Index › Finance › Planning and analysis › SaaS metrics · November 2026 Edition

SaaS metrics and analytics

Asked as “SaaS metrics dashboard”, and as “ARR analytics tool”, on behalf of a mid-market B2B company. 53 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
43%
Clear leader
43ChartMogul13ProfitWell Metrics09Databox34others

43% of first choices, clear leader.

Since October 2026▼−6Since October 2026: 49% → 43%, −6 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.ChartMogul held the lead, −6 points on 49%, inside the 10-point floor.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.

The standing

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01ChartMogul43%13%69endorsed leader▼−6Since October 2026: 49% → 43%, −6 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.49% → 43%
02ProfitWell Metrics13%28%46criticized challenger▼−1Since October 2026: 14% → 13%, −1 point. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.14% → 13%
03Databox9%0%23accepted challenger▲+3Since October 2026: 6% → 9%, +3 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.6% → 9%
04Baremetrics4%18%55accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.2% → 4%
05Maxio Metrics4%8%24accepted challenger▼−4Since October 2026: 8% → 4%, −4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.8% → 4%
06Amplitude4%26%35criticized challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.2% → 4%
07Mixpanel2%20%40accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%
08PostHog2%14%21accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%
09Looker Studio Lab in the set2%0%11accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 4% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.4% → 2%
10Metabase2%8%13accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%
Show the four products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
14Tableau0%47%15criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
13Heap0%38%13criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
11Microsoft Power BI0%25%12criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
12Looker Lab in the set0%23%13accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%

The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured

Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.

Looker Studio is made by Google, whose model Gemini 3.5 Flash is in the set. On the four share prompts that model made it the first choice zero times of 4; the other thirteen models one time of 52. Looker is made by Google, whose model Gemini 3.5 Flash is in the set. On the four share prompts that model made it the first choice zero times of 4; the other thirteen models zero times of 52. Lab treatment is defined on the method page; the row is marked, not excluded.

All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each

Recommended versus criticized

Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.

Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
M11
12
13
14
Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative60%
Key
01ChartMogul43%
02ProfitWell Metrics13%
03Databox9%
04Baremetrics4%
05Maxio Metrics4%
06Amplitude4%
07Mixpanel2%
08PostHog2%
09Looker Studio2%
10Metabase2%
11Microsoft Power BI0%
12Looker0%
13Heap0%
14Tableau0%

What they warned about

Five of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Perplexity Sonar, Mistral Small, Qwen 3.7 Flash, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5 and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
ProfitWell Metrics
28%
13 of 46 labels negative · 9 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“ProfitWell Metrics (by Paddle) — *Avoid if you need reliability*” DeepSeek V4 Flash, negative prompt
Baremetrics
18%
10 of 55 labels negative · 9 of 14 models
“Baremetrics has received similar warnings, particularly regarding: Reliability for subscription-revenue metrics at basic tiers” MiniMax M2.5, negative prompt
ChartMogul
13%
9 of 69 labels negative · 9 of 14 models
“Basic ChartMogul - Multiple AI models recommend avoiding the basic tier if you need reliable subscription-revenue metrics” MiniMax M2.5, negative prompt
Amplitude
26%
9 of 35 labels negative · 8 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“Avoid for tight budgets: Tools like Amplitude, Heap, or Maxio, which quickly go custom/enterprise pricing” Grok 4.20, budget prompt

What they cite

Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.

Sites the answers cite

73 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 813 links across 241 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 7 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.

vendor site · Baremetrics40 answers · 58 citations · 13 models
28 answers · 43 citations · 10 models
vendor site · ChartMogul26 answers · 34 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Databox23 answers · 31 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Intempt21 answers · 21 citations · 10 models
vendor site · G218 answers · 30 citations · 8 models
13 answers · 13 citations · 7 models
vendor site · NetSuite12 answers · 14 citations · 9 models
11 answers · 25 citations · 9 models
11 answers · 11 citations · 7 models
vendor site · Basedash10 answers · 12 citations · 5 models
10 answers · 11 citations · 6 models

Pages the answers cite

The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.

Search against answers

Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best saas metrics dashboard”, “saas metrics dashboard”, “saas metrics tools”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Company and productsShareOwn site citedName searches, GoogleAI search demand, est.Organic visitsPaid search a month, est.Google ads, last 30 daysBest Google position
ChartMogul chartmogul.com43%1761,00044,4672
ProfitWell paddle.com
ProfitWell Metrics 13%
13%105100172,07931
Databox databox.com9%1103,6006860,8614
Baremetrics baremetrics.com4%136590342,517266
Maxio Metrics maxio.com4%64032,891$518596
Amplitude amplitude.com4%8674,0005,691373,273$20727
Mixpanel mixpanel.com2%9812,10045820,284$45811
PostHog posthog.com2%5433,10027125,936120
Looker Studio lookerstudio.google.com2%7240,5004525,456
Metabase metabase.com2%4214,80033760,1511

Google's top ten for the three searches hold 21 sites; 2 of them are among the sites the models cited here (baremetrics.com, netsuite.com). The first result for “best saas metrics dashboard” is uxcam.com.

