Log management for enterprise buyers
Asked as “log management platform”, and as “centralized logging tool”, on behalf of an enterprise B2B company. 54 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, twelve models each.
Standing · first-choice share
41%
Clear leader
41Splunk20Datadog Log Management07Elastic Stack31others
41% of first choices, clear leader.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all twelve models, for an enterprise B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Show the three products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
Head to head
Datadog Log Management vs Grafana LokiDatadog Log Management vs GraylogDatadog Log Management vs New Relic Logs
Head-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not enterprise.All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each
Datadog Log Management vs OpenObserveDatadog Log Management vs Better StackDatadog Log Management vs SigNozDatadog Log Management vs Elastic StackGrafana Loki vs GraylogGrafana Loki vs New Relic LogsGrafana Loki vs OpenObserveGrafana Loki vs Better StackGrafana Loki vs SigNozGrafana Loki vs Elastic StackGraylog vs New Relic LogsGraylog vs OpenObserveGraylog vs Better StackGraylog vs SigNozGraylog vs Elastic StackNew Relic Logs vs OpenObserveNew Relic Logs vs Better StackNew Relic Logs vs SigNozNew Relic Logs vs Elastic StackOpenObserve vs Better StackOpenObserve vs SigNozOpenObserve vs Elastic StackBetter Stack vs SigNozBetter Stack vs Elastic StackSigNoz vs Elastic Stack
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative60%
Key
01Splunk41%
Splunk41%02Datadog Log Management20%
Datadog Log Management20%03Elastic Stack7%
Elastic Stack7%04Sumo Logic6%
Sumo Logic6%05New Relic Logs4%
New Relic Logs4%06Coralogix4%
Coralogix4%07Grafana Loki2%
Grafana Loki2%08Cribl Stream2%
Cribl Stream2%09Elastic Observability2%
Elastic Observability2%10Dynatrace2%
Dynatrace2%11OpenObserve0%
OpenObserve0%12Microsoft Sentinel0%
Microsoft Sentinel0%13Graylog0%
Graylog0%What they warned about
Zero of twelve models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.20, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX and MiniMax M2.5 changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Splunk34%
21 of 61 labels negative · 11 of 12 models · 4 hard negative
“Avoid these for predictability — Splunk — ... which makes it hard to forecast. ✗” DeepSeek V4 Flash, budget prompt
Datadog Log Management26%
16 of 61 labels negative · 10 of 12 models · 4 hard negative
“Options to Avoid if Cost Predictability is Critical: Datadog's pricing model is complex and expensive at scale” Claude Haiku 4.5, budget prompt
Elastic Stack24%
11 of 46 labels negative · 9 of 12 models · 2 hard negative
“Why? Operational nightmare at scale... Best avoided if: You're not running managed services like Elastic Cloud” Grok 4.20, negative prompt
Graylog24%
5 of 21 labels negative · 5 of 12 models · 2 hard negative
“Platforms to Strongly Avoid or Approach with Extreme Caution: 1. Graylog (especially self-managed deployments)” Grok 4.20, negative prompt
What they cite
Twelve of the twelve models returned a source list in this edition: four return the pages they cited and eight the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
61 of 72 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 12 of 12 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 910 links across 232 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page.
