Infrastructure monitoring
Asked as “infrastructure monitoring tool”, and as “server and cloud infrastructure monitoring solution”, on behalf of a mid-market B2B company. 45 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, twelve models each.
Standing · first-choice share
24%
Contested · New Relic 22%
24Site24x722New Relic18Zabbix36others
24% of first choices, contested.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Show the three products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each
Site24x7 vs NetdataSite24x7 vs GrafanaSite24x7 vs PrometheusSite24x7 vs LogicMonitorNew Relic vs ZabbixNew Relic vs DatadogNew Relic vs NetdataNew Relic vs GrafanaNew Relic vs PrometheusNew Relic vs LogicMonitorZabbix vs DatadogZabbix vs NetdataZabbix vs GrafanaZabbix vs PrometheusZabbix vs LogicMonitorDatadog vs NetdataDatadog vs GrafanaDatadog vs PrometheusDatadog vs LogicMonitorNetdata vs GrafanaNetdata vs PrometheusNetdata vs LogicMonitorGrafana vs PrometheusGrafana vs LogicMonitorPrometheus vs LogicMonitor
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative40%
Key
01Site24x724%
Site24x724%02New Relic22%
New Relic22%03Zabbix18%
Zabbix18%04Datadog13%
Datadog13%05Netdata7%
Netdata7%06Grafana4%
Grafana4%07Prometheus4%
Prometheus4%08LogicMonitor2%
LogicMonitor2%09Dynatrace2%
Dynatrace2%10Prometheus + Grafana0%
Prometheus + Grafana0%11Paessler PRTG0%
Paessler PRTG0%12Nagios0%
Nagios0%What they warned about
Four of twelve models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Perplexity Sonar, Mistral Small, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2 and MiniMax M2.5 changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Zabbix25%
11 of 44 labels negative · 10 of 12 models · 3 hard negative
“Who to avoid: Older, static monitoring platforms (like early versions of Nagios or basic configurations of Zabbix)” Qwen 3.7 Flash, negative prompt
Datadog43%
23 of 54 labels negative · 10 of 12 models · 1 hard negative
“Avoid Datadog for mid-market unless you have a specific need” Kimi K2, direct prompt
Nagios55%
12 of 22 labels negative · 8 of 12 models · 5 hard negative
“Who to avoid: Older, static monitoring platforms (like early versions of Nagios or basic configurations of Zabbix) when running at scale on Kubernetes.” Qwen 3.7 Flash, negative prompt
Dynatrace30%
11 of 37 labels negative · 7 of 12 models
“great for large, complex environments and heavier automation, but often more expensive and enterprise-oriented” GPT-5.4 mini, paraphrase prompt
What they cite
Twelve of the twelve models returned a source list in this edition: four return the pages they cited and eight the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
58 of 72 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 12 of 12 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 773 links across 221 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page.
vendor site · Netdata44 answers · 44 citations · 11 models
40 answers · 47 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Middleware.io37 answers · 39 citations · 11 models
vendor site · New Relic27 answers · 35 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Motadata23 answers · 29 citations · 10 models
vendor site · G219 answers · 19 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Instatus16 answers · 16 citations · 8 models
vendor site · SigNoz16 answers · 16 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Sematext14 answers · 14 citations · 7 models
vendor site · Dash013 answers · 14 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Better Stack12 answers · 12 citations · 7 models
vendor site · Domotz12 answers · 12 citations · 7 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
44 answers · 11 models
40 answers · 11 models
36 answers · 10 models
22 answers · 9 models
21 answers · 9 models
19 answers · 11 models
15 answers · 8 models
15 answers · 7 models
14 answers · 7 models
13 answers · 10 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best infrastructure monitoring tool”, “infrastructure monitoring tool”, “infrastructure monitoring tools”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Site24x7 site24x7.com | 24% | 304 | 1,300 | 61 | 174,542 | $522 | 120 | |
| New Relic newrelic.com | 22% | 595 | 14,800 | 843 | 83,276 | $412 | 89 | |
| Zabbix zabbix.com | 18% | 313 | 12,100 | 992 | 18,850 | 3 | ||
| Datadog datadoghq.com | 13% | 590 | 74,000 | 3,541 | 159,408 | $633 | 120 | 5 |
| Netdata netdata.cloud | 7% | 67 | 2,900 | 91 | 13,040 | 1 | 2 | |
| Grafana grafana.com Grafana 4%, Prometheus + Grafana 0%, Grafana Loki 0% | 4% | 277 | 40,500 | 2,627 | 84,520 | 116 | ||
| Prometheus prometheus.io | 4% | 280 | 246,000 | 11,819 | 22,996 | |||
| LogicMonitor logicmonitor.com | 2% | 184 | 5,400 | 236 | 82,441 | $1,636 | 31 | 4 |
| Dynatrace dynatrace.com | 2% | 676 | 22,200 | 1,106 | 62,738 | $3,941 | 120 | |
| Sematext sematext.com | 2% | 9 | 90 | 0 | 67,747 | 6 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 20 sites; 4 of them are among the sites the models cited here (blog.domotz.com, gartner.com, middleware.io, netdata.cloud). The first result for “best infrastructure monitoring tool” is hyperping.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best infrastructure monitoring tool for a mid-market B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which server and cloud infrastructure monitoring solution would you recommend to a mid-sized B2B company?”Comparative“What are the top infrastructure monitoring tools and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best infrastructure monitoring tool for a company with a limited budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 500 person company evaluating an infrastructure monitoring tool. What should we look at?”Negative“Which infrastructure monitoring tools should I avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5SematextDatadog, New RelicChangedagainst: Splunkno first choiceagainst: Nagios, ZabbixPrometheusno first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
