Virtual data rooms
Asked as “virtual data room”, and as “M&A due diligence data room”, on behalf of a mid-market B2B company. 51 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each. Added to the November 2026 Edition.
Standing · first-choice share
27%
Contested · Papermark Data Rooms 16%
27iDeals16Papermark Data Rooms10Firmex47others
27% of first choices, contested.
Since October 2026▲+2Since October 2026: 25% → 27%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.iDeals held the lead, +2 points on 25%, inside the 10-point floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
Papermark Data Rooms17%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: Papermark Data Rooms (17%) replaces Peony Data Room (29% then, 15% now), 2 points clear, inside the 10-point floor.Standing →Mid-market
iDeals27%Contested▲+2Since October 2026: 25% → 27%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.This pageEnterprise
Datasite Diligence44%Clear leader▼−2Since October 2026: 46% → 44%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.Standing →
Papermark Data Rooms17%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: Papermark Data Rooms (17%) replaces Peony Data Room (29% then, 15% now), 2 points clear, inside the 10-point floor.Standing →Mid-marketiDeals27%Contested▲+2Since October 2026: 25% → 27%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.This pageEnterpriseDatasite Diligence44%Clear leader▼−2Since October 2026: 46% → 44%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.Standing →The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01iDeals27%6%47accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 25% → 27%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.25% → 27%
iDeals27%6%47accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 25% → 27%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.25% → 27%02Papermark Data Rooms16%0%21accepted challenger▲+8Since October 2026: 8% → 16%, +8 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.8% → 16%
Papermark Data Rooms16%0%21accepted challenger▲+8Since October 2026: 8% → 16%, +8 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.8% → 16%03
Firmex10%8%51accepted challenger▼−6Since October 2026: 16% → 10%, −6 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.16% → 10%
Firmex10%8%51accepted challenger▼−6Since October 2026: 16% → 10%, −6 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.16% → 10%04
SecureDocs6%6%34accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 8% → 6%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.8% → 6%
SecureDocs6%6%34accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 8% → 6%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.8% → 6%05
FirmRoom6%4%25accepted challenger▼−4Since October 2026: 10% → 6%, −4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.10% → 6%
FirmRoom6%4%25accepted challenger▼−4Since October 2026: 10% → 6%, −4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.10% → 6%06
Ansarada4%6%36accepted challenger▲+1Since October 2026: 3% → 4%, +1 point. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.3% → 4%
Ansarada4%6%36accepted challenger▲+1Since October 2026: 3% → 4%, +1 point. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.3% → 4%07
ShareVault4%0%13accepted challenger▲+4Since October 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 4%
ShareVault4%0%13accepted challenger▲+4Since October 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 4%08
CapLinked2%6%18accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%
CapLinked2%6%18accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%09Datasite Diligence2%47%53criticized challenger▼−1Since October 2026: 3% → 2%, −1 point. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.3% → 2%
Datasite Diligence2%47%53criticized challenger▼−1Since October 2026: 3% → 2%, −1 point. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.3% → 2%Show the four products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
13
Intralinks0%61%41criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Intralinks0%61%41criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%12
Box0%56%16criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Box0%56%16criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%10
DealRoom0%3%31accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%
DealRoom0%3%31accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%11
Digify0%0%12accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%
Digify0%0%12accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
For buyers
