Multi-factor authentication for enterprise buyers
Asked as “MFA solution”, and as “multi-factor authentication tool”, on behalf of an enterprise B2B company. 50 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, twelve models each.
Standing · first-choice share
40%
Contested · Cisco Duo 30%
40Microsoft Entra ID30Cisco Duo26Okta Verify04others
40% of first choices, contested.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all twelve models, for an enterprise B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Show the four products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
Head to headHead-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not enterprise.
All twenty-one head-to-head pages: the top seven products, each against each
Cisco Duo vs Google AuthenticatorCisco Duo vs Ping IdentityCisco Duo vs AuthyMicrosoft Entra ID vs Okta VerifyMicrosoft Entra ID vs Microsoft AuthenticatorMicrosoft Entra ID vs Google AuthenticatorMicrosoft Entra ID vs Ping IdentityMicrosoft Entra ID vs AuthyOkta Verify vs Microsoft AuthenticatorOkta Verify vs Google AuthenticatorOkta Verify vs Ping IdentityOkta Verify vs AuthyMicrosoft Authenticator vs Google AuthenticatorMicrosoft Authenticator vs Ping IdentityMicrosoft Authenticator vs AuthyGoogle Authenticator vs Ping IdentityGoogle Authenticator vs AuthyPing Identity vs Authy
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01
02
03
04
05
06
07Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative60%
Key
01Microsoft Entra ID40%
Microsoft Entra ID40%02Cisco Duo30%
Cisco Duo30%03Okta Verify26%
Okta Verify26%04YubiKey0%
YubiKey0%05Ping Identity0%
Ping Identity0%06RSA SecurID0%
RSA SecurID0%07Microsoft Authenticator0%
Microsoft Authenticator0%What they warned about
Two of twelve models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Perplexity Sonar, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, GLM 4.7 FlashX and MiniMax M2.5 changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Okta Verify19%
10 of 54 labels negative · 7 of 12 models · 1 hard negative
“Avoid Okta for a pure MFA project unless you require its extensive third-party SSO integration capabilities” GLM 4.7 FlashX, budget prompt
RSA SecurID25%
4 of 16 labels negative · 4 of 12 models · 1 hard negative
“RSA SecurID legacy OTP | Phase out for modern needs” DeepSeek V4 Flash, negative prompt
Microsoft Authenticator30%
3 of 10 labels negative · 3 of 12 models
“software authenticator apps (like Google Authenticator or Microsoft Authenticator generating time-based one-time passwords) is better than SMS but has significant drawbacks” Qwen 3.7 Flash, negative prompt
Cisco Duo4%
2 of 52 labels negative · 2 of 12 models
“Cisco Duo is a market leader, but specific implementation flaws and supply chain risks make it a cautionary example.” GLM 4.7 FlashX, negative prompt
What they cite
Twelve of the twelve models returned a source list in this edition: four return the pages they cited and eight the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
64 of 72 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 12 of 12 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 993 links across 269 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page.
37 answers · 50 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Rippling33 answers · 34 citations · 10 models
vendor site · WorkOS25 answers · 27 citations · 10 models
23 answers · 24 citations · 10 models
vendor site · miniOrange22 answers · 22 citations · 10 models
20 answers · 27 citations · 7 models
vendor site · Okta18 answers · 23 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Microsoft17 answers · 24 citations · 7 models
17 answers · 18 citations · 10 models
15 answers · 19 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Datawiza15 answers · 16 citations · 8 models
14 answers · 14 citations · 9 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
29 answers · 10 models
24 answers · 10 models
21 answers · 10 models
21 answers · 11 models
20 answers · 9 models
19 answers · 7 models
17 answers · 10 models
15 answers · 10 models
14 answers · 9 models
12 answers · 8 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best mfa solution”, “mfa solution”, “mfa solutions”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Microsoft parent site Microsoft Entra ID 40%, Microsoft Authenticator 0% | 40% | 499 | 2,240,000 | 403,136 | ||||
| Cisco parent site Cisco Duo 30%, Cisco Secure Access 0% | 30% | 189 | 165,000 | 48,352 | ||||
| Okta Verify okta.com | 26% | 122 | 49,500 | 1,322 | 1,959,740 | 118 | ||
| Auth0 auth0.com | 2% | 245 | 18,100 | 772 | 170,673 | 117 | ||
| WorkOS workos.com | 2% | 30 | 12,100 | 107 | 33,478 | 75 | ||
| YubiKey yubico.com | 0% | 53 | 49,500 | 2,536 | 97,363 | 32 | ||
| Ping pingidentity.com Ping Identity 0%, PingID 0% | 0% | 264 | 12,100 | 249 | 73,959 company | $30 | 55 | |
| Windows Hello windows.net | 0% | 2 | 9,900 | 1,212 | 29 | 0 | ||
| RSA rsa.com RSA SecurID 0%, RSA ID Plus 0% | 0% | 20 | 2,900 | 113 | 45,286 company | 0 | 8 | |