How they answered

Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHide
ModelDirect“What is the best SaaS metrics dashboard for a mid-market B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which ARR analytics tool would you recommend to a mid-sized B2B company?”Comparative“What are the top SaaS metrics tools and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best SaaS metrics dashboard for a company with a limited budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 500 person company evaluating a SaaS metrics dashboard. What should we look at?”Negative“Which SaaS metrics tools should I avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5ChartMogul
Two alternativesBaremetrics, Databox
ChartMogul, ToolboksChanged
Four alternativesAmplitude, Baremetrics, Maxio Metrics, Mixpanel
ChartMogul
Three alternativesBaremetrics, Databox, Mixpanel
against: ProfitWell Metrics
ChartMogul, ProfitWell Metrics
Four alternativesDatabox, Looker Studio, Metabase, Stripe Sigma
no first choiceagainst: ChartMogul, Google Analytics, Heap, Kissmetrics, Segment
GPT-5.4 miniDatabox
Four alternativesBaremetrics, ChartMogul, Looker, Tableau
ChartMogulChanged
Two alternativesBaremetrics, ProfitWell Metrics
ChartMogul
Five alternativesAmplitude, Baremetrics, Mixpanel, Stripe Billing Analytics, Stripe Sigma
Metabase
Two alternativesBaremetrics, Looker Studio
against: ChartMogul
no first choicenothing named
Gemini 3.5 FlashMosaic
Five alternativesChartMogul, Looker, Maxio Metrics, Metabase, Subscript
SubscriptChanged
Three alternativesChartMogul, Maxio Metrics, ProfitWell Metrics
no first choice
Six alternativesBaremetrics, ChartMogul, Maxio Metrics, Mixpanel, PostHog, ProfitWell Metrics
ProfitWell Metrics
Four alternativesChartMogul, Metabase, Paddle, Stripe Billing Analytics
no first choiceagainst: Amplitude, Baremetrics, Looker, Metabase, Microsoft Power BI, Mixpanel, Native Stripe Dashboard Analytics, PostHog, ProfitWell Metrics, Snowflake, Tableau
Perplexity SonarDatabox
Four alternativesAmplitude, ChartMogul, Maxio Metrics, Mixpanel
Maxio MetricsChanged
Three alternativesChartMogul, Discern, Zuora Analytics
Baremetrics, ChartMogul
Nine alternativesAmplitude, Databox, Heap, Maxio Metrics, Microsoft Power BI, Mixpanel, Pendo, PostHog, ProfitWell Metrics
Databox
Three alternativesChartMogul, Looker Studio, Metabase
no first choiceagainst: Amplitude, Baremetrics, Chargebee, ChartMogul, Google Analytics, Heap, Mixpanel, PostHog, Recurly, Stripe Billing
Grok 4.20ChartMogul
Three alternativesBaremetrics, Metabase, ProfitWell Metrics
against: SaaSGrid
ChartMogulHeld
Three alternativesBaremetrics, Grid, Maxio Metrics
against: Looker, ProfitWell Metrics
Mixpanel
Four alternativesAmplitude, Baremetrics, ChartMogul, PostHog
against: ProfitWell Metrics
ChartMogul
Two alternativesBaremetrics, Databox
against: Amplitude, Heap, Maxio Metrics, ProfitWell Metrics
no first choiceagainst: Amplitude, Baremetrics, ChartMogul, Google Analytics, Mixpanel, ProfitWell Metrics
Mistral SmallFairview
Two alternativesDatabox, Intempt
against: Baremetrics, ChartMogul
GridChanged
Two alternativesChartMogul, ProfitWell Metrics
no first choiceProfitWell Metrics
Two alternativesBaremetrics, ChartMogul
no first choiceagainst: Baremetrics, Fairview, ProfitWell Metrics
DeepSeek V4 FlashChartMogul
Three alternativesBaremetrics, Databox, ProfitWell Metrics
against: Maxio Metrics
ChartMogulHeld
