Index › HR › Performance and talent management › Goals and OKRs › Enterprise · September 2026 Edition
Goals and OKRs for enterprise buyers
Asked as “OKR software”, and as “goal management platform”, on behalf of an enterprise B2B company. 51 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, twelve models each.
Standing · first-choice share
33%
Contested · WorkBoard 25%
33Betterworks25WorkBoard14Profit.co27others
33% of first choices, contested.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all twelve models, for an enterprise B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Show the six products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
Head to headHead-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not enterprise.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each
Tability vs PerdooTability vs Profit.coTability vs LeapsomeTability vs 15FiveLattice vs MooncampLattice vs OKRs ToolLattice vs PerdooLattice vs Profit.coLattice vs LeapsomeLattice vs 15FiveMooncamp vs OKRs ToolMooncamp vs PerdooMooncamp vs Profit.coMooncamp vs LeapsomeMooncamp vs 15FiveOKRs Tool vs PerdooOKRs Tool vs Profit.coOKRs Tool vs LeapsomeOKRs Tool vs 15FivePerdoo vs Profit.coPerdoo vs LeapsomePerdoo vs 15FiveProfit.co vs LeapsomeProfit.co vs 15FiveLeapsome vs 15Five
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative50%
Key
01Betterworks33%
Betterworks33%02WorkBoard25%
WorkBoard25%03Profit.co14%
Profit.co14%04Tability6%
Tability6%05Mooncamp6%
Mooncamp6%06Quantive4%
Quantive4%07OKRs Tool4%
OKRs Tool4%08Lattice2%
Lattice2%09Perdoo0%
Perdoo0%10Cascade Strategy0%
Cascade Strategy0%1115Five0%
15Five0%12Asana0%
Asana0%13Weekdone0%
Weekdone0%14Microsoft Viva Goals0%
Microsoft Viva Goals0%What they warned about
Two of twelve models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.20, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX and MiniMax M2.5 changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Lattice22%
9 of 40 labels negative · 7 of 12 models · 3 hard negative
“HR-Performance Hybrids (e.g., Lattice, Betterworks) ... Why Avoid It: OKRs require psychological safety” GLM 4.7 FlashX, negative prompt
OKRs Tool47%
7 of 15 labels negative · 6 of 12 models · 3 hard negative
“caps around 200 users and publishes no SOC 2 certification... this is a hard no” DeepSeek V4 Flash, negative prompt
Betterworks13%
7 of 54 labels negative · 6 of 12 models · 2 hard negative
“Tools to Avoid for "Predictable Cost" at Scale ... Betterworks & Gtmhub: ... custom-only pricing models” Qwen 3.7 Flash, budget prompt
WorkBoard17%
8 of 48 labels negative · 6 of 12 models · 1 hard negative
“Dated or Cluttered UI Platforms (e.g., Workboard, Perdoo) ... "Dated UI" (Workboard)” GLM 4.7 FlashX, negative prompt
What they cite
Twelve of the twelve models returned a source list in this edition: four return the pages they cited and eight the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
70 of 72 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 12 of 12 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 1038 links across 181 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page.
vendor site · Tability56 answers · 128 citations · 11 models
vendor site · OKRs Tool51 answers · 98 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Profit.co43 answers · 80 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Mooncamp41 answers · 75 citations · 11 models
vendor site · WorkBoard30 answers · 47 citations · 9 models
29 answers · 43 citations · 9 models
22 answers · 22 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Workpath19 answers · 21 citations · 7 models
vendor site · Betterworks18 answers · 32 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Synergita17 answers · 19 citations · 10 models
17 answers · 18 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Teamflect17 answers · 18 citations · 9 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
40 answers · 11 models
39 answers · 11 models
31 answers · 11 models
26 answers · 9 models
22 answers · 10 models
22 answers · 9 models
19 answers · 9 models
18 answers · 8 models
16 answers · 6 models
14 answers · 9 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best okr software”, “okr software”, “okr tools”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Betterworks betterworks.com | 33% | 220 | 3,600 | 21 | 12,379 | 0 | ||
| WorkBoard workboard.com | 25% | 104 | 1,900 | 19 | 66,805 | $56 | 15 | |
| Profit.co profit.co | 14% | 129 | 590 | 0 | 28,000 | 26 | ||
| Tability tability.io | 6% | 118 | 320 | 14 | 39,804 | 3 | ||
| Mooncamp mooncamp.com | 6% | 68 | 720 | 0 | 58,678 | 1 | ||
| Quantive quantive.com | 4% | 61 | 49,500 | 6 | ||||
| OKRs Tool okrstool.com | 4% | 58 | 260 | 20 | 6,738 | 1 | 1 | |
| Lattice lattice.com | 2% | 625 | 90,500 | 13,900 | 122,123 | $1,328 | 120 | 7 |
| SmartSuite | 2% | |||||||
| Synergita OKR synergita.com | 2% | 24 | 6,041 | 9 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 12 sites; 6 of them are among the sites the models cited here (mooncamp.com, okrstool.com, peoplemanagingpeople.com, synergita.com, tability.io, teamflect.com). The first result for “best okr software” is okrstool.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best OKR software for an enterprise B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which goal management platform would you recommend to a large B2B company with thousands of employees?”Comparative“What are the top enterprise-grade OKR tools and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best OKR software for a large company that needs predictable total cost across thousands of users?”Scale-constrained“We are a 5,000 person company with SSO, SOC 2 and procurement review requirements evaluating a OKR software. What should we look at?”Negative“Which OKR tools should a large enterprise avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5WorkBoardBetterworksChangedno first choiceMooncampagainst: SimpleOKRno first choicenothing named