vendor site · Cribl32 answers · 41 citations · 11 models
vendor site · OpenObserve32 answers · 41 citations · 10 models
vendor site · CubeAPM25 answers · 29 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Middleware.io25 answers · 27 citations · 10 models
vendor site · SigNoz24 answers · 27 citations · 10 models
23 answers · 29 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Parseable23 answers · 28 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Exabeam21 answers · 25 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Dash020 answers · 34 citations · 11 models
19 answers · 19 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Coralogix16 answers · 21 citations · 7 models
16 answers · 16 citations · 10 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
24 answers · 11 models
20 answers · 10 models
20 answers · 9 models
20 answers · 9 models
20 answers · 9 models
19 answers · 10 models
19 answers · 8 models
18 answers · 8 models
18 answers · 9 models
16 answers · 10 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best log management platform”, “log management platform”, “log management platforms”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splunk splunk.com | 41% | 253 | 40,500 | 6,832 | 892,906 | 120 | ||
| Datadog parent site Datadog Log Management 20% | 20% | 167 | 74,000 | 3,541 | ||||
| Elastic elastic.co Elastic Stack 7%, Elastic Observability 2% | 9% | 154 | 74,000 | 34,672 | 208,306 company | 105 | 8 | |
| Sumo Logic sumologic.com | 6% | 83 | 4,400 | 265 | 82,749 | $4,123 | 55 | |
| CubeAPM cubeapm.com | 6% | 42 | 40 | 0 | 846 | |||
| New Relic newrelic.com New Relic Logs 4% | 4% | 67 | 14,800 | 843 | 83,276 company | $412 | 89 | |
| Coralogix coralogix.com | 4% | 116 | 4,400 | 83 | 10,540 | $28 | 27 | |
| Grafana Loki grafana.com Grafana Loki 2%, Grafana Cloud Logs 2% | 4% | 155 | 1,900 | 122 | 84,520 | 116 | ||
| Cribl Stream cribl.io | 2% | 124 | 260 | 15 | 17,616 | $19 | 20 | 5 |
| Dynatrace dynatrace.com | 2% | 676 | 22,200 | 1,106 | 62,738 | $3,941 | 120 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 13 sites; 5 of them are among the sites the models cited here (cribl.io, dash0.com, exabeam.com, grepr.ai, openobserve.ai). The first result for “best log management platform” is reddit.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best log management platform for an enterprise B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which centralized logging tool would you recommend to a large B2B company with thousands of employees?”Comparative“What are the top enterprise-grade log management platforms and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best log management platform for a large company that needs predictable total cost across thousands of users?”Scale-constrained“We are a 5,000 person company with SSO, SOC 2 and procurement review requirements evaluating a log management platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which log management platforms should a large enterprise avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5Datadog Log Management, SplunkSplunk, Sumo LogicChangedno first choiceagainst: SplunkNew Relic Logsagainst: Datadog Log Management, Splunkno first choiceagainst: Elastic Stack, OpenSearch, Splunk
One alternative
Sumo LogicSix alternatives
Cribl Stream, Datadog Log Management, Dynatrace, Elastic Stack, Grafana Loki, GraylogOne alternative
CubeAPMGPT-5.4 miniDatadog Log ManagementSplunkChangedSplunkGrafana Cloud Logsagainst: Elastic Stack, Graylogno first choicenothing named
Four alternatives
Elastic Observability, Grafana Loki, New Relic Logs, SplunkTwo alternatives
Elastic Observability, Sumo LogicSix alternatives
Datadog Log Management, Elastic Observability, Elastic Stack, Grafana Loki, Microsoft Sentinel, Sumo LogicTwo alternatives
Datadog Log Management, SplunkGemini 3.5 FlashDatadog Log Management, SplunkDatadog Log ManagementChangedagainst: Elastic Stack, Splunkno first choiceGrafana Lokiagainst: Datadog Log Management, Splunk, Sumo LogicSplunk, Sumo Logicagainst: ArcSight, Better Stack, Datadog Log Management, Elastic Stack, IBM QRadar, LogRhythm, Loggly, OpenSearch, SolarWinds Papertrail, Splunk
Six alternatives
Coralogix, Cribl Stream, Dynatrace, Grafana Loki, Logz.io, OpenObserveThree alternatives
Coralogix, Dynatrace, Grafana LokiSix alternatives
Datadog Log Management, Dynatrace, Elastic Stack (ELK) & OpenSearch, Grafana Loki, Splunk, Sumo LogicFour alternatives
Coralogix, Cribl Stream, CrowdStrike Falcon LogScale, OpenObserveFive alternatives
CrowdStrike Falcon LogScale, Datadog Log Management, Elastic Stack, Grafana Loki, New Relic LogsPerplexity SonarElastic ObservabilitySplunkChangedno first choiceCubeAPMno first choiceagainst: Datadog Log Management, Elastic Stack, Graylog, Splunk
Five alternatives
Cribl Stream, Datadog Log Management, Microsoft Sentinel, OpenObserve, SplunkThree alternatives
