Application performance monitoring for enterprise buyers
Asked as “APM tool”, and as “application performance monitoring solution”, on behalf of an enterprise B2B company. 46 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, twelve models each.
Standing · first-choice share
46%
Clear leader
46Dynatrace28Datadog APM11New Relic15others
46% of first choices, clear leader.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all twelve models, for an enterprise B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Show the four products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
Head to headHead-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not enterprise.
All twenty-one head-to-head pages: the top seven products, each against each
New Relic vs IBM InstanaNew Relic vs ManageEngine Applications ManagerNew Relic vs HoneycombSigNoz vs Datadog APMSigNoz vs Grafana CloudSigNoz vs IBM InstanaSigNoz vs ManageEngine Applications ManagerSigNoz vs HoneycombDatadog APM vs Grafana CloudDatadog APM vs IBM InstanaDatadog APM vs ManageEngine Applications ManagerDatadog APM vs HoneycombGrafana Cloud vs IBM InstanaGrafana Cloud vs ManageEngine Applications ManagerGrafana Cloud vs HoneycombIBM Instana vs ManageEngine Applications ManagerIBM Instana vs HoneycombManageEngine Applications Manager vs Honeycomb
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative60%
Key
01Dynatrace46%
Dynatrace46%02Datadog APM28%
Datadog APM28%03New Relic11%
New Relic11%04CubeAPM9%
CubeAPM9%05AppDynamics2%
AppDynamics2%06Grafana Cloud0%
Grafana Cloud0%07IBM Instana0%
IBM Instana0%08Elastic APM0%
Elastic APM0%09Splunk Observability Cloud0%
Splunk Observability Cloud0%What they warned about
Five of twelve models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, Grok 4.20, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash and GLM 4.7 FlashX changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Datadog APM28%
17 of 60 labels negative · 9 of 12 models · 2 hard negative
“Notorious for "bill shock": Invoices commonly run 3-12× higher than initial estimates ... Datadog's billing practices and AppDynamics' post-acquisition decline represent the highest current risks” Kimi K2, negative prompt
Dynatrace21%
13 of 62 labels negative · 8 of 12 models
“it is also noted for being the most expensive commercial APM at scale and having a monolithic agent model that may conflict with teams that want fine-grained control” Llama 4 Maverick, negative prompt
AppDynamics24%
10 of 42 labels negative · 7 of 12 models · 4 hard negative
“Avoid these if your enterprise is actively migrating to Kubernetes, multi-cloud environments, or serverless workloads.” Gemini 3.5 Flash, negative prompt
New Relic12%
7 of 59 labels negative · 6 of 12 models
“your seat bill alone will quickly spiral into millions of dollars... However, be aware that forecasting CCUs is more complex” Gemini 3.5 Flash, budget prompt
What they cite
Twelve of the twelve models returned a source list in this edition: four return the pages they cited and eight the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
66 of 72 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 12 of 12 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 918 links across 219 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page.
vendor site · New Relic41 answers · 66 citations · 12 models
vendor site · CubeAPM30 answers · 56 citations · 11 models
23 answers · 23 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Rollbar23 answers · 23 citations · 10 models
vendor site · OpenObserve21 answers · 24 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Atatus20 answers · 20 citations · 8 models
vendor site · ManageEngine19 answers · 23 citations · 8 models
19 answers · 19 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Middleware.io18 answers · 20 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Instatus18 answers · 18 citations · 9 models
15 answers · 17 citations · 7 models
vendor site · Augment Code14 answers · 16 citations · 9 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
24 answers · 11 models
24 answers · 11 models
23 answers · 8 models
23 answers · 9 models
23 answers · 10 models
20 answers · 8 models
19 answers · 10 models
18 answers · 9 models
18 answers · 8 models
17 answers · 8 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “apm tool”, “apm tools”, “best apm tool”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dynatrace dynatrace.com | 46% | 676 | 22,200 | 1,106 | 62,738 | $3,941 | 120 | 2 |
| Datadog datadoghq.com Datadog APM 28% | 28% | 185 | 74,000 | 3,541 | 159,408 company | $633 | 120 | |
| New Relic newrelic.com | 11% | 595 | 14,800 | 843 | 83,276 | $412 | 89 | 4 |
| CubeAPM cubeapm.com | 9% | 42 | 40 | 0 | 846 | |||
| Splunk splunk.com AppDynamics 2%, Splunk 0% | 2% | 253 | 40,500 | 6,832 | 892,906 | 120 | ||
| Honeycomb honeycomb.io | 2% | 105 | 135,000 | 13,732 | 6,603 | 65 | ||
| Scout scoutapm.com Scout APM 2% | 2% | 28 | 170 | 0 | 4,420 company | 1 | ||
| Grafana Cloud grafana.com Grafana Cloud 0%, Grafana Stack 0%, Grafana Cloud / LGTM 0% | 0% | 183 | 2,400 | 40 | 84,520 | 116 | ||
| IBM parent site IBM Instana 0% | 0% | 108 | 201,000 | 34,098 | ||||