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each
iDeals vs FirmRoomiDeals vs AnsaradaiDeals vs ShareVaultiDeals vs CapLinkedPapermark Data Rooms vs FirmexPapermark Data Rooms vs SecureDocsPapermark Data Rooms vs FirmRoomPapermark Data Rooms vs AnsaradaPapermark Data Rooms vs ShareVaultPapermark Data Rooms vs CapLinkedFirmex vs SecureDocsFirmex vs FirmRoomFirmex vs AnsaradaFirmex vs ShareVaultFirmex vs CapLinkedSecureDocs vs FirmRoomSecureDocs vs AnsaradaSecureDocs vs ShareVaultSecureDocs vs CapLinkedFirmRoom vs AnsaradaFirmRoom vs ShareVaultFirmRoom vs CapLinkedAnsarada vs ShareVaultAnsarada vs CapLinkedShareVault vs CapLinked
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01020304050607080910111213Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative40%
Key
01iDeals27%
iDeals27%02Papermark Data Rooms16%
Papermark Data Rooms16%03Firmex10%
Firmex10%04SecureDocs6%
SecureDocs6%05FirmRoom6%
FirmRoom6%06Ansarada4%
Ansarada4%07ShareVault4%
ShareVault4%08CapLinked2%
CapLinked2%09Datasite Diligence2%
Datasite Diligence2%10DealRoom0%
DealRoom0%11Digify0%
Digify0%12Box0%
Box0%13Intralinks0%
Intralinks0%What they warned about
One of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. GPT-5.4 mini, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.20, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5, GPT-6 Luna and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Datasite Diligence47%
25 of 53 labels negative · 13 of 14 models · 7 hard negative
“Enterprise-heavy (Intralinks, Datasite): Feature-rich but often overpriced and complex for mid-market” Grok 4.20, direct prompt
Intralinks61%
25 of 41 labels negative · 12 of 14 models · 8 hard negative
“A 1.0/5 review titled *"Avoid Intralinks at all costs!"* cites frequent bugs requiring constant support contact” DeepSeek V4 Flash, negative prompt
Box56%
9 of 16 labels negative · 9 of 14 models · 3 hard negative
“Some analysts specifically warn against per-user models like Box if you have hundreds of external participants, citing cost unpredictability and feature limitations.” Qwen 3.7 Flash, negative prompt
Dropbox100%
7 of 7 labels negative · 7 of 14 models · 5 hard negative
“not recommended for sensitive transactions due to lack of robust security and compliance features” Mistral Small, negative prompt
What they cite
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
77 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 858 links across 180 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 15 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
vendor site · FirmRoom33 answers · 35 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Ideals VDR29 answers · 36 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Papermark27 answers · 37 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Intralinks25 answers · 34 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Capterra23 answers · 47 citations · 10 models
23 answers · 24 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Firmex22 answers · 29 citations · 13 models
vendor site · CapLinked20 answers · 35 citations · 9 models
19 answers · 19 citations · 9 models
15 answers · 22 citations · 7 models
vendor site · Peony15 answers · 21 citations · 6 models
vendor site · Orangedox15 answers · 15 citations · 7 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
27 answers · 9 models
23 answers · 10 models
21 answers · 9 models
17 answers · 9 models
15 answers · 8 models
13 answers · 8 models
11 answers · 6 models
11 answers · 9 models
11 answers · 7 models
10 answers · 6 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best virtual data room”, “virtual data room”, “virtual data rooms”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| iDeals idealsboard.com | 27% | 109 | 74,000 | 124,212 | 3,877 | $55 | 36 | |
| Papermark Data Rooms papermark.com | 16% | 47 | 7,522 | |||||
| Firmex firmex.com | 10% | 111 | 4,400 | 31 | 4,370 | 17 | ||
| Ideals VDR idealsvdr.com | 8% | 10 | 1 | |||||
| SecureDocs securedocs.com | 6% | 84 | 1,000 | 66 | 2,831 | 0 | ||
| FirmRoom firmroom.com | 6% | 60 | 320 | 3 | 6,534 | $78 | 2 | |
| iDeals Virtual Data Room | 6% | 1,300 | 8 | |||||
| Peony Data Room peony.ink | 6% | 18 | 110 | 0 | 3,103 | |||
| Ansarada ansarada.com | 4% | 90 | 1,300 | 20 | 20,444 | $732 | 25 | |
