Account reconciliation
Asked as “account reconciliation software”, and as “bank reconciliation automation”, on behalf of a mid-market B2B company. 62 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
27%
Contested · Xero 15%
27FloQast15Xero13QuickBooks Online45others
27% of first choices, contested.
Since October 2026▼−6Since October 2026: 33% → 27%, −6 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.FloQast held the lead, −6 points on 33%, inside the 10-point floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
QuickBooks Online47%Clear leader▼−2Since October 2026: 49% → 47%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.Standing →Mid-market
FloQast27%Contested▼−6Since October 2026: 33% → 27%, −6 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.This pageEnterprise
BlackLine Transaction Matching66%Clear leader▲+3Since October 2026: 63% → 66%, +3 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.Standing →
QuickBooks Online47%Clear leader▼−2Since October 2026: 49% → 47%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.Standing →Mid-marketFloQast27%Contested▼−6Since October 2026: 33% → 27%, −6 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.This pageEnterpriseBlackLine Transaction Matching66%Clear leader▲+3Since October 2026: 63% → 66%, +3 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.Standing →The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01FloQast27%10%49accepted challenger▼−6Since October 2026: 33% → 27%, −6 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.33% → 27%
FloQast27%10%49accepted challenger▼−6Since October 2026: 33% → 27%, −6 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.33% → 27%02
Xero15%6%32accepted challenger▲+9Since October 2026: 6% → 15%, +9 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.6% → 15%
Xero15%6%32accepted challenger▲+9Since October 2026: 6% → 15%, +9 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.6% → 15%03QuickBooks Online13%10%30accepted challenger▲+5Since October 2026: 8% → 13%, +5 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.8% → 13%
QuickBooks Online13%10%30accepted challenger▲+5Since October 2026: 8% → 13%, +5 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.8% → 13%04
Zoho Books10%8%12accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 10% → 10%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.10% → 10%
Zoho Books10%8%12accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 10% → 10%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.10% → 10%05
Trintech Adra8%14%28accepted challenger▼−4Since October 2026: 12% → 8%, −4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.12% → 8%
Trintech Adra8%14%28accepted challenger▼−4Since October 2026: 12% → 8%, −4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.12% → 8%06
Prophix One5%0%21accepted challenger▲+5Since October 2026: 0% → 5%, +5 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 5%
Prophix One5%0%21accepted challenger▲+5Since October 2026: 0% → 5%, +5 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 5%07BlackLine Transaction Matching5%40%53criticized challenger▲+3Since October 2026: 2% → 5%, +3 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.2% → 5%
BlackLine Transaction Matching5%40%53criticized challenger▲+3Since October 2026: 2% → 5%, +3 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.2% → 5%08
Numeric3%0%27accepted challenger▼−7Since October 2026: 10% → 3%, −7 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.10% → 3%
Numeric3%0%27accepted challenger▼−7Since October 2026: 10% → 3%, −7 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.10% → 3%09
Sage Intacct3%11%18accepted challenger▼−1Since October 2026: 4% → 3%, −1 point. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.4% → 3%
Sage Intacct3%11%18accepted challenger▼−1Since October 2026: 4% → 3%, −1 point. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.4% → 3%10
Trintech2%13%23accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.2% → 2%
Trintech2%13%23accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.2% → 2%11
HighRadius2%0%14accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.2% → 2%
HighRadius2%0%14accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.2% → 2%Show the four products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
13
Oracle NetSuite0%12%17accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Oracle NetSuite0%12%17accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%15
Trintech Cadency0%10%10accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Trintech Cadency0%10%10accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%12
ReconArt0%6%17accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%
ReconArt0%6%17accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%14
OneStream0%0%10accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
OneStream0%0%10accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
For buyers
