Candidate assessment for small business buyers
Asked as “pre-employment assessment platform”, and as “skills testing tool for hiring”, on behalf of a small B2B company. 50 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
68%
Clear leader
68TestGorilla14Canditech04EmployTest14others
68% of first choices, clear leader.
Since October 2026▼−8Since October 2026: 76% → 68%, −8 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.TestGorilla held the lead, −8 points on 76%, inside the 13-point floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
TestGorilla68%Clear leader▼−8Since October 2026: 76% → 68%, −8 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.This pageMid-marketTestGorilla51%Clear leader▼−1Since October 2026: 52% → 51%, −1 point. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.Standing →Enterprise
SHL41%Clear leader▲+21Since October 2026: 20% → 41%, +21 points. Past the 13-point floor: movement.Standing →
TestGorilla68%Clear leader▼−8Since October 2026: 76% → 68%, −8 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.This pageMid-marketTestGorilla51%Clear leader▼−1Since October 2026: 52% → 51%, −1 point. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.Standing →EnterpriseSHL41%Clear leader▲+21Since October 2026: 20% → 41%, +21 points. Past the 13-point floor: movement.Standing →The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a small B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01TestGorilla68%5%60endorsed leader▼−8Since October 2026: 76% → 68%, −8 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.76% → 68%
TestGorilla68%5%60endorsed leader▼−8Since October 2026: 76% → 68%, −8 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.76% → 68%02
Canditech14%4%23accepted challenger▲+12Since October 2026: 2% → 14%, +12 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.2% → 14%
Canditech14%4%23accepted challenger▲+12Since October 2026: 2% → 14%, +12 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.2% → 14%03
EmployTest4%0%17accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 6% → 4%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.6% → 4%
EmployTest4%0%17accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 6% → 4%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.6% → 4%04
Toggl Hire4%0%14accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 4% → 4%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.4% → 4%
Toggl Hire4%0%14accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 4% → 4%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.4% → 4%05
Codility2%12%17accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%
Codility2%12%17accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%06
Criteria Corp2%37%30criticized challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%
Criteria Corp2%37%30criticized challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%Show the five products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
11
HireVue0%80%10criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
HireVue0%80%10criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%10
Vervoe0%32%28criticized challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%
Vervoe0%32%28criticized challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%07
HackerRank0%7%27accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%
HackerRank0%7%27accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%08
Testlify0%7%15accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Testlify0%7%15accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%09
TestDome0%0%10accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%
TestDome0%0%10accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
Head to headHead-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not small business.
All twenty-one head-to-head pages: the top seven products, each against each
TestGorilla vs HackerRankTestGorilla vs CodeSignalTestGorilla vs HarverCriteria Corp vs CodilityCriteria Corp vs EmployTestCriteria Corp vs HackerRankCriteria Corp vs CodeSignalCriteria Corp vs HarverCodility vs EmployTestCodility vs HackerRankCodility vs CodeSignalCodility vs HarverEmployTest vs HackerRankEmployTest vs CodeSignalEmployTest vs HarverHackerRank vs CodeSignalHackerRank vs HarverCodeSignal vs Harver
One product takes 68% of first choices here, so the chart would put ten markers in one corner and one at the far edge. The two measurements it plots are columns in the standing above: share, and the negative label rate. Three products carry a negative rate above 25% in this category.