Two alternativesBaremetrics, Maxio Metrics
against: ProfitWell Metrics
Amplitude, ChartMogul
Eight alternativesBaremetrics, ChurnZero, Heap, Maxio Metrics, Mixpanel, PostHog, ProfitWell Metrics, RevenueCat
Looker Studio
Seven alternativesBaremetrics, ChartMogul, Databox, Microsoft Power BI, Porter Metrics, Stripe's Native Analytics, Taskade Genesis
ChartMogul, Maxio Metrics
One alternativeMicrosoft Power BI
against: Amplitude, Baremetrics, Google Analytics, Mixpanel, ProfitWell Metrics
Llama 4 MaverickChartMogulChartMogulHeld
Four alternativesBaremetrics, Chargebee, Maxio Metrics, Zenskar
no first choiceGoogle Sheets, SaaS Metrics Dashboard in Excel
Three alternativesChartMogul, Databox, Mixpanel
no first choiceagainst: Fairview
Qwen 3.7 FlashProfitWell Metrics
Two alternativesClari, Microsoft Power BI
against: Tableau
ChartMogulChanged
Two alternativesBaremetrics, ProfitWell Metrics
against: Gainsight, Salesforce CPQ, Totango
Amplitude, Baremetrics
Eight alternativesChartMogul, ChurnZero, Gainsight, Intempt, June.so, Mixpanel, PostHog, Reforge
ChartMogul, Databox
Three alternativesLooker Studio, Mixpanel, ProfitWell Metrics
against: Microsoft Power BI, Tableau
no first choiceagainst: Amplitude, Google Analytics, Microsoft Power BI, Mixpanel, Tableau
Kimi K2ChartMogul
Four alternativesAmplitude, Baremetrics, Databox, Mixpanel
ChartMogulHeld
Three alternativesGrid, ProfitWell Metrics, Rillet
ChartMogul
Two alternativesBaremetrics, ProfitWell Metrics
ChartMogul, ProfitWell Metrics
One alternativeDatabox
no first choice
Eight alternativesBaremetrics, ChartMogul, Cube, Drivetrain, Maxio Metrics, Mosaic, ProfitWell Metrics, Runway
against: Looker, Tableau
against: Amplitude, Baremetrics, ChartMogul, Heap, Mixpanel, Pendo, ProfitWell Metrics
GLM 4.7 FlashXAmplitude, Databox
Three alternativesGoogle Analytics, Luzmo, Mixpanel
against: Tableau
ChartMogulChanged
One alternativeTekStack
no first choice
Seven alternativesAmplitude, Baremetrics, ChartMogul, Mixpanel, Pendo, ProfitWell Metrics, RevenueCat
PostHog
Six alternativesAmplitude, Baremetrics, ChartMogul, Looker Studio, Mixpanel, OpenPanel
no first choiceagainst: Amplitude, GoSquared, Hotjar, Klipfolio, Mixpanel, Plausible, Supermetrics
MiniMax M2.5Amplitude, Mixpanel
One alternativeDomo
ChartMogulChanged
Two alternativesMaxio Metrics, Zenskar
ChartMogul
Two alternativesBaremetrics, ProfitWell Metrics
Baremetrics, ChartMogul
One alternativeTaskade Genesis
no first choiceagainst: Baremetrics, ChartMogul, ProfitWell Metrics, Tableau
GPT-6 LunaChartMogul
Two alternativesGrid, Maxio Metrics
ChartMogulHeld
Two alternativesGrid, Maxio Metrics
Stripe Billing Analytics
Six alternativesAmplitude, Baremetrics, ChartMogul, Mixpanel, PostHog, ProfitWell Metrics
ProfitWell Metrics, Stripe Billing
Two alternativesChartMogul, Metabase Open Source
no first choiceagainst: Baremetrics, ChartMogul, ProfitWell Metrics
Muse Glimmer 30BBaremetrics
Three alternativesChartMogul, Databox, ProfitWell Metrics
ChartMogulChanged
Four alternativesBaremetrics, Chargebee, Grid, Maxio Metrics
Intempt
Seven alternativesAmplitude, Baremetrics, ChartMogul, Databox, Microsoft Power BI, Mixpanel, PostHog
ProfitWell Metrics
Three alternativesBaremetrics, ChartMogul, Databox
no first choiceagainst: Amplitude, Baremetrics, ChartMogul, Heap, Mixpanel, Pendo, PostHog, ProfitWell Metrics
Bold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against