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each
FloQast vs Trintech AdraFloQast vs Prophix OneFloQast vs BlackLine Transaction MatchingFloQast vs NumericXero vs QuickBooks OnlineXero vs Zoho BooksXero vs Trintech AdraXero vs Prophix OneXero vs BlackLine Transaction MatchingXero vs NumericQuickBooks Online vs Zoho BooksQuickBooks Online vs Trintech AdraQuickBooks Online vs Prophix OneQuickBooks Online vs BlackLine Transaction MatchingQuickBooks Online vs NumericZoho Books vs Trintech AdraZoho Books vs Prophix OneZoho Books vs BlackLine Transaction MatchingZoho Books vs NumericTrintech Adra vs Prophix OneTrintech Adra vs BlackLine Transaction MatchingTrintech Adra vs NumericProphix One vs BlackLine Transaction MatchingProphix One vs NumericBlackLine Transaction Matching vs Numeric
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
010203040506070809101112131415Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative40%
Key
01FloQast27%
FloQast27%02Xero15%
Xero15%03QuickBooks Online13%
QuickBooks Online13%04Zoho Books10%
Zoho Books10%05Trintech Adra8%
Trintech Adra8%06Prophix One5%
Prophix One5%07BlackLine Transaction Matching5%
BlackLine Transaction Matching5%08Numeric3%
Numeric3%09Sage Intacct3%
Sage Intacct3%10Trintech2%
Trintech2%11HighRadius2%
HighRadius2%12ReconArt0%
ReconArt0%13Oracle NetSuite0%
Oracle NetSuite0%14OneStream0%
OneStream0%15Trintech Cadency0%
Trintech Cadency0%What they warned about
Four of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, Grok 4.20, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5, GPT-6 Luna and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
BlackLine Transaction Matching40%
21 of 53 labels negative · 12 of 14 models · 3 hard negative
“What to Avoid on a Budget - BlackLine ($50K+ per year) \u2014 enterprise-grade, way overkill” DeepSeek V4 Flash, budget prompt
Microsoft Excel100%
9 of 9 labels negative · 7 of 14 models · 6 hard negative
“many experts recommend phasing it out for primary reconciliation tasks due to the risk of errors, lack of automation, and difficulty in maintaining audit trails” Mistral Small, negative prompt
FloQast10%
5 of 49 labels negative · 5 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“Avoid enterprise platforms such as BlackLine, FloQast, and Trintech” Perplexity Sonar, budget prompt
Google Sheets100%
4 of 4 labels negative · 4 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“Pure Spreadsheets (Excel, Google Sheets) | Why to Avoid” GLM 4.7 FlashX, negative prompt
What they cite
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
70 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 729 links across 179 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 27 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
vendor site · Prophix39 answers · 52 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Simetrik29 answers · 42 citations · 10 models
27 answers · 38 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Maxima17 answers · 19 citations · 6 models
17 answers · 19 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Milestone17 answers · 17 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Bluecopa16 answers · 21 citations · 9 models
16 answers · 16 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Numeric14 answers · 17 citations · 7 models
14 answers · 16 citations · 6 models
publisher (Gane)12 answers · 13 citations · 6 models
12 answers · 12 citations · 5 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
28 answers · 10 models
27 answers · 11 models
17 answers · 9 models
16 answers · 9 models
14 answers · 6 models
13 answers · 7 models
12 answers · 6 models
12 answers · 5 models
12 answers · 9 models
11 answers · 5 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “account reconciliation software”, “best account reconciliation software”, “reconciliation tools”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FloQast floqast.com | 27% | 389 | 9,900 | 194 | 41,324 | $5,039 | 76 | |
| Xero xero.com | 15% | 729 | 90,500 | 4,610 | 1,200,289 | $500 | 119 | |
| QuickBooks quickbooks.ninja QuickBooks Online 13% | 13% | 692 | 1,000,000 | 54,681 | 253 company | |||
| Zoho zoho.com Zoho Books 10% | 10% | 367 | 27,100 | 268 | 1,216,894 company | $51,031 | 119 | |
| Trintech trintech.com Trintech Adra 8%, Trintech 2%, Trintech Cadency 0% | 10% | 134 | 1,900 | 44 | 30,370 | 13 | 2 | |
| Prophix prophix.com Prophix One 5% | 5% | 107 | 1,600 | 41 | 14,138 company | $109 | 103 | |
| BlackLine blackline.com BlackLine Transaction Matching 5% | 5% | 147 | 27,100 | 1,255 | 28,740 company | $4,066 | 79 | 2 |
| Wave waveapps.com | 5% | 363 | 368,000 | 253,218 | 708,862 | 39 | ||
| Numeric numeric.io | 3% | 201 | 12,100 | 38,006 | 94,254 | $426 | 9 | 4 |