What they warned about
Nine of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, Mistral Small, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Criteria Corp37%
11 of 30 labels negative · 7 of 14 models · 4 hard negative
“Criteria Corp is shown at 42% negative, 14 of 33 labels negative · 9 of 14 models · 7 hard negative” Muse Glimmer 30B, negative prompt
Vervoe32%
9 of 28 labels negative · 7 of 14 models · 3 hard negative
“Vendors to avoid on a tight budget ... Criteria Corp, Vervoe and HireVue publish no price at all” Muse Glimmer 30B, budget prompt
HireVue80%
8 of 10 labels negative · 6 of 14 models · 3 hard negative
“This is one of the most controversial assessment platforms on the market... AI bias concerns” DeepSeek V4 Flash, negative prompt
SHL86%
6 of 7 labels negative · 4 of 14 models · 3 hard negative
“high-end HR suites like Korn Ferry or SHL if you don’t have a dedicated HR analyst” Qwen 3.7 Flash, negative prompt
What they cite
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
72 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 814 links across 190 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 5 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
44 answers · 83 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Lead Change Group36 answers · 56 citations · 10 models
33 answers · 43 citations · 10 models
32 answers · 46 citations · 10 models
vendor site · G225 answers · 43 citations · 9 models
vendor site · TestGorilla25 answers · 39 citations · 10 models
22 answers · 22 citations · 9 models
22 answers · 22 citations · 10 models
18 answers · 21 citations · 9 models
vendor site · FirstHR16 answers · 19 citations · 9 models
vendor site · TestTrick13 answers · 14 citations · 7 models
vendor site · Criteria Corp12 answers · 16 citations · 8 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
34 answers · 10 models
25 answers · 11 models
23 answers · 9 models
21 answers · 9 models
19 answers · 9 models
17 answers · 9 models
14 answers · 5 models
13 answers · 9 models
13 answers · 10 models
12 answers · 7 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “assessment platforms”, “best pre-employment assessment platform”, “pre-employment assessment platform”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TestGorilla testgorilla.com | 68% | 254 | 4,400 | 170 | 58,548 | $462 | 76 | |
| Canditech canditech.io | 14% | 34 | 390 | 13 | 4,346 | 22 | ||
| EmployTest employtest.com | 4% | 33 | 170 | 0 | 4,422 | 3 | ||
| Toggl toggl.com Toggl Hire 4% | 4% | 19 | 70 | 1 | 257,259 company | 30 | ||
| Codility codility.com | 2% | 235 | 3,600 | 114 | 3,042 | $108 | 3 | |
| Criteria criteriacorp.com Criteria Corp 2% | 2% | 102 | 2,400 | 39 | 103,671 company | $6,427 | 63 | 3 |
| DriveTest® by SalesDrive | 2% | |||||||
| Testlify B2B Sales Test | 2% | |||||||
| Topaz | 2% | |||||||
| HackerRank hackerrank.com | 0% | 278 | 33,100 | 1,116 | 58,699 | 22 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 18 sites; 1 of them are among the sites the models cited here (criteriacorp.com). The first result for “assessment platforms” is testportal.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best pre-employment assessment platform for a small B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which skills testing tool for hiring would you recommend to a small business that sells to other businesses?”Comparative“What are the top assessment platforms for a small team and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best pre-employment assessment platform for a small company with a tight budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 30 person company evaluating a pre-employment assessment platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which assessment platforms should a small business avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5no first choiceTestGorillaChangedno first choiceTestGorillano first choicenothing named
Three alternatives
TestTrick, Vervoe, XobinFour alternatives
DevSkiller, Replit Teams Pro, TeamDynamics, TestGorillaThree alternatives
EmployTest, FlexiQuiz, TestTrickGPT-5.4 miniTestGorillaTestGorillaHeldTestGorillaTestGorillano first choiceagainst: Testlify
Six alternatives
Canditech, CodeSignal, Criteria Corp, HackerRank, Vervoe, WonderlicThree alternatives
Canditech, HackerRank, TestDomeFive alternatives
HiPeople, Indeed Hiring Platform, Testlify, The Predictive Index, WorkableOne alternative
CanditechGemini 3.5 FlashTestGorillaagainst: Mercer | Mettl, SHLTestGorillaHeldTestGorilla, Toggl Hireagainst: Culture Amp, LatticeTestGorillaTestGorillaagainst: DISC, Enneagram, Korn Ferry Hay Group, Myers-Briggs Type Indicator, Oracle Taleo, SAP SuccessFactors, SHL
Five alternatives
Coderbyte, Testlify, The Predictive Index, Truffle, VervoeThree alternatives
Criteria Corp, Toggl Hire, VervoeSeven alternatives
15Five, Canditech, CodeSignal, PerformYard, Small Improvements, Teamflect, VervoeFour alternatives
Assessing AI, HR Avatar, JobCannon, Toggl HireFour alternatives
Criteria Corp, The Predictive Index, Toggl Hire, eSkillPerplexity SonarTestGorillaagainst: Criteria Corp, Hogan AssessmentsTestGorillaHeldagainst: Vervoeno first choiceagainst: Google Forms, The Predictive IndexTestGorillano first choiceagainst: SHL
Four alternatives
Canditech, Codility, EmployTest, HackerRankTwo alternatives
TestDome, eSkillFour alternatives
TestDome, TestGorilla, TestTrick, XobinOne alternative
