September 2026 Edition, expanded tier · The six flagship models on every category, as published . The public index runs on the standard tier; this record is what the Expanded Edition Pack delivers on one category. The category page →
Index › GTM › Customer › Helpdesk · September 2026 Edition

Customer support and helpdesk

Asked as “customer support and helpdesk platform”, and as “helpdesk and customer support software”, on behalf of a mid-market B2B software company. 28 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, six models each.
Standing · first-choice share
43%
43Zendesk Support Suite21Freshdesk21Zoho Desk14others

43% of first choices, clear leader.

The standing

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all six models, for a mid-market B2B software company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
01Zendesk Support Suite43%27%30criticized defaultnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 43% now.
02Freshdesk21%12%26accepted challengernewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 21% now.
03Zoho Desk21%0%15accepted challengernewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 21% now.
04Jira Service Management4%27%15criticized challengernewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 4% now.
Show the five products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
09Salesforce Service Cloud0%45%20criticized challengernewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
08Help Scout0%20%15accepted challengernewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
06Intercom0%19%27accepted challengernewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
05HubSpot Service Hub0%7%27accepted challengernewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
07Front0%0%11accepted challengernewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.

The floor is 12 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. How the floor is measured

Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
All six head-to-head pages: the top four products, each against each

Recommended versus criticized

Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.

Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative60%
Key
01Zendesk Support Suite43%
02Freshdesk21%
03Zoho Desk21%
04Jira Service Management4%
05HubSpot Service Hub0%
06Intercom0%
07Front0%
08Help Scout0%
09Salesforce Service Cloud0%

What they warned about

Two of six models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Opus 5, GPT-6 Astra, Gemini 3.1 Pro and Perplexity Sonar Pro changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Salesforce Service Cloud
45%
9 of 20 labels negative · 6 of 6 models
“Zendesk and Salesforce Service Cloud for smaller or less complex teams, because one B2B-focused source explicitly says to avoid them at this stage” Perplexity Sonar Pro, negative prompt
Zendesk Support Suite
27%
8 of 30 labels negative · 6 of 6 models
“caution around Zendesk and Salesforce Service Cloud for smaller teams, not because they are bad products overall, but because they can be too complex” Perplexity Sonar Pro, negative prompt
Intercom
19%
5 of 27 labels negative · 4 of 6 models
“SLAs, HIPAA support, SSO, workload management and multibrand features are restricted to the top Expert plan.” GPT-5.6 Sol, negative prompt
Kayako
100%
2 of 2 labels negative · 2 of 6 models · 1 hard negative
“legacy products like Kayako and Desk.com have historically stagnated or shut down” Claude Opus 5, negative prompt

What they cite

Six of the six models returned a source list in this edition: six return the pages they cited.

Sites the answers cite

30 of 36 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 6 of 6 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 575 links across 199 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. None of the 36 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category.

vendor site · Freshworks17 answers · 19 citations · 5 models
vendor site · Zendesk15 answers · 18 citations · 5 models
vendor site · Featurebase12 answers · 23 citations · 4 models
11 answers · 14 citations · 4 models
vendor site · Desk36510 answers · 13 citations · 3 models
vendor site · Intercom10 answers · 12 citations · 2 models
vendor site · Salesforce10 answers · 11 citations · 4 models
9 answers · 16 citations · 4 models
9 answers · 15 citations · 3 models
vendor site · Hiver9 answers · 11 citations · 3 models
vendor site · HubSpot9 answers · 9 citations · 2 models
8 answers · 8 citations · 3 models

Pages the answers cite

The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.

Search against answers

Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best customer support and helpdesk platform”, “customer support and helpdesk platform”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Company and productsShareOwn site citedName searches, GoogleAI search demand, est.Organic visitsPaid search a month, est.Google ads, last 30 daysBest Google position
Zendesk Support Suite zendesk.com43%1823025,365,445$16,18163
Freshworks freshworks.com
Freshdesk 21%, Freshservice 0%
21%29112,100391111,586 company$14,486113
Zoho parent site
Zoho Desk 21%
21%1678,100105
Pylon usepylon.com11%3640,5003,11829,726$16621
Atlassian atlassian.com
Jira Service Management 4%
4%416,6001884,724,388 company$5,90661
HubSpot parent site
HubSpot Service Hub 0%
0%285368,0009,776
Intercom intercom.com0%39233,1007,16564,348$3,304120
Front front.com0%3290,500304,67663,585$1,62668
Help Scout helpscout.com0%1208,10017337,8991410
Gorgias gorgias.com0%4627,10031721,763126

Google's top ten for the two searches hold 18 sites; 1 of them are among the sites the models cited here (featurebase.app). The first result for “best customer support and helpdesk platform” is proprofsdesk.com.

