September 2026 Edition, published · The permanent record of that edition, superseded since. The current standing is on the category page →
Index › IT › IT operations and endpoint › Patching · September 2026 Edition

Patch management

Asked as “patch management tool”, and as “OS and third-party patching solution”, on behalf of a mid-market B2B company. 52 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, twelve models each.
Standing · first-choice share
27%
Contested · ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus 21%
27Action121ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus19Automox33others

27% of first choices, contested.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.

The standing

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
01Action127%2%42accepted challenger
02ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus21%7%41accepted challenger
03Automox19%11%36accepted challenger
04NinjaOne Autonomous Patch Management13%8%38accepted challenger
05Syxsense6%0%15accepted challenger
06Heimdal Patch & Asset Management4%0%17accepted challenger
07Microsoft Intune2%14%22accepted challenger
08Ivanti Neurons for Patch Management2%21%19accepted challenger
09Windows Server Update Services2%59%17criticized challenger
Show the five products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
13Tanium Patch0%13%15accepted challenger
12PDQ Deploy & Inventory0%10%10accepted challenger
14Atera0%9%11accepted challenger
10ManageEngine Endpoint Central0%8%12accepted challenger
11Patch My PC0%8%13accepted challenger
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each

Recommended versus criticized

Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.

Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative40%
Key
01Action127%
02ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus21%
03Automox19%
04NinjaOne Autonomous Patch Management13%
05Syxsense6%
06Heimdal Patch & Asset Management4%
07Microsoft Intune2%
08Ivanti Neurons for Patch Management2%
09Windows Server Update Services2%
10ManageEngine Endpoint Central0%
11Patch My PC0%
12PDQ Deploy & Inventory0%
13Tanium Patch0%
14Atera0%

What they warned about

Three of twelve models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.20, Mistral Small, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2 and MiniMax M2.5 changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Windows Server Update Services
59%
10 of 17 labels negative · 8 of 12 models · 5 hard negative
“WSUS has limitations including Windows-only infrastructure, manual catalog management, limited automation, lack of native support for many third-party vendors” Claude Haiku 4.5, negative prompt
Ivanti Neurons for Patch Management
21%
4 of 19 labels negative · 4 of 12 models · 2 hard negative
“Ivanti Products — High Caution ... Multiple critical vulnerabilities in recent years suggest systemic security challenges” Kimi K2, negative prompt
Kaseya VSA
50%
4 of 8 labels negative · 4 of 12 models · 1 hard negative
“Steer clear of SolarWinds and Kaseya” Qwen 3.7 Flash, negative prompt
Microsoft Configuration Manager
57%
4 of 7 labels negative · 4 of 12 models · 1 hard negative
“SCCM is prohibitively expensive ... leading to high costs for operation and maintenance” Claude Haiku 4.5, negative prompt

What they cite

Twelve of the twelve models returned a source list in this edition: four return the pages they cited and eight the search results they consulted.

Sites the answers cite

63 of 72 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 12 of 12 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 836 links across 206 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page.

vendor site · Heimdal Security35 answers · 45 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Motadata35 answers · 36 citations · 11 models
vendor site · G234 answers · 34 citations · 12 models
30 answers · 30 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Acronis26 answers · 26 citations · 10 models
vendor site · CyberPress23 answers · 23 citations · 10 models
vendor site · NinjaOne21 answers · 27 citations · 9 models
20 answers · 22 citations · 9 models
19 answers · 19 citations · 8 models
vendor site · PDQ17 answers · 20 citations · 10 models
15 answers · 33 citations · 7 models
15 answers · 18 citations · 8 models

Pages the answers cite

The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.

