Workforce identity and SSO for enterprise buyers
Asked as “workforce identity platform”, and as “single sign-on and identity provider for employees”, on behalf of an enterprise B2B company. 53 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, twelve models each.
Standing · first-choice share
53%
Clear leader
53Okta Workforce Identity47Microsoft Entra ID
53% of first choices, clear leader.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all twelve models, for an enterprise B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Show the seven products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
Head to head
Microsoft Entra ID vs Okta Workforce IdentityMicrosoft Entra ID vs OneLoginMicrosoft Entra ID vs JumpCloud
Head-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not enterprise.All six head-to-head pages: the top four products, each against each
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative70%
Key
01Okta Workforce Identity53%
Okta Workforce Identity53%02Microsoft Entra ID47%
Microsoft Entra ID47%03Ping Identity0%
Ping Identity0%04CyberArk Identity0%
CyberArk Identity0%05SailPoint Identity Security Cloud0%
SailPoint Identity Security Cloud0%06IBM Verify0%
IBM Verify0%07ForgeRock Identity Platform0%
ForgeRock Identity Platform0%08JumpCloud0%
JumpCloud0%09OneLogin0%
OneLogin0%What they warned about
Five of twelve models held their first choice under the paraphrase. GPT-5.4 mini, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Grok 4.20, Mistral Small, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2 and MiniMax M2.5 changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Okta Workforce Identity16%
11 of 70 labels negative · 10 of 12 models
“Okta Workforce Identity (High Security Risk & Vendor Fatigue)... Caution is warranted if you lack the internal IAM team to harden it” DeepSeek V4 Flash, negative prompt
Ping Identity16%
10 of 62 labels negative · 8 of 12 models · 2 hard negative
“You should be extremely cautious about organizations heavily reliant on Ping Identity and ForgeRock due to their recent merger” GLM 4.7 FlashX, negative prompt
Microsoft Entra ID9%
6 of 67 labels negative · 6 of 12 models
“You should be cautious about choosing Microsoft Entra ID (formerly Azure AD) if your enterprise is not deeply invested in the Microsoft ecosystem.” GLM 4.7 FlashX, negative prompt
OneLogin50%
7 of 14 labels negative · 5 of 12 models · 3 hard negative
“Avoid OneLogin for the *primary* workforce identity provider if you require extensive governance and complex B2B trust relationships.” DeepSeek V4 Flash, negative prompt
What they cite
Twelve of the twelve models returned a source list in this edition: four return the pages they cited and eight the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
66 of 72 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 12 of 12 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 987 links across 257 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page.
47 answers · 97 citations · 11 models
34 answers · 50 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Okta30 answers · 38 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Siit24 answers · 27 citations · 9 models
vendor site · SSOJet20 answers · 33 citations · 9 models
15 answers · 20 citations · 7 models
vendor site · Hideez14 answers · 15 citations · 10 models
14 answers · 14 citations · 5 models
14 answers · 14 citations · 8 models
vendor site · WorkOS13 answers · 20 citations · 7 models
vendor site · Microsoft13 answers · 18 citations · 7 models
13 answers · 14 citations · 7 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
29 answers · 10 models
26 answers · 10 models
24 answers · 9 models
16 answers · 7 models
16 answers · 10 models
14 answers · 5 models
10 answers · 10 models
10 answers · 5 models
9 answers · 7 models
9 answers · 7 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best workforce identity platform”, “workforce identity platform”, “workforce identity platforms”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Okta Workforce Identity okta.com Okta Workforce Identity 53%, Okta Identity Governance 0% | 53% | 202 | 390 | 8 | 1,959,740 | 118 | 2 | |
| Microsoft parent site Microsoft Entra ID 47% | 47% | 499 | 2,240,000 | 403,136 | ||||
| Ping pingidentity.com Ping Identity 0%, ForgeRock Identity Platform 0%, Ping Identity / ForgeRock 0%, Ping Workforce360 0% | 0% | 264 | 12,100 | 249 | 73,959 company | $30 | 55 | |
| CyberArk cyberark.com CyberArk Identity 0% | 0% | 54 | 22,200 | 1,253 | 147,793 company | $62 | 0 | |
| SailPoint IdentityNow/IdentityIQ sailpoint.com SailPoint Identity Security Cloud 0%, SailPoint IdentityNow/IdentityIQ 0% | 0% | 186 | 320 | 3 | 58,881 | 46 | ||
| IBM parent site IBM Verify 0% | 0% | 86 | 201,000 | 34,098 | ||||
