since October 2026: 2% → 5%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 5%
Tray.ai5%14%14accepted challenger▲+3Since October 2026: 2% → 5%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 5%06Zapier5%59%49criticized challenger▲+1Since October 2026: 4% → 5%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 5%
Zapier5%59%49criticized challenger▲+1Since October 2026: 4% → 5%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 5%07
Make2%57%30criticized challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%
Make2%57%30criticized challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%Show the eight products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
15
n8n0%32%22criticized challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%
n8n0%32%22criticized challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%13
UiPath0%24%21accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
UiPath0%24%21accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%08
Dell Boomi0%7%15accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%
Dell Boomi0%7%15accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%10
Informatica Intelligent Cloud Services0%6%18accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%
Informatica Intelligent Cloud Services0%6%18accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%14
Celigo0%0%12accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Celigo0%0%12accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%09
ServiceNow Flow Designer0%0%12accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
ServiceNow Flow Designer0%0%12accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%11
Appian0%0%11accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Appian0%0%11accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%12SAP Integration Suite0%0%10accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
Head to headHead-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not enterprise.
All twenty-one head-to-head pages: the top seven products, each against each
Workato vs n8nWorkato vs Microsoft Power AutomateWorkato vs Boomi Enterprise PlatformMake vs CeligoMake vs ZapierMake vs n8nMake vs Microsoft Power AutomateMake vs Boomi Enterprise PlatformCeligo vs ZapierCeligo vs n8nCeligo vs Microsoft Power AutomateCeligo vs Boomi Enterprise PlatformZapier vs n8nZapier vs Microsoft Power AutomateZapier vs Boomi Enterprise Platformn8n vs Microsoft Power Automaten8n vs Boomi Enterprise PlatformMicrosoft Power Automate vs Boomi Enterprise Platform
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
0102030405060708091011S12
131415Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative60%
Key
01Workato43%
Workato43%02MuleSoft Anypoint Platform19%
MuleSoft Anypoint Platform19%03Microsoft Power Automate12%
Microsoft Power Automate12%04Boomi Enterprise Platform9%
Boomi Enterprise Platform9%05Tray.ai5%
Tray.ai5%06Zapier5%
Zapier5%07Make2%
Make2%08Dell Boomi0%
Dell Boomi0%09ServiceNow Flow Designer0%
ServiceNow Flow Designer0%10Informatica Intelligent Cloud Services0%
Informatica Intelligent Cloud Services0%11Appian0%
Appian0%12SAP Integration Suite0%
13UiPath0%
UiPath0%14Celigo0%
Celigo0%15n8n0%
n8n0%What they warned about
Two of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Grok 4.20, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, MiniMax M2.5, GPT-6 Luna and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Zapier59%
29 of 49 labels negative · 14 of 14 models · 13 hard negative
“Popular tools like Zapier and Microsoft Power Automate often fail on core compliance needs like audit logging and access control, making them unsuitable for regulated enterprise use.” Muse Glimmer 30B, negative prompt
Make57%
17 of 30 labels negative · 11 of 14 models · 8 hard negative
“hosted SaaS with per-operation pricing that can grow expensive ... When to Avoid: Mission-critical processes with sensitive data” Grok 4.20, negative prompt
Microsoft Power Automate19%
10 of 52 labels negative · 8 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“Popular tools like Zapier and Microsoft Power Automate often fail on core compliance needs like audit logging and access control, making them unsuitable for regulated enterprise use.” Muse Glimmer 30B, negative prompt
n8n32%
7 of 22 labels negative · 7 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“these platforms are generally not suitable for large enterprises because they lack the robust governance, deep technical features, and scalability” Mistral Small, negative prompt
What they cite
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
75 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 939 links across 299 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 13 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
