Index › Finance › Accounting and close › Account reconciliation › Enterprise · November 2026 Edition
Account reconciliation for enterprise buyers
Asked as “account reconciliation software”, and as “bank reconciliation automation”, on behalf of an enterprise B2B company. 58 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
66%
Clear leader
66BlackLine Transaction Matching09HighRadius07Trintech Cadency19others
66% of first choices, clear leader.
Since October 2026▲+3Since October 2026: 63% → 66%, +3 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.BlackLine Transaction Matching held the lead, +3 points on 63%, inside the 10-point floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
QuickBooks Online47%Clear leader▼−2Since October 2026: 49% → 47%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.Standing →Mid-market
FloQast27%Contested▼−6Since October 2026: 33% → 27%, −6 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.Standing →Enterprise
BlackLine Transaction Matching66%Clear leader▲+3Since October 2026: 63% → 66%, +3 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.This page
QuickBooks Online47%Clear leader▼−2Since October 2026: 49% → 47%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.Standing →Mid-marketFloQast27%Contested▼−6Since October 2026: 33% → 27%, −6 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.Standing →EnterpriseBlackLine Transaction Matching66%Clear leader▲+3Since October 2026: 63% → 66%, +3 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.This pageThe standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for an enterprise B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01BlackLine Transaction Matching66%11%73endorsed leader▲+3Since October 2026: 63% → 66%, +3 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.63% → 66%
BlackLine Transaction Matching66%11%73endorsed leader▲+3Since October 2026: 63% → 66%, +3 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.63% → 66%02
HighRadius9%5%38accepted challenger▲+1Since October 2026: 8% → 9%, +1 point. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.8% → 9%
HighRadius9%5%38accepted challenger▲+1Since October 2026: 8% → 9%, +1 point. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.8% → 9%03
Trintech Cadency7%10%21accepted challenger▲+1Since October 2026: 6% → 7%, +1 point. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.6% → 7%
Trintech Cadency7%10%21accepted challenger▲+1Since October 2026: 6% → 7%, +1 point. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.6% → 7%04
OneStream5%8%36accepted challenger▲+3Since October 2026: 2% → 5%, +3 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.2% → 5%
OneStream5%8%36accepted challenger▲+3Since October 2026: 2% → 5%, +3 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.2% → 5%05
Trintech3%10%42accepted challenger▲+1Since October 2026: 2% → 3%, +1 point. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.2% → 3%
Trintech3%10%42accepted challenger▲+1Since October 2026: 2% → 3%, +1 point. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.2% → 3%06FloQast3%18%44accepted challenger▼−3Since October 2026: 6% → 3%, −3 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.6% → 3%
FloQast3%18%44accepted challenger▼−3Since October 2026: 6% → 3%, −3 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.6% → 3%Show the four products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
07
Oracle Account Reconciliation Cloud0%14%22accepted challenger▼−4Since October 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.4% → 0%
Oracle Account Reconciliation Cloud0%14%22accepted challenger▼−4Since October 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.4% → 0%08
Numeric0%13%23accepted challenger▼−4Since October 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.4% → 0%
Numeric0%13%23accepted challenger▼−4Since October 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.4% → 0%10
ReconArt0%9%11accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
ReconArt0%9%11accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%09
CCH Tagetik0%8%12accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
CCH Tagetik0%8%12accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
For buyers
Head to headHead-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not enterprise.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each
FloQast vs Trintech AdraFloQast vs Prophix OneFloQast vs BlackLine Transaction MatchingFloQast vs NumericXero vs QuickBooks OnlineXero vs Zoho BooksXero vs Trintech AdraXero vs Prophix OneXero vs BlackLine Transaction MatchingXero vs NumericQuickBooks Online vs Zoho BooksQuickBooks Online vs Trintech AdraQuickBooks Online vs Prophix OneQuickBooks Online vs BlackLine Transaction MatchingQuickBooks Online vs NumericZoho Books vs Trintech AdraZoho Books vs Prophix OneZoho Books vs BlackLine Transaction MatchingZoho Books vs NumericTrintech Adra vs Prophix OneTrintech Adra vs BlackLine Transaction MatchingTrintech Adra vs NumericProphix One vs BlackLine Transaction MatchingProphix One vs NumericBlackLine Transaction Matching vs Numeric
One product takes 66% of first choices here, so the chart would put nine markers in one corner and one at the far edge. The two measurements it plots are columns in the standing above: share, and the negative label rate. Zero products carry a negative rate above 25% in this category.