Three alternatives
Betterworks, Profit.co, Synergita OKRThree alternatives
Lattice, WorkBoard, WrikeTwo alternatives
Tability, WorkBoardGPT-5.4 miniWorkBoardWorkBoardHeldWorkBoardagainst: WeekdoneBetterworksno first choicenothing named
One alternative
BetterworksThree alternatives
Lattice, Leapsome, Profit.coThree alternatives
Betterworks, Perdoo, QuantiveOne alternative
WorkBoardGemini 3.5 FlashWorkBoardWorkBoardHeldagainst: Microsoft Viva GoalsWorkBoardOboard, WorkBoardagainst: Microsoft Viva GoalsWorkBoardagainst: Asana, Atlassian Goals, Clarity PPM, Microsoft Viva Goals, Monday.com, OKRs Tool, Perdoo, Planview, Quantive, Trello, WorkBoard
Four alternatives
Betterworks, Microsoft Viva Goals, Profit.co, TabilityFour alternatives
Betterworks, Cascade Strategy, Profit.co, TeamflectSix alternatives
Atlassian Goals, Betterworks, Jira Align, Mooncamp, Profit.co, TabilityFour alternatives
Asana, ClickUp, OKR for Jira, Profit.coFour alternatives
Mooncamp, Profit.co, Tability, TeamflectPerplexity SonarWorkBoardBetterworksChangedno first choiceBetterworksagainst: OKRs Toolno first choiceagainst: Asana, ClickUp, Microsoft Viva Goals
Four alternatives
Betterworks, Lattice, Mooncamp, Profit.coThree alternatives
Lattice, Quantive, WorkBoardTwo alternatives
Cascade Strategy, MooncampGrok 4.20Profit.coWorkBoardChangedWorkBoardagainst: Microsoft Viva Goals, QuantiveSmartSuiteagainst: Betterworks, Mooncamp, Synergita OKR, WorkBoardBetterworksagainst: 15Five, Asana, Betterworks, Excel, Google Sheets, Jira, Lattice, OKRs Tool, Oboard, Teamflect, Trello, Weekdone, WorkBoard
Four alternatives
Betterworks, Lattice, Perdoo, WorkBoardThree alternatives
Betterworks, Lattice, Workday GoalsFour alternatives
Aha! Roadmaps, Lattice, Perdoo, Profit.coTwo alternatives
OKRs Tool, SimpleOKRFive alternatives
Cascade Strategy, Lattice, Profit.co, Tability, WorkBoardMistral SmallTabilityBetterworksChangedTabilityagainst: QuantiveMooncampno first choiceagainst: 15Five, Lattice, OKRs Tool
Five alternatives
Betterworks, Lattice, Mooncamp, Profit.co, QuantiveTwo alternatives
Cascade Strategy, WorkBoardTwo alternatives
Perdoo, Profit.coTwo alternatives
Synergita OKR, WorkBoardDeepSeek V4 FlashProfit.coBetterworksChangedWorkBoardagainst: Microsoft Viva GoalsOKRs Toolagainst: Cascade Strategy, Jira Align, Lattice, Leapsome, Profit.coBetterworksagainst: Jira Align, Tabilityagainst: Atlassian Goals, Betterworks, Microsoft Viva Goals, OKRs Tool, Perdoo, Profit.co, Quantive, Weekdone, WorkBoard
Five alternatives
Asana, Betterworks, Jira Align, Quantive, WorkBoardFive alternatives
15Five, Lattice, Microsoft Viva Goals, Profit.co, WorkBoardFour alternatives
Betterworks, Lattice, Perdoo, Profit.coTwo alternatives
Betterworks, WorkBoardFive alternatives
15Five, Lattice, Perdoo, Profit.co, WorkBoardLlama 4 MaverickTabilityBetterworks, QuantiveChangedno first choiceSynergita OKRagainst: WorkBoardBetterworks, Profit.conothing named
One alternative
BetterworksTwo alternatives
Betterworks, Profit.coThree alternatives
Lattice, OKRs Tool, TabilityQwen 3.7 FlashBetterworksBetterworks, Quantive, WorkBoardChangedagainst: LatticeWorkBoardagainst: Asana, Monday.comMooncampagainst: Asana, Betterworks, Monday.com, Quantive, SmartsheetBetterworks, Profit.co, WorkBoardagainst: Trello, Weekdoneagainst: Airtable, Asana, Excel/Google Sheets, Jira, Perdoo, Trello, Weekdone
Three alternatives
Mooncamp, Quantive, TabilityFive alternatives
Betterworks, Lattice, OnStrategy, Perdoo, Profit.coTwo alternatives
Weekdone, WorkBoardKimi K2Profit.coBetterworksChangedagainst: LatticeProfit.coagainst: Microsoft Viva GoalsBetterworksagainst: 15Five, Cascade Strategy, Jira Align, Lattice, Mooncamp, OKRs Tool, Rhythms, WorkBoardProfit.co, WorkBoardagainst: 15Five, OKRs Toolagainst: 15Five, Betterworks, Lattice, Profit.co, Weekdone
Two alternatives
Lattice, QuantiveOne alternative
WorkBoardFive alternatives
Betterworks, Perdoo, Teamflect, WorkBoard, WorkpathOne alternative
Profit.coTwo alternatives
Betterworks, LatticeGLM 4.7 FlashXWorkBoardBetterworksChangedProfit.coTabilityagainst: WorkBoardno first choiceagainst: Betterworks, Excel, Lattice, Notion, Perdoo, Profit.co, WorkBoard
Four alternatives
Betterworks, Lattice, Perdoo, Profit.coSix alternatives
Lattice, Microsoft Viva Goals, Mooncamp, Profit.co, Quantive, WorkBoardFive alternatives
15Five, Betterworks, Cascade Strategy, Lattice, PerdooFour alternatives
Betterworks, Mooncamp, Perdoo, Profit.coMiniMax M2.5Lattice, Profit.coBetterworksChangedProfit.coOKRs Toolno first choiceagainst: 15Five, Betterworks, Lattice, Leapsome, Profit.co, Synergita OKR
Three alternatives
Betterworks, Tability, WorkBoardOne alternative
LatticeFour alternatives
Lattice, Microsoft Viva Goals, Perdoo, QuantiveTwo alternatives