Search against answers

Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best patch management tool”, “patch management tool”, “patch management tools”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Company and productsShareOwn site citedName searches, GoogleAI search demand, est.Organic visitsPaid search a month, est.Google ads, last 30 daysBest Google position
Action1 action1.com27%2558,1008718,854$3,801485
ManageEngine parent site
ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus 21%, ManageEngine Endpoint Central 0%
21%2448,100675
Automox automox.com19%1343,6005264,075$83218
NinjaOne Autonomous Patch Management ninjaone.com13%1420316,268$17,2261184
Syxsense syxsense.com6%817044,573
Heimdal Security heimdalsecurity.com
Heimdal Patch & Asset Management 4%, Heimdal Security 0%
4%19111,895$16448
Microsoft parent site
Microsoft Intune 2%, Microsoft Configuration Manager 2%
4%3862,240,000403,136
Ivanti parent site
Ivanti Neurons for Patch Management 2%
2%529,900636
Windows Autopatch windowsforum.com2%1059048141,6550
Windows Server Update Services microsoft.com2%363,6005145,358,109$12,455103

Google's top ten for the three searches hold 18 sites; 5 of them are among the sites the models cited here (acronis.com, heimdalsecurity.com, learn.g2.com, ninjaone.com, reddit.com). The first result for “best patch management tool” is reddit.com.