| Sage sage.com Sage Intacct 3% | 3% | 500 | 246,000 | 90,599 | 1,737,127 company | $114,671 | 78 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 15 sites; 2 of them are among the sites the models cited here (bluecopa.com, numeric.io). The first result for “account reconciliation software” is highradius.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best account reconciliation software for a mid-market B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which bank reconciliation automation would you recommend to a mid-sized B2B company?”Comparative“What are the top reconciliation tools and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best account reconciliation software for a company with a limited budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 500 person company evaluating an account reconciliation software. What should we look at?”Negative“Which reconciliation tools should I avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5Trintech Adraagainst: BlackLine Transaction MatchingSage Intacct, Trintech AdraChangedBlackLine Transaction MatchingZoho Booksno first choicenothing named
Three alternatives
FloQast, Numeric, Prophix OneTwo alternatives
Oracle NetSuite, XeroSeven alternatives
FloQast, Numeric, OneStream, Prophix One, QuickBooks Online, Trintech, XeroThree alternatives
QuickBooks Online, Wave, XeroGPT-5.4 miniBlackLine Transaction MatchingBlackLine Transaction MatchingHeldBlackLine Transaction MatchingXerono first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
FloQast, TrintechThree alternatives
Centime, ReconNET, TrintechSeven alternatives
Datarails, DocuClipper, FloQast, OneStream, Trintech, Vena, WorkivaTwo alternatives
ZarMoney, Zoho BooksGemini 3.5 FlashFloQastFloQastHeldBlackLine Transaction Matching, FloQastQuickBooks Online, Xero, Zoho Booksagainst: BlackLine Transaction Matching, TrintechFloQastagainst: BlackLine Transaction Matchingagainst: Google Sheets, Microsoft Excel, Oracle NetSuite, QuickBooks Online, Xero
Four alternatives
BlackLine Transaction Matching, Numeric, Trintech Adra, ZoneReconcileFour alternatives
HighRadius, Numeric, ReconArt, Trintech AdraFour alternatives
Gresham Technologies, Modern Treasury, ReconArt, TrintechFive alternatives
Airwallex, Numeric, Reconcilely, SkyStem, SynderThree alternatives
Planful, Trintech Adra, VenaPerplexity SonarFloQastagainst: BlackLine Transaction MatchingFloQastHeldBlackLine Transaction Matching, FloQastagainst: Hevo DataQuickBooks Onlineagainst: BlackLine Transaction Matching, FloQast, Trintechno first choicenothing named
Four alternatives
HighRadius, Numeric, Prophix One, Trintech AdraFive alternatives
HighRadius, NetSuite's native reconciliation tools, ReconArt, SolveXia, Trintech AdraFourteen alternatives
AutoRek, Duco, FIS, HighRadius, Numeric, OneStream, Oracle NetSuite, QuickBooks Online, ReconArt, Sage Intacct, SmartStream, SolveXia, Trintech, XeroTwo alternatives
NCH Express Accounts, XeroGrok 4.20FloQastHighRadiusChangedagainst: Microsoft Excel, QuickBooks Online, XeroQuickBooks Online, XeroQuickBooks Online, Xeroagainst: BlackLine Transaction Matching, ReconArt, Sage Intacct, Trintech Adrano first choiceagainst: BlackLine Transaction Matching, FloQast, Microsoft Excel, Trintech Adra
Four alternatives
BlackLine Transaction Matching, Datarails, Prophix One, TrintechTwo alternatives
BlackLine Transaction Matching, Oracle NetSuiteFive alternatives
BlackLine Transaction Matching, Oracle NetSuite, ReconArt, Sage 50 Accounting, Sage IntacctTwo alternatives
Google Sheets or Excel with Templates, WaveMistral SmallFloQastFloQastHeldno first choiceQuickBooks Online, Xerono first choiceagainst: BlackLine Transaction Matching, FloQast, Microsoft Excel, Trintech Adra
Three alternatives
Numeric, Prophix One, Trintech AdraThree alternatives
BlackLine Transaction Matching, HighRadius, NomentiaOne alternative
FloQastDeepSeek V4 FlashFloQast, Numericagainst: BlackLine Transaction MatchingTrintech AdraChangedagainst: BlackLine Transaction Matching, Trintech CadencyBlackLine Transaction Matching, Trintech CadencyWave, Xeroagainst: BlackLine Transaction Matching, FloQast, Sage IntacctFloQastagainst: BlackLine Transaction Matchingagainst: BlackLine Transaction Matching, Google Sheets, Microsoft Excel, Trintech Adra
Two alternatives
Prophix One, TrintechFive alternatives
FloQast, Oracle NetSuite, QuickBooks Online, Sage Intacct, XeroNine alternatives
CCH Tagetik, FloQast, HighRadius, OneStream, Prophix One, QuickBooks Online, ReconArt, Trintech Adra, XeroThree alternatives
NCH Express Accounts, QuickBooks Online, ReconcilerFour alternatives
DOKKA, Numeric, Prophix One, Trintech AdraLlama 4 MaverickFloQastQuickBooks Online, Trintech, XeroChangedBlackLine Transaction MatchingQuickBooks Online, Xero, Zoho Booksno first choiceagainst: BlackLine Transaction Matching, Microsoft Excel
Four alternatives
BlackLine Transaction Matching, Numeric, Prophix One, Trintech AdraFour alternatives
FloQast, ReconArt, Trintech, Trintech AdraQwen 3.7 FlashBlackLine Transaction Matchingagainst: Oracle NetSuiteFloQastChangedagainst: BlackLine Transaction MatchingBlackLine Transaction MatchingXero, Zoho Booksagainst: BlackLine Transaction Matching, Google Sheets, Microsoft Excelno first choiceagainst: Microsoft Excel
