Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM is enterprise performance management software from Oracle that helps organizations analyze, understand, and report on their business · oracle.com ↗
The standing depends on who is buying. Every model is asked the same questions for each company size.
Cube is first at 18%.
Planful is first at 27%. 0 of 14 models made it the first choice when asked directly.
Ranked first, contested: OneStream has 29%.
“Oracle holds the largest market share (approx. 53% among global top companies). It is widely considered the industry standard for large, complex enterprises.”Qwen 3.7 Flash · Comparative question · first choice
“Rated best overall for financial consolidation and reconciliation and for integration/extensibility in 2026 vendor round-ups.”Muse Glimmer 30B · Comparative question · first choice
“Oracle leads, followed by others... Choose Oracle/SAP if you're in their ERP ecosystem and need depth in financials.”Grok 4.20 · Comparative question · first choice
“The market leader (#1 by revenue share, ~20.3%); named a Leader in the 2025 Gartner Magic Quadrant”DeepSeek V4 Flash · Comparative question · first choice
“When to avoid \u201cfull\u2011stack\u201d EPM suites ... Oracle EPM Cloud | $150\u202f/ user\u202f/ mo | Enterprise\u2011grade”GLM 4.7 FlashX · Budget-constrained question · warning
“Options to AVOID on a Limited Budget ... | OneStream | ~$150K+/year | ... | Oracle EPM Cloud | ~$150–$250/user/month”DeepSeek V4 Flash · Budget-constrained question · warning
“I'd recommend being most cautious about Oracle EPM Cloud (due to complexity, cost, and high failure rates)”DeepSeek V4 Flash · Negative question · warning
“Red flag: Enterprise platforms (Anaplan, Oracle EPM) often assume a 5+ person dedicated FP&A staff”Kimi K2 · Scale-constrained question · warning
The products named in the same answers as Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, over the 347 answers that named it, and how often each was the first choice instead.
| Product | Named together | Picked instead | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 263 | 59 | View → | |
| 229 | 53 | View → | |
| 208 | 18 | View → | |
| 139 | 15 | View → | |
| 136 | 10 | View → | |
| 97 | 11 | View → | |
| 96 | 1 | View → | |
| 89 | 3 | View → | |
| 87 | 5 | View → | |
| 84 | 5 | View → |
What the models named instead of Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM →
A side-by-side page exists where both products are among a category's top eight.
Stated on Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM's own site, not checked by Gane.
Fourteen AI models from 12 labs are asked the same buying questions six ways, for three company sizes. Standings refresh every edition.
Gane sells AI visibility software. No company can pay to change a result.
Read the method →Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted. These counts come from 326 of the 347 answers that named Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM and are not a share of its labels.
813 of the 813 domain citations in answers naming Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM came from a third party's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Warning | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 7 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 7 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 7 |
| Grok 4.20 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 7 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 5 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 2 | 0 | 8 | 11 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 4 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 8 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 6 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 7 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 5 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 |