Corporate performance management
Asked as “EPM software”, and as “corporate performance management platform”, on behalf of a mid-market B2B company. 49 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
27%
Contested · Vena 12%
27Planful12Vena10Cube51others
27% of first choices, contested.
Since October 2026▲+5Since October 2026: 22% → 27%, +5 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.Planful held the lead, +5 points on 22%, inside the 10-point floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
Cube18%Contested▲+3Since October 2026: 15% → 18%, +3 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.Standing →Mid-market
Planful27%Contested▲+5Since October 2026: 22% → 27%, +5 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.This pageEnterprise
Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM30%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM (30%) replaces Anaplan (30% then, 14% now), 16 points clear, past the 10-point floor.Standing →
Cube18%Contested▲+3Since October 2026: 15% → 18%, +3 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.Standing →Mid-marketPlanful27%Contested▲+5Since October 2026: 22% → 27%, +5 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.This pageEnterpriseOracle Fusion Cloud EPM30%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM (30%) replaces Anaplan (30% then, 14% now), 16 points clear, past the 10-point floor.Standing →The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01Planful27%5%42accepted challenger▲+5Since October 2026: 22% → 27%, +5 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.22% → 27%
Planful27%5%42accepted challenger▲+5Since October 2026: 22% → 27%, +5 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.22% → 27%02
Vena12%12%40accepted challenger▼−3Since October 2026: 15% → 12%, −3 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.15% → 12%
Vena12%12%40accepted challenger▼−3Since October 2026: 15% → 12%, −3 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.15% → 12%03
Workday Adaptive Planning10%19%53accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 10% → 10%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.10% → 10%
Workday Adaptive Planning10%19%53accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 10% → 10%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.10% → 10%04Cube10%13%15accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 8% → 10%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.8% → 10%
Cube10%13%15accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 8% → 10%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.8% → 10%05
Pigment6%9%23accepted challenger▲+4Since October 2026: 2% → 6%, +4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.2% → 6%
Pigment6%9%23accepted challenger▲+4Since October 2026: 2% → 6%, +4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.2% → 6%06
Jedox6%10%10accepted challenger▲+4Since October 2026: 2% → 6%, +4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.2% → 6%
Jedox6%10%10accepted challenger▲+4Since October 2026: 2% → 6%, +4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.2% → 6%07
Datarails4%25%12criticized challenger▼−3Since October 2026: 7% → 4%, −3 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.7% → 4%
Datarails4%25%12criticized challenger▼−3Since October 2026: 7% → 4%, −3 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.7% → 4%08
Prophix2%7%29accepted challenger▼−15Since October 2026: 17% → 2%, −15 points. Past the 10-point floor: movement.17% → 2%
Prophix2%7%29accepted challenger▼−15Since October 2026: 17% → 2%, −15 points. Past the 10-point floor: movement.17% → 2%09
Anaplan2%48%48criticized challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%
Anaplan2%48%48criticized challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%Show the seven products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
16
SAP BPC0%77%13criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
SAP BPC0%77%13criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%15Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM0%51%47criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM0%51%47criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%14
IBM Planning Analytics0%46%13criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
IBM Planning Analytics0%46%13criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%11
OneStream0%31%39criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
OneStream0%31%39criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%10
SAP Analytics Cloud0%12%24accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
SAP Analytics Cloud0%12%24accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%12
Board0%0%10accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Board0%0%10accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%13
CCH Tagetik0%0%10accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
CCH Tagetik0%0%10accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
For buyers
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each