Four alternatives
FloQast, ReconArt, Syft, VenaFour alternatives
Atlan, HighRadius, Lunos, SimetrikSix alternatives
Bluecopa, Digits, HighRadius, Prophix One, QuickBooks Online, XeroFour alternatives
BILL, Dext Prepare, Kofinances, QuickBooks OnlineKimi K2FloQastFloQast, Trintech AdraChangedBlackLine Transaction MatchingWave, Zoho Booksagainst: QuickBooks Onlineno first choicenothing named
Three alternatives
DOKKA, Numeric, TrintechThree alternatives
NetCash, Oracle NetSuite, Sage IntacctEight alternatives
Datarails, FloQast, Nanonets, Numeric, SolveXia, Trintech Adra, Trintech Cadency, XeroFour alternatives
Akaunting, GnuCash, NCH Express Accounts, XeroTwo alternatives
Oracle NetSuite, Sage IntacctGLM 4.7 FlashXProphix Oneagainst: BlackLine Transaction MatchingTrintech AdraChangedBlackLine Transaction MatchingNCH Express Accounts, QuickBooks Onlineagainst: Zoho Booksno first choiceagainst: Google Sheets, Microsoft Excel
Three alternatives
FloQast, Numeric, Trintech AdraTwo alternatives
FloQast, ReconArtTwelve alternatives
FloQast, HighRadius, Numeric, OneStream, Prophix One, QuickBooks Online, ReconArt, Sage 50 Accounting, Sage Intacct, Trintech Adra, Trintech Cadency, XeroThree alternatives
AccountMate, Sage 50 Accounting, XeroMiniMax M2.5FloQast, Numericagainst: BlackLine Transaction MatchingProphix One, Sage IntacctChangedBlackLine Transaction MatchingWaveno first choiceagainst: OpenRefine's reconciliation API version 0.1
One alternative
Trintech AdraThree alternatives
FloQast, NetCash, TrintechFour alternatives
Datarails, FloQast, Oracle NetSuite, TrintechTwo alternatives
QuickBooks Online, XeroGPT-6 LunaFloQastNumeric Cash ManagementChangedagainst: BlackLine Transaction Matchingno first choiceZoho Booksno first choicenothing named
Three alternatives
BlackLine Transaction Matching, Numeric, Trintech AdraTwo alternatives
FloQast, Trintech Adra MatcherSeven alternatives
BlackLine Transaction Matching, FloQast, Numeric, OneStream, Oracle Account Reconciliation Cloud, QuickBooks Online / Xero, Trintech CadencyTwo alternatives
QuickBooks Online, XeroMuse Glimmer 30BProphix OneFloQastChangedagainst: BlackLine Transaction MatchingQuickBooks OnlineQuickBooks Online, Xerono first choiceagainst: BlackLine Transaction Matching, FloQast, Trintech
Five alternatives
BlackLine Transaction Matching, DOKKA, FloQast, Numeric, TrintechTwo alternatives
Agicap, Trintech AdraTwelve alternatives
BlackLine Transaction Matching, CCH Tagetik, FloQast, Fyorin, Nomentia, Numeric, OneStream, Prophix One, ReconArt, Trintech Adra, Trintech Cadency, XeroThree alternatives
GnuCash, NCH Express Accounts, Zoho BooksBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 10:47 | yes | 10 | 8 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 09:11 | yes | 3 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 11:24 | yes | 8 | 19 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 10:23 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:27 | yes | 12 | 39 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 08:47 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 10:40 | yes | 19 | 26 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 09:44 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 10:41 | no | 0 | 28 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 09:05 | yes | 15 | 26 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 13:02 | yes | 17 | 170 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 10:07 | yes | 9 | 29 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 09:32 | yes | 3 | 15 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 10:17 | yes | 12 | 19 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 10:33 | yes | 9 | 8 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 12:49 | yes | 3 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 12:16 | no | 0 | 17 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 08:49 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:27 | yes | 5 | 25 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 12:16 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 09:40 | yes | 18 | 22 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 09:56 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 09:16 | yes | 5 | 27 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 08:48 | yes | 9 | 31 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 09:26 | yes | 14 | 48 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 10:26 | yes | 5 | 33 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 11:06 | yes | 4 | 19 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 09:27 | yes | 21 | 31 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 10:14 | yes | 9 | 8 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 12:55 | yes | 6 | 8 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 12:08 | no | 0 | 16 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 