Entity management
Asked as “legal entity management software”, and as “corporate governance and entity management tool”, on behalf of a mid-market B2B company. 49 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
51%
Clear leader
51Athennian18Filejet08Diliforce22others
51% of first choices, clear leader.
Since October 2026▲+10Since October 2026: 41% → 51%, +10 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.Athennian held the lead, +10 points on 41%, inside the 10-point floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
Filejet43%Clear leader↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: Filejet (43%) replaces EntityKeeper (23% then, 20% now), 23 points clear, past the 10-point floor.Standing →Mid-market
Athennian51%Clear leader▲+10Since October 2026: 41% → 51%, +10 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.This pageEnterprise
Diligent Entities60%Clear leader▲+10Since October 2026: 50% → 60%, +10 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.Standing →
Filejet43%Clear leader↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: Filejet (43%) replaces EntityKeeper (23% then, 20% now), 23 points clear, past the 10-point floor.Standing →Mid-marketAthennian51%Clear leader▲+10Since October 2026: 41% → 51%, +10 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.This pageEnterpriseDiligent Entities60%Clear leader▲+10Since October 2026: 50% → 60%, +10 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.Standing →The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01Athennian51%6%51endorsed leader▲+10Since October 2026: 41% → 51%, +10 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.41% → 51%
Athennian51%6%51endorsed leader▲+10Since October 2026: 41% → 51%, +10 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.41% → 51%02Filejet18%0%48accepted challenger▲+12Since October 2026: 6% → 18%, +12 points. Past the 10-point floor: movement.6% → 18%
Filejet18%0%48accepted challenger▲+12Since October 2026: 6% → 18%, +12 points. Past the 10-point floor: movement.6% → 18%03
Diliforce8%0%14accepted challenger▲+6Since October 2026: 2% → 8%, +6 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.2% → 8%
Diliforce8%0%14accepted challenger▲+6Since October 2026: 2% → 8%, +6 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.2% → 8%04
Commenda4%0%14accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 4% → 4%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.4% → 4%
Commenda4%0%14accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 4% → 4%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.4% → 4%05ContractZen4%0%11accepted challenger▼−4Since October 2026: 8% → 4%, −4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.8% → 4%
06
MinuteBox2%0%19accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 4% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.4% → 2%
MinuteBox2%0%19accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 4% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.4% → 2%07
CSC Entity Management2%42%31criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.2% → 2%
CSC Entity Management2%42%31criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.2% → 2%Show the five products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
11Diligent Entities0%42%57criticized challenger▼−8Since October 2026: 8% → 0%, −8 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.8% → 0%
Diligent Entities0%42%57criticized challenger▼−8Since October 2026: 8% → 0%, −8 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.8% → 0%12
CT Corporation Entity Management0%30%10criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
CT Corporation Entity Management0%30%10criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%08
EntityKeeper0%9%33accepted challenger▼−6Since October 2026: 6% → 0%, −6 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.6% → 0%
EntityKeeper0%9%33accepted challenger▼−6Since October 2026: 6% → 0%, −6 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.6% → 0%10
DiliTrust Entity Management0%8%12accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
DiliTrust Entity Management0%8%12accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%09EnGlobe0%7%14accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
For buyers
All twenty-one head-to-head pages: the top seven products, each against each