| Elastic elastic.co Elastic APM 0%, Elastic Observability 0% | 0% | 142 | 74,000 | 34,672 | 208,306 company | 105 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 15 sites; 3 of them are among the sites the models cited here (manageengine.com, newrelic.com, openobserve.ai). The first result for “apm tool” is blazemeter.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best APM tool for an enterprise B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which application performance monitoring solution would you recommend to a large B2B company with thousands of employees?”Comparative“What are the top enterprise-grade APM tools and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best APM tool for a large company that needs predictable total cost across thousands of users?”Scale-constrained“We are a 5,000 person company with SSO, SOC 2 and procurement review requirements evaluating a APM tool. What should we look at?”Negative“Which APM tools should a large enterprise avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5Datadog APMDatadog APM, DynatraceChangedDatadog APM, DynatraceDynatraceno first choiceagainst: Dynatrace, LogicMonitor
Three alternatives
AppDynamics, Dynatrace, New RelicOne alternative
New RelicThree alternatives
AppDynamics, New Relic, SolarWinds ObservabilityThree alternatives
Middleware.io, New Relic, SigNozGPT-5.4 miniDynatraceDynatraceHeldno first choiceDynatraceno first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
Datadog APM, New RelicThree alternatives
AppDynamics, New Relic, Splunk Observability CloudOne alternative
New RelicGemini 3.5 FlashDynatraceDynatraceHeldDynatraceHoneycombagainst: Datadog APM, New RelicDynatraceagainst: Datadog APMagainst: AppDynamics, Broadcom DX APM, Datadog APM, ELK, Jaeger, Prometheus, Raygun, Rollbar, Sentry
Four alternatives
Chronosphere, Datadog APM, Grafana Labs, New RelicThree alternatives
Chronosphere, Datadog APM, New RelicFive alternatives
Datadog APM, Grafana Labs, Honeycomb, New Relic, SplunkThree alternatives
Coralogix, CubeAPM, SigNozTwo alternatives
Grafana Cloud, New RelicPerplexity SonarDynatraceDynatraceHeldagainst: ManageEngine Applications ManagerDynatraceCubeAPMagainst: Dynatraceno first choiceagainst: Apache SkyWalking, Datadog APM, Elastic-based APM setups, New Relic
Three alternatives
AppDynamics, Datadog APM, New RelicThree alternatives
AppDynamics, Datadog APM, IBM InstanaFour alternatives
AppDynamics, Datadog APM, Grafana Cloud, New RelicOne alternative
Middleware.ioGrok 4.20Datadog APM, Dynatraceagainst: Elastic APM, Grafana LabsDynatraceChangedDatadog APM, Dynatraceagainst: Grafana Cloud, SigNozNew Relicagainst: AppDynamics, Datadog APM, DynatraceDatadog APMagainst: AppDynamics, Datadog APM, Dynatrace, Elastic APM, Grafana/Tempo, Jaeger, New Relic, Prometheus, SigNoz, Zipkin
Two alternatives
AppDynamics, New RelicTwo alternatives
Datadog APM, New RelicTwo alternatives
AppDynamics, New RelicTwo alternatives
CubeAPM, SigNozFour alternatives
AppDynamics, Dynatrace, New Relic, Splunk Observability CloudMistral SmallDatadog APM, Dynatraceno first choiceChangedDatadog APMCubeAPMagainst: AppDynamics, Dynatraceno first choiceagainst: AppDynamics, Datadog APM, Dynatrace, Splunk Observability Cloudagainst: AppDynamics, Dynatrace, New Relic
Two alternatives
AppDynamics, New RelicFour alternatives
AppDynamics, Dynatrace, Grafana Cloud, New RelicDeepSeek V4 FlashDatadog APMDatadog APM, DynatraceChangedDatadog APM, DynatraceNew Relicagainst: Datadog APMno first choiceagainst: AppDynamics, Broadcom DX APM, Datadog APM, Legacy SAP APM / SAP IoT based tools, SolarWinds AppOptics
Two alternatives
Dynatrace, New RelicThree alternatives
AppDynamics, New Relic, SplunkTwo alternatives
AppDynamics, New RelicOne alternative
DynatraceLlama 4 Maverickno first choiceNew RelicChangedOpenObserveCubeAPMno first choiceagainst: Dynatrace
Four alternatives
Datadog APM, Dynatrace, Elastic APM, IBM InstanaSeven alternatives
AppDynamics, Datadog APM, Dynatrace, Elastic APM, IBM Instana, New Relic, SentryQwen 3.7 FlashDatadog APM, DynatraceAppDynamics, Datadog APMChangedDatadog APM, DynatraceCubeAPMagainst: Datadog APM, New Relicno first choiceagainst: Honeycombagainst: AppDynamics, Elasticsearch, IBM Instana, Rollbar, Sentry, Splunk
Two alternatives
AppDynamics, New RelicTwo alternatives
Dynatrace, Grafana StackThree alternatives
AppDynamics, CubeAPM, New RelicTwo alternatives
AppDynamics, DynatraceFour alternatives
Datadog APM, Dynatrace, Grafana Cloud / LGTM, New RelicKimi K2DynatraceDynatraceHeldagainst: Datadog APMDatadog APM, DynatraceNew Relicagainst: Datadog APM, DynatraceDatadog APMagainst: AppDynamics, Datadog APM, Dynatrace
Two alternatives
Datadog APM, New RelicTwo alternatives
AppDynamics, New RelicFour alternatives
AppDynamics, Elastic Observability, Grafana Cloud, New RelicTwo alternatives
CubeAPM, groundcoverTwo alternatives
Dynatrace, New RelicGLM 4.7 FlashXDatadog APM, DynatraceDynatraceChangedDatadog APMNew Relicagainst: Datadog APM, Dynatraceno first choiceagainst: AppDynamics, Broadcom DX APM, Datadog APM, Dynatrace, Nagios, Paessler PRTG, Scout APM, SolarWinds Application Performance Monitor, Zabbix
Two alternatives
Grafana Stack, New RelicFour alternatives
AppDynamics, Datadog APM, IBM Instana, New RelicSeven alternatives
AppDynamics, Dynatrace, Elastic APM, Grafana Cloud, IBM Instana, New Relic, SolarWinds ObservabilityFour alternatives
CubeAPM, Grafana Loki, Grafana/Tempo, PrometheusMiniMax M2.5Datadog APM, DynatraceDatadog APM, DynatraceHeldDynatraceScout APMagainst: Datadog APM, New Relicno first choiceagainst: Datadog APM, Dynatrace, New Relic
Three alternatives
Elastic APM, New Relic, Splunk Observability CloudOne alternative
New RelicFour alternatives
AppDynamics, Datadog APM, IBM Instana, New RelicTwo alternatives
