Product analytics for enterprise buyers
Asked as “product analytics platform”, and as “product analytics tool”, on behalf of an enterprise B2B company. 61 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
56%
Clear leader
56Amplitude18Pendo13Mixpanel13others
56% of first choices, clear leader.
Since September 2026▲+4Since September 2026: 53% → 57%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Amplitude held the lead, +4 points on 53%, inside the 11-point floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
PostHog50%Clear leader▲+3Since September 2026: 43% → 46%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →Mid-market
Amplitude34%Contested▲+3Since September 2026: 32% → 35%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →EnterpriseAmplitude56%Clear leader▲+4Since September 2026: 53% → 57%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.This page
PostHog50%Clear leader▲+3Since September 2026: 43% → 46%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →Mid-marketAmplitude34%Contested▲+3Since September 2026: 32% → 35%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →EnterpriseAmplitude56%Clear leader▲+4Since September 2026: 53% → 57%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.This pageThe standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for an enterprise B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
01Amplitude56%19%78endorsed leader▲+4Since September 2026: 53% → 57%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.53% → 57%
Amplitude56%19%78endorsed leader▲+4Since September 2026: 53% → 57%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.53% → 57%02
Pendo18%11%63accepted challenger▼−14Since September 2026: 31% → 17%, −14 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.31% → 17%
Pendo18%11%63accepted challenger▼−14Since September 2026: 31% → 17%, −14 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.31% → 17%03
Mixpanel13%25%72criticized challenger▲+5Since September 2026: 8% → 13%, +5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.8% → 13%
Mixpanel13%25%72criticized challenger▲+5Since September 2026: 8% → 13%, +5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.8% → 13%04
Gainsight PX5%0%13accepted challenger▲+4Since September 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 4%
Gainsight PX5%0%13accepted challenger▲+4Since September 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 4%05PostHog2%17%36accepted challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 2%
PostHog2%17%36accepted challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 2%Show the six products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
11
Google Analytics 4 Lab in the set0%83%12criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
Google Analytics 4 Lab in the set0%83%12criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%10
Adobe Analytics0%50%16criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
Adobe Analytics0%50%16criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%09
Heap0%38%40criticized challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 0%
Heap0%38%40criticized challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 0%06
Contentsquare0%11%18accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
Contentsquare0%11%18accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%07
Fullstory0%11%18accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
Fullstory0%11%18accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%08
Quantum Metric0%0%10accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
Quantum Metric0%0%10accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
Google Analytics 4 is made by Google, whose model Gemini 3.5 Flash is in the set. On the four share prompts that model made it the first choice zero times of 4; the other thirteen models zero times of 52. Lab treatment is defined on the method page; the row is marked, not excluded.
Head to headHead-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not enterprise.
All fifteen head-to-head pages: the top six products, each against each
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
0102030405060708091011Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative70%
Key
01Amplitude56%
Amplitude56%02Pendo18%
Pendo18%03Mixpanel13%
Mixpanel13%04Gainsight PX5%
Gainsight PX5%05PostHog2%
PostHog2%06Contentsquare0%
Contentsquare0%07Fullstory0%
Fullstory0%08Quantum Metric0%
Quantum Metric0%09Heap0%
Heap0%10Adobe Analytics0%
Adobe Analytics0%11Google Analytics 40%
Google Analytics 40%What they warned about
Five of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Grok 4.20, Mistral Small, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, MiniMax M2.5 and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Amplitude19%
15 of 78 labels negative · 13 of 14 models
“it's described as having a steep learning curve and can feel very complex, with mentions of data not always matching internal databases and potentially getting expensive as usage grows.” Claude Haiku 4.5, negative prompt
Mixpanel25%