What they warned about
Five of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, GLM 4.7 FlashX and MiniMax M2.5 changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
QuickBooks Online100%
7 of 7 labels negative · 7 of 14 models · 5 hard negative
“Tools like QuickBooks Online, Xero, or Sage Intacct are not suitable for large companies with thousands of users due to per-seat fees.” Qwen 3.7 Flash, budget prompt
FloQast18%
8 of 44 labels negative · 7 of 14 models
“it is generally less "deep enterprise reconciliation platform" than BlackLine/Trintech... not typically the first pick for large, complex, global reconciliation programs” GPT-5.4 mini, direct prompt
Xero86%
6 of 7 labels negative · 6 of 14 models · 4 hard negative
“Avoid tools designed primarily for SMB platforms (e.g., QuickBooks/Xero ecosystems or lightweight plugins)” Gemini 3.5 Flash, negative prompt
BlackLine Transaction Matching11%
8 of 73 labels negative · 6 of 14 models
“Even well-known platforms (BlackLine, Trintech, OneStream, HighRadius, etc.) can be mis-applied if they don't meet the depth, workflow, and compliance requirements” GLM 4.7 FlashX, negative prompt
What they cite
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
76 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 864 links across 175 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 27 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
48 answers · 61 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Bluecopa38 answers · 66 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Prophix35 answers · 43 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Simetrik27 answers · 38 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Kolleno23 answers · 27 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Maxima23 answers · 27 citations · 11 models
vendor site · BlackLine22 answers · 39 citations · 9 models
vendor site · HighRadius21 answers · 49 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Stacks17 answers · 18 citations · 9 models
15 answers · 15 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Milestone14 answers · 14 citations · 9 models
vendor site · G213 answers · 16 citations · 7 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
46 answers · 12 models
26 answers · 11 models
16 answers · 10 models
16 answers · 8 models
15 answers · 9 models
15 answers · 8 models
15 answers · 8 models
14 answers · 9 models
14 answers · 8 models
12 answers · 6 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “account reconciliation software”, “best account reconciliation software”, “reconciliation tools”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BlackLine blackline.com BlackLine Transaction Matching 66% | 66% | 147 | 27,100 | 1,255 | 28,740 company | $4,066 | 79 | 2 |
| Trintech trintech.com Trintech Cadency 7%, Trintech 3% | 10% | 134 | 1,900 | 44 | 30,370 | 13 | 2 | |
| HighRadius highradius.com | 9% | 604 | 6,600 | 118 | 294,561 | $2,272 | 120 | 1 |
| OneStream onestream.com | 5% | 553 | 12,100 | 703 | 32,233 | $36 | 120 | 5 |
| FloQast floqast.com | 3% | 389 | 9,900 | 194 | 41,324 | $5,039 | 76 | |
| Oracle Fusion oracle.com Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM 2% | 2% | 326 | 260 | 0 | 7,410,638 company | $247 | 101 | |
| Corvus | 2% | |||||||
| ReconNET | 2% | |||||||
| Trintech's Cadency | 2% | |||||||
| Oracle parent site Oracle Account Reconciliation Cloud 0%, Oracle Fusion 0% | 0% | 28 | 450,000 | 66,611 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 15 sites; 3 of them are among the sites the models cited here (blackline.com, bluecopa.com, highradius.com). The first result for “account reconciliation software” is highradius.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best account reconciliation software for an enterprise B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which bank reconciliation automation would you recommend to a large B2B company with thousands of employees?”Comparative“What are the top enterprise-grade reconciliation tools and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best account reconciliation software for a large company that needs predictable total cost across thousands of users?”Scale-constrained“We are a 5,000 person company with SSO, SOC 2 and procurement review requirements evaluating an account reconciliation software. What should we look at?”Negative“Which reconciliation tools should a large enterprise avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5BlackLine Transaction Matching, Trintech's CadencyBlackLine Transaction MatchingChangedBlackLine Transaction MatchingBlackLine Transaction Matching, Trintech Cadencyagainst: Oracle Account Reconciliation Cloudno first choiceagainst: BlackLine Transaction Matching, NetSuite Account Reconciliation, Oracle Account Reconciliation Cloud, QuickBooks Online
Two alternatives
CCH Tagetik, OneStreamTwo alternatives