How they answered

Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHide
ModelDirect“What is the best customer support and helpdesk platform for a mid-market B2B software company?”Paraphrase“Which helpdesk and customer support software would you recommend to a mid-sized B2B software company?”Comparative“What are the top customer support and helpdesk platforms and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best customer support and helpdesk platform for a company with a limited budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 500 person company evaluating a customer support and helpdesk platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which customer support and helpdesk platforms should I avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Opus 5Zendesk Support Suite
Three alternativesHubSpot Service Hub, Intercom, Pylon
FreshdeskChanged
Five alternativesHubSpot Service Hub, Intercom, Plain, Pylon, TeamSupport
against: Zendesk Support Suite
no first choice
Nine alternativesFreshdesk, Gorgias, Help Scout, Hiver, HubSpot Service Hub, Intercom, Salesforce Service Cloud, Zendesk Support Suite, Zoho Desk
against: Freshservice, Jira Service Management, ServiceNow
Zoho Desk
Nine alternativesChatwoot, Crisp, FreeScout, Freshdesk, Hiver, HubSpot Service Hub, Jira Service Management, Spiceworks Help Desk, Tidio
against: Help Scout, Intercom, Zendesk Support Suite
Freshdesk
Three alternativesHubSpot Service Hub, Intercom, Salesforce Service Cloud
against: Desk.com, Intercom, Jira Service Management, Kayako, Salesforce Service Cloud, Zendesk Support Suite
Claude Opus 4.8Freshdesk, Zendesk Support Suite
Two alternativesHubSpot Service Hub, Intercom
Freshdesk, Zendesk Support SuiteHeld
Three alternativesHubSpot Service Hub, Intercom, Zoho Desk
Zendesk Support Suite
Seven alternativesFreshdesk, Gorgias, Help Scout, HubSpot Service Hub, Intercom, Salesforce Service Cloud, Zoho Desk
Zoho Desk
Three alternativesChatwoot, Help Scout, Zammad
against: Freshdesk
no first choiceagainst: Freshdesk, Intercom, Salesforce Service Cloud, Zendesk Support Suite
GPT-6 AstraPylon
Two alternativesIntercom, Zendesk Support Suite
Pylon, Zendesk Support SuiteChanged
Two alternativesFreshdesk, Intercom
no first choice
Two alternativesFreshservice, Jira Service Management
Zoho Desk
One alternativeHelp Scout
against: Freshdesk
Freshdesk, Zendesk Support Suite
Four alternativesFront, HubSpot Service Hub, Intercom, Salesforce Service Cloud
against: Gorgias, HubSpot Service Hub, Intercom, Salesforce Service Cloud, Zendesk Support Suite
GPT-5.6 SolZendesk Support Suite
Four alternativesFreshdesk, Front, HubSpot Service Hub, Intercom
against: Salesforce Service Cloud
Zendesk Support SuiteHeld
Three alternativesFreshdesk, HubSpot Service Hub, Intercom
against: Jira Service Management, Salesforce Service Cloud
Zendesk Support Suite
Eight alternativesFreshdesk, Gorgias, Help Scout, HubSpot Service Hub, Intercom, Jira Service Management, Salesforce Service Cloud, Zoho Desk
Zoho Desk
Three alternativesFreshdesk, HubSpot Service Hub, Jira Service Management
against: Help Scout
Zendesk Support Suite
Six alternativesFreshdesk, Front, HubSpot Service Hub, Intercom, Jira Service Management, Salesforce Service Cloud
against: Gorgias, Help Scout, HubSpot Service Hub, Intercom, Jira Service Management, Salesforce Service Cloud, Zendesk Support Suite
Gemini 3.1 ProZendesk Support Suite
Four alternativesFront, HubSpot Service Hub, Intercom, Jira Service Management
Jira Service Management, Zendesk Support SuiteChanged
Three alternativesFront, HubSpot Service Hub, Intercom
no first choiceZoho Desk
Five alternativesFreeScout, Help Scout, HubSpot Service Hub, Jira Service Management, osTicket
Zendesk Support Suite
Four alternativesFreshdesk, HubSpot Service Hub, Intercom, Jira Service Management
against: Salesforce Service Cloud
against: BMC FootPrints, Cherwell Service Management, Kayako, Salesforce Service Cloud, ServiceNow, SysAid, Zendesk Support Suite
Perplexity Sonar ProPylon
Four alternativesFreshdesk, HubSpot Service Hub, Supportbench, Zendesk Support Suite
Zendesk Support SuiteChanged
Four alternativesFreshdesk, Help Scout, Intercom, Plain
Zendesk Support Suite
Eight alternativesFreshdesk, Front, Help Scout, Hiver, HubSpot Service Hub, Intercom, Salesforce Service Cloud, Zoho Desk
Freshdesk, Zoho Desk
Two alternativesHubSpot Service Hub, LiveAgent
no first choiceagainst: Salesforce Service Cloud, Zendesk Support Suite
Bold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against