08:41 | yes | 10 | 6 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:11 | yes | 5 | 31 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 10:57 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 12:16 | yes | 21 | 33 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 09:37 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 12:01 | yes | 10 | 45 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 08:49 | yes | 20 | 29 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 09:19 | yes | 15 | 75 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 08:51 | yes | 25 | 77 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 12:21 | yes | 8 | 21 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 11:46 | yes | 11 | 22 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 12:39 | yes | 10 | 8 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 10:52 | yes | 2 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 12:54 | yes | 11 | 18 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 11:35 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:14 | yes | 5 | 28 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 10:58 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 09:08 | yes | 23 | 20 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 10:20 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 12:09 | no | 0 | 36 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 09:10 | yes | 8 | 16 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 10:13 | yes | 12 | 55 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 11:42 | yes | 5 | 30 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 09:08 | yes | 2 | 14 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 11:00 | yes | 14 | 14 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 11:54 | no | 0 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 10:18 | no | 0 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 08:42 | no | 0 | 16 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 10:41 | yes | 10 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:22 | yes | 5 | 29 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 09:40 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 09:55 | yes | 20 | 28 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 08:54 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 09:21 | no | 0 | 29 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 11:08 | yes | 14 | 25 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 09:59 | yes | 9 | 20 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 12:48 | no | 0 | 26 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 12:28 | yes | 4 | 22 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 10:28 | no | 0 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 12:03 | no | 0 | 2 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 10:30 | no | 0 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 11:25 | yes | 10 | 22 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 08:55 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:14 | yes | 5 | 23 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 09:38 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 10:56 | yes | 23 | 30 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 10:34 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 10:05 | yes | 24 | 64 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 09:11 | yes | 25 | 60 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 11:33 | yes | 23 | 102 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 10:27 | yes | 5 | 33 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 09:45 | no | 0 | 2 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 11:54 | yes | 24 | 27 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Adra read as Trintech Adra
Adra (by Trintech) read as Trintech Adra
Adra by Trintech read as Trintech Adra
Bill.com read as BILL
BlackLine read as BlackLine Transaction Matching
BlackLine (Trintech) read as BlackLine Transaction Matching
Excel read as Microsoft Excel
Hevo read as Hevo Data
NetSuite read as Oracle NetSuite
Oracle's reconciliation product read as Oracle Account Reconciliation Cloud
Osfin.ai read as Osfin
Prophix read as Prophix One
QuickBooks read as QuickBooks Online
QuickBooks Free read as QuickBooks Online
QuickBooks Online Simple Start read as QuickBooks Online
SAP read as SAP Reconciliation
Wave Accounting read as Wave
Zoho read as Zoho Books
Unresolved, counted raw
ABBYY Vantage
Auditor
CCH Axess
Google Sheets or Excel with Templates
Gresham Technologies (Clareti)
GreshamTech
Hyperscience
Kani
Kofinances
LabVantage
Multiview ERP
NetSuite's native reconciliation tools
Numeric Cash Management
Onymos (DocKnow)
OpenRefine's reconciliation API version 0.1
Oracle reconciliation product
SkyStem (ART)
SpendControl/Doxis SpendControl
Trintech Adra Matcher
XiFin / Waystar
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.