HighRadius, Trintech CadencyThree alternatives
FloQast, OneStream, TrintechOne alternative
OneStreamGPT-5.4 miniBlackLine Transaction Matching, Trintechagainst: FloQastBlackLine Transaction Matching, ReconNET, Trintech CadencyChangedBlackLine Transaction Matching, TrintechBlackLine Transaction Matchingno first choicenothing named
One alternative
Oracle Fusion Cloud EPMThree alternatives
Kyriba, Oracle Account Reconciliation Cloud, ReconArtTwo alternatives
FloQast, TrintechGemini 3.5 FlashBlackLine Transaction MatchingHighRadiusChangedBlackLine Transaction Matching, TrintechOneStreamagainst: BlackLine Transaction MatchingBlackLine Transaction Matchingagainst: Alteryx, FloQast, Google Sheets, KNIME, Microsoft Excel, Microsoft Power BI, QuickBooks Online, Tableau, Xero
Four alternatives
FloQast, HighRadius, Numeric, TrintechThree alternatives
BlackLine Transaction Matching, Kyriba, TrintechFive alternatives
Duco, FIS IntelliMatch, OneStream, Simetrik, SmartStreamTwo alternatives
Oracle Cloud EPM – Account Reconciliation, TrintechTwo alternatives
FloQast, Oracle Account Reconciliation CloudPerplexity SonarBlackLine Transaction Matchingagainst: FloQast, NumericBlackLine Transaction MatchingHeldBlackLine Transaction MatchingOneStreamagainst: Trintech Cadencyno first choiceagainst: QuickBooks Online, Xero, Zoho Books
Five alternatives
Bluecopa, HighRadius, OneStream, Trintech Cadency, ZoneReconcileTwo alternatives
Simetrik, Trintech CadencyNine alternatives
AutoRek, Bluecopa, FloQast, HighRadius, Numeric, OneStream, SmartStream, SolveXia, Trintech CadencyOne alternative
BlackLine Transaction MatchingGrok 4.20BlackLine Transaction MatchingBlackLine Transaction MatchingHeldagainst: QuickBooks Online, Sage Intacct, XeroBlackLine Transaction Matching, HighRadius, TrintechBlackLine Transaction MatchingBlackLine Transaction Matchingagainst: Google Sheets, Microsoft Excel
Three alternatives
HighRadius, OneStream, TrintechSix alternatives
FloQast, HighRadius, Oracle Account Reconciliation Cloud, Oracle NetSuite, Simetrik, TrintechThree alternatives
FloQast, OneStream, Oracle Account Reconciliation CloudFour alternatives
FloQast, Numeric, OneStream, Trintech CadencyTwo alternatives
Trintech, WorkivaMistral SmallBlackLine Transaction MatchingBlackLine Transaction Matching, HighRadiusChangedBlackLine Transaction MatchingBlackLine Transaction Matchingno first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
OneStream, TrintechOne alternative
OneStreamSix alternatives
CCH Tagetik, FloQast, HighRadius, OneStream, SmartStream, TrintechThree alternatives
OneStream, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, TrintechDeepSeek V4 FlashBlackLine Transaction Matching, Trintechagainst: FloQastBlackLine Transaction MatchingChangedBlackLine Transaction Matchingagainst: CCH Tagetik, OneStreamBlackLine Transaction Matching, Trintech Cadencyagainst: Oracle Fusion Cloud EPMBlackLine Transaction Matchingagainst: FloQastagainst: BlackLine Transaction Matching, Oracle Account Reconciliation Cloud, QuickBooks Online, Spreadsheets, Trintech, Xero, ZoneReconcile
Two alternatives
HighRadius, OneStreamTwo alternatives
HighRadius, Trintech CadencyFive alternatives
FloQast, HighRadius, Oracle Account Reconciliation Cloud, ReconArt, TrintechOne alternative
NumericThree alternatives
OneStream, Oracle Account Reconciliation Cloud, TrintechLlama 4 Maverickno first choiceBlackLine Transaction MatchingChangedno first choiceBlackLine Transaction Matching, Trintech Cadencyno first choiceagainst: Microsoft Excel
Three alternatives
FloQast, HighRadius, TrintechTwo alternatives
FloQast, Trintech AdraQwen 3.7 FlashBlackLine Transaction Matching, CorvusBlackLine Transaction MatchingChangedBlackLine Transaction MatchingOneStreamagainst: FloQast, Numeric, QuickBooks Online, ReconArt, Sage Intacct, Xerono first choicenothing named
Six alternatives
FloQast, Flux, NetSuite SuiteSuccess, Oracle Fusion, SAP BPC, SAP S/4HANAThree alternatives
FloQast, Numeric, ReconArtFive alternatives
FloQast, OneStream, Oracle Account Reconciliation Cloud, Trintech Adra, Trintech CadencyTwo alternatives
BlackLine Transaction Matching, DualEntryKimi K2BlackLine Transaction MatchingBlackLine Transaction MatchingHeldagainst: OneStreamBlackLine Transaction MatchingFloQastagainst: BlackLine Transaction Matching, Trintech CadencyBlackLine Transaction Matchingagainst: BlackLine Transaction Matching, Trintech
Six alternatives
FloQast, HighRadius, Numeric, OneStream, Oracle Account Reconciliation Cloud, Trintech CadencyThree alternatives
HighRadius, Oracle NetSuite Account Reconciliation, Trintech CadencySeven alternatives
FloQast, HighRadius, Numeric, OneStream, Oracle Account Reconciliation Cloud, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, TrintechTwo alternatives