How they answered

Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHide
ModelDirect“What is the best patch management tool for a mid-market B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which OS and third-party patching solution would you recommend to a mid-sized B2B company?”Comparative“What are the top patch management tools and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best patch management tool for a company with a limited budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 500 person company evaluating a patch management tool. What should we look at?”Negative“Which patch management tools should I avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus
Two alternativesAutomox, NinjaOne Autonomous Patch Management
Automox, ManageEngine Patch Manager PlusChanged
Two alternativesWindows Server Update Services, Windows Update for Business
no first choice
Seven alternativesAcronis Cyber Protect, Automox, Ivanti Neurons for Patch Management, ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus, Microsoft Intune, PDQ Connect, Tanium Patch
Windows Server Update Services
One alternativeManageEngine Patch Manager Plus
no first choiceagainst: Microsoft Configuration Manager, Windows Server Update Services
GPT-5.4 miniMicrosoft Configuration Manager, Microsoft Intune
Two alternativesAutomox, ManageEngine Endpoint Central
ManageEngine Patch Manager PlusChanged
One alternativeMicrosoft ecosystem
no first choiceAction1
Three alternativesMicrosoft Intune, Windows Autopatch, Windows Update for Business
against: ManageEngine Endpoint Central
no first choicenothing named
Gemini 3.5 FlashAutomox
Four alternativesAction1, ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus, NinjaOne Autonomous Patch Management, PDQ Connect
against: Microsoft Configuration Manager
NinjaOne Autonomous Patch ManagementChanged
Four alternativesAction1, Automox, Microsoft Intune, Patch My PC
NinjaOne Autonomous Patch Management
Five alternativesAction1, Automox, Ivanti Neurons for Patch Management, ManageEngine Endpoint Central, PDQ Connect
Action1
Five alternativesForeman, ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus, PDQ Deploy & Inventory, Windows Server Update Services, Winget
Action1, Automox
Four alternativesMicrosoft Intune, NinjaOne Autonomous Patch Management, PDQ Connect, Patch My PC
against: PDQ Deploy & Inventory, Windows Server Update Services
against: Ivanti Neurons for Patch Management, Kaseya Ecosystem, SolarWinds Patch Manager, Windows Server Update Services
Perplexity SonarManageEngine Patch Manager Plus
Three alternativesAutomox, Heimdal Patch & Asset Management, Syxsense
against: Action1
Windows AutopatchChanged
Three alternativesUbuntu Server, Windows 11 Pro, Windows Server
no first choiceagainst: Atera, Datto RMM, SolarWinds Patch Manager, SyncroAction1
Two alternativesManageEngine Patch Manager Plus, Microsoft Intune
no first choiceagainst: ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus, Microsoft security solutions, Winget
Grok 4.20NinjaOne Autonomous Patch Management
Two alternativesAction1, ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus
against: Microsoft, Tanium Patch
AutomoxChanged
Three alternativesMicrosoft Intune, NinjaOne Autonomous Patch Management, Windows Server Update Services
NinjaOne Autonomous Patch Management
Four alternativesAction1, Automox, ManageEngine Endpoint Central, Patch My PC
Action1
Two alternativesManageEngine Patch Manager Plus, PDQ Deploy & Inventory
against: Automox, Comodo, NinjaOne Autonomous Patch Management, PatchMon CE, Spacewalk
NinjaOne Autonomous Patch Management
Three alternativesAction1, Automox, ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus
against: Automox, Ivanti Neurons for Patch Management, Kaseya VSA, ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus
Mistral SmallManageEngine Patch Manager Plus, Syxsense
Three alternativesAction1, Heimdal Patch & Asset Management, NinjaOne Autonomous Patch Management
ManageEngine Patch Manager PlusChanged
Two alternativesHeimdal Security, Syxsense
NinjaOne Autonomous Patch Management
Five alternativesAutomox, GFI LanGuard, ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus, PDQ Deploy & Inventory, SolarWinds Patch Manager
against: Microsoft Configuration Manager
Action1
One alternativeManageEngine Patch Manager Plus
against: Windows Server Update Services
no first choiceagainst: Patch My PC Home Updater
DeepSeek V4 FlashAutomox
Three alternativesAction1, ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus, NinjaOne Autonomous Patch Management
AutomoxHeld
Four alternativesAction1, Heimdal Patch & Asset Management, ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus, NinjaOne Autonomous Patch Management
against: Patch My PC
NinjaOne Autonomous Patch Management
Eight alternativesAction1, Automox, ManageEngine Endpoint Central, Microsoft Intune / Configuration Manager, PDQ Connect, PDQ Deploy & Inventory, Qualys VMDR, Tanium Patch
Action1
Three alternativesManageEngine Patch Manager Plus, PDQ Deploy & Inventory, Windows Server Update Services
against: Automox, NinjaOne Autonomous Patch Management
Automox, NinjaOne Autonomous Patch Management
Three alternativesAction1, Heimdal Patch & Asset Management, ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus
against: Microsoft Intune, Tanium Patch
against: ConnectWise ScreenConnect, Ivanti Endpoint Manager, Kaseya VSA, ManageEngine (Zoho) – Patch Manager Plus / Desktop Central / ADSelfService Plus, SolarWinds Orion, Windows Server Update Services
Llama 4 MaverickHeimdal Patch & Asset Management, ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus, Syxsense
One alternativeNinjaOne Autonomous Patch Management
Heimdal Patch & Asset Management, ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus, SyxsenseHeldno first choiceAction1
Two alternativesManageEngine Endpoint Central, TeamViewer
no first choiceagainst: Ivanti Neurons for Patch Management, ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus
Qwen 3.7 FlashManageEngine Patch Manager Plus
Four alternativesAction1, Heimdal Security, NinjaOne Autonomous Patch Management, Syxsense
NinjaOne Autonomous Patch ManagementChanged
Four alternativesDatto RMM, ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus, PDQ Deploy & Inventory, Windows Server Update Services
against: Windows Update
Action1, NinjaOne Autonomous Patch Management
Four alternativesAtera, ManageEngine Endpoint Central, PDQ Connect, SolarWinds Patch Manager
against: Windows Server Update Services
Action1
Four alternativesAtera, Avast Business Patch Management, ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus, Windows Server Update Services
against: SolarWinds
no first choice
One alternativeMicrosoft Intune
against: Automox, Kaseya VSA, NinjaOne Autonomous Patch Management, SolarWinds Patch Manager
Kimi K2ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus
Four alternativesAction1, Automox, Heimdal Patch & Asset Management, Syxsense
Action1, AutomoxChanged
One alternativePatch My PC
against: Microsoft Intune/SCCM
Action1, NinjaOne Autonomous Patch Management
Four alternativesAutomox, ManageEngine Endpoint Central / Patch Manager Plus, Patch My PC, Tanium Patch
against: Microsoft Intune
Action1
Three alternativesAtera, ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus, PDQ Deploy & Inventory
Action1, Automox
Two alternativesManageEngine Patch Manager Plus, NinjaOne Autonomous Patch Management
against: Ivanti Neurons for Patch Management, Microsoft Configuration Manager, Spacewalk, Windows Server Update Services
GLM 4.7 FlashXNinjaOne Autonomous Patch Management
Five alternativesAction1, Heimdal Security, ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus, Microsoft Intune, Motadata ServiceOps
NinjaOne Autonomous Patch ManagementHeld
Three alternativesHeimdal Patch & Asset Management, ManageEngine Endpoint Central, Syxsense
Action1, Automox, NinjaOne Autonomous Patch Management
Ten alternativesAcronis RMM, Datto RMM, Heimdal Patch & Asset Management, Kaseya VSA, ManageEngine Endpoint Central, Microsoft Intune, N-able N-central, PDQ Connect, Patch My PC, Tanium Patch
Action1
Two alternativesManageEngine Patch Manager Plus, PDQ Deploy & Inventory
against: Opsi, Windows Server Update Services
no first choiceagainst: LogMeIn Resolve, Microsoft Intune, N-able N-central, Windows Server Update Services
MiniMax M2.5Ivanti Neurons for Patch Management, ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus
Five alternativesAWS Systems Manager Patch Manager, Microsoft Configuration Manager, Microsoft Intune, Red Hat Satellite, SolarWinds Patch Manager
against: Ansible, OpenSCAP, Windows Server Update Services, Windows Update for Business
AutomoxChanged
One alternativePDQ Connect
NinjaOne Autonomous Patch Management
Seven alternativesAction1, Automox, HCL BigFix, ManageEngine Endpoint Central, Microsoft Intune, Patch My PC, Tanium Patch
Action1
Three alternativesAtera, Avast Business Patch Management, ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus
no first choiceagainst: Kaseya VSA, SolarWinds
Bold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against