Planful vs PigmentPlanful vs JedoxPlanful vs DatarailsPlanful vs ProphixVena vs Workday Adaptive PlanningVena vs CubeVena vs PigmentVena vs JedoxVena vs DatarailsVena vs ProphixWorkday Adaptive Planning vs CubeWorkday Adaptive Planning vs PigmentWorkday Adaptive Planning vs JedoxWorkday Adaptive Planning vs DatarailsWorkday Adaptive Planning vs ProphixCube vs PigmentCube vs JedoxCube vs DatarailsCube vs ProphixPigment vs JedoxPigment vs DatarailsPigment vs ProphixJedox vs DatarailsJedox vs ProphixDatarails vs Prophix
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01020304050607080910111213141516Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative40%
Key
01Planful27%
Planful27%02Vena12%
Vena12%03Workday Adaptive Planning10%
Workday Adaptive Planning10%04Cube10%
Cube10%05Pigment6%
Pigment6%06Jedox6%
Jedox6%07Datarails4%
Datarails4%08Prophix2%
Prophix2%09Anaplan2%
Anaplan2%10SAP Analytics Cloud0%
SAP Analytics Cloud0%11OneStream0%
OneStream0%12Board0%
Board0%13CCH Tagetik0%
CCH Tagetik0%14IBM Planning Analytics0%
IBM Planning Analytics0%15Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM0%
Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM0%16SAP BPC0%
SAP BPC0%What they warned about
Nine of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Perplexity Sonar, Mistral Small, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2 and GLM 4.7 FlashX changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM51%
24 of 47 labels negative · 13 of 14 models · 4 hard negative
“When to avoid \u201cfull\u2011stack\u201d EPM suites ... Oracle EPM Cloud | $150\u202f/ user\u202f/ mo | Enterprise\u2011grade” GLM 4.7 FlashX, budget prompt
Anaplan48%
23 of 48 labels negative · 11 of 14 models · 4 hard negative
“When to avoid \u201cfull\u2011stack\u201d EPM suites ... Anaplan | $120\u202fK\u202f+/yr | Designed for massive, multi\u2011entity ... steep learning curve.” GLM 4.7 FlashX, budget prompt
SAP BPC77%
10 of 13 labels negative · 7 of 14 models · 6 hard negative
“Platforms to AVOID (End-of-Life/Legacy Systems) ... Why avoid: No longer actively developed” Kimi K2, negative prompt
Oracle Hyperion100%
8 of 8 labels negative · 7 of 14 models · 5 hard negative
“you don't need the multi-million dollar, IT-heavy legacy EPM systems built for Fortune 100 conglomerates (like legacy Oracle Hyperion or IBM Cognos)” Gemini 3.5 Flash, scale prompt
What they cite
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
72 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 880 links across 218 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 15 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
36 answers · 36 citations · 11 models
27 answers · 36 citations · 9 models
25 answers · 41 citations · 10 models
vendor site · OneStream24 answers · 40 citations · 11 models
23 answers · 41 citations · 9 models
18 answers · 18 citations · 10 models
13 answers · 14 citations · 5 models
12 answers · 18 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Oracle12 answers · 17 citations · 6 models
12 answers · 12 citations · 7 models
vendor site · Betterworks11 answers · 13 citations · 9 models
11 answers · 13 citations · 9 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
34 answers · 11 models
23 answers · 9 models
19 answers · 9 models
17 answers · 10 models
12 answers · 7 models
11 answers · 9 models
11 answers · 7 models
10 answers · 7 models
9 answers · 9 models
9 answers · 5 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best epm software”, “epm platforms”, “epm software”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Planful planful.com | 27% | 357 | 3,600 | 685,726 | 58,997 | $137 | 120 | |
| Vena venasolutions.com | 12% | 404 | 12,100 | 3,928 | 62,294 | $13,792 | 58 | |
| Workday workday.com Workday Adaptive Planning 10% | 10% | 430 | 1,220,000 | 23,848 | 2,213,450 company | 80 | 5 | |
| Cube cubesoftware.com | 10% | 304 | 90,500 | 152,613 | 168,764 | 13 | 1 | |
| Pigment pigment.com | 6% | 198 | 49,500 | 25,645 | 12,248 | 22 | 8 | |
| Jedox jedox.com | 6% | 44 | 720 | 3 | 9,363 | $14 | 18 | 9 |
| Lattice lattice.com | 4% | 19 | 90,500 | 13,900 | 122,123 | $1,328 | 120 | |
| Datarails datarails.com | 4% | 374 | 6,600 | 134 | 18,964 | $16,697 | 107 | 6 |
| Synergita | 4% | 40 | 0 | |||||
| Prophix prophix.com | 2% | 249 | 1,600 | 41 | 14,138 | $109 | 103 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 24 sites; 3 of them are among the sites the models cited here (appsruntheworld.com, onestream.com, oracle.com). The first result for “best epm software” is peoplemanagingpeople.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best EPM software for a mid-market B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which corporate performance management platform would you recommend to a mid-sized B2B company?”Comparative“What are the top EPM platforms and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best EPM software for a company with a limited budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 500 person company evaluating a EPM software. What should we look at?”Negative“Which EPM platforms should I avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5no first choiceno first choiceHeldDrivetrainagainst: DatarailsEPM Liveno first choiceagainst: Anaplan, Cartesis, Longview Khalix, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Oracle Hyperion, Pigment, Prophix, SAP BPC, TM1