| ShareVault sharevault.com | 4% | 19 | 720 | 9 | 1,076 | 12 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 18 sites; 4 of them are among the sites the models cited here (capterra.com, idealsvdr.com, intralinks.com, orangedox.com). The first result for “best virtual data room” is visible.vc.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best virtual data room for a mid-market B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which M&A due diligence data room would you recommend to a mid-sized B2B company?”Comparative“What are the top virtual data rooms and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best virtual data room for a company with a limited budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 500 person company evaluating a virtual data room. What should we look at?”Negative“Which virtual data rooms should I avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5iDealsiDealsHeldDatasite DiligencePapermark Data Roomsagainst: DocSendno first choiceagainst: Box, HighQ, iDeals
Three alternatives
FirmRoom, Firmex, SecureDocsThree alternatives
EthosData, FirmRoom, FirmexEight alternatives
Ansarada, Boundeal, Clinked, Firmex Virtual Data Room, Papermark Data Rooms, SecureDocs, iDeals, iDeals Virtual Data RoomFour alternatives
Ellty, Orangedox, SecureDocs Virtual Data Room, SendNowGPT-5.4 miniiDeals Virtual Data Roomagainst: Datasite Diligence, IntralinksFirmexChangedDatasite Diligence, SS&C IntralinksSecureDocsagainst: CapLinkedno first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
Firmex, SecureDocsTwo alternatives
Datasite Diligence, IntralinksEight alternatives
Ansarada, DealRoom, Drooms, FirmRoom, Firmex, SecureDocs, ShareVault, iDealsOne alternative
iDealsGemini 3.5 FlashiDealsagainst: DocSend, Google Drive, IntralinksIdeals VDRChangedDatasite Diligence, SS&C IntralinksDocSendagainst: Datasite Diligence, IntralinksAnsarada, Firmex, ShareVault, iDealsagainst: Datasite Diligence, Intralinksagainst: Box, Dropbox, Google Drive, OneDrive
Five alternatives
Ansarada, CapLinked, Datasite Diligence, FirmRoom, FirmexThree alternatives
Ansarada, DealRoom, FirmexSeven alternatives
Ansarada, Clinked, DealRoom, Digify, Firmex, Papermark Data Rooms, iDealsEight alternatives
Box, DeelTrix, Ellty, FirmRoom, Google Workspace, Orangedox, Papermark Data Rooms, SecureDocsTwo alternatives
Box, ShareFilePerplexity SonariDealsFirmexChangedagainst: Ansarada, Datasite Diligence, IntralinksiDealsagainst: Box or ShareFilePapermark Data Roomsagainst: Box, Google Workspaceno first choicenothing named
Six alternatives
Datasite Diligence, DealRoom, FirmRoom, Firmex, Intralinks, Papermark Data RoomsTwo alternatives
DealRoom, iDealsSeven alternatives
Ansarada, CapLinked, Datasite Diligence, DealRoom, Firmex, Intralinks, SecureDocsThree alternatives
Ansarada, Digify, SecureDocsGrok 4.20iDeals Virtual Data Roomagainst: Datasite Diligence, DocSend, Intralinks, SecureDocsIdeals VDRChangedagainst: Datasite Diligence, Intralinksno first choicePeony Data Roomagainst: Ansarada, Datasite Diligence, DealRoom, Dropbox, Firmex, Google Drive, IntralinksiDealsagainst: Datasite Diligenceagainst: Datasite Diligence, Donnelley Venue, FirmRoom, Firmex, Google Drive, Intralinks, SharePoint
Three alternatives
DealRoom, FirmRoom, ShareVaultFour alternatives
Ansarada, DealRoom, FirmRoom, FirmexSeven alternatives
Ansarada, Datasite Diligence, DealRoom, FirmRoom, Firmex, Intralinks, iDealsFive alternatives
Box, Digify, Onehub, SecureDocs, iDeals Virtual Data RoomThree alternatives
CapLinked, Firmex, ProjectfusionMistral SmallAnsarada, iDealsDatasite DiligenceChangedIntralinksFirmRoom, SecureDocsagainst: iDealsno first choiceagainst: Box, Datasite Diligence, Dropbox, Intralinks
Two alternatives
Clinked, FirmexTwo alternatives
Firmex VDR, Ideals VDRSix alternatives
Ansarada, DFIN Venue, Datasite Diligence, DealRoom, Firmex, iDealsOne alternative
OnehubDeepSeek V4 FlashiDealsagainst: Datasite Diligence, IntralinksiDeals Virtual Data RoomChangedagainst: Datasite Diligence, IntralinksDatasite Diligence, SS&C IntralinksPeony Data Roomno first choiceagainst: Box, Datasite Diligence, Dropbox, Google Drive, Intralinks, OneDrive, ShareFile
Three alternatives
DealRoom, FirmRoom, FirmexFour alternatives
Ansarada, DealRoom, Firmex, SecureDocsSix alternatives
Ansarada, Capitalk, FirmRoom, Firmex, Papermark Data Rooms, iDealsFour alternatives
Digify, SecureDocs, SendNow, iDealsLlama 4 MaverickiDealsno first choiceChangedno first choicePapermark Data Roomsno first choiceagainst: Box, Datasite Diligence, Dropbox, Intralinks, SharePoint
Two alternatives
Digify, SecureDocsQwen 3.7 FlashFirmRoomagainst: Datasite Diligence, IntralinksiDealsChangedagainst: Datasite Diligence, IntralinksIntralinksPapermark Data Roomsno first choiceagainst: Box, Dropbox, Intralinks, Microsoft OneDrive, SharePoint
Three alternatives
DealRoom, Papermark Data Rooms, iDealsTwo alternatives