The record

One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Seventy-two rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
PromptModelVersion stringTime (UTC)SearchedSourcesLatency
Direct recommendationClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-09-17 13:39yes188 s
Direct recommendationGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-09-17 10:30no04 s
Direct recommendationGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-09-17 14:04yes919 s
Direct recommendationPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-09-17 12:28yes206 s
Direct recommendationGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version)2026-09-17 12:24yes3421 s
Direct recommendationMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-09-17 10:19yes55 s
Direct recommendationDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks2026-09-17 12:16yes1815 s
Direct recommendationLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-09-17 12:03yes53 s
Direct recommendationQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-09-17 10:54yes533 s
Direct recommendationKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-09-17 10:09yes823 s
Direct recommendationGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-09-17 13:19yes8112 s
Direct recommendationMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-09-17 12:02no073 s
ParaphraseClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-09-17 10:26no06 s
ParaphraseGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-09-17 11:55yes35 s
ParaphraseGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-09-17 09:35yes1122 s
ParaphrasePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-09-17 11:14yes206 s
ParaphraseGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version)2026-09-17 11:10yes2011 s
ParaphraseMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-09-17 11:04yes106 s
ParaphraseDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks2026-09-17 13:13yes1720 s
ParaphraseLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-09-17 12:36yes53 s
ParaphraseQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-09-17 09:43no047 s
ParaphraseKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-09-17 10:54yes1127 s
ParaphraseGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-09-17 10:09yes1726 s
ParaphraseMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-09-17 12:10yes960 s
ComparativeClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-09-17 10:43yes98 s
ComparativeGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-09-17 13:27yes1113 s
ComparativeGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-09-17 09:41yes2028 s
ComparativePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-09-17 12:11yes2011 s
ComparativeGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version)2026-09-17 12:42yes1813 s
ComparativeMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-09-17 09:34yes57 s
ComparativeDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks2026-09-17 12:37yes1625 s
ComparativeLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-09-17 13:45yes52 s
ComparativeQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-09-17 09:53yes549 s
ComparativeKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-09-17 11:03yes931 s
ComparativeGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-09-17 09:55yes7258 s
ComparativeMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-09-17 12:56yes1430 s
Budget constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-09-17 13:52no05 s
Budget constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-09-17 11:14yes26 s
Budget constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-09-17 13:46yes1622 s
Budget constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-09-17 14:09yes204 s
Budget constrainedGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version)2026-09-17 12:21yes1710 s
Budget constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-09-17 11:41yes54 s
Budget constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks2026-09-17 12:17yes1012 s
Budget constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-09-17 14:06yes53 s
Budget constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-09-17 11:29yes533 s
Budget constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-09-17 13:43yes515 s
Budget constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-09-17 10:47yes2353 s
Budget constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-09-17 12:12yes513 s
Scale constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-09-17 09:44no05 s
Scale constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-09-17 13:02no06 s
Scale constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-09-17 09:41yes1023 s
Scale constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-09-17 12:31yes208 s
Scale constrainedGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version)2026-09-17 10:09yes1110 s
Scale constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-09-17 13:43no09 s
Scale constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks2026-09-17 13:48yes1624 s
Scale constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-09-17 11:46yes53 s
Scale constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-09-17 13:17no038 s
Scale constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-09-17 12:24yes1430 s
Scale constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-09-17 09:39yes883 s
Scale constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-09-17 13:48yes522 s
Negative framingClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-09-17 12:15yes2816 s
Negative framingGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-09-17 12:21yes48 s
Negative framingGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-09-17 09:54yes1723 s
Negative framingPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-09-17 13:43yes206 s
Negative framingGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version)2026-09-17 09:56yes4016 s
Negative framingMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-09-17 11:56yes55 s
Negative framingDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks2026-09-17 11:05yes2837 s
Negative framingLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-09-17 13:26yes53 s
Negative framingQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-09-17 13:17yes2080 s
Negative framingKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-09-17 11:11yes3038 s
Negative framingGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-09-17 11:04yes2422 s
Negative framingMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-09-17 10:16yes2147 s