Five alternatives
Anaplan, IBM Planning Analytics, Limelight, OneStream, Workday Adaptive PlanningThree alternatives
Cube, Prophix, Zoho ProjectsGPT-5.4 miniWorkday Adaptive Planningagainst: VenaWorkday Adaptive PlanningHeldno first choiceCubeagainst: Pigmentno first choiceagainst: Anaplan, OneStream, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Oracle Hyperion, Workday Adaptive Planning
Two alternatives
Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, ProphixTwo alternatives
OneStream, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPMTwo alternatives
Planful, VenaGemini 3.5 FlashPigmentPigmentHeldagainst: Anaplan, SAP BPCno first choiceCube, Datarailsagainst: Anaplan, OneStream, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPMPigment, Workday Adaptive Planningagainst: Anaplan, Excel/Google Sheets, IBM Cognos, Oracle Hyperionagainst: IBM Planning Analytics, On-Premise Oracle Hyperion, OneStream, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, SAP Analytics Cloud, SAP BPC, SAP Group Reporting, legacy IBM Cognos TM1
Five alternatives
Cube, Mosaic, Planful, Vena, Workday Adaptive PlanningFive alternatives
Cube, Planful, Prophix, Vena, Workday Adaptive PlanningSeven alternatives
Anaplan, OneStream, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Pigment, Planful, SAP Analytics Cloud, Workday Adaptive PlanningEight alternatives
Acterys, Budgyt, Centage, Inforiver, Jirav, Limelight, Vena, accoPLANNINGFour alternatives
Cube, Datarails, Planful, VenaPerplexity SonarPlanfulLatticeChangedno first choiceJedoxagainst: Monday.com, Smartsheetno first choiceagainst: Anaplan, Cube, Datarails, Jedox, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Oracle Hyperion, Vena, Workday Adaptive Planning
Five alternatives
Drivetrain, Pigment, Prophix, Vena, Workday Adaptive PlanningFour alternatives
15Five, Culture Amp, Leapsome, PerformYardTwo alternatives
Prophix, VenaGrok 4.20Planfulagainst: AnaplanPlanfulHeldagainst: Anaplan, OneStreamOracle Fusion Cloud EPMSynergitaagainst: Anaplan, OneStream, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Planful, Vena, Workday Adaptive Planningno first choiceagainst: Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, SAP, Workday Adaptive Planning
Three alternatives
Drivetrain, OneStream, ProphixThree alternatives
Pigment, Vena, Workday Adaptive PlanningFour alternatives
Anaplan, OneStream, SAP Analytics Cloud, SAP Enterprise Performance ManagementSix alternatives
Konsolidat, Microsoft Excel, Microsoft Power BI, Prophix, SAP Analytics Cloud, TallyPrimeThree alternatives
OneStream, Planful, Workday Adaptive PlanningMistral SmallAnaplan, Empowerno first choiceChangedOracle Fusion Cloud EPM, SAPSynergitano first choiceagainst: Cube, Datarails, IBM Planning Analytics, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, SAP BPC, Venaagainst: Ivanti Endpoint Manager, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM
Two alternatives
Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, SAP Analytics CloudThree alternatives
Anaplan, OneStream, Workday Adaptive PlanningFour alternatives
Effy AI, SAP Analytics Cloud, Small Improvements, TallyPrimeTwo alternatives
Anaplan, Workday Adaptive PlanningDeepSeek V4 FlashPlanfulagainst: Oracle Fusion Cloud EPMPlanfulHeldagainst: Anaplan, OneStream, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, SAP BPCOracle Fusion Cloud EPMJedoxagainst: Anaplan, OneStream, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Planful, TallyPrime, Vena, Workday Adaptive PlanningWorkday Adaptive Planningagainst: Anaplan, OneStreamagainst: Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Oracle Hyperion, SAP BPC, SAP Enterprise Performance Management
Four alternatives
Datarails, Prophix, Vena, Workday Adaptive PlanningTwo alternatives
Prophix, VenaEight alternatives
Anaplan, Board, CCH Tagetik, OneStream, Planful, Prophix, SAP Analytics Cloud, Workday Adaptive PlanningTwo alternatives
Centage, ProphixThree alternatives
Planful, Prophix, VenaLlama 4 Maverickno first choiceno first choiceHeldno first choiceno first choiceno first choiceagainst: Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM
Qwen 3.7 FlashWorkday Adaptive Planningagainst: Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, SAPLattice, LimelightChangedagainst: Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, SAPOracle Fusion Cloud EPMagainst: IBM Planning AnalyticsDatarailsagainst: Anaplan, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPMno first choiceagainst: Anaplan, FiscalPoint, IBM Cognos Analytics, IBM Planning Analytics, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, SAP BPC
Four alternatives
Anaplan, Cube, OneStream, PlanfulTwo alternatives
15Five, VenaFive alternatives
Anaplan Platform, OneStream, SAP Analytics Cloud, SAP BPC, Workday Adaptive PlanningTwo alternatives
Cube, JedoxKimi K2Cube, Venaagainst: Workday Adaptive PlanningPlanful, ProphixChangedOracle Fusion Cloud EPMCube, LiveFlowagainst: Anaplan, Prophix, Workday Adaptive Planningno first choiceagainst: Anaplan, Axiom EPM, Cartesis, IBM Planning Analytics, Longview Khalix, OneStream, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Oracle Hyperion, SAP BPC