LogicMonitor, Site24x7Four alternatives
Azure Monitor, CloudWatch, Dynatrace, Prometheus + GrafanaThree alternatives
Datadog, Grafana, New RelicGPT-5.4 miniNew RelicDatadogChangedagainst: DynatraceDatadogPrometheusagainst: Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relicno first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
Dynatrace, GrafanaFive alternatives
Amazon CloudWatch, Azure Monitor, Google Cloud Operations, Grafana, New RelicFive alternatives
Dynatrace, Grafana, New Relic, Prometheus, ZabbixFour alternatives
Checkmk, Grafana, Netdata, ZabbixGemini 3.5 FlashNew Relicagainst: Datadog, Grafana, PrometheusNew RelicHeldagainst: DatadogDatadog, Prometheus + GrafanaGrafana, New Relicagainst: Datadogno first choiceagainst: Datadog, Dynatrace, Grafana, New Relic, Prometheusagainst: Amazon CloudWatch, Azure Monitor, Datadog, Dynatrace, Nagios, New Relic, Prometheus, SolarWinds Orion, Zabbix
Three alternatives
Better Stack, LogicMonitor, NetdataThree alternatives
Better Stack, Grafana, LogicMonitorFour alternatives
Dynatrace, LogicMonitor, New Relic, ZabbixThree alternatives
Netdata, Prometheus + Grafana, ZabbixFive alternatives
Better Stack, Chronosphere, Grafana, Honeycomb, Logz.ioPerplexity SonarLogicMonitoragainst: Datadog, DynatraceSite24x7ChangedDatadogZabbixagainst: Paessler PRTG, Prometheus + Grafanano first choiceagainst: Checkly, Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic, Pingdom, Zabbix
Three alternatives
ManageEngine OpManager, Progress WhatsUp Gold, Site24x7Five alternatives
Datadog, ManageEngine OpManager, Paessler PRTG, Prometheus + Grafana, SematextEight alternatives
Dynatrace, ManageEngine OpManager, New Relic, Paessler PRTG, Prometheus + Grafana, SolarWinds Observability, Zabbix, npmTwo alternatives
Site24x7, UptimeRobotGrok 4.20Site24x7against: DynatraceSite24x7Heldagainst: DatadogDatadog, DynatraceZabbixagainst: NagiosDatadogagainst: Centreon Infra Monitoring, Datadog, Nagios, New Relic, SolarWinds Orion, Zabbix
Two alternatives
Datadog, LogicMonitorTwo alternatives
ManageEngine OpManager, New RelicThree alternatives
New Relic, Prometheus, ZabbixFive alternatives
Grafana, Netdata, Prometheus, SigNoz, UptraceFour alternatives
Dynatrace, Grafana, New Relic, PrometheusMistral SmallNetdata, Site24x7no first choiceChangedDatadogZabbixno first choiceagainst: AppDynamics, Nagios, Site24x7, Zabbix
One alternative
LogicMonitorFive alternatives
Dynatrace, Grafana, New Relic, Prometheus, ZabbixThree alternatives
Netdata, Prometheus, SigNozDeepSeek V4 FlashNew Relicagainst: DatadogNew RelicHeldagainst: DatadogDatadog, Prometheus + Grafanaagainst: NagiosNetdatano first choiceagainst: Datadogagainst: Datadog, ManageEngine, Nagios, New Relic, Paessler PRTG, SolarWinds Observability
Three alternatives
Grafana, ManageEngine OpManager, Site24x7Four alternatives
Grafana, Grafana Loki, Prometheus, Site24x7Three alternatives
Dynatrace, New Relic, ZabbixFour alternatives
Nagios, Prometheus + Grafana, UptimeRobot, ZabbixLlama 4 MaverickNetdata, Site24x7Site24x7Changedno first choiceZabbixno first choiceagainst: Datadog, Dynatrace, Prometheus, Zabbix
Four alternatives
Checkmk, Datadog, Dynatrace, New RelicTwo alternatives
Freshping, ManageEngine OpManagerQwen 3.7 FlashDatadogagainst: DynatraceSite24x7ChangedDatadog, Prometheusagainst: NagiosZabbixDatadog, Dynatrace, New Relicagainst: Prometheus + Grafana, Zabbixagainst: Datadog, Dynatrace, Grafana, Nagios, Prometheus, Zabbix
Two alternatives
Grafana, New RelicFour alternatives
Datadog, Grafana, Prometheus, ZabbixFour alternatives
Dynatrace, Grafana, Site24x7, ZabbixFour alternatives
Checkmk, Grafana, LibreNMS, PrometheusThree alternatives
AppDynamics, Coralogix, GrafanaKimi K2Site24x7against: DatadogDatadogChangedDatadog, Dynatrace, Prometheus + Grafana, Zabbixagainst: NagiosZabbixGrafana, New Relicagainst: Datadogagainst: Datadog, Nagios, New Relic, Prometheus, SolarWinds Orion, Zabbix
Two alternatives
ManageEngine OpManager, New RelicThree alternatives
Netdata, New Relic, Paessler PRTGOne alternative
New RelicTwo alternatives
Nagios, Prometheus + GrafanaGLM 4.7 FlashXSite24x7against: DatadogSite24x7Heldagainst: DatadogDatadogZabbixno first choiceagainst: Checkly, Dash0, Nagios, Pingdom, Zabbix
Three alternatives
LogicMonitor, New Relic, Prometheus + GrafanaThree alternatives
Amazon CloudWatch, Azure Monitor, GCP Operations SuiteNine alternatives
Dynatrace, Grafana, LibreNMS, Middleware.io, Motadata ObserveOps, Nagios, New Relic, Prometheus, ZabbixFive alternatives
ManageEngine OpManager, Nagios, Netdata, Paessler PRTG, Prometheus + GrafanaMiniMax M2.5Site24x7against: DatadogNew RelicChangedno first choiceZabbixno first choiceagainst: Datadog, Dynatrace, Prometheus, Zabbix
Two alternatives
Netdata, New RelicThree alternatives
Datadog, Prometheus + Grafana, Site24x7Seven alternatives
Datadog, Dynatrace, Grafana, Middleware.io, Motadata ObserveOps, Prometheus, ZabbixThree alternatives