vendor site · Zapier32 answers · 68 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Workato23 answers · 36 citations · 11 models
vendor site · ONES.com20 answers · 45 citations · 11 models
17 answers · 22 citations · 10 models
16 answers · 19 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Jitterbit15 answers · 19 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Albato13 answers · 14 citations · 8 models
13 answers · 13 citations · 7 models
12 answers · 17 citations · 7 models
12 answers · 13 citations · 6 models
vendor site · Celigo10 answers · 11 citations · 6 models
vendor site · Workato10 answers · 11 citations · 6 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
11 answers · 8 models
11 answers · 8 models
11 answers · 7 models
10 answers · 8 models
9 answers · 4 models
9 answers · 5 models
9 answers · 7 models
9 answers · 5 models
8 answers · 4 models
8 answers · 5 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best workflow automation and integration platform”, “workflow automation and integration platform”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Workato workato.com | 43% | 149 | 14,800 | 405 | 38,042 | $20 | 120 |
| MuleSoft Anypoint Platform mulesoft.com | 19% | 75 | 720 | 4 | 73,982 | 99 | |
| Microsoft parent site Microsoft Power Automate 12% | 12% | 139 | 2,240,000 | 403,136 | |||
| Boomi Enterprise Platform boomi.com | 9% | 70 | 19,837 | $22,810 | 120 | ||
| Tray.ai tray.ai | 5% | 38 | 390 | 7 | 4,110 | $97 | 1 |
| Zapier zapier.com | 5% | 222 | 165,000 | 2,145 | 7,333,309 | $230 | 120 |
| Jitterbit Harmony jitterbit.com | 2% | 12 | 4,728 | $1,468 | 120 | ||
| Paragon | 2% | ||||||
| Zenphi zenphi.com | 2% | 1 | |||||
| Make make.com | 2% | 165 | 135,000 | 12,939,045 | 439,031 | 76 |
Google's top ten for the two searches hold 16 sites; 1 of them are among the sites the models cited here (ezintegrations.ai). The first result for “best workflow automation and integration platform” is useparagon.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best workflow automation and integration platform for an enterprise B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which iPaaS would you recommend to a large B2B company with thousands of employees?”Comparative“What are the top enterprise-grade workflow automation and integration platforms and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best workflow automation and integration platform for a large company that needs predictable total cost across thousands of users?”Scale-constrained“We are a 5,000 person company with SSO, SOC 2 and procurement review requirements evaluating a workflow automation and integration platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which workflow automation and integration platforms should a large enterprise avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5WorkatoMuleSoft Anypoint PlatformChangedWorkatoWorkatono first choiceagainst: Zapier
Three alternatives
Boomi Enterprise Platform, Microsoft Power Automate, Tray.aiFour alternatives
Boomi AtomSphere, Informatica Intelligent Cloud Services, SAP Cloud Platform Integration, Talend CloudFive alternatives
Microsoft Power Automate, ServiceNow Flow Designer, UiPath, Zapier, n8nOne alternative
Microsoft Power AutomateGPT-5.4 miniWorkatoagainst: ZapierBoomi Enterprise PlatformChangedWorkatoTray.aiagainst: Microsoft Power AutomateWorkato, Zapieragainst: UiPath
Two alternatives
Boomi Enterprise Platform, MuleSoft Anypoint PlatformThree alternatives
Informatica Intelligent Cloud Services, MuleSoft Anypoint Platform, WorkatoEleven alternatives
Automation Anywhere, Azure Logic Apps, Boomi Enterprise Platform, Celigo, IBM Automation / Agentic Process Automation, Microsoft Power Automate, MuleSoft Anypoint Platform, ServiceNow Workflow Automation / Integration Hub / Workflow Data Fabric, SnapLogic, UiPath, ZapierTwo alternatives
ServiceNow Integration Hub, WorkatoOne alternative
Boomi Enterprise PlatformGemini 3.5 FlashWorkatoBoomi Enterprise Platform, MuleSoft Anypoint PlatformChangedMuleSoft Anypoint Platform, WorkatoMicrosoft Power Automateagainst: Make, ZapierTray.ai, Workatoagainst: Make, Zapieragainst: Activepieces, Apache Airflow, Huginn, IFTTT, Make, Microsoft BizTalk Server, Pabbly Connect, TIBCO ActiveMatrix, Zapier, n8n
Five alternatives
Azure Logic Apps, Boomi Enterprise Platform, Microsoft Power Automate, MuleSoft Anypoint Platform, Tray.aiThree alternatives
Microsoft Azure Integration Services, SAP Integration Suite, WorkatoFour alternatives
Boomi Enterprise Platform, Microsoft Power Automate, Tray.ai, ZapierFour alternatives
AWS Step Functions, Azure Logic Apps, Workato, n8nFour alternatives