Three alternatives
Datarails, Planful, ProphixThree alternatives
Datarails, Pigment, VenaSix alternatives
Anaplan, Board, IBM Planning Analytics, OneStream, SAP Analytics Cloud, Workday Adaptive PlanningThree alternatives
ERPNext, Joiin, PlanGuruFour alternatives
Jedox, OneStream, Vena, Workday Adaptive PlanningGLM 4.7 FlashXPlanful, Venaagainst: AnaplanPlanfulChangedno first choiceJedox, Planfulagainst: Anaplan, OneStream, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, SAP BPCno first choiceagainst: Oracle Hyperion EPM Suite
Three alternatives
Board, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Workday Adaptive PlanningThree alternatives
Datarails, Pigment, VenaEleven alternatives
Anaplan, BlackLine, Board, CCH Tagetik, IBM Planning Analytics, OneStream, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Planful, SAP Analytics Cloud, SAP Enterprise Performance Management, Workday Adaptive PlanningFive alternatives
Cube, PivotXL, QuickBooks Online, Vena, XeroMiniMax M2.5Venaagainst: AnaplanVenaHeldagainst: BetterworksOracle Fusion Cloud EPMagainst: SAPEffy AIagainst: Anaplan, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, SAP Analytics Cloud, TallyPrimeno first choiceagainst: Anaplan, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, SAP
Four alternatives
OneStream, Pigment, Planful, Workday Adaptive PlanningTwo alternatives
15Five, LatticeFive alternatives
Anaplan, BlackLine, Board Intelligence, OneStream, Workday Adaptive PlanningTwo alternatives
PerformYard, Small ImprovementsGPT-6 LunaPlanfulPlanfulHeldno first choiceCubeno first choiceagainst: IBM Planning Analytics, Oracle Hyperion, Oracle Hyperion 11.1.2.x, SAP BPC for Microsoft, version 10.1, SAP BPC on older NetWeaver/BW setups
Three alternatives
Pigment, Vena, Workday Adaptive PlanningThree alternatives
Prophix, Vena, Workday Adaptive PlanningTwo alternatives
Excel, Google SheetsMuse Glimmer 30BPlanful, VenaPlanful, VenaHeldagainst: Anaplan, OneStream, Workday Adaptive PlanningOneStream, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPMKonsolidatagainst: Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, SAP Analytics Cloud, Workday Adaptive Planningno first choiceagainst: Anaplan, Ivanti Endpoint Manager EPM, OneStream, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Workday Adaptive Planning
Two alternatives
Prophix, deFacto GlobalFour alternatives
15Five, Lattice, Leapsome, ProphixFive alternatives
Anaplan, Board, SAP Analytics Cloud, SAP BPC, Workday Adaptive PlanningThree alternatives
OrangeHRM Open Source Starter edition, Synergita, TallyPrimeBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 09:19 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 09:35 | yes | 4 | 6 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 12:56 | yes | 11 | 20 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 12:37 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:17 | yes | 16 | 42 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 11:09 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 12:17 | yes | 24 | 23 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 09:13 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 08:59 | yes | 9 | 36 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 11:57 | yes | 9 | 36 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 10:13 | yes | 15 | 77 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 08:40 | yes | 12 | 56 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 11:34 | yes | 5 | 24 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 09:59 | yes | 19 | 33 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 10:05 | no | 0 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 09:13 | yes | 2 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 10:17 | no | 0 | 15 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 12:48 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:31 | yes | 9 | 33 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 12:41 | no | 0 | 1 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 12:26 | yes | 22 | 30 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 11:02 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 10:25 | yes | 5 | 31 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 11:45 | yes | 20 | 63 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 09:38 | yes | 20 | 64 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 11:24 | yes | 5 | 20 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 11:49 | yes | 4 | 11 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 09:08 | yes | 11 | 23 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 10:05 | yes | 9 | 7 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 09:38 | yes | 5 | 9 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 12:42 | no | 0 | 19 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 12:55 | yes | 10 | 6 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:16 | yes | 5 | 29 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 11:13 | yes | 5 | 7 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 10:33 | yes | 22 | 54 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 09:29 