Normalization in this category

Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.

ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Acronis read as Acronis Cyber Protect
Datto read as Datto RMM
Heimdal read as Heimdal Patch & Asset Management
Ivanti read as Ivanti Neurons for Patch Management
Ivanti (Endpoint Manager, EPMM, etc.) read as Ivanti Neurons for Patch Management
Ivanti Neurons read as Ivanti Neurons for Patch Management
Kaseya read as Kaseya VSA
Manage Engine read as ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus
ManageEngine read as ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus
Microsoft Autopatch / Intune read as Microsoft Intune
Microsoft Autopatch/Intune read as Microsoft Intune
Microsoft Intune + Windows Autopatch read as Microsoft Intune
Microsoft Intune / Autopatch read as Microsoft Intune
Microsoft Intune / Windows Autopatch read as Microsoft Intune
Microsoft Intune/Autopatch read as Microsoft Intune
NinjaOne read as NinjaOne Autonomous Patch Management
NinjaOne (Patch Management) read as NinjaOne Autonomous Patch Management
NinjaOne (formerly NinjaRMM) read as NinjaOne Autonomous Patch Management
NinjaOne Patch Management (formerly NinjaRMM) read as NinjaOne Autonomous Patch Management
NinjaRMM read as NinjaOne Autonomous Patch Management
PDQ Deploy read as PDQ Deploy & Inventory
PDQ Deploy (Free Version) read as PDQ Deploy & Inventory
Qualys read as Qualys VMDR
SCCM (System Center Configuration Manager) read as Microsoft Configuration Manager
Tanium read as Tanium Patch
Unresolved, counted raw
AWS Systems Manager Patch Manager
AlmaLinux
Apple Configurator
Comodo
Google Cloud Asset Inventory + Patch Management (Beta)
Kaseya Ecosystem (VSA / Datto RMM)
Landscape
ManageEngine (Zoho) – Patch Manager Plus / Desktop Central / ADSelfService Plus
Microsoft ecosystem
Microsoft security solutions
PatchMon CE
Pulp
Rocky Linux
Shavlik/NinjaOne
Ubuntu Server
Windows 11 Pro
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.
← ObservabilityProcess mining →