Athennian vs ContractZenAthennian vs MinuteBoxAthennian vs CSC Entity ManagementFilejet vs DiliforceFilejet vs CommendaFilejet vs ContractZenFilejet vs MinuteBoxFilejet vs CSC Entity ManagementDiliforce vs CommendaDiliforce vs ContractZenDiliforce vs MinuteBoxDiliforce vs CSC Entity ManagementCommenda vs ContractZenCommenda vs MinuteBoxCommenda vs CSC Entity ManagementContractZen vs MinuteBoxContractZen vs CSC Entity ManagementMinuteBox vs CSC Entity Management
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01020304C05
060708E09
101112Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative70%
Key
01Athennian51%
Athennian51%02Filejet18%
Filejet18%03Diliforce8%
Diliforce8%04Commenda4%
Commenda4%05ContractZen4%
06MinuteBox2%
MinuteBox2%07CSC Entity Management2%
CSC Entity Management2%08EntityKeeper0%
EntityKeeper0%09EnGlobe0%
10DiliTrust Entity Management0%
DiliTrust Entity Management0%11Diligent Entities0%
Diligent Entities0%12CT Corporation Entity Management0%
CT Corporation Entity Management0%What they warned about
Ten of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, Mistral Small, Qwen 3.7 Flash and GPT-6 Luna changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Diligent Entities42%
24 of 57 labels negative · 13 of 14 models · 5 hard negative
“Enterprise Tools to Avoid: Options like Diligent Entities, EntityKeeper, or EnGlobe are highly rated but often cost thousands annually” Grok 4.20, budget prompt
CSC Entity Management42%
13 of 31 labels negative · 11 of 14 models · 6 hard negative
“Avoid or proceed with extreme caution with CSC Entity Management given its poor reviews and documented issues with invoicing, missed filings, and unresponsive support.” Muse Glimmer 30B, negative prompt
Computershare GEMS75%
6 of 8 labels negative · 5 of 14 models · 3 hard negative
“Heavy Corporate Services Firms (e.g., CSC Global, Intertrust, Computershare)... overly complex, expensive, and may have issues with invoicing, missed filings, and unresponsive support” Muse Glimmer 30B, negative prompt
Intertrust
100%
4 of 4 labels negative · 4 of 14 models · 3 hard negative
“large enterprises should be cautious about or avoid the following types of entity management tools: 1. Heavy Corporate Services Firms (e.g., CSC Global, Intertrust, Computershare)” Muse Glimmer 30B, negative prompt
What they cite
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
77 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 863 links across 161 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 64 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
40 answers · 51 citations · 12 models
vendor site · GetApp37 answers · 59 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Capterra36 answers · 56 citations · 10 models
publisher (Gane)27 answers · 37 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Athennian26 answers · 44 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Sourceforge20 answers · 29 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Guideflow20 answers · 20 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Filejet19 answers · 25 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Diligent19 answers · 23 citations · 10 models
vendor site · G217 answers · 27 citations · 7 models
vendor site · Diliforce15 answers · 19 citations · 7 models
vendor site · Capterra14 answers · 17 citations · 7 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
33 answers · 12 models
27 answers · 10 models
21 answers · 9 models
20 answers · 10 models
19 answers · 9 models
18 answers · 10 models
13 answers · 8 models
12 answers · 10 models
11 answers · 6 models
11 answers · 5 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best legal entity management software”, “entity management tools”, “legal entity management software”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Athennian athennian.com | 51% | 129 | 390 | 8 | 6,319 | 3 | 1 | |
| Filejet filejet.com | 18% | 137 | 320 | 0 | 1,207 | 5 | ||
| Diliforce diliforce.com | 8% | 37 | 10 | 0 | 93 | 1 | 7 | |
| Commenda commenda.io | 4% | 70 | 390 | 5 | 569,684 | $5,224 | 0 | |
| ContractZen | 4% | 50 | 0 | |||||
| MinuteBox minutebox.com | 2% | 41 | 210 | 4 | 3,676 | 8 | 4 | |
| Lextree lextree.ai | 2% | 18 | 70 | 1 | 2 | |||
| Corporately | 2% | |||||||
| LawVu | 2% | |||||||