TestDomeGrok 4.20TestGorillaagainst: Codility, HackerRankTestGorillaHeldagainst: Criteria Corp, eSkillTestGorillaagainst: The Predictive Index, eSkillCanditechno first choiceagainst: Criteria Corp, Google Forms, Harver, Qualtrics, SHL, SurveyMonkey, TestGorilla, Typeform, Vervoe
Four alternatives
Canditech, Testlify, Toggl Hire, VervoeTwo alternatives
Vervoe, iMochaFive alternatives
AssessTEAM, Brilliant Assessments, Criteria Corp, HackerRank, LatticeFour alternatives
TestDome, TestGorilla, Testlify, Toggl HireFive alternatives
Codility, Criteria Corp, HackerRank, Harver, TestGorillaMistral SmallCanditech, TestGorillaTestGorillaChangedBrilliant Assessments, SynapTestGorillano first choiceagainst: Mercer | Mettl, RiskLens, SAFE Security, Wonderlic
Three alternatives
Codility, HackerRank, TestDomeTwo alternatives
Criteria Corp, HackerRankFour alternatives
Connecteam, EasyHire.me, QuickQuiz, SimplifiedIQFour alternatives
Canditech, Criteria Corp, EmployTest, PrehireformsDeepSeek V4 FlashTestGorillaTestGorillaHeldTestGorillaagainst: ProProfsCanditech, Toggl HireCanditech, Criteria Corp, TestGorillaagainst: Criteria Corp, HireVue, TestGorilla, The Predictive Index, Vervoe
Four alternatives
Canditech, Criteria Corp, Testlify, VervoeTwo alternatives
Criteria Corp, WizehireFour alternatives
Codility, Criteria Corp, HackerRank, SynapThree alternatives
Ducknowl, EmployTest, TestGorillaOne alternative
HackerRankLlama 4 MaverickCodilityno first choiceChangedno first choiceEmployTestno first choiceagainst: Axio, RiskLens, SAFE Security
Three alternatives
Canditech, EmployTest, HackerRankThree alternatives
TestDome, TestGorilla, WeCPQwen 3.7 FlashTopazagainst: SHL, WorkdayTestGorillaChangedTestGorillaagainst: Criteria CorpTestGorillano first choiceagainst: Canditech, HireVue, Korn Ferry, RiskLens, SAFE Security, SHL, The Predictive Index, Vervoe
Four alternatives
Aptitude.ai, Criteria Connect, Great Jobs, TestDomeTwo alternatives
Socratic, VervoeSix alternatives
AssessTEAM, Canditech, Codility, HackerRank, Lattice, PerformYardFour alternatives
Codility, HackerRank, Toggl Hire, VervoeKimi K2TestGorillaagainst: Criteria Corp, VervoeTestGorillaHeldagainst: VervoeTestGorillaagainst: Culture Amp, LatticeTestGorillaagainst: Criteria Corp, HireVue, Vervoe, WonderlicCanditechagainst: HireVue
Two alternatives
Testlify, Toggl HireOne alternative
EmployTestFive alternatives
15Five, AssessTEAM, FeedbackPulse, Spidergap, VervoeThree alternatives
Canditech, EmployTest, HireValidTwo alternatives
Ducknowl, WizehireGLM 4.7 FlashXTestGorillaTestGorillaHeldagainst: Codility, Criteria Corp, HackerRank, eSkillBrilliant AssessmentsTestGorillano first choiceagainst: AhaSlides, AssessTEAM, Buzz, Criteria Corp, EcoVadis, HireVue, Mercer | Mettl, Mindbody, Pointerpro, TestGorilla, Truffle, Unstop, Vervoe, iSpring Suite
Three alternatives
Codility, Testlify, VervoeNine alternatives
Cloud Assess, Kahoot!, Small Improvements, Synap, Teamflect, ThriveSparrow, WeCP, eSkill, iSpring SuiteTwo alternatives
EmployTest, TestDomeMiniMax M2.5TestGorillaagainst: HireVueTestGorillaHeldBrilliant Assessments, TestGorilla, Truffleagainst: HireVueTestGorilla, Toggl Hireno first choiceagainst: Myers-Briggs Type Indicator
Two alternatives
Canditech, Criteria CorpThree alternatives
Codility, EmployTest, HackerRankFive alternatives
Criteria Corp, Prevue HR, TeamDynamics, The Predictive Index, VervoeTwo alternatives
Canditech, EmployTestGPT-6 LunaTestGorillaTestGorillaHeldTestGorillaTestGorillano first choiceagainst: Criteria Corporation's Emotify
One alternative
Criteria CorpThree alternatives
Criteria Corp, HackerRank, VervoeOne alternative
TestlifyMuse Glimmer 30BCanditech, EmployTestDriveTest® by SalesDrive, Testlify B2B Sales TestChangedTestGorillaCanditechagainst: Criteria Corp, HireVue, Vervoeno first choiceagainst: Criteria Corp, Lattice, Workleap Officevibe
Six alternatives
Codility, Criteria Corp, HackerRank, TestGorilla, Testlify, Toggl HireTwo alternatives
EmployTest, TestGorillaSix alternatives
Codility, HackerRank, TestDome, Testlify, Toggl Hire, VervoeFour alternatives
Ducknowl, EmployTest, TestGorilla, WizehireBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 09:35 | no | 0 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 08:36 | yes | 2 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 10:06 | yes | 13 | 23 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 12:57 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:14 | yes | 11 | 30 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 11:41 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 11:10 | yes | 22 | 26 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 12:30 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 12:46 | no | 0 | 28 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 11:19 | yes | 13 | 32 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 12:21 | yes | 23 | 56 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 09:47 | yes | 14 | 30 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 10:44 | yes | 3 | 17 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 12:09 | yes | 9 | 18 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 08:51 | yes | 10 | 7 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 10:07 | yes | 3 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 09:12 | no | 0 | 14 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 09:50 