The record

One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Thirty-six rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
PromptModelVersion stringTime (UTC)SearchedSourcesLatency
Direct recommendationClaude Opus 5claude-opus-52026-09-08 13:49yes4076 s
Direct recommendationClaude Opus 4.8claude-opus-4-82026-09-08 13:50yes4062 s
Direct recommendationGPT-6 Astragpt-6-astra2026-09-08 13:51yes539 s
Direct recommendationGPT-5.6 Solgpt-5.6-sol2026-09-08 13:52yes755 s
Direct recommendationGemini 3.1 Progemini-3.1-pro-preview2026-09-08 13:51no031 s
Direct recommendationPerplexity Sonar Prosonar-pro2026-09-08 13:50yes2010 s
ParaphraseClaude Opus 5claude-opus-52026-09-08 13:53yes3963 s
ParaphraseClaude Opus 4.8claude-opus-4-82026-09-08 13:54no029 s
ParaphraseGPT-6 Astragpt-6-astra2026-09-08 13:56yes542 s
ParaphraseGPT-5.6 Solgpt-5.6-sol2026-09-08 13:57yes651 s
ParaphraseGemini 3.1 Progemini-3.1-pro-preview2026-09-08 13:55no049 s
ParaphrasePerplexity Sonar Prosonar-pro2026-09-08 13:54yes2010 s
ComparativeClaude Opus 5claude-opus-52026-09-08 13:58yes3965 s
ComparativeClaude Opus 4.8claude-opus-4-82026-09-08 13:59yes3366 s
ComparativeGPT-6 Astragpt-6-astra2026-09-08 14:01yes1062 s
ComparativeGPT-5.6 Solgpt-5.6-sol2026-09-08 14:02yes1077 s
ComparativeGemini 3.1 Progemini-3.1-pro-preview2026-09-08 14:00no027 s
ComparativePerplexity Sonar Prosonar-pro2026-09-08 13:59yes1914 s
Budget constrainedClaude Opus 5claude-opus-52026-09-08 14:03yes3263 s
Budget constrainedClaude Opus 4.8claude-opus-4-82026-09-08 16:12yes18232 s
Budget constrainedGPT-6 Astragpt-6-astra2026-09-08 14:10yes533 s
Budget constrainedGPT-5.6 Solgpt-5.6-sol2026-09-08 14:11yes529 s
Budget constrainedGemini 3.1 Progemini-3.1-pro-preview2026-09-08 14:09yes842 s
Budget constrainedPerplexity Sonar Prosonar-pro2026-09-08 14:09yes2011 s
Scale constrainedClaude Opus 5claude-opus-52026-09-08 14:12yes3988 s
Scale constrainedClaude Opus 4.8claude-opus-4-82026-09-08 14:13no027 s
Scale constrainedGPT-6 Astragpt-6-astra2026-09-08 14:14yes641 s
Scale constrainedGPT-5.6 Solgpt-5.6-sol2026-09-08 14:16yes780 s
Scale constrainedGemini 3.1 Progemini-3.1-pro-preview2026-09-08 14:14no038 s
Scale constrainedPerplexity Sonar Prosonar-pro2026-09-08 14:13yes2015 s
Negative framingClaude Opus 5claude-opus-52026-09-08 14:17yes4168 s
Negative framingClaude Opus 4.8claude-opus-4-82026-09-08 14:18yes3862 s
Negative framingGPT-6 Astragpt-6-astra2026-09-08 14:20yes547 s
Negative framingGPT-5.6 Solgpt-5.6-sol2026-09-08 14:21yes771 s
Negative framingGemini 3.1 Progemini-3.1-pro-preview2026-09-08 14:19yes1156 s
Negative framingPerplexity Sonar Prosonar-pro2026-09-08 14:18yes2010 s

Noise floor in this category

Flips between the edition run and its calibration repeat. Six prompts per model is a small sample; the index-wide floor is the number to trust.

ShowHide
Claude Opus 5
3 of 5 flipped
Claude Opus 4.8
2 of 4 flipped
GPT-6 Astra
2 of 4 flipped
GPT-5.6 Sol
0 of 5 flipped
Gemini 3.1 Pro
4 of 6 flipped
Perplexity Sonar Pro
2 of 4 flipped

Normalization in this category

Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.

ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Zendesk read as Zendesk Support Suite
Zendesk Suite read as Zendesk Support Suite
Zendesk Suite Professional read as Zendesk Support Suite
Unresolved, counted raw
None awaiting human review.
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.
← Customer successDigital adoption →