| Legally | 2% |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 18 sites; 5 of them are among the sites the models cited here (athennian.com, capterra.com, diliforce.com, diligent.com, g2.com). The first result for “best legal entity management software” is wolterskluwer.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best legal entity management software for a mid-market B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which corporate governance and entity management tool would you recommend to a mid-sized B2B company?”Comparative“What are the top entity management tools and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best legal entity management software for a company with a limited budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 500 person company evaluating a legal entity management software. What should we look at?”Negative“Which entity management tools should I avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5Commendaagainst: Diligent EntitiesAthennianChangedCSC Entity Managementagainst: Diligent EntitiesFilejetno first choicenothing named
Three alternatives
EnGlobe, EntityKeeper, SimpleLegalThree alternatives
Diligent Entities, EntityKeeper, OnBoardSix alternatives
Ataccama ONE, Athennian, CT hCue Entity Management, DiliTrust Entity Management, Microsoft Purview, MinuteBoxFour alternatives
Athennian, Commenda, ContractZen, EntityKeeperGPT-5.4 miniAthennianAthennianHeldDiligent Entitiesagainst: Safeguard GlobalFilejetagainst: Athennian, CSC Entity Management, Diligent Entities, EntityKeeperno first choicenothing named
Three alternatives
Corporify, Diligent Entities, FilejetOne alternative
Diligent EntitiesEight alternatives
Athennian, CSC Entity Management, CT Corporation Entity Management, Commenda, DiliTrust Entity Management, Filejet, MinuteBox, Wolters KluwerOne alternative
MinuteBoxGemini 3.5 FlashAthennianagainst: Computershare GEMS, Diligent EntitiesAthennianHeldagainst: Computershare GEMSDiligent EntitiesContractZen, Lextreeagainst: CSC Entity Management, CT Corporation Entity Management, Diligent Entitiesno first choiceagainst: Dropbox, Google Sheets, Microsoft Excel
Five alternatives
CSC Entity Management, Corporify, EntityKeeper, Filejet, MinuteBoxSix alternatives
CSC Entity Management, Corporify, Diligent Entities, EntityKeeper, HSP GateWay, MinuteBoxEight alternatives
Athennian, CSC Entity Management, CT Corporation Entity Management, Carta, Corporify, EntityKeeper, MinuteBox, Wolters KluwerSix alternatives
Airtable, Clerky, EntityKeeper, Filejet, Notion, PulleyPerplexity SonarAthennianagainst: Diligent EntitiesAthennianHeldAthennian, Diligent EntitiesFilejetno first choiceagainst: CSC Entity Management, CT Corporation Entity Management, Diligent Entities
Four alternatives
Commenda, EntityKeeper, Filejet, HSP Group GateWay EntitiesFour alternatives
Diligent Entities, EnGlobe, EntityKeeper, FilejetSeven alternatives
Atlas, CSC Entity Management, CT Corporation Entity Management, DiliTrust Entity Management, EntityKeeper, Filejet, MinuteBoxOne alternative
ContractZenGrok 4.20Athennianagainst: Deloitte-managed services, Diligent EntitiesAthennianHeldagainst: Diligent EntitiesAthennian, Diligent Entitiesagainst: CSC Entity Management, Deloitte Entity Management, SAP, Thomson Reuters, WorkdayDiliforceagainst: Diligent Entities, EnGlobe, EntityKeeper, Google Workspace, Microsoft 365, Microsoft Excel, Notionno first choiceagainst: Diligent Entities, Thomson Reutersagainst: CSC Entity Management, Computershare GEMS, Diligent Entities, Intertrust
Two alternatives
EntityKeeper, FilejetOne alternative
ContractZenThree alternatives
EntityKeeper, Filejet, MinuteBoxOne alternative
FilejetMistral SmallAthennian, CommendaAthennianChangedno first choiceFilejetno first choiceagainst: CSC Entity Management, Computershare GEMS, Intertrust
Two alternatives
Diligent Entities, HSP GroupFour alternatives
Commenda, ContractZen, Diligent Entities, FilejetOne alternative
DiliforceDeepSeek V4 FlashAthennianAthennianHeldagainst: Diligent EntitiesAthennianDiliforceagainst: Athennian, DiliTrust Entity Management, Diligent Entitiesno first choiceagainst: CSC Entity Management, Computershare GEMS, Diligent Entities, Intertrust
Four alternatives
ContractZen, Diligent Entities, Filejet, MinuteBoxTwo alternatives
EntityKeeper, FilejetSeven alternatives
DiliTrust Entity Management, Diliforce, Diligent Entities, EnGlobe, EntityKeeper, Filejet, Nasdaq KubeTwo alternatives
Filejet, LegalZoomLlama 4 MaverickAthennianAthennianHeldPulleyno first choiceno first choiceagainst: Athennian, Diligent Entities
Four alternatives
Commenda, ContractZen, Diligent Entities, EntityFloTwo alternatives
EnGlobe, FilejetFour alternatives
DiliTrust Entity Management, Diligent Entities, EntityKeeper, FilejetQwen 3.7 FlashFilejetAthennianChangedAthennianagainst: Deel, RipplingDiliforce, Filejetagainst: Diligent Entities, Wolters KluwerCorporately, LawVu, Legally, Miregoagainst: Diligent Boards, Oracle, SAP, Thomson Reuters ONESOURCEnothing named
Three alternatives