Boomi Enterprise Platform, MuleSoft Anypoint Platform, Salesforce Flow, ServiceNow Integration HubPerplexity SonarWorkatoagainst: Make, ZapierWorkatoHeldWorkatoagainst: Automation Anywhere, Blue PrismMicrosoft Power Automateagainst: Make, Zapierno first choiceagainst: Make, Microsoft Power Automate, MuleSoft Anypoint Platform, ServiceNow IntegrationHub, Tray.ai, Unito, Workato, Zapier, n8n
Five alternatives
Boomi Enterprise Platform, Cleo Integration Cloud, Microsoft Power Automate, MuleSoft Anypoint Platform, PrismaticOne alternative
Boomi Enterprise PlatformNine alternatives
Appian, Boomi Enterprise Platform, Camunda, Microsoft Power Automate, MuleSoft Anypoint Platform, Pega, SAP Integration Suite, ServiceNow Flow Designer, UiPathTwo alternatives
Workato, n8nGrok 4.20WorkatoMuleSoft Anypoint PlatformChangedWorkatoMicrosoft Power Automateagainst: Make, MuleSoft Anypoint Platform, ZapierBoomi Enterprise Platform, Paragon, Workatoagainst: IFTTT, MuleSoft Anypoint Platform, Zapieragainst: Make, MuleSoft Anypoint Platform, Workato, Zapier, n8n
Three alternatives
Dell Boomi, Microsoft Power Automate, MuleSoft Anypoint PlatformFour alternatives
Dell Boomi, IBM App Connect, Informatica Intelligent Cloud Services, WorkatoSeven alternatives
Boomi Enterprise Platform, Informatica Intelligent Cloud Services, Microsoft Power Automate, MuleSoft Anypoint Platform, SAP Integration Suite, ServiceNow Flow Designer, UiPathTwo alternatives
Boomi Enterprise Platform, WorkatoOne alternative
MakeMistral SmallWorkatoMuleSoft Anypoint Platform, WorkatoChangedWorkatoagainst: ZapierWorkatoagainst: Make, Microsoft Power Automate, Zapierno first choiceagainst: Zapieragainst: Tray.ai, Workato, Zapier, n8n
Four alternatives
Microsoft Power Automate, MuleSoft Anypoint Platform, Zapier, n8nEight alternatives
Appian, Camunda, Make, Microsoft Power Automate, Pega, ServiceNow Flow Designer, UiPath, n8nDeepSeek V4 FlashWorkatoagainst: Microsoft Power AutomateMuleSoft Anypoint PlatformChangedno first choiceTray.aiagainst: Boomi Enterprise Platform, Celonis, MuleSoft Anypoint Platform, UiPath, Workato, ZapierWorkatoagainst: Make, Zapieragainst: Automate.io, IFTTT, Integromat, Make, Microsoft Power Automate, Zapier
Four alternatives
Boomi Enterprise Platform, MuleSoft Anypoint Platform, SAP Integration Suite, ZapierFour alternatives
Dell Boomi, Informatica Intelligent Cloud Services, SAP Integration Suite, WorkatoNine alternatives
Appian, Camunda, Dell Boomi, Microsoft Power Automate, MuleSoft Anypoint Platform, Pega, ServiceNow Flow Designer, UiPath, WorkatoOne alternative
Microsoft Power AutomateFive alternatives
Boomi Enterprise Platform, Microsoft Power Automate, MuleSoft Anypoint Platform, Tray.ai, n8nLlama 4 MaverickWorkatono first choiceChangedno first choiceWorkatoagainst: Make, Zapier, n8nMake, Zapiernothing named
One alternative
GoFormzQwen 3.7 FlashWorkatoMuleSoft Anypoint Platform, WorkatoChangedMuleSoft Anypoint PlatformMicrosoft Power Automateno first choiceagainst: Automation Anywhere, Dell Boomi, Make, Microsoft Power Automate, UiPath, WorkFusion, Zapier
Five alternatives
Microsoft Power Automate, MuleSoft Anypoint Platform, Paragon, Prismatic, ServiceNow Flow DesignerOne alternative
Dell BoomiFive alternatives
Appian, Azure Logic Apps, Dell Boomi, Microsoft Power Automate, WorkatoOne alternative
WorkatoKimi K2WorkatoMuleSoft Anypoint PlatformChangedno first choiceMicrosoft Power Automateagainst: MuleSoft Anypoint Platform, UiPath, Workato, ZapierWorkatoagainst: Zapieragainst: Zapier
Two alternatives
Boomi Enterprise Platform, MuleSoft Anypoint PlatformTwo alternatives
Dell Boomi, WorkatoNine alternatives
Appian, Boomi Enterprise Platform, Camunda, Microsoft Power Automate, MuleSoft Anypoint Platform, Pega, ServiceNow Flow Designer, UiPath, WorkatoFour alternatives
Beta Systems ANOW! Suite, Dell Boomi, ServiceNow Flow Designer, n8nOne alternative
MuleSoft Anypoint PlatformGLM 4.7 FlashXMuleSoft Anypoint PlatformMuleSoft Anypoint PlatformHeldUiPathMicrosoft Power Automateagainst: Workato, Zapierno first choiceagainst: Make, Zapier
Seven alternatives
Boomi Enterprise Platform, Celigo, IBM Integration Bus, Make, SAP Integration Suite, Workato, ZapierFive alternatives
Celigo, Dell Boomi, Informatica Intelligent Cloud Services, SAP Integration Suite, WorkatoSeven alternatives
Appian, Dell Boomi, Informatica Intelligent Cloud Services, Microsoft Power Automate, MuleSoft Anypoint Platform, Oracle Integration Cloud, WorkatoThree alternatives
Fivetran, ServiceNow Flow Designer, iPaaS.comMiniMax M2.5Jitterbit HarmonyMuleSoft Anypoint PlatformChangedMicrosoft Power Automateno first choiceWorkato, Zapieragainst: Make, Microsoft Power Automate, Zapier, n8n
Four alternatives
Boomi Enterprise Platform, Microsoft Power Automate, MuleSoft Anypoint Platform, WorkatoTwo alternatives
