Infrastructure monitoring for enterprise buyers
Asked as “infrastructure monitoring tool”, and as “server and cloud infrastructure monitoring solution”, on behalf of an enterprise B2B company. 46 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, twelve models each.
Standing · first-choice share
35%
Contested · Dynatrace 33%
35Datadog33Dynatrace15Netdata17others
35% of first choices, contested.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all twelve models, for an enterprise B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Show the four products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
Head to headHead-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not enterprise.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each
Site24x7 vs NetdataSite24x7 vs GrafanaSite24x7 vs PrometheusSite24x7 vs LogicMonitorNew Relic vs ZabbixNew Relic vs DatadogNew Relic vs NetdataNew Relic vs GrafanaNew Relic vs PrometheusNew Relic vs LogicMonitorZabbix vs DatadogZabbix vs NetdataZabbix vs GrafanaZabbix vs PrometheusZabbix vs LogicMonitorDatadog vs NetdataDatadog vs GrafanaDatadog vs PrometheusDatadog vs LogicMonitorNetdata vs GrafanaNetdata vs PrometheusNetdata vs LogicMonitorGrafana vs PrometheusGrafana vs LogicMonitorPrometheus vs LogicMonitor
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative50%
Key
01Datadog35%
Datadog35%02Dynatrace33%
Dynatrace33%03Netdata15%
Netdata15%04Prometheus4%
Prometheus4%05Zabbix2%
Zabbix2%06Splunk2%
Splunk2%07New Relic0%
New Relic0%08Grafana0%
Grafana0%09Prometheus + Grafana0%
Prometheus + Grafana0%10Nagios0%
Nagios0%What they warned about
Three of twelve models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Perplexity Sonar, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash and MiniMax M2.5 changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Datadog31%
19 of 62 labels negative · 10 of 12 models · 7 hard negative
“unpredictable at scale—per-host *plus* ingestion/custom metrics/logs lead to overruns (e.g., Datadog bills 3–10x estimates)” Grok 4.20, budget prompt
Nagios85%
11 of 13 labels negative · 9 of 12 models · 6 hard negative
“The Culprits: Nagios Core, traditional/standard Zabbix deployments, and legacy Microsoft System Center Operations Manager (SCOM).” Gemini 3.5 Flash, negative prompt
Dynatrace16%
9 of 57 labels negative · 8 of 12 models · 2 hard negative
“Datadog and Dynatrace are enterprise-grade but expensive at scale — costs compound quickly” Claude Haiku 4.5, budget prompt
Zabbix36%
10 of 28 labels negative · 8 of 12 models · 2 hard negative
“Tools to Avoid or Be Highly Cautious About... Zabbix: Why cautious: Very high setup (6-8 weeks) and maintenance burden” Grok 4.20, negative prompt
What they cite
Twelve of the twelve models returned a source list in this edition: four return the pages they cited and eight the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
58 of 72 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 12 of 12 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 862 links across 270 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page.
43 answers · 58 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Netdata36 answers · 44 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Middleware.io29 answers · 32 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Motadata23 answers · 24 citations · 9 models
18 answers · 21 citations · 8 models
vendor site · New Relic17 answers · 27 citations · 8 models
vendor site · CubeAPM15 answers · 23 citations · 8 models
vendor site · SigNoz15 answers · 15 citations · 7 models
13 answers · 13 citations · 7 models
vendor site · eG Innovations12 answers · 13 citations · 10 models
11 answers · 11 citations · 9 models
vendor site · G211 answers · 11 citations · 7 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
41 answers · 11 models
36 answers · 11 models
29 answers · 10 models
20 answers · 8 models
16 answers · 8 models
13 answers · 7 models
12 answers · 7 models
12 answers · 6 models
11 answers · 7 models
10 answers · 7 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best infrastructure monitoring tool”, “infrastructure monitoring tool”, “infrastructure monitoring tools”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Datadog datadoghq.com | 35% | 590 | 74,000 | 3,541 | 159,408 | $633 | 120 | 5 |
| Dynatrace dynatrace.com | 33% | 676 | 22,200 | 1,106 | 62,738 | $3,941 | 120 | |
| Netdata netdata.cloud | 15% | 67 | 2,900 | 91 | 13,040 | 1 | 2 | |
| Prometheus prometheus.io | 4% | 280 | 246,000 | 11,819 | 22,996 | |||
| LogicMonitor logicmonitor.com | 2% | 184 | 5,400 | 236 | 82,441 | $1,636 | 31 | 4 |
| Zabbix zabbix.com | 2% | 313 | 12,100 | 992 | 18,850 | 3 | ||
| OpenObserve openobserve.ai | 2% | 85 | 1,600 | 9 | 4,825 | 7 | 9 | |
| groundcover groundcover.com | 2% | 29 | 14,800 | 1,328 | 9,109 | $792 | 24 | |
| Splunk splunk.com | 2% | 253 | 40,500 | 6,832 | 892,906 | 120 | 2 | |
| Middleware.io middleware.io | 2% | 43 | 30 | 0 | 7,321 | 3 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 20 sites; 4 of them are among the sites the models cited here (gartner.com, gartsolutions.com, middleware.io, netdata.cloud). The first result for “best infrastructure monitoring tool” is hyperping.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best infrastructure monitoring tool for an enterprise B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which server and cloud infrastructure monitoring solution would you recommend to a large B2B company with thousands of employees?”Comparative“What are the top enterprise-grade infrastructure monitoring tools and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best infrastructure monitoring tool for a large company that needs predictable total cost across thousands of users?”Scale-constrained“We are a 5,000 person company with SSO, SOC 2 and procurement review requirements evaluating an infrastructure monitoring tool. What should we look at?”Negative“Which infrastructure monitoring tools should a large enterprise avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5no first choiceagainst: SplunkDatadogChangedProgress WhatsUp GoldMiddleware.io, Netdataagainst: Datadog, Dynatraceno first choiceagainst: Amazon CloudWatch, Auvik, Datadog