FloQast, TrintechGLM 4.7 FlashXBlackLine Transaction MatchingHighRadiusChangedBlackLine Transaction MatchingOracle Fusion Cloud EPMagainst: BlackLine Transaction Matching, FloQast, HighRadius, TrintechBlackLine Transaction Matchingagainst: BlackLine Transaction Matching, HighRadius, OneStream, Trintech
Six alternatives
FloQast, HighRadius, OneStream, ReconArt, SolveXia, TrintechThree alternatives
Aritma, BlackLine Transaction Matching, FloQastTwelve alternatives
AutoRek, Bluecopa, CCH Tagetik, FloQast, HighRadius, Numeric, OneStream, Oracle Account Reconciliation Cloud, Prophix One, ReconArt, SmartStream, TrintechTwo alternatives
Numeric, ReconcilerFour alternatives
FloQast, HighRadius, Numeric, TrintechMiniMax M2.5BlackLine Transaction MatchingBlackLine Transaction Matching, HighRadiusChangedBlackLine Transaction MatchingBlackLine Transaction Matching, HighRadiusno first choicenothing named
Four alternatives
Kolleno, Oracle Fusion, Trintech, VenaThree alternatives
Maxima, Numeric, TrintechFour alternatives
FloQast, HighRadius, ReconArt, TrintechTwo alternatives
OneStream, Trintech CadencyGPT-6 LunaBlackLine Transaction MatchingBlackLine Transaction MatchingHeldBlackLine Transaction Matching, Trintech Cadencyagainst: Advanced Financial ClosingBlackLine Transaction Matchingno first choicenothing named
Three alternatives
HighRadius, Oracle Account Reconciliation Cloud, Trintech CadencyFive alternatives
Account Reconciliations, HighRadius, Oracle Fusion, SAP Reconciliation, Trintech CadencyFive alternatives
FIS Data Integrity Manager, FloQast, OneStream Financial Close, Oracle Account Reconciliation Cloud, SmartStream TLM ReconciliationsTwo alternatives
Oracle Account Reconciliation Cloud, Trintech CadencyMuse Glimmer 30BBlackLine Transaction MatchingBlackLine Transaction MatchingHeldBlackLine Transaction MatchingFloQastagainst: BlackLine Transaction Matchingno first choiceagainst: DOKKA, FloQast, Numeric, Oracle NetSuite, QuickBooks Online, Reconciler, Sage Intacct, SolveXia, Trintech Adra, Xero, Zoho Books
Five alternatives
CCH Tagetik, FloQast, HighRadius, OneStream, TrintechOne alternative
HighRadiusSeven alternatives
CCH Tagetik, FloQast, HighRadius, OneStream, Oracle Account Reconciliation Cloud, Prophix One, TrintechTwo alternatives
Easy Month End, ReconcilerBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 11:22 | yes | 10 | 8 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 13:00 | yes | 3 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 12:53 | yes | 8 | 24 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 09:11 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:12 | yes | 10 | 30 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 10:02 | yes | 5 | 27 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 11:14 | yes | 10 | 14 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 11:43 | yes | 6 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 08:56 | no | 0 | 25 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 10:00 | yes | 13 | 22 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 12:54 | yes | 14 | 30 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 11:59 | yes | 5 | 24 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 09:15 | yes | 4 | 18 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 11:54 | yes | 12 | 16 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 11:50 | yes | 19 | 11 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 08:39 | yes | 3 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 09:47 | yes | 12 | 21 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 08:42 | yes | 10 | 9 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:19 | yes | 5 | 41 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 09:20 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 10:18 | yes | 25 | 19 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 12:52 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 08:45 | yes | 5 | 17 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 10:19 | yes | 18 | 26 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 09:52 | yes | 24 | 33 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 11:27 | yes | 9 | 35 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 11:07 | yes | 4 | 13 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 11:58 | yes | 22 | 21 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 10:10 | yes | 9 | 8 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 10:02 | yes | 5 | 9 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 09:47 | yes | 10 | 24 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 10:22 | yes | 10 | 6 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:16 | yes | 9 | 35 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 09:52 | yes | 5 | 10 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 12:50 | yes | 23 | 35 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 11:18 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 11:12 | yes | 14 | 45 