DealRoom, FirmexSix alternatives
CapLinked, Datasite Diligence, DealRoom, FirmRoom, SecureDocs, iDealsTwo alternatives
Firmex, OnehubSix alternatives
Datasite Diligence, Diligent, Firmex, IdeaLink, Iris, SmartRoomKimi K2iDealsagainst: Datasite Diligence, IntralinksFirmRoomChangedagainst: Datasite Diligence, IntralinksDatasite Diligence, IntralinksSecureDocsagainst: Box, iDealsPapermark Data Roomsagainst: Intralinks, Legacy Intralinksagainst: Datasite Diligence, Donnelley Venue, Firmex, Intralinks, SecureDocs
Four alternatives
CapLinked, Firmex, SecureDocs, ShareVaultThree alternatives
Ansarada, CapLinked, iDealsEight alternatives
Ansarada, DFIN Venue, DealRoom, FirmRoom, Firmex, SecureDocs, ShareVault, iDealsTwo alternatives
Citrix ShareFile, OnehubFour alternatives
Datasite Diligence, Firmex, SecureDocs, iDealsGLM 4.7 FlashXIdeals VDRPapermark Data RoomsChangedDFIN Venue, Datasite Diligence, IntralinksFirmexagainst: Box, Datasite Diligenceno first choiceagainst: Datasite Diligence, Dropbox, Firmex, Google Drive, Imprima VDR, Intralinks
Three alternatives
Ansarada, Datasite Diligence, SecureDocsTwo alternatives
DealRoom, FirmRoomFive alternatives
Ansarada, DealRoom, FirmRoom, Firmex, iDealsTwo alternatives
CapLinked, iDeals Virtual Data RoomMiniMax M2.5ShareVault, iDealsPapermark Data Rooms, iDealsChangedDatasite Diligenceagainst: IntralinksElltyno first choiceagainst: Datasite Diligence
Two alternatives
DealRoom, FirmexTwo alternatives
DealRoom, FirmexFive alternatives
Ansarada, DealRoom, FirmRoom, Firmex, iDeals Virtual Data RoomTwo alternatives
CapLinked, DigifySeven alternatives
Box, Datasite Diligence, Firmex, Google Drive, Intralinks, SharePoint, iDealsGPT-6 LunaiDealsagainst: Datasite DiligenceFirmexChangedDatasite Diligence, SS&C IntralinksPapermark Data Roomsno first choicenothing named
One alternative
FirmexThree alternatives
Datasite Diligence, DealRoom, iDealsThree alternatives
DocSend, Firmex, iDealsOne alternative
SecureDocsMuse Glimmer 30BCapLinkedagainst: Datasite Diligence, IntralinksIdeals VDRChangedno first choicePeony Data Roomno first choiceagainst: Datasite Diligence, Intralinks, Merrill
Four alternatives
DealRoom, Firmex, SecureDocs, iDealsFour alternatives
Ansarada, CapLinked, Papermark Data Rooms, SecureDocsTwo alternatives
Ellty, SendNowBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 09:31 | yes | 10 | 7 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 08:50 | yes | 4 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 11:04 | yes | 11 | 23 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 09:12 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:31 | yes | 14 | 37 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 12:13 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 11:50 | yes | 18 | 23 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 12:00 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 10:48 | yes | 10 | 33 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 09:08 | yes | 14 | 58 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 09:47 | yes | 14 | 23 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 11:26 | yes | 5 | 23 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 09:50 | yes | 3 | 11 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 09:21 | yes | 13 | 18 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 12:09 | yes | 16 | 9 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 12:46 | yes | 1 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 09:16 | yes | 8 | 24 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 11:44 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:11 | yes | 5 | 25 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 10:43 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 10:47 | yes | 22 | 21 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 12:22 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 08:54 | yes | 10 | 21 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 09:36 | yes | 14 | 20 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 08:53 | yes | 9 | 13 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 10:37 | yes | 10 | 19 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 09:14 | yes | 4 | 22 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 09:17 | yes | 14 | 17 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 11:52 | yes | 9 | 8 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 11:25 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 08:59 | yes | 9 | 24 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 