The record

One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
PromptModelVersion stringTime (UTC)SearchedSourcesLatency
Direct recommendationClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 11:23yes108 s
Direct recommendationGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 09:02yes25 s
Direct recommendationGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 11:42yes1424 s
Direct recommendationPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 12:07yes104 s
Direct recommendationGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 13:21yes1028 s
Direct recommendationMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 09:27yes55 s
Direct recommendationDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 11:56yes2120 s
Direct recommendationLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 09:54yes53 s
Direct recommendationQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 10:33no027 s
Direct recommendationKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 10:21yes1591 s
Direct recommendationGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 09:19yes2476 s
Direct recommendationMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 12:24yes1942 s
Direct recommendationGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 12:12yes415 s
Direct recommendationMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 12:38yes2032 s
ParaphraseClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 09:38yes108 s
ParaphraseGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 11:55yes55 s
ParaphraseGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 11:08no014 s
ParaphrasePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 11:12yes103 s
ParaphraseGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 13:15yes1027 s
ParaphraseMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 12:01yes529 s
ParaphraseDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 09:41yes1720 s
ParaphraseLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 11:23yes53 s
ParaphraseQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 09:09no027 s
ParaphraseKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 10:03yes2263 s
ParaphraseGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 12:36yes10133 s
ParaphraseMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 11:33yes1033 s
ParaphraseGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 10:36yes415 s
ParaphraseMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 09:46yes1418 s
ComparativeClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 10:16yes108 s
ComparativeGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 12:20yes47 s
ComparativeGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 10:29no018 s
ComparativePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 11:10yes106 s
ComparativeGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 13:06yes540 s
ComparativeMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 08:58yes56 s
ComparativeDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 10:51yes2235 s
ComparativeLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 10:01yes52 s
ComparativeQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 10:52yes532 s
ComparativeKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 12:03yes1831 s
ComparativeGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 12:51yes2041 s
ComparativeMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 10:55yes915 s
ComparativeGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 12:13yes720 s
ComparativeMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 08:53yes1427 s
Budget constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 12:04yes109 s
Budget constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 10:37yes35 s
Budget constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 09:07yes1021 s
Budget constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 10:52yes103 s
Budget constrainedGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 13:16yes531 s
Budget constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 11:12yes54 s
Budget constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 12:17yes2221 s
Budget constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 10:12yes52 s
Budget constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 11:22yes522 s
Budget constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 12:25yes2028 s
Budget constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 12:02yes2576 s
Budget constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 11:10yes526 s
Budget constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 10:26yes412 s
Budget constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 10:20yes2029 s
Scale constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 11:03no06 s
Scale constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 10:51no05 s
Scale constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 09:50no014 s
Scale constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 12:13yes109 s
Scale constrainedGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 13:09yes534 s
Scale constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 08:52no06 s
Scale constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 12:47yes2429 s
Scale constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 11:51yes52 s
Scale constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 10:42yes529 s
Scale constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 10:47no057 s
Scale constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 11:03yes1532 s
Scale constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 09:52no012 s
Scale constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 10:09yes315 s
Scale constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 09:57yes1418 s
Negative framingClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 12:22yes1711 s
Negative framingGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 12:40yes56 s
Negative framingGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 10:20no020 s
Negative framingPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 10:39yes104 s
Negative framingGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 13:11yes1531 s
Negative framingMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 11:42yes55 s
Negative framingDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 09:10yes2531 s
Negative framingLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 11:37yes55 s
Negative framingQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 12:09yes1032 s
Negative framingKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 10:18yes2530 s
Negative framingGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 11:56yes2329 s
Negative framingMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 10:15yes527 s
Negative framingGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 11:15yes316 s
Negative framingMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 09:04yes2038 s

Normalization in this category

Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.

ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Google Looker Studio read as Looker Studio
Google Looker Studio (Free) read as Looker Studio
Maxio read as Maxio Metrics
Maxio (formerly SaaSOptics + Chargify) read as Maxio Metrics
Maxio (formerly SaaSOptics) read as Maxio Metrics
NetSuite read as Oracle NetSuite
PowerBI read as Microsoft Power BI
ProfitWell read as ProfitWell Metrics
ProfitWell (by Paddle) read as ProfitWell Metrics
ProfitWell (by Palo Alto Networks) read as ProfitWell Metrics
ProfitWell (now Paddle Billing) read as ProfitWell Metrics
ProfitWell (now Paddle Metrics) read as ProfitWell Metrics
ProfitWell (now Paddle Revenue) read as ProfitWell Metrics
ProfitWell (now Paddle) read as ProfitWell Metrics
ProfitWell (now part of Paddle) read as ProfitWell Metrics
ProfitWell by Paddle read as ProfitWell Metrics
Profitwell read as ProfitWell Metrics
Profitwell (by Paddle) read as ProfitWell Metrics
SaaSOptics read as Maxio Metrics
SaaSOptics (Maxio) read as Maxio Metrics
Sigma read as Sigma Computing
Stripe Analytics read as Stripe Billing Analytics
Zuora read as Zuora Analytics
Unresolved, counted raw
Bold BI
FloopFloop
GoSquared
Kometrics
Metabase Open Source
Native Stripe Dashboard Analytics
OpenPanel
Porter Metrics
Reforge
RudderStack
SaaSBoard
Sage Intacct SaaS
Sigma Cloud
Stripe's Native Analytics
Userpilot
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.
← FP&A platformsAccounts payable automat →