Commenda, Diligent Entities, EntityKeeperThree alternatives
Commenda, Diliforce, FilejetFour alternatives
Diligent Entities, EnGlobe, Filejet, MinuteBoxThree alternatives
DiliTrust Entity Management, EnGlobe, EntityKeeperKimi K2AthennianAthennianHeldagainst: Diligent EntitiesAthennianContractZen, Filejetagainst: CSC Entity Management, CT Corporation Entity Management, Diligent Entitiesno first choiceagainst: CSC Entity Management
Two alternatives
Diligent Entities, FilejetTwo alternatives
Diliforce, EntityKeeperSeven alternatives
Commenda, Deloitte Entity Management, DiliTrust Entity Management, Diligent Entities, EntityKeeper, Filejet, MinuteBoxTwo alternatives
Commenda, VobeSoftGLM 4.7 FlashXAthennianAthennianHeldagainst: Diligent Entities, NasdaqFilejetDiliforceno first choiceagainst: CSC Entity Management, Diligent Entities
Two alternatives
Diligent Entities, FilejetThree alternatives
Diliforce, EntityFlo, FilejetFour alternatives
Athennian, Diligent Entities, EntityKeeper, KleaFour alternatives
Filejet, LegalZoom, Lextree, VobeSoftMiniMax M2.5AthennianAthennianHeldAthennianagainst: Diligent EntitiesMinuteBoxno first choiceagainst: CSC Entity Management
Two alternatives
Diligent Entities, FilejetFour alternatives
CSC Entity Management, Commenda, Diliforce, Diligent EntitiesSix alternatives
CSC Entity Management, Deel, EntityKeeper, Filejet, MinuteBox, RipplingTwo alternatives
Athennian, EntityKeeperGPT-6 LunaAthennianCSC Entity ManagementChangedno first choiceFilejetagainst: EntityKeeperno first choiceagainst: CSC Entity Management, Diligent Entities
Two alternatives
Diligent Entities, FilejetOne alternative
AthennianEight alternatives
Athennian, CSC Entity Management, CT hCue, Computershare GEMS, DiliTrust Legal Entity Management, Diligent Entities, Filejet, MinuteBoxOne alternative
Harbor ComplianceMuse Glimmer 30BAthennianAthennianHeldAthennianFilejetno first choiceagainst: CSC Entity Management, Computershare GEMS, Diligent Entities, Intertrust
Two alternatives
EntityKeeper, FilejetTwo alternatives
Commenda, Diligent EntitiesFive alternatives
Diligent Entities, EnGlobe, EntityKeeper, Filejet, MinuteBoxTwo alternatives
LegalZoom, PulleyBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 10:26 | yes | 10 | 8 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 11:06 | yes | 3 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 09:50 | yes | 7 | 17 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 09:33 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:04 | yes | 12 | 33 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 12:43 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 11:32 | yes | 21 | 20 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 11:04 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 12:33 | yes | 10 | 58 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 10:33 | yes | 25 | 42 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 09:32 | yes | 13 | 24 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 09:56 | yes | 14 | 62 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 12:25 | yes | 4 | 14 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 11:08 | yes | 13 | 23 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 10:49 | yes | 18 | 9 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 10:35 | yes | 3 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 12:57 | yes | 9 | 19 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 09:54 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:24 | yes | 9 | 29 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 11:18 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 12:35 | yes | 21 | 28 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 12:56 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 09:31 | yes | 5 | 21 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 08:58 | yes | 20 | 56 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 12:43 | yes | 15 | 21 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 09:48 | yes | 5 | 14 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 12:07 | yes | 3 | 14 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 12:17 | yes | 14 | 18 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 11:58 | yes | 9 | 9 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 11:19 | yes | 4 | 8 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 10:19 | yes | 7 | 18 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 08:56 | yes | 10 | 6 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:31 | yes | 10 | 45 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 