Betterworks, LatticeBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Seventy-two rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 19:14 | yes | 9 | 8 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 20:55 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 21:57 | yes | 16 | 52 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 18:15 | yes | 20 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 19:23 | yes | 15 | 11 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 21:24 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-09-17 19:52 | yes | 27 | 60 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 17:53 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 19:48 | yes | 9 | 35 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 19:07 | yes | 9 | 23 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 19:21 | yes | 24 | 126 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 21:08 | yes | 9 | 23 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 21:27 | yes | 9 | 7 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 18:20 | yes | 4 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 19:25 | yes | 17 | 22 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 18:15 | yes | 20 | 6 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 20:38 | yes | 47 | 19 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 20:50 | yes | 5 | 10 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 20:37 | yes | 15 | 13 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 19:14 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 21:07 | yes | 11 | 39 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 19:35 | yes | 19 | 27 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 18:22 | yes | 13 | 48 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 18:53 | yes | 16 | 34 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 19:00 | yes | 9 | 9 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 17:56 | yes | 5 | 8 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 21:54 | yes | 22 | 45 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 18:23 | yes | 20 | 13 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 18:20 | yes | 27 | 14 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 21:33 | yes | 23 | 14 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 19:23 | yes | 15 | 24 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 18:59 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 21:22 | yes | 5 | 25 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 18:12 | yes | 22 | 39 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 20:41 | yes | 24 | 130 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 21:41 | yes | 23 | 29 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 20:55 | yes | 9 | 8 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 21:40 | yes | 2 | 7 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 18:21 | yes | 20 | 29 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 21:16 | yes | 20 | 9 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 21:42 | yes | 32 | 20 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 19:37 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 21:10 | yes | 19 | 29 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 20:36 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 21:38 | yes | 9 | 33 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 19:04 | yes | 22 | 87 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 19:29 | yes | 20 | 96 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 18:07 | yes | 18 | 71 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 18:03 | yes | 18 | 11 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 21:04 | no | 0 | 11 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 19:44 | yes | 9 | 23 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 18:29 | yes | 20 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 21:21 | yes | 17 | 13 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 21:08 | no | 0 | 11 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-09-17 18:04 | yes | 20 | 109 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 19:16 | yes | 6 | 5 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 21:03 | yes | 10 | 24 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 18:08 | yes | 26 | 65 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 18:41 | yes | 9 | 133 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 21:41 | yes | 5 | 24 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 19:57 | yes | 17 | 9 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 18:16 | yes | 3 | 6 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 22:03 | yes | 15 | 54 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 18:02 | yes | 20 | 7 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 19:59 | yes | 33 | 17 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 19:58 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 18:55 | yes | 25 | 36 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 21:05 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 19:00 | yes | 10 | 50 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 20:50 | yes | 22 | 43 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 19:09 | yes | 23 | 114 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 19:43 | yes | 5 | 22 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Ally.io read as Microsoft Viva Goals
Ally.io (Microsoft Viva Goals) read as Microsoft Viva Goals
Ally.io (now part of Microsoft Viva) read as Microsoft Viva Goals
Cascade read as Cascade Strategy
Gtmhub read as Quantive
Notion Templates read as Notion
Synergita read as Synergita OKR
Unresolved, counted raw
Aha! Roadmaps (Enterprise+)
Clarity PPM
Expand
OKR for Jira (by Appfire)
SmartSuite
Workday Goals
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.