CubeAPM, Grafana CloudBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Seventy-two rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 11:58 | yes | 9 | 7 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 11:02 | yes | 4 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 09:32 | yes | 15 | 36 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 14:08 | yes | 17 | 6 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 10:25 | yes | 39 | 16 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 12:25 | yes | 15 | 12 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 13:13 | yes | 13 | 17 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 11:02 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 11:16 | yes | 5 | 19 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 12:31 | yes | 13 | 31 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 13:32 | yes | 21 | 65 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 10:51 | yes | 7 | 19 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 09:35 | yes | 9 | 8 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 12:59 | yes | 3 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 10:35 | yes | 15 | 26 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 09:34 | yes | 20 | 8 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 09:44 | yes | 32 | 14 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 13:15 | no | 0 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 12:36 | yes | 10 | 17 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 12:37 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 09:53 | no | 0 | 43 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 13:48 | yes | 14 | 25 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 10:15 | yes | 8 | 62 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 12:37 | yes | 5 | 25 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 12:19 | yes | 14 | 10 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 13:47 | yes | 5 | 9 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 12:23 | yes | 22 | 27 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 10:42 | yes | 20 | 10 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 13:21 | yes | 22 | 19 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 11:14 | yes | 5 | 7 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 10:00 | yes | 19 | 17 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 10:21 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 13:29 | yes | 5 | 23 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 13:40 | yes | 14 | 31 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 09:50 | yes | 14 | 177 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 14:11 | yes | 5 | 18 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 11:06 | yes | 17 | 11 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 10:08 | yes | 3 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 09:45 | yes | 21 | 104 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 11:09 | yes | 16 | 6 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 09:38 | yes | 42 | 17 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 11:53 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 11:35 | yes | 10 | 14 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 12:50 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 12:25 | yes | 5 | 49 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 12:48 | yes | 10 | 21 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 14:01 | yes | 22 | 200 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 13:50 | yes | 12 | 51 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 12:03 | yes | 18 | 16 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 11:13 | no | 0 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 11:07 | no | 0 | 14 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 11:25 | yes | 20 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 12:45 | yes | 24 | 14 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 11:26 | no | 0 | 9 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 11:17 | yes | 9 | 20 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 14:03 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 13:26 | yes | 10 | 49 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 13:38 | yes | 23 | 36 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 12:20 | yes | 10 | 185 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 12:41 | yes | 7 | 21 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 09:46 | yes | 18 | 8 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 13:59 | yes | 5 | 12 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 11:58 | yes | 16 | 25 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 10:12 | yes | 20 | 8 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 12:03 | yes | 28 | 17 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 13:18 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 13:17 | yes | 27 | 33 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 13:29 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 10:12 | no | 0 | 50 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 11:09 | yes | 29 | 39 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 12:00 | yes | 23 | 455 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 11:19 | yes | 14 | 40 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Cisco AppDynamics read as AppDynamics
Datadog read as Datadog APM
Elastic read as Elastic APM
Grafana read as Grafana Cloud
SolarWinds read as SolarWinds Observability
Splunk APM read as Splunk Observability Cloud
Unresolved, counted raw
AWS managed services
Elastic-based APM setups
Legacy SAP APM / SAP IoT based tools
SolarWinds Application Performance Monitor
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.