10:58 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 12:46 | yes | 23 | 30 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 12:52 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 11:09 | yes | 10 | 23 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 10:01 | yes | 15 | 60 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 13:01 | yes | 23 | 242 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 11:06 | yes | 23 | 63 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 12:18 | yes | 8 | 26 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 12:44 | yes | 19 | 29 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 10:12 | yes | 10 | 7 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 11:41 | yes | 4 | 6 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 12:09 | yes | 7 | 18 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 10:56 | yes | 10 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:23 | yes | 17 | 33 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 11:11 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 12:05 | yes | 21 | 24 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 10:08 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 12:51 | yes | 9 | 26 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 09:45 | yes | 13 | 19 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 11:00 | yes | 22 | 32 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 08:42 | yes | 5 | 16 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 11:16 | yes | 3 | 18 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 10:06 | yes | 12 | 16 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 10:34 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 09:55 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 09:36 | no | 0 | 17 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 12:18 | yes | 10 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:10 | yes | 9 | 36 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 09:29 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 10:56 | yes | 23 | 60 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 09:38 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 11:29 | no | 0 | 30 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 12:21 | yes | 14 | 25 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 11:21 | yes | 23 | 70 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 09:58 | no | 0 | 36 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 09:15 | yes | 2 | 13 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 09:24 | yes | 10 | 24 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 09:52 | yes | 26 | 12 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 11:04 | yes | 4 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 08:52 | yes | 9 | 20 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 12:29 | yes | 10 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:13 | yes | 5 | 32 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 12:16 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 10:19 | yes | 21 | 21 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 11:46 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 12:58 | no | 0 | 29 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 12:34 | yes | 24 | 59 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 12:16 | yes | 13 | 36 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 12:49 | yes | 20 | 36 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 09:39 | yes | 4 | 16 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 11:20 | yes | 13 | 24 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
CSC read as CSC Entity Management
CSC (Corporation Service Company) read as CSC Entity Management
CT Corporation read as CT Corporation Entity Management
Computershare read as Computershare GEMS
Computershare (GEMS) read as Computershare GEMS
DiliTrust read as DiliTrust Entity Management
Diligent read as Diligent Entities
Dilitrust read as DiliTrust Entity Management
Excel read as Microsoft Excel
Informatica MDM read as Informatica
Wolters Kluwer CT Corporation read as CT Corporation Entity Management
Unresolved, counted raw
Bizee
Bootlegal
CSC Entities
CorpKeeper
Corporately
CorpsAdmin
Deloitte-managed services
HSP GateWay
HSP Group (GateWay Entities)
LawVu
LexisNexis Entity Insight
Mirego
Mitratech's EntityKeeper
RASi
SimpleLegal
TMF
TMF Group / Vistra / HSP Group
Traact
Trust & Scale
Wolters Kluwer Entity Management
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.