TeamDynamix is a no-code IT service management platform built on AI, with automation for service delivery · teamdynamix.com ↗
The standing depends on who is buying. Every model is asked the same questions for each company size.
Freshservice is first at 51%.
Freshservice is first at 52%. 2 of 14 models made it the first choice when asked directly.
ServiceNow ITSM is first at 66%.
“TeamDynamix ITSM and JIRA Service Management stand out for their balance of ease of use, scalability, and strong mid-market support.”Mistral Small · Direct question · first choice
“TeamDynamix is cited as the no-code option with the lowest admin overhead and built-in ITAM.”Muse Glimmer 30B · Scale-constrained question · first choice
“I'd recommend starting with InvGate Service Management or TeamDynamix”MiniMax M2.5 · Direct question · first choice
“Choose TeamDynamix if: You need ITSM and project management (PPM) in one platform”Kimi K2 · Direct question · alternative
No model argued against it.
The products named in the same answers as TeamDynamix, over the 21 answers that named it, and how often each was the first choice instead.
| Product | Named together | Picked instead | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20 | 6 | Compare → | |
| 20 | 3 | Compare → | |
| 16 | 8 | View → | |
| 16 | 0 | Compare → | |
| 12 | 0 | View → | |
| 11 | 0 | View → | |
| 10 | 2 | Compare → | |
| 9 | 0 | View → | |
| 8 | 1 | View → | |
| 8 | 0 | View → |
What the models named instead of TeamDynamix →
A side-by-side page exists where both products are among a category's top eight.
Stated on TeamDynamix's own site, not checked by Gane.
Fourteen AI models from 12 labs are asked the same buying questions six ways, for three company sizes. Standings refresh every edition.
Gane sells AI visibility software. No company can pay to change a result.
Read the method →Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted. These counts come from 21 of the 21 answers that named TeamDynamix and are not a share of its labels.
Seventy-one of the seventy-nine domain citations in answers naming TeamDynamix came from a third party's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Warning | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 392 | 16 | 2026-09-16 | ITSM, ITAM | |
| Case study | 83 | 1 | 2026-09-18 | ITSM, ITAM | |
| Report or ebook | 62 | 1 | 2026-09-10 | ITSM, ITAM | |
| Comparison | 14 | 5 | 2026-08-10 | ITSM, ETL | |
| Glossary or explainer | 14 | 0 | 2026-06-23 | ITSM, ITAM |
Every page teamdynamix.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.