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 10:53 | yes | 10 | 31 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 10:30 | yes | 20 | 30 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 09:14 | yes | 24 | 185 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 12:37 | yes | 25 | 48 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 09:50 | yes | 8 | 17 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 12:12 | yes | 24 | 39 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 12:35 | yes | 9 | 7 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 09:01 | no | 0 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 12:16 | yes | 9 | 19 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 09:52 | yes | 10 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:29 | yes | 17 | 39 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 09:41 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 11:51 | yes | 22 | 31 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 09:39 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 08:59 | yes | 18 | 91 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 12:13 | yes | 14 | 52 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 11:15 | yes | 21 | 38 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 12:12 | yes | 5 | 31 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 10:55 | yes | 1 | 16 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 12:38 | yes | 20 | 23 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 11:46 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 09:03 | no | 0 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 12:09 | no | 0 | 18 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 08:49 | yes | 10 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:16 | yes | 5 | 31 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 11:37 | no | 0 | 10 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 12:06 | yes | 22 | 28 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 09:02 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 10:09 | no | 0 | 26 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 10:17 | yes | 14 | 22 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 12:36 | yes | 15 | 38 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 10:24 | no | 0 | 27 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 12:48 | yes | 3 | 21 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 08:46 | yes | 15 | 21 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 09:14 | yes | 17 | 9 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 08:57 | yes | 4 | 6 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 08:59 | yes | 4 | 20 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 08:41 | yes | 10 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:17 | yes | 13 | 32 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 12:54 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 10:52 | yes | 24 | 27 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 10:45 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 11:56 | yes | 25 | 83 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 11:43 | yes | 25 | 28 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 12:56 | yes | 24 | 76 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 11:04 | yes | 23 | 50 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 11:41 | yes | 3 | 14 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 09:53 | yes | 24 | 29 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Adaptive Insights read as Workday Adaptive Planning
Adaptive Insights (Workday) read as Workday Adaptive Planning
Host Analytics read as Planful
NetSuite read as Oracle NetSuite
Oracle read as Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM
Oracle Cloud EPM read as Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM
Oracle Cloud EPM (Successor to Hyperion) read as Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM
Oracle EPM read as Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM
Oracle EPM (Hyperion) read as Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM
Oracle EPM Cloud read as Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM
Oracle EPM Cloud (Hyperion successors - FCCS/EPBCS) read as Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM
Prophix One read as Prophix
SAP BPC read as SAP BPC
SAP BPC (Business Planning & Consolidation) read as SAP BPC
SAP BPC (Business Planning and Consolidation) read as SAP BPC
SAP Group Reporting read as SAP Group Reporting
Vena Solutions read as Vena
Wolters Kluwer CCH Tagetik read as CCH Tagetik
Workday Adaptive read as Workday Adaptive Planning
deFacto read as deFacto Global
Unresolved, counted raw
Anaplan Platform
Axiom EPM (Syntellis)
Cascade.ai
Corrsim
CultureAmp
FiscalPoint
Flynote
Inforiver
Ivanti Endpoint Manager EPM
Jedox EPM Software
Kasisto.ai
On-Premise Oracle Hyperion (Versions 11.1.x and earlier)
Oracle Hyperion 11.1.2.x
Oracle Hyperion EPM Suite
OrangeHRM Open Source Starter edition
Profit.co
ProjectLibre
Quantive
SAP BPC for Microsoft, version 10.1
SAP BPC on older NetWeaver/BW setups
TM1
Trullio
Wdesk
Worxmate
accoPLANNING
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.