Five alternatives
Dynatrace, Elastic Stack, New Relic, Prometheus + Grafana, SplunkThree alternatives
AppDynamics, Cisco, ZabbixGPT-5.4 miniDatadog, DynatraceDynatraceChangedagainst: Prometheus + GrafanaDatadogDynatraceagainst: Datadog, Splunk Observability Cloudno first choicenothing named
One alternative
Prometheus + GrafanaTwo alternatives
Datadog, New RelicFour alternatives
Dynatrace, IBM Instana, New Relic, SolarWinds ObservabilityOne alternative
GrafanaGemini 3.5 FlashDatadogDynatraceChangedagainst: Splunk Observability CloudDatadogagainst: SplunkZabbixagainst: Datadog, New RelicDynatraceagainst: Datadogagainst: Amazon CloudWatch, Azure Monitor, Datadog, Dynatrace, Elastic Observability, Google Cloud Operations, Microsoft System Center Operations Manager, Nagios, Prometheus, Splunk, Zabbix
Four alternatives
Chronosphere, Dynatrace, Grafana Labs, New RelicTwo alternatives
Datadog, GrafanaFive alternatives
Chronosphere, Dynatrace, Elastic Observability, Grafana Labs, New RelicThree alternatives
Grafana, Netdata, PrometheusTwo alternatives
Grafana, New RelicPerplexity SonarDatadog, DynatraceDynatraceChangedDatadog, Dynatraceagainst: Splunkgroundcoveragainst: Dynatraceno first choiceagainst: Datadog, Dynatrace, Nagios, Paessler PRTG, Prometheus + Grafana, SolarWinds Network Performance Monitor, Splunk Observability Cloud, Zabbix
Three alternatives
New Relic, Prometheus + Grafana, ZabbixThree alternatives
Datadog, LogicMonitor, Site24x7Five alternatives
LogicMonitor, New Relic, Paessler PRTG, Prometheus + Grafana, ZabbixOne alternative
NetdataGrok 4.20DynatraceDynatraceHeldDatadogNetdataagainst: Datadog, Grafana, Middleware.io, New Relic, Prometheus, ZabbixDatadogagainst: Datadog, Dynatrace, Microsoft SCOM, Nagios, New Relic, Prometheus, Splunk Observability Cloud, Zabbix
Two alternatives
Datadog, New RelicTwo alternatives
Datadog, New RelicFour alternatives
Dynatrace, New Relic, Prometheus with Grafana, Splunk Observability CloudOne alternative
DynatraceFour alternatives
Dynatrace, Grafana Labs, New Relic, SplunkMistral SmallLogicMonitor, SplunkDatadog, DynatraceChangedDynatraceagainst: Paessler PRTG, Progress WhatsUp GoldNetdataagainst: Middleware.io, New Relicno first choiceagainst: Prometheus + Grafanaagainst: Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic, Zabbix
One alternative
PrometheusFour alternatives
Cisco AppDynamics, Grafana + Prometheus + Loki, New Relic, SplunkFour alternatives
Datadog, Netdata, Prometheus, ZabbixOne alternative
Prometheus + GrafanaDeepSeek V4 FlashDatadog, PrometheusDatadog, DynatraceChangedagainst: LogicMonitor, Prometheus + Grafana, SolarWinds Observability, ZabbixDatadogagainst: NagiosNetdataagainst: Datadog, Middleware.io, New Relic, Prometheus + Grafanano first choiceagainst: Datadogagainst: CA UIM, Datadog, Nagios, Prometheus, SevOne, SolarWinds Orion, Zabbix
Two alternatives
Grafana, New RelicTwo alternatives
IBM Instana, New RelicSix alternatives
Dynatrace, Grafana, New Relic, Prometheus, SolarWinds Observability, ZabbixTwo alternatives
CubeAPM, DynatraceLlama 4 MaverickPrometheusDatadogChangedno first choiceNetdataOpenObserveagainst: Dynatrace, Grafana Stack, Nagios, New Relic, Prometheus, Zabbix
Five alternatives
Datadog, Dynatrace, IBM Instana, New Relic, Site24x7Two alternatives
Icinga, eG EnterpriseOne alternative
New RelicTwo alternatives
Scout, SolarWinds Network Performance MonitorQwen 3.7 FlashDatadog, DynatraceDatadogChangedagainst: AppDynamicsDatadogNetdatano first choiceagainst: Amazon CloudWatch, Azure Monitor, Cacti, MRTG, Nagios, Prometheus, UptimeRobot, Zabbix
Two alternatives
New Relic, Prometheus + GrafanaFour alternatives
Dynatrace, Grafana, Prometheus, SplunkTwo alternatives
Dynatrace, Prometheus + GrafanaFour alternatives
Datadog, Dynatrace, Prometheus, ZabbixKimi K2DatadogDatadogHeldDatadogagainst: AppDynamics, Paessler PRTGDynatraceagainst: Datadog, Splunkno first choiceagainst: Splunkagainst: Datadog, Nagios, Prometheus, Splunk, Zabbix
Two alternatives
Dynatrace, New RelicThree alternatives
Dynatrace, LogicMonitor, Splunk Observability CloudThree alternatives
Dynatrace, New Relic, ZabbixTwo alternatives
Grafana, New RelicGLM 4.7 FlashXDatadogagainst: NagiosDatadogHeldno first choiceagainst: SplunkNetdataagainst: Datadog, Dynatrace, Splunkno first choiceagainst: Datadog, Nagios, Prometheus
Three alternatives
New Relic, Prometheus + Grafana, ZabbixOne alternative
New RelicThree alternatives
CubeAPM, New Relic, Prometheus + GrafanaMiniMax M2.5DynatraceDatadogChangedno first choiceagainst: NagiosDynatraceagainst: Datadog, New Relicno first choiceagainst: Datadog, Dynatrace
Four alternatives
Datadog, New Relic, Site24x7, SplunkThree alternatives
Dynatrace, IBM Instana, New RelicTwo alternatives