Dell Boomi, WorkatoNine alternatives
Appian, Camunda, Make, Nintex, Pega, ServiceNow Workflow Engine, UiPath, Workato, ZapierThree alternatives
Jinba, Microsoft Power Automate, NextMatterGPT-6 LunaWorkatoBoomi Enterprise PlatformChangedno first choiceagainst: Informatica Intelligent Cloud Services, ServiceNow workflow automation, UiPathMicrosoft Power Automateno first choiceagainst: Make, Microsoft Power Automate, Oracle Integration Generation 2, Salesforce Workflow Rules and Process Builder, Zapier, n8n
Three alternatives
Boomi Enterprise Platform, Cleo Integration Cloud, MuleSoft Anypoint PlatformTwo alternatives
MuleSoft Anypoint Platform, WorkatoEight alternatives
Boomi Enterprise Platform, Camunda, IBM Integration Software / IBM Integration SaaS, Microsoft Power Automate, MuleSoft Anypoint Platform, Oracle Integration Cloud, SAP Integration Suite, WorkatoOne alternative
WorkatoFive alternatives
Boomi Enterprise Platform, Microsoft Power Automate, MuleSoft Anypoint Platform, ServiceNow IntegrationHub, WorkatoMuse Glimmer 30BWorkatoBoomi Enterprise Platform, MuleSoft Anypoint PlatformChangedMuleSoft Anypoint PlatformZenphiagainst: Microsoft Power Automate, Power Apps, Workato, ZapierWorkatoagainst: Make, Microsoft Power Automate, Workato, Zapier, n8n cloud
Three alternatives
Appian, Boomi Enterprise Platform, MuleSoft Anypoint PlatformOne alternative
WorkatoEleven alternatives
Appian, Automation Anywhere, Dell Boomi, Microsoft Power Automate, Pega, SS&C Blue Prism, ServiceNow Flow Designer, SnapLogic, UiPath, Workato, ZapierThree alternatives
Infor Velocity Suite, Integrate.io, n8nTwo alternatives
Boomi Enterprise Platform, MuleSoft Anypoint PlatformBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 17:25 | yes | 10 | 8 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 12:42 | yes | 2 | 6 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 08:42 | yes | 7 | 20 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 10:44 | yes | 10 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 17:28 | yes | 15 | 16 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 13:44 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 12:13 | yes | 23 | 21 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 16:44 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 10:05 | yes | 5 | 22 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 17:19 | yes | 10 | 33 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 11:37 | yes | 25 | 64 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 14:10 | yes | 15 | 39 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 16:55 | yes | 5 | 14 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 13:00 | yes | 14 | 19 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 17:21 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 15:53 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 09:59 | yes | 11 | 23 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 09:26 | yes | 10 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:47 | yes | 5 | 9 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 11:40 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 14:56 | yes | 23 | 29 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 14:21 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 17:36 | yes | 5 | 32 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 14:53 | yes | 19 | 27 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 08:36 | yes | 20 | 59 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 15:40 | yes | 5 | 48 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 11:42 | yes | 5 | 29 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 12:58 | yes | 9 | 19 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 13:29 | yes | 10 | 9 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 09:24 | yes | 8 | 12 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 14:57 | no | 0 | 22 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 12:19 | yes | 10 | 7 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 17:14 | yes | 10 | 16 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 09:28 | yes | 15 | 15 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 17:07 | yes | 24 | 62 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 10:53 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 08:58 | no | 0 | 31 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 14:27 | yes | 19 | 32 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 11:40 | yes | 24 | 147 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 16:32 | yes | 5 | 152 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 12:42 | yes | 11 | 25 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 11:12 | yes | 25 | 49 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 12:12 | yes | 19 | 8 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 09:37 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 10:46 | no | 0 | 15 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 10:53 | yes | 10 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 14:16 | yes | 15 | 17 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 14:57 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 09:28 | yes | 25 | 26 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 09:47 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 13:57 | yes | 5 | 30 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 14:11 | yes | 20 | 64 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 10:01 | yes | 24 | 207 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 17:19 | no | 0 | 40 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 08:35 | yes | 2 | 15 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 08:43 | yes | 22 | 34 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 11:55 | yes | 19 | 13 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 10:30 | yes | 5 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 16:08 | no | 0 | 21 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 10:59 | yes | 10 | 9 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:59 | yes | 10 | 15 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 15:32 | no | 0 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 13:12 | yes | 23 | 45 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 13:17 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 12:20 | no | 0 | 29 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 10:35 | yes | 15 | 28 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 16:34 | yes | 25 | 29 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 10:31 | yes | 10 | 33 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 11:04 | yes | 6 | 32 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 10:35 | yes | 14 | 21 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 11:07 | yes | 18 | 15 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 10:20 | yes | 4 | 7 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 11:54 | no | 0 | 20 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 15:44 | yes | 10 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:48 | yes | 15 | 19 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 17:30 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 14:49 | yes | 24 | 47 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 11:44 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 10:47 | yes | 20 | 47 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 12:36 | yes | 25 | 26 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 13:20 | yes | 25 | 44 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 15:52 | yes | 25 | 66 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 16:25 | yes | 5 | 22 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 12:48 | yes | 15 | 27 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Boomi read as Boomi Enterprise Platform
Boomi (Dell) read as Boomi Enterprise Platform
Boomi (formerly Dell Boomi) read as Boomi Enterprise Platform
Cleo read as Cleo Integration Cloud
Informatica read as Informatica Intelligent Cloud Services
Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) read as Informatica Intelligent Cloud Services
Jitterbit read as Jitterbit Harmony
MuleSoft read as MuleSoft Anypoint Platform
MuleSoft (Anypoint Platform) read as MuleSoft Anypoint Platform
MuleSoft (Salesforce Anypoint Platform) read as MuleSoft Anypoint Platform
MuleSoft (Salesforce) read as MuleSoft Anypoint Platform
MuleSoft (by Salesforce) read as MuleSoft Anypoint Platform
Mulesoft read as MuleSoft Anypoint Platform
Mulesoft (Anypoint Platform) read as MuleSoft Anypoint Platform
SAP read as SAP Integration Suite
ServiceNow read as ServiceNow Flow Designer
ServiceNow (Flow Designer + Integration Hub) read as ServiceNow Flow Designer
Unresolved, counted raw
Boomi AtomSphere
Celonis
FlexFlow
Flow Builder
Getint
IBM Automation / Agentic Process Automation
IBM Integration Bus
IBM Integration Software / IBM Integration SaaS
IBM webMethods Hybrid Integration
Infor Velocity Suite
Informatica Cloud
Microsoft BizTalk Server
NextMatter
Oracle Integration Generation 2
Power Apps
Qntrl
SAP Cloud Platform Integration
Salesforce Workflow Rules and Process Builder
ServiceNow Workflow Automation / Integration Hub / Workflow Data Fabric
ServiceNow Workflow Engine
ServiceNow workflow automation
SnapLogic Agentic Integration and Applied AI Platform
TIBCO ActiveMatrix
Talend Cloud
TrailHQ
Unito
WSO2 Integration Platform Enterprise
WorkFusion
Zenphi
altaFlow
iPaaS.com
n8n cloud
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.