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:28 | yes | 10 | 31 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 10:01 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 11:08 | yes | 23 | 18 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 09:31 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 11:41 | no | 0 | 27 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 11:25 | yes | 19 | 35 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 12:36 | yes | 19 | 72 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 11:27 | yes | 5 | 30 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 10:45 | yes | 2 | 10 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 10:36 | yes | 15 | 17 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 10:41 | yes | 9 | 9 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 10:13 | yes | 3 | 6 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 10:42 | yes | 12 | 19 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 12:40 | yes | 10 | 5 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:04 | yes | 10 | 44 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 11:43 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 12:06 | yes | 24 | 33 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 11:46 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 10:32 | yes | 15 | 57 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 11:03 | yes | 15 | 71 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 11:35 | yes | 14 | 40 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 10:59 | yes | 17 | 95 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 11:38 | yes | 5 | 21 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 11:00 | yes | 14 | 27 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 12:00 | yes | 10 | 8 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 10:09 | yes | 2 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 10:37 | yes | 7 | 15 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 10:39 | yes | 10 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:05 | yes | 18 | 41 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 11:49 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 12:15 | yes | 23 | 26 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 11:17 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 08:58 | yes | 5 | 20 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 11:02 | yes | 14 | 45 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 11:08 | yes | 23 | 53 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 11:18 | yes | 10 | 22 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 10:19 | yes | 3 | 15 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 10:34 | yes | 12 | 17 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 08:49 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 10:43 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 11:23 | no | 0 | 18 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 11:16 | yes | 10 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:10 | yes | 5 | 35 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 11:41 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 09:30 | yes | 24 | 32 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 12:17 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 11:55 | no | 0 | 28 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 10:40 | yes | 9 | 30 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 10:08 | yes | 15 | 47 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 08:50 | no | 0 | 82 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 12:22 | yes | 5 | 18 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 12:19 | yes | 13 | 23 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 09:59 | yes | 17 | 8 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 10:16 | yes | 4 | 7 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 11:38 | no | 0 | 19 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 12:24 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:12 | yes | 20 | 37 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 11:25 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 12:09 | yes | 25 | 33 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 09:05 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 12:23 | yes | 5 | 17 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 11:18 | yes | 25 | 38 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 12:47 | yes | 22 | 83 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 11:42 | no | 0 | 17 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 11:57 | yes | 5 | 22 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 11:09 | yes | 24 | 38 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Criteria read as Criteria Corp
Criteria (HireSelect) read as Criteria Corp
Criteria (formerly Criteria Corp) read as Criteria Corp
Hogan read as Hogan Assessments
Myers-Briggs read as Myers-Briggs Type Indicator
Unresolved, counted raw
Aptitude.ai
Assessing AI
Axio
Belbin
Buzz
Criteria Connect (formerly CriteriaCorp)
Criteria Corporation's Emotify
Criterion
DriveTest® by SalesDrive
FairCRQ
Great Jobs
HR Avatar
HireValid
Indeed Assessments
Korn Ferry Hay Group
MBTIonline Teams
Prehireforms
SharpAssessment
Socratic
TestGorilla Core
Testlify B2B Sales Test
The Enneagram
Topaz
UpGuard
Working Genius
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.