| Auth0 auth0.com Auth0 0%, Auth0/Okta CIC 0% | 0% | 245 | 18,100 | 772 | 170,673 | 117 | ||
| Cisco parent site Cisco Duo 0% | 0% | 189 | 165,000 | 48,352 | ||||
| Google Cloud google.dev Google Cloud Identity 0% | 0% | 53 | 165,000 | 7,596 | 881,346 | 109 | ||
| SSOJet ssojet.com | 0% | 28 | 40 | 0 | 9,629 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 23 sites; 3 of them are among the sites the models cited here (majorkeytech.com, okta.com, startwithidentity.com). The first result for “best workforce identity platform” is thectoclub.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best workforce identity platform for an enterprise B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which single sign-on and identity provider for employees would you recommend to a large B2B company with thousands of employees?”Comparative“What are the top enterprise-grade workforce identity platforms and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best workforce identity platform for a large company that needs predictable total cost across thousands of users?”Scale-constrained“We are a 5,000 person company with SSO, SOC 2 and procurement review requirements evaluating a workforce identity platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which workforce identity platforms should a large enterprise avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5Microsoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce IdentityMicrosoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce IdentityHeldMicrosoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce IdentityMicrosoft Entra IDagainst: Okta Workforce IdentityOkta Workforce Identitynothing named
One alternative
Okta Identity GovernanceTwo alternatives
Auth0, Ping IdentityThree alternatives
IBM Verify, JumpCloud, SailPoint Identity Security CloudOne alternative
Ping IdentityFour alternatives
ForgeRock Identity Platform, IBM Verify, Microsoft Entra ID, Ping IdentityGPT-5.4 miniOkta Workforce IdentityMicrosoft Entra IDChangedMicrosoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce IdentityMicrosoft Entra IDno first choicenothing named
One alternative
Microsoft Entra IDOne alternative
Okta Workforce IdentityFour alternatives
CyberArk Identity, IBM Verify, Ping Identity, SailPoint Identity Security CloudThree alternatives
Okta Workforce Identity, Ping Identity, PingOne for WorkforceGemini 3.5 FlashOkta Workforce IdentityMicrosoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce IdentityChangedMicrosoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce IdentityMicrosoft Entra IDMicrosoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce Identityagainst: CA/Broadcom SiteMinder, CyberArk Identity, ForgeRock Identity Platform, IBM Verify, Okta Workforce Identity, OneLogin, Oracle Access Manager, Ping Identity
Five alternatives
Auth0, Microsoft Entra ID, Ping Identity, PropelAuth, WorkOSOne alternative
Ping IdentityTwo alternatives
CyberArk Identity, Ping IdentityTwo alternatives
Okta Workforce Identity, Ping Identity / ForgeRockOne alternative
Ping IdentityPerplexity SonarOkta Workforce IdentityOkta Workforce IdentityHeldMicrosoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce IdentityMicrosoft Entra IDagainst: Ping Identityno first choiceagainst: Cisco Duo, ForgeRock Identity Platform, IBM ISAM, IBM Verify, JumpCloud, OneLogin, Rippling IT, SailPoint Identity Security Cloud, Saviynt Enterprise Identity Cloud
Two alternatives
Microsoft Entra ID, Ping IdentityTwo alternatives
Auth0, Microsoft Entra IDFive alternatives
CyberArk Identity, IBM Verify, JumpCloud, OneLogin, Ping IdentityOne alternative
Okta Workforce IdentityGrok 4.20Microsoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce IdentityMicrosoft Entra IDChangedagainst: Ping IdentityMicrosoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce Identityagainst: IBM VerifyMicrosoft Entra IDagainst: Ping IdentityOkta Workforce Identityagainst: JumpCloudagainst: JumpCloud, Okta Workforce Identity, Omada Identity, One Identity, OneLogin, Ping Identity
One alternative
Ping IdentityOne alternative
Okta Workforce IdentityTwo alternatives
Ping Identity, SailPoint IdentityNow/IdentityIQOne alternative
Okta Workforce IdentityThree alternatives
Microsoft Entra ID, OneLogin, Ping IdentityMistral SmallOkta Workforce IdentityMicrosoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce IdentityChangedMicrosoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce IdentityMicrosoft Entra IDno first choiceagainst: ForgeRock Identity Platform, Microsoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce Identity, Ping Identity
Four alternatives
Frontegg, Microsoft Entra ID, Ping Identity, SSOJetThree alternatives
Cisco Duo, JumpCloud, Ping IdentityFour alternatives
CyberArk Identity, ForgeRock Identity Platform, IBM Verify, Ping IdentityTwo alternatives