| HYPR hypr.com | 0% | 8 | 1,900 | 209 | 137,619 | 0 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 24 sites; 3 of them are among the sites the models cited here (datawiza.com, miniorange.com, rippling.com). The first result for “best mfa solution” is miniorange.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best MFA solution for an enterprise B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which multi-factor authentication tool would you recommend to a large B2B company with thousands of employees?”Comparative“What are the top enterprise-grade MFA solutions and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best MFA solution for a large company that needs predictable total cost across thousands of users?”Scale-constrained“We are a 5,000 person company with SSO, SOC 2 and procurement review requirements evaluating a MFA solution. What should we look at?”Negative“Which MFA solutions should a large enterprise avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5Microsoft Entra ID, Okta VerifyMicrosoft Entra IDChangedCisco Duo, Microsoft Entra IDno first choiceno first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
Cisco Duo, Ping IdentityTwo alternatives
Cisco Duo, Okta VerifyFive alternatives
IBM Verify, Inteca Managed Keycloak, Okta Verify, PingID, YubiKeyGPT-5.4 miniMicrosoft Entra IDOkta VerifyChangedno first choiceMicrosoft Entra IDno first choicenothing named
One alternative
Cisco DuoOne alternative
Microsoft Entra IDOne alternative
Okta VerifyGemini 3.5 FlashOkta VerifyCisco DuoChangedMicrosoft Entra ID, Okta VerifyCisco Duo, Microsoft Entra IDCisco Duonothing named
Six alternatives
Auth0, Cisco Duo, Microsoft Entra ID, Ping Identity, WorkOS, YubiKeyFive alternatives
Microsoft Entra ID, Okta Verify, Ping Identity, PingID, YubiKeyTwo alternatives
Cisco Duo, Ping IdentityOne alternative
YubiKeyFour alternatives
Microsoft Entra ID, Okta Verify, Ping Identity, YubiKeyPerplexity SonarCisco Duo, Microsoft Entra IDMicrosoft Entra IDChangedno first choiceCisco Duo, Microsoft Entra IDagainst: Okta Verifyno first choicenothing named
Three alternatives
Auth0, Silverfort, WorkOSThree alternatives
Cisco Duo, Okta Verify, Ping IdentityGrok 4.20Cisco DuoCisco DuoHeldCisco Duo, Okta Verifyagainst: Beyond Identity, HYPRMicrosoft Entra IDagainst: Okta Verify, YubiKeyCisco Duoagainst: Authy, Google Authenticator
Three alternatives
Microsoft Entra ID, Okta Verify, PingOne MFATwo alternatives
Microsoft Entra ID, Okta VerifyThree alternatives
Microsoft Entra ID, Ping Identity, RSA SecurIDOne alternative
Cisco DuoFour alternatives
Microsoft Entra ID, Okta Verify, Ping Identity, WorkOSMistral SmallMicrosoft Entra ID, Okta VerifyOkta VerifyChangedCisco Duoagainst: RSA SecurIDMicrosoft Entra ID, Okta Verifyno first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
Auth0, Cisco DuoTwo alternatives
Cisco Duo, Microsoft Entra IDSix alternatives
Microsoft Authenticator, Microsoft Entra ID, Okta Verify, Ping Identity, Thales SafeNet Trusted Access, YubiKeyTwo alternatives
Cisco Duo, RSA ID PlusDeepSeek V4 FlashAuth0, WorkOSagainst: Okta VerifyOkta VerifyChangedCisco Duo, Microsoft Entra ID, Okta VerifyMicrosoft Entra IDagainst: Okta Verifyno first choiceagainst: Cisco Duo, Microsoft Authenticator, Okta Verify, RSA SecurID
Five alternatives
Cisco Duo, Clerk, Descope, Microsoft Entra ID, YubiKeyThree alternatives
Cisco Duo, Microsoft Entra ID, YubiKeyTwo alternatives
Ping Identity, YubiKeyOne alternative
Cisco DuoSix alternatives
Cisco Duo, Microsoft Entra ID, Okta Verify, PingID, YubiEnterprise, YubiKeyLlama 4 Maverickno first choiceOkta VerifyChangedCisco DuoMicrosoft Entra ID, Okta Verifyno first choicenothing named
Four alternatives
HYPR, Microsoft Authenticator, RSA SecurID, YubiKeyQwen 3.7 FlashMicrosoft Entra ID, Okta VerifyCisco Duo, Okta VerifyChangedCisco Duo, Okta Verifyagainst: RSA SecurIDMicrosoft Entra IDagainst: Okta Verifyno first choiceagainst: Google Authenticator, Microsoft Authenticator
Four alternatives
Auth0, Feitian, Ping Identity, YubiKeyOne alternative
Microsoft Entra IDFour alternatives
HYPR, Microsoft Entra ID, Ping Identity, YubiKeyTwo alternatives
Cisco Duo, Ping IdentityKimi K2Cisco DuoCisco DuoHeldCisco DuoMicrosoft Entra IDagainst: Okta VerifyMicrosoft Entra ID, Okta Verifynothing named
Two alternatives
Microsoft Entra ID, Okta VerifyThree alternatives
Microsoft Entra ID, Okta Verify, Ping IdentityFive alternatives
Microsoft Authenticator, Okta Verify, Ping Identity, RSA SecurID, YubiKeyOne alternative
Cisco DuoTwo alternatives
Cisco Duo, Ping IdentityGLM 4.7 FlashXCisco Duo, Okta VerifyMicrosoft Entra IDChangedno first choiceCisco Duoagainst: Okta Verifyno first choiceagainst: Cisco Duo, Microsoft Authenticator, Okta Verify
Four alternatives
Auth0, Microsoft Entra External ID, Microsoft Entra ID, Ping IdentityTwo alternatives
Cisco Duo, Okta VerifyOne alternative
Microsoft Entra IDMiniMax M2.5Cisco DuoMicrosoft Entra IDChangedno first choiceCisco Duo, Microsoft Entra IDagainst: Okta Verifyno first choiceagainst: RSA SecurID
Two alternatives
Microsoft Entra ID, Okta VerifyThree alternatives