Cribl Stream, Datadog Log Management, GraylogTwo alternatives
Coralogix, Cribl StreamGrok 4.20Elastic Stack, SplunkSplunkChangedno first choiceNew Relic Logsagainst: Datadog Log ManagementSplunkagainst: Dynatraceagainst: Datadog Log Management, Dynatrace, Elastic Stack, Graylog, Splunk
Two alternatives
Datadog Log Management, Sumo LogicThree alternatives
Datadog Log Management, Elastic Stack, Sumo LogicOne alternative
Grafana LokiThree alternatives
Datadog Log Management, Elastic Stack, Sumo LogicMistral SmallDatadog Log Management, Splunk Observability CloudSplunkChangedSplunkCoralogix, CubeAPMagainst: Datadog Log Management, Elastic Stack, Splunkno first choiceagainst: Datadog Log Management, Elastic Stack, Splunk
Three alternatives
Cribl Stream, Elastic Observability, Grafana LokiTwo alternatives
Datadog Log Management, Elastic StackFive alternatives
Cribl Stream, Datadog Log Management, Elastic Stack, Graylog, Microsoft SentinelOne alternative
New Relic LogsDeepSeek V4 FlashDatadog Log Management, SplunkSplunkChangedDatadog Log Management, SplunkDynatraceagainst: Datadog Log Management, Splunk, Sumo Logicno first choiceagainst: Datadog Log Management, Elastic Stack / OpenSearch, Graylog, Loggly, SolarWinds Papertrail, Splunk, Sumo Logic
Five alternatives
Cribl Stream, Dynatrace, Elastic Observability, New Relic Logs, OpenObserveFour alternatives
Cribl Stream, Datadog Log Management, Elastic Stack, Sumo LogicSeven alternatives
Elastic Observability, Grafana Loki, Graylog, New Relic Logs, OpenObserve, SigNoz, Sumo LogicOne alternative
ExabeamLlama 4 MaverickCribl StreamSplunkChangedno first choiceCubeAPMagainst: Datadog Log Managementno first choiceagainst: Datadog Log Management, Dynatrace, Splunk
Three alternatives
Datadog Log Management, Dynatrace, Elastic ObservabilityTwo alternatives
Datadog Log Management, DynatraceTwo alternatives
Grafana Cloud Logs, SigNozQwen 3.7 FlashSplunkDatadog Log Management, SplunkChangedSplunkSumo Logicagainst: Datadog Log Management, New Relic Logs, Splunkno first choiceagainst: Elastic Stack, OpenSearch, Splunk, Sumo Logicagainst: Loggly, SolarWinds Papertrail
Four alternatives
Datadog Log Management, Elastic Stack, Grafana Loki, Microsoft SentinelTwo alternatives
Elastic Stack, Grafana LokiThree alternatives
Cribl Stream, Datadog Log Management, Elastic StackTwo alternatives
Graylog, OpenSearch / ElasticsearchFour alternatives
Cloud-Native, Datadog Log Management, Dynatrace, New Relic LogsKimi K2SplunkDatadog Log Management, Elastic StackChangedagainst: SplunkSplunkCoralogixagainst: Datadog Log Management, Grafana Cloud Logs, New Relic Logs, SplunkSplunkagainst: Datadog Log Management, Elastic Stack, Splunk, Sumo Logic
Four alternatives
Datadog Log Management, Elastic Stack, Logpoint, Sumo LogicOne alternative
Cribl StreamFour alternatives
Datadog Log Management, Elastic Stack, Grafana Loki, Sumo LogicFour alternatives
CrowdStrike Falcon LogScale, Datadog Log Management, Elastic Security, Microsoft SentinelGLM 4.7 FlashXDatadog Log Management, SplunkSplunkChangedSplunkDatadog Log Management, Elastic Stackagainst: New Relic Logs, Splunkno first choiceagainst: Elastic Stack, Graylog, IBM QRadar, Splunk
Three alternatives
Elastic Stack, Grafana Cloud Logs, New Relic LogsFour alternatives
Datadog Log Management, Elastic Stack, Grafana Loki, OpenObserveSeven alternatives
Amazon CloudWatch Logs, Azure Monitor Logs, Datadog Log Management, Elastic Stack, Google Cloud Logging, New Relic Logs, Sumo LogicMiniMax M2.5Elastic Stack, SplunkSplunkChangedagainst: IBM QRadarno first choiceManageEngine Log360against: Datadog Log Management, SplunkDatadog Log Management, Splunknothing named
One alternative
Grafana LokiSix alternatives
Datadog Log Management, Elastic Stack, Grafana Loki, Graylog, Microsoft Sentinel, Sumo LogicFour alternatives
Dash0, KloudMate, Netdata, Sumo LogicTwo alternatives
Elastic Stack, Microsoft SentinelBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Seventy-two rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 11:37 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 11:41 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 11:07 | yes | 9 | 29 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 12:50 | yes | 20 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 12:00 | yes | 38 | 17 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 10:38 | yes | 9 | 6 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 09:43 | yes | 9 | 14 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 11:33 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 10:30 | no | 0 | 38 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 11:18 | yes | 15 | 27 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 11:03 | yes | 15 | 62 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 13:55 | yes | 5 | 26 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 12:20 | yes | 9 | 8 