18 of 72 labels negative · 12 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“Platforms to Avoid or Use with Caution ... Mixpanel ... Best suited for: Series A–B / mid-market, not enterprise-scale” GLM 4.7 FlashX, negative prompt
Heap38%
15 of 40 labels negative · 10 of 14 models · 3 hard negative
“Avoid Heap unless you have strong data governance (auto-capture causes unpredictable overages)” Kimi K2, budget prompt
Google Analytics 483%
10 of 12 labels negative · 9 of 14 models · 7 hard negative
“the event model was retrofitted onto a session-first architecture, making product-level behavioral analysis awkward compared to purpose-built tools, with limited cohort analysis” Claude Haiku 4.5, negative prompt
What they cite
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
78 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 1146 links across 256 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 19 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
vendor site · Amplitude58 answers · 97 citations · 13 models
vendor site · Pendo42 answers · 53 citations · 13 models
vendor site · Gainsight40 answers · 47 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Mixpanel35 answers · 48 citations · 12 models
35 answers · 35 citations · 10 models
vendor site · checkthat.ai34 answers · 47 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Guideflow32 answers · 36 citations · 11 models
vendor site · CleverX27 answers · 34 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Userpilot24 answers · 30 citations · 10 models
vendor site · LinkedIn23 answers · 26 citations · 9 models
22 answers · 33 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Fullstory22 answers · 25 citations · 10 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
41 answers · 11 models
40 answers · 11 models
35 answers · 10 models
29 answers · 11 models
27 answers · 10 models
27 answers · 11 models
23 answers · 9 models
19 answers · 10 models
16 answers · 9 models
15 answers · 7 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best product analytics platform”, “product analytics platform”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amplitude amplitude.com | 56% | 418 | 74,000 | 5,691 | 373,273 | $207 | 27 | 2 |
| Pendo pendo.io | 18% | 409 | 12,100 | 761 | 19,185 | $3,609 | 93 | |
| Mixpanel mixpanel.com | 13% | 467 | 12,100 | 458 | 20,284 | $458 | 11 | |
| Gainsight gainsight.com Gainsight PX 5%, Gainsight 2% | 7% | 27 | 8,100 | 426 | 59,569 | 58 | 9 | |
| PostHog posthog.com | 2% | 420 | 33,100 | 271 | 25,936 | 120 | ||
| OpenPanel openpanel.dev | 2% | 2 | ||||||
| Optimizely Warehouse-Native Analytics | 2% | |||||||
| Qrvey qrvey.com | 2% | 6 | 260 | 0 | 1,992 | $256 | 7 | |
| Contentsquare contentsquare.com | 0% | 184 | 2,900 | 101 | 149,925 | 86 | ||
| Fullstory fullstory.com | 0% | 217 | 5,400 | 159 | 141,869 | $348 | 14 | 8 |
Google's top ten for the two searches hold 16 sites; 4 of them are among the sites the models cited here (amplitude.com, fullstory.com, gainsight.com, userpilot.com). The first result for “best product analytics platform” is domo.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best product analytics platform for an enterprise B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which product analytics tool would you recommend to a large B2B company with thousands of employees?”Comparative“What are the top enterprise-grade product analytics platforms and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best product analytics platform for a large company that needs predictable total cost across thousands of users?”Scale-constrained“We are a 5,000 person company with SSO, SOC 2 and procurement review requirements evaluating a product analytics platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which product analytics platforms should a large enterprise avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5AmplitudeAmplitude, MixpanelChangedagainst: Google Analytics 4AmplitudeAmplitudeno first choiceagainst: Adobe Analytics, Amplitude, Google Analytics 4, Mixpanel
Two alternatives
Gainsight PX, PendoThree alternatives
Heap, Matomo, PendoThree alternatives
Heap, Mixpanel, PendoTwo alternatives
GrowthBook, MixpanelGPT-5.4 miniAmplitudeAmplitudeHeldAmplitude, Mixpanelagainst: Adobe Product Analytics / Adobe Analytics ecosystemAmplitudeagainst: Mixpanel, Pendono first choicenothing named
Three alternatives
Adobe Analytics, Mixpanel, PendoTwo alternatives
Mixpanel, PendoThree alternatives
Fullstory, Pendo, Quantum MetricGemini 3.5 FlashAmplitude, PendoAmplitudeChangedAmplitudeOptimizely Warehouse-Native AnalyticsAmplitudeagainst: Heapagainst: Amplitude, Contentsquare, Google Analytics 4, Heap, Looker, Mixpanel, Pendo, PowerBI, Self-Hosted PostHog, Tableau
Two alternatives
Gainsight PX, MixpanelTwo alternatives
Mixpanel, PendoFive alternatives
Contentsquare, Heap, Mixpanel, Pendo, PostHogFour alternatives
Amplitude, Mitzu, Mixpanel, PostHogTwo alternatives
Mixpanel, PostHogPerplexity SonarAmplitudeAmplitudeHeldAmplitudeMixpanelagainst: Amplitude, Pendono first choiceagainst: Adobe Analytics, Glew, Google Analytics 4, PostHog
Three alternatives
Contentsquare, Mixpanel, PendoTwo alternatives
Adobe Analytics, PendoSeven alternatives