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 11:21 | yes | 13 | 52 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 11:52 | yes | 13 | 73 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 12:42 | yes | 20 | 42 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 11:13 | yes | 7 | 19 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 10:08 | yes | 11 | 25 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 09:52 | yes | 10 | 7 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 12:00 | yes | 3 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 10:11 | yes | 5 | 24 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 09:17 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:26 | yes | 13 | 26 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 12:04 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 09:31 | yes | 21 | 27 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 09:19 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 09:01 | yes | 23 | 135 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 12:20 | yes | 22 | 148 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 12:53 | yes | 18 | 83 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 11:00 | yes | 5 | 24 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 11:03 | yes | 2 | 17 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 11:23 | yes | 19 | 20 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 11:42 | no | 0 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 10:08 | no | 0 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 11:56 | no | 0 | 25 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 09:42 | yes | 10 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:22 | yes | 15 | 36 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 12:14 | no | 0 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 12:06 | yes | 22 | 40 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 10:32 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 12:31 | yes | 5 | 41 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 11:26 | yes | 24 | 39 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 11:30 | yes | 22 | 43 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 11:55 | no | 0 | 11 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 10:54 | yes | 1 | 20 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 12:49 | yes | 13 | 23 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 09:53 | yes | 18 | 9 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 12:27 | yes | 3 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 11:12 | no | 0 | 20 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 09:31 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:20 | yes | 9 | 32 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 12:52 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 09:19 | yes | 24 | 25 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 08:39 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 09:17 | yes | 10 | 32 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 09:12 | yes | 24 | 27 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 10:04 | yes | 23 | 50 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 09:46 | yes | 7 | 48 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 12:22 | no | 0 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 10:24 | yes | 18 | 34 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Adra read as Trintech Adra
Adra by Trintech read as Trintech Adra
BlackLine read as BlackLine Transaction Matching
BlackLine (by Trintech) read as BlackLine Transaction Matching
Excel read as Microsoft Excel
NetSuite read as Oracle NetSuite
Oracle read as Oracle Account Reconciliation Cloud
Oracle Cloud EPM read as Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM
Oracle Cloud EPM (with Oracle Account Reconciliation) read as Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM
Oracle EPM read as Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM
Oracle EPM (Account Reconciliation module) read as Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM
Oracle Reconciliation read as Oracle Account Reconciliation Cloud
Oracle's reconciliation product read as Oracle Account Reconciliation Cloud
Osfin.ai read as Osfin
Prophix read as Prophix One
QuickBooks read as QuickBooks Online
SAP read as SAP Reconciliation
SAP Account Substantiation and Automation by BlackLine read as BlackLine Transaction Matching
Unresolved, counted raw
Account Reconciliations
Advanced Financial Closing
Aritma
Corvus
Cygnet
FIS Data Integrity Manager
FIS IntelliMatch
Flux
NetSuite Account Reconciliation Software
NetSuite SuiteSuccess
OneStream Financial Close
Oracle Cloud EPM – Account Reconciliation (ARCS)
Oracle NetSuite Account Reconciliation
ReconHub
Safebooks.ai
SmartStream TLM Reconciliations
Trintech's Cadency
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.