Cisco Duo, Okta Workforce IdentityDeepSeek V4 FlashOkta Workforce IdentityOkta Workforce IdentityHeldagainst: OneLoginMicrosoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce IdentityMicrosoft Entra IDagainst: OneLoginMicrosoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce Identityagainst: Auth0, IBM Verify, JumpCloud, Microsoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce Identity, OneLogin, Oracle Access Manager, Ping Identity
Five alternatives
CyberArk Identity, JumpCloud, Microsoft Entra ID, Ping Identity, SailPoint Identity Security CloudTwo alternatives
Microsoft Entra ID, Ping IdentityFive alternatives
CyberArk Identity, IBM Verify, Ping Identity, SailPoint Identity Security Cloud, Saviynt Enterprise Identity CloudTwo alternatives
Okta Workforce Identity, Ping IdentityLlama 4 MaverickOkta Workforce IdentityOkta Workforce IdentityHeldno first choiceOkta Workforce Identityno first choiceagainst: Microsoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce Identity, Ping Identity
Five alternatives
CyberArk Identity, ForgeRock Identity Platform, IBM Verify, Microsoft Entra ID, Ping Workforce360Qwen 3.7 FlashMicrosoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce IdentityOkta Workforce IdentityChangedMicrosoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce IdentityMicrosoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce Identityagainst: Auth0, Salesforce Identityno first choiceagainst: 1Password, AuthConn, CA Single Sign-On, Dashlane, Microsoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce Identity, OneIdentity
One alternative
Ping IdentityTwo alternatives
Microsoft Entra ID, Ping IdentityTwo alternatives
Ping Identity, SailPoint Identity Security CloudKimi K2Okta Workforce IdentityMicrosoft Entra IDChangedMicrosoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce IdentityMicrosoft Entra IDagainst: Okta Workforce IdentityMicrosoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce Identityagainst: Okta Workforce Identity, OneLogin, Ping Identity, SailPoint Identity Security Cloud
Two alternatives
Microsoft Entra ID, Ping IdentityTwo alternatives
Okta Workforce Identity, Ping IdentityFour alternatives
CyberArk Identity, Ping Identity, SailPoint Identity Security Cloud, Saviynt Enterprise Identity CloudOne alternative
Ping IdentityOne alternative
Ping IdentityGLM 4.7 FlashXOkta Workforce IdentityOkta Workforce IdentityHeldMicrosoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce IdentityMicrosoft Entra IDno first choiceagainst: ForgeRock Identity Platform, Microsoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce Identity, Ping Identity
Four alternatives
JumpCloud, Microsoft Entra ID, OneLogin, Ping IdentityFour alternatives
Auth0, IBM Verify, Microsoft Entra ID, Ping IdentityFour alternatives
ForgeRock Identity Platform, OneLogin, Ping Identity, SailPoint Identity Security CloudOne alternative
Okta Workforce IdentityMiniMax M2.5Okta Workforce IdentityMicrosoft Entra IDChangedMicrosoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce Identityagainst: JumpCloudMicrosoft Entra IDMicrosoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce Identityagainst: JumpCloud, Microsoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce Identity
Three alternatives
CyberArk Identity, Microsoft Entra ID, Ping IdentityTwo alternatives
JumpCloud, Okta Workforce IdentityTwo alternatives
CyberArk Identity, Ping IdentityTwo alternatives
Okta Workforce Identity, Ping IdentityTwo alternatives
CyberArk Identity, Ping IdentityBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Seventy-two rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 09:10 | yes | 9 | 9 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 08:16 | yes | 2 | 6 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 09:01 | yes | 16 | 28 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 08:31 | yes | 20 | 6 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 08:16 | yes | 34 | 15 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 08:58 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 08:39 | yes | 9 | 16 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 08:53 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 09:04 | yes | 10 | 32 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 08:39 | yes | 14 | 49 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 08:31 | yes | 15 | 17 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 08:59 | yes | 14 | 66 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 08:37 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 08:48 | yes | 2 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 09:11 | yes | 12 | 24 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 09:06 | yes | 20 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 08:47 | yes | 34 | 14 