Adobe Analytics, Contentsquare, Fullstory, Heap, Mixpanel, Pendo, PostHogGrok 4.20Amplitude, PendoAmplitudeChangedagainst: MixpanelAmplitudePendoagainst: Heap, MixpanelAmplitudeagainst: Adobe Analytics, Amplitude, Chartbeat, Google Analytics 4, Heap, Looker, Matomo, Mixpanel, PostHog, Tableau
Two alternatives
Heap, PendoFive alternatives
Contentsquare, Heap, Mixpanel, Pendo, PostHogOne alternative
PostHogThree alternatives
Mixpanel, Pendo, PostHogMistral SmallAmplitudeGainsight, PendoChangedAmplitude, PendoAmplitude, Mixpanelno first choiceagainst: Adobe Analytics, Amplitude, Google Analytics 4, Heap, Mixpanel
Three alternatives
Heap, Mixpanel, PendoTwo alternatives
Amplitude, MixpanelFour alternatives
Contentsquare, Fullstory, Heap, MixpanelTwo alternatives
Gainsight PX, StatsigDeepSeek V4 FlashAmplitudeAmplitudeHeldAmplitudePendoagainst: MixpanelAmplitude, Mixpanelagainst: Heapagainst: Adobe Analytics, Amplitude, Google Analytics 360, Heap
Three alternatives
Mixpanel, Pendo, PostHogTwo alternatives
Mixpanel, PendoSeven alternatives
Fullstory, Glassbox, Heap, Mixpanel, Pendo, PostHog, Quantum MetricOne alternative
AmplitudeTwo alternatives
Pendo, PostHogLlama 4 MaverickAmplitudeno first choiceChangedAmplitudeno first choiceagainst: AmplitudeAmplitudeagainst: Adobe Analytics, Amplitude
Two alternatives
Mixpanel, Quantum MetricTwo alternatives
Contentsquare, PendoQwen 3.7 FlashAmplitudeMixpanelChangedAmplitudePostHogagainst: MixpanelAmplitudeagainst: Amplitude, Heap, Mixpanel, PostHog
Four alternatives
Fullstory, Heap, Mixpanel, PendoThree alternatives
Amplitude, Pendo, PostHogFour alternatives
Heap, Mixpanel, Pendo, PostHogThree alternatives
Amplitude, Metabase, PendoThree alternatives
Heap, Mixpanel, PostHogKimi K2Amplitude, PendoAmplitudeChangedAmplitudeGainsight PX, Pendoagainst: HeapAmplitude, Mixpanelagainst: Heap, Pendoagainst: Amplitude, Google Analytics 4, Heap, Mixpanel, Pendo
One alternative
MixpanelOne alternative
Gainsight PXSix alternatives
Contentsquare, Fullstory, Heap, Mixpanel, Pendo, Quantum MetricThree alternatives
Amplitude, PostHog, StatsigTwo alternatives
Optimizely CMS, PostHogGLM 4.7 FlashXAmplitudeAmplitudeHeldAmplitudeAmplitudeagainst: Fullstory, Heap, Mixpanel, Pendono first choiceagainst: Amplitude, Contentsquare, Fullstory, Google Analytics 4, Looker, Matomo, Mixpanel, Tableau
Two alternatives
Mixpanel, PendoTwo alternatives
Pendo, PostHogSix alternatives
Fullstory, Heap, Matomo, Mixpanel, PostHog, StatsigMiniMax M2.5Gainsight PX, PendoAmplitudeChangedAmplitudeOpenPanel, Qrveyagainst: Amplitude, MixpanelAmplitude, Mixpanel, Pendoagainst: Adobe Analytics, Amplitude, Google Analytics 4, Heap, Mixpanel, PostHog
Two alternatives
Amplitude, MixpanelThree alternatives
June, Pendo, PostHogFive alternatives
Contentsquare, Fullstory, Mixpanel, Pendo, Quantum MetricTwo alternatives
Metabase, PostHogGPT-6 LunaAmplitudeAmplitudeHeldAmplitude, MixpanelMixpanelno first choiceagainst: Amplitude, Heap, Mixpanel, PostHog
Two alternatives
Mixpanel, PendoOne alternative
MixpanelFour alternatives
Adobe Product Analytics / Customer Journey Analytics, Contentsquare Product Analytics, Pendo, PostHogOne alternative
PendoThree alternatives
Amplitude, Mixpanel, PendoMuse Glimmer 30BGainsight PX, Pendoagainst: JuneAmplitudeChangedAmplitude, MixpanelPendoagainst: Mixpanel, PostHogno first choiceagainst: Adobe Analytics, Amplitude, GA360, Google Analytics 4, Heap, Mixpanel, Pendo
Two alternatives
Amplitude, MixpanelFour alternatives
Adobe Analytics, June, Pendo, Quantum MetricFour alternatives
Gainsight PX, Heap, Pendo, PostHogOne alternative
AmplitudeBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 11:28 | yes | 9 | 7 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 10:52 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 08:04 | yes | 17 | 27 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 09:26 | yes | 30 | 2 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-10-01 08:38 | yes | 23 | 8 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 12:16 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 07:36 | yes | 23 | 29 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 09:52 | yes | 5 | 1 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 12:51 | no | 0 | 28 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 11:57 | yes | 13 | 21 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 11:08 | yes | 24 | 87 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 12:46 | yes | 10 | 20 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 13:02 | yes | 3 | 13 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 10:54 | yes | 14 | 23 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 10:33 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 13:28 | yes | 3 | 6 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 08:22 | yes | 15 | 24 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 10:51 | yes | 21 | 2 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-10-01 13:47 | yes | 23 | 7 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 13:59 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 11:54 | yes | 22 | 26 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 10:17 