Cisco Duo, Okta Verify, RSA SecurIDBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Seventy-two rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 11:07 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 12:39 | yes | 3 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 11:50 | yes | 11 | 22 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 14:14 | yes | 20 | 6 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 10:31 | yes | 37 | 25 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 12:01 | yes | 7 | 8 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 12:13 | yes | 23 | 38 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 11:40 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 11:08 | no | 0 | 41 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 10:19 | yes | 10 | 22 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 12:09 | yes | 33 | 59 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 12:20 | yes | 20 | 40 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 09:57 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 12:43 | yes | 2 | 6 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 09:29 | yes | 8 | 18 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 12:32 | yes | 20 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 09:23 | yes | 34 | 15 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 14:03 | yes | 20 | 12 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 11:33 | yes | 17 | 20 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 10:05 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 12:59 | yes | 10 | 58 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 11:17 | yes | 14 | 55 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 13:48 | yes | 25 | 82 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 12:02 | no | 0 | 14 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 12:44 | yes | 14 | 12 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 10:58 | yes | 4 | 8 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 14:01 | yes | 20 | 31 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 12:33 | yes | 20 | 9 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 09:29 | yes | 31 | 18 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 10:03 | yes | 9 | 11 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 12:56 | yes | 18 | 23 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 09:25 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 12:44 | yes | 5 | 38 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 13:38 | yes | 14 | 42 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 10:49 | no | 0 | 84 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 09:30 | yes | 10 | 21 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 12:10 | yes | 33 | 31 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 13:50 | yes | 2 | 6 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 13:46 | yes | 19 | 24 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 11:02 | yes | 20 | 6 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 11:14 | yes | 24 | 12 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 13:47 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 10:05 | yes | 20 | 24 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 13:48 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 09:40 | yes | 5 | 37 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 12:11 | yes | 10 | 20 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 14:09 | yes | 28 | 56 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 13:09 | yes | 14 | 46 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 09:26 | yes | 19 | 11 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 12:03 | no | 0 | 10 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 10:54 | yes | 12 | 25 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 12:46 | yes | 20 | 9 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 13:55 | yes | 15 | 12 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 13:48 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 13:44 | yes | 26 | 28 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 10:43 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 12:10 | yes | 5 | 57 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 10:19 | yes | 15 | 60 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 13:48 | yes | 18 | 118 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 11:08 | no | 0 | 13 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 14:10 | yes | 18 | 14 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 11:33 | yes | 3 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 10:05 | yes | 15 | 25 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 09:36 | yes | 20 | 7 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 13:49 | yes | 23 | 11 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 12:55 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 13:56 | yes | 29 | 29 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 13:35 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 10:33 | yes | 10 | 44 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 11:27 | yes | 28 | 41 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 12:51 | yes | 27 | 180 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 12:23 | yes | 16 | 52 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
JumpCloud read as JumpCloud Protect
Microsoft read as Microsoft Entra ID
Okta read as Okta Verify
Okta (Adaptive MFA) read as Okta Verify
Okta Adaptive MFA read as Okta Verify
Okta Adaptive Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) read as Okta Verify
Okta Identity Cloud read as Okta Verify
Okta Workforce Identity read as Okta Verify
Okta Workforce Identity Cloud read as Okta Verify
Okta Workforce Identity with Adaptive MFA read as Okta Verify
OneLogin read as OneLogin MFA
Ping read as Ping Identity
RSA read as RSA SecurID
Thales read as Thales SafeNet Trusted Access
Unresolved, counted raw
AuthX
FIDO2 / WebAuthn security keys
FaceID
Inteca Managed Keycloak
PingOne MFA
Thales SafeNet
Touch ID
macOS Touch ID
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.