09:03 | yes | 10 | 6 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:11 | yes | 5 | 35 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 10:30 | yes | 5 | 8 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 12:00 | yes | 19 | 24 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 11:02 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 10:42 | yes | 5 | 20 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 12:42 | yes | 14 | 27 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 10:56 | yes | 20 | 100 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 11:09 | yes | 23 | 83 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 12:36 | yes | 8 | 22 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 12:37 | yes | 12 | 24 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 11:43 | yes | 9 | 7 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 09:53 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 11:52 | yes | 10 | 17 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 09:42 | yes | 10 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:26 | yes | 13 | 29 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 09:27 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 09:01 | yes | 25 | 23 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 11:16 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 12:57 | yes | 5 | 30 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 11:25 | yes | 19 | 50 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 09:38 | yes | 24 | 54 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 10:25 | yes | 5 | 40 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 10:22 | yes | 2 | 15 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 08:56 | yes | 13 | 34 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 09:04 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 10:19 | no | 0 | 9 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 11:56 | no | 0 | 16 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 11:50 | yes | 10 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:27 | yes | 15 | 32 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 12:10 | no | 0 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 09:40 | yes | 23 | 46 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 10:45 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 12:50 | no | 0 | 28 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 12:03 | yes | 14 | 26 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 11:59 | yes | 15 | 98 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 10:32 | no | 0 | 23 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 09:01 | yes | 2 | 16 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 10:18 | yes | 15 | 20 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 08:44 | yes | 18 | 9 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 11:07 | yes | 4 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 11:36 | no | 0 | 16 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 09:12 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:20 | yes | 10 | 28 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 12:01 | yes | 5 | 7 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 09:15 | yes | 23 | 30 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 09:10 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 09:57 | yes | 24 | 67 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 11:09 | yes | 22 | 39 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 09:23 | yes | 22 | 73 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 08:51 | yes | 23 | 41 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 09:15 | yes | 2 | 29 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 09:54 | yes | 23 | 28 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Datasite read as Datasite Diligence
Datasite (Formerly Merrill Datasite) read as Datasite Diligence
Datasite (OneTrust) read as Datasite Diligence
Datasite (Venue) read as Datasite Diligence
Datasite (formerly Datasite Diligence) read as Datasite Diligence
Datasite (formerly Merrill DataSite) read as Datasite Diligence
Datasite (formerly Merrill Datasite) read as Datasite Diligence
Papermark read as Papermark Data Rooms
Peony read as Peony Data Room
Unresolved, counted raw
Boundeal
Box Governance/VDR
Box or ShareFile
Capitalk (CapLinked)
Deal Interactive
Euronext Corporate Solutions
IdeaLink
Imprima VDR
Intralinks Dealspace
Iris
Legacy Intralinks
SecureDocs Virtual Data Room
Vault Rooms
dataroomX®
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.