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 09:58 | no | 0 | 28 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 13:28 | yes | 24 | 22 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 10:29 | yes | 24 | 275 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 12:15 | yes | 15 | 28 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 07:30 | yes | 2 | 16 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 10:52 | yes | 20 | 27 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 09:36 | yes | 10 | 8 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 11:28 | yes | 8 | 11 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 14:01 | yes | 18 | 29 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 11:13 | yes | 18 | 8 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-10-01 08:53 | yes | 21 | 11 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 08:30 | yes | 13 | 10 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 09:49 | yes | 25 | 47 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 07:26 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 10:35 | yes | 5 | 24 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 08:20 | yes | 15 | 27 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 08:49 | yes | 15 | 38 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 14:05 | yes | 20 | 29 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 13:14 | yes | 6 | 30 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 12:35 | yes | 13 | 32 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 08:01 | yes | 15 | 10 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 09:57 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 10:41 | yes | 26 | 31 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 09:26 | yes | 16 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-10-01 12:44 | yes | 19 | 9 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 09:01 | yes | 15 | 8 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 11:45 | yes | 23 | 23 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 10:14 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 11:24 | no | 0 | 38 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 11:58 | yes | 25 | 21 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 13:12 | yes | 23 | 63 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 07:53 | yes | 25 | 61 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 10:08 | yes | 2 | 22 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 11:03 | yes | 14 | 16 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 09:26 | yes | 18 | 11 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 08:33 | yes | 3 | 9 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 13:31 | no | 0 | 19 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 09:56 | yes | 18 | 10 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-10-01 07:49 | yes | 18 | 11 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 07:35 | no | 0 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 08:22 | yes | 23 | 35 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 12:08 | yes | 8 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 13:13 | yes | 10 | 38 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 07:59 | yes | 24 | 36 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 11:20 | yes | 11 | 33 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 10:31 | yes | 24 | 64 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 08:57 | yes | 1 | 24 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 10:25 | yes | 13 | 25 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 08:29 | yes | 9 | 13 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 13:58 | yes | 3 | 7 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 13:44 | yes | 11 | 26 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 10:26 | yes | 19 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-10-01 13:42 | yes | 20 | 13 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 11:08 | yes | 12 | 11 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 12:56 | yes | 23 | 40 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 13:06 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 10:23 | yes | 10 | 48 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 07:37 | yes | 24 | 21 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 13:13 | yes | 21 | 41 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 14:04 | yes | 23 | 55 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 08:32 | yes | 5 | 24 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 12:58 | yes | 20 | 46 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Amplitude read as Amplitude
Amplitude (Enterprise tier) read as Amplitude
Amplitude (Enterprise) read as Amplitude
Unresolved, counted raw
Adobe Product Analytics / Adobe Analytics ecosystem
Adobe Product Analytics / Customer Journey Analytics
Contentsquare Product Analytics (including Heap capabilities)
Kaelio
Optimizely Warehouse-Native Analytics (formerly NetSpring)
Self-Hosted PostHog
Discontinued, still offered
Gemini 3.5 Flash named Indicative as alternative on the negative prompt. Folded into mParticle after acquisition.