LogicMonitor, NetdataBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Seventy-two rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 13:24 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 11:31 | yes | 4 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 13:22 | yes | 7 | 22 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 09:40 | yes | 20 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 10:34 | yes | 29 | 18 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 11:56 | yes | 7 | 7 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 11:10 | yes | 10 | 15 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 11:31 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 12:42 | yes | 10 | 43 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 10:23 | yes | 15 | 25 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 11:27 | yes | 28 | 169 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 12:08 | yes | 8 | 26 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 09:22 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 11:35 | yes | 4 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 12:40 | no | 0 | 16 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 10:06 | yes | 20 | 6 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 10:13 | yes | 36 | 15 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 09:52 | no | 0 | 9 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 11:37 | yes | 9 | 14 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 09:23 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 10:55 | no | 0 | 39 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 13:16 | yes | 15 | 46 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 12:41 | yes | 14 | 30 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 12:14 | yes | 5 | 36 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 13:32 | yes | 18 | 12 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 11:01 | yes | 6 | 9 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 13:01 | yes | 15 | 33 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 13:10 | yes | 20 | 10 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 11:03 | yes | 30 | 16 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 10:51 | yes | 5 | 8 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 12:36 | yes | 19 | 25 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 13:45 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 11:12 | no | 0 | 38 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 12:20 | yes | 20 | 39 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 12:22 | no | 0 | 20 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 13:15 | no | 0 | 18 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 13:29 | yes | 9 | 10 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 10:20 | no | 0 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 13:08 | yes | 18 | 27 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 13:15 | yes | 19 | 6 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 10:09 | yes | 39 | 22 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 09:23 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 09:29 | yes | 7 | 12 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 13:22 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 10:16 | yes | 10 | 77 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 12:46 | yes | 15 | 24 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 10:37 | yes | 11 | 88 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 11:19 | yes | 19 | 83 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 12:07 | no | 0 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 10:06 | no | 0 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 09:41 | yes | 9 | 27 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 11:57 | yes | 20 | 9 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 11:45 | yes | 18 | 14 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 12:14 | no | 0 | 11 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 11:26 | yes | 30 | 34 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 09:23 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 12:37 | yes | 10 | 60 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 09:30 | yes | 25 | 54 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 10:47 | yes | 14 | 81 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 13:49 | yes | 5 | 55 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 12:35 | yes | 18 | 9 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 12:41 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 12:31 | yes | 25 | 27 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 09:38 | yes | 20 | 8 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 13:24 | yes | 17 | 15 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 09:36 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 11:31 | yes | 22 | 25 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 13:15 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 11:58 | no | 0 | 41 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 14:07 | yes | 25 | 43 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 11:20 | yes | 24 | 41 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 11:14 | yes | 19 | 55 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
AWS CloudWatch read as Amazon CloudWatch
Elastic read as Elastic Observability
Elastic (ELK) read as Elastic Observability
Grafana Cloud read as Grafana
Grafana Cloud Enterprise read as Grafana
Grafana Enterprise read as Grafana
Motadata read as Motadata ObserveOps
SolarWinds read as SolarWinds Observability
Unresolved, counted raw
Amazon Managed Prometheus
CA UIM
Managed Prometheus
Microsoft System Center Operations Manager (SCOM)
Prometheus with Grafana
SevOne
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.