ManageEngine OpManager, Netdata, Paessler PRTGBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Seventy-two rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 10:40 | yes | 9 | 7 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 10:26 | yes | 3 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 13:43 | yes | 7 | 26 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 13:41 | yes | 20 | 6 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 13:03 | yes | 29 | 16 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 11:29 | yes | 9 | 8 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 09:23 | yes | 10 | 13 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 14:07 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 13:02 | no | 0 | 40 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 13:50 | yes | 18 | 38 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 12:27 | yes | 11 | 34 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 12:41 | yes | 5 | 21 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 14:09 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 09:39 | no | 0 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 12:25 | yes | 12 | 23 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 13:46 | yes | 20 | 6 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 14:03 | yes | 46 | 24 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 13:53 | no | 0 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 13:55 | yes | 10 | 14 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 10:11 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 09:47 | yes | 15 | 39 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 12:30 | yes | 14 | 26 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 13:16 | yes | 15 | 41 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 12:19 | yes | 9 | 16 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 11:38 | yes | 9 | 9 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 11:05 | yes | 3 | 7 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 12:24 | yes | 10 | 26 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 12:02 | yes | 17 | 11 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 11:09 | yes | 22 | 15 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 13:18 | yes | 7 | 9 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 11:14 | yes | 12 | 19 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 09:54 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 10:44 | yes | 5 | 27 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 12:25 | yes | 10 | 33 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 13:55 | yes | 14 | 39 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 11:29 | yes | 5 | 11 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 13:57 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 12:48 | no | 0 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 11:57 | yes | 19 | 27 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 09:49 | yes | 18 | 6 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 13:17 | yes | 17 | 11 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 14:09 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 13:16 | yes | 9 | 11 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 10:40 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 11:23 | no | 0 | 31 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 13:45 | yes | 10 | 35 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 10:20 | yes | 17 | 200 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 10:12 | yes | 8 | 37 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 11:17 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 12:18 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 09:58 | no | 0 | 15 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 13:03 | yes | 20 | 9 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 12:34 | yes | 11 | 13 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 13:02 | no | 0 | 9 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 13:13 | yes | 18 | 22 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 13:13 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 09:33 | no | 0 | 47 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 12:47 | yes | 14 | 26 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 11:55 | no | 0 | 44 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 13:57 | yes | 9 | 25 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 11:14 | no | 0 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 13:25 | yes | 5 | 8 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 12:38 | yes | 19 | 23 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 11:06 | yes | 20 | 7 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 12:23 | yes | 43 | 19 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 13:42 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 10:03 | yes | 25 | 34 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 12:08 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 12:03 | yes | 9 | 41 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 09:30 | yes | 30 | 61 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 13:16 | yes | 21 | 55 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 09:32 | yes | 15 | 26 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
AWS CloudWatch read as Amazon CloudWatch
Elastic read as Elastic Observability
Grafana Cloud read as Grafana
SolarWinds read as SolarWinds Observability
Unresolved, counted raw
Centreon Infra Monitoring
Data Infrastructure Insights
GCP Operations Suite
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.