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 08:32 | no | 0 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 08:30 | yes | 10 | 11 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 09:00 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 08:58 | yes | 10 | 28 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 08:23 | yes | 15 | 21 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 08:48 | yes | 14 | 47 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 08:25 | yes | 15 | 49 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 08:17 | yes | 9 | 8 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 08:50 | yes | 6 | 12 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 08:43 | yes | 22 | 29 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 08:22 | yes | 20 | 8 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 09:08 | yes | 24 | 14 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 09:12 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 09:11 | yes | 16 | 24 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 08:18 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 08:25 | yes | 5 | 36 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 08:49 | yes | 15 | 170 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 09:08 | no | 0 | 36 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 08:25 | yes | 14 | 32 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 09:11 | yes | 16 | 12 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 08:48 | yes | 3 | 8 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 08:19 | yes | 14 | 27 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 09:06 | yes | 20 | 6 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 09:05 | yes | 38 | 18 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 09:09 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 08:57 | yes | 19 | 19 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 09:02 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 08:51 | yes | 5 | 60 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 08:28 | yes | 14 | 25 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 08:41 | yes | 24 | 38 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 08:42 | yes | 19 | 104 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 08:33 | yes | 25 | 12 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 09:08 | yes | 4 | 10 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 09:09 | no | 0 | 18 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 08:22 | yes | 20 | 10 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 08:53 | yes | 20 | 13 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 08:33 | no | 0 | 9 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 08:28 | yes | 24 | 24 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 08:55 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 08:43 | no | 0 | 45 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 08:28 | yes | 25 | 59 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 08:37 | yes | 15 | 258 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 08:52 | yes | 5 | 32 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 09:05 | yes | 27 | 13 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 08:49 | yes | 4 | 7 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 08:23 | yes | 16 | 31 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 09:05 | yes | 20 | 7 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 08:31 | yes | 29 | 16 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 08:22 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 08:53 | yes | 25 | 40 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 09:10 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 08:24 | yes | 20 | 72 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 08:43 | yes | 29 | 47 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 08:24 | yes | 28 | 63 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 09:09 | yes | 23 | 78 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
CyberArk read as CyberArk Identity
ForgeRock read as ForgeRock Identity Platform
ForgeRock Identity Cloud / ForgeRock Identity Platform read as ForgeRock Identity Platform
Google Workspace read as Google Cloud Identity
IBM read as IBM Verify
Microsoft Entra read as Microsoft Entra ID
Okta read as Okta Workforce Identity
Okta Workforce read as Okta Workforce Identity
Ping read as Ping Identity
Rippling read as Rippling IT
SailPoint read as SailPoint Identity Security Cloud
SailPoint IdentityIQ / Identity Security Cloud read as SailPoint Identity Security Cloud
Saviynt read as Saviynt Enterprise Identity Cloud
Unresolved, counted raw
AuthConn
CA Single Sign-On
CA/Broadcom SiteMinder
Strata Identity
Trusona
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.