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 11:01 | yes | 4 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 11:52 | yes | 9 | 22 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 13:26 | yes | 20 | 6 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 10:56 | yes | 13 | 8 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 13:13 | no | 0 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 12:19 | yes | 9 | 13 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 10:48 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 14:02 | yes | 10 | 41 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 11:39 | yes | 10 | 62 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 12:32 | yes | 13 | 36 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 09:26 | no | 0 | 68 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 11:28 | yes | 9 | 9 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 13:17 | yes | 7 | 10 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 13:04 | yes | 20 | 34 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 11:47 | yes | 20 | 8 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 12:59 | yes | 27 | 15 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 10:31 | yes | 5 | 7 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 13:59 | yes | 12 | 18 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 09:22 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 10:14 | yes | 5 | 45 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 09:45 | yes | 18 | 51 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 13:30 | no | 0 | 158 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 11:14 | yes | 9 | 47 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 10:19 | yes | 9 | 7 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 12:22 | yes | 4 | 7 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 12:53 | yes | 23 | 32 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 10:16 | yes | 20 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 11:09 | yes | 39 | 21 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 12:06 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 10:24 | yes | 23 | 31 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 11:15 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 10:47 | yes | 13 | 117 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 10:46 | yes | 20 | 31 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 12:16 | yes | 27 | 66 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 09:27 | yes | 5 | 32 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 10:15 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 10:54 | no | 0 | 10 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 11:58 | yes | 9 | 32 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 13:02 | yes | 20 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 12:11 | yes | 15 | 13 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 10:47 | no | 0 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 13:13 | yes | 30 | 33 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 13:16 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 13:54 | no | 0 | 43 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 13:04 | yes | 15 | 26 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 10:29 | yes | 23 | 58 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 10:10 | yes | 10 | 29 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 11:31 | yes | 28 | 16 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 13:48 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 10:31 | yes | 14 | 25 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 13:48 | yes | 19 | 7 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 10:41 | yes | 22 | 17 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 13:05 | yes | 19 | 14 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 12:59 | yes | 34 | 45 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 13:03 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 10:45 | yes | 26 | 63 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 09:32 | yes | 29 | 37 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 13:39 | yes | 25 | 165 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 13:11 | no | 0 | 9 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
AWS CloudWatch read as Amazon CloudWatch Logs
Azure Monitor read as Azure Monitor Logs
Cribl read as Cribl Stream
Datadog read as Datadog Log Management
ELK read as Elastic Stack
ELK Stack read as Elastic Stack
ELK Stack (Elasticsearch, Logstash, Kibana) read as Elastic Stack
ELK Stack (Elasticsearch/Logstash/Kibana, self-hosted) read as Elastic Stack
Elastic read as Elastic Stack
Elastic (ELK Stack) read as Elastic Stack
Elastic (ELK Stack/Observability) read as Elastic Stack
Elastic (ELK) read as Elastic Stack
Elastic Cloud read as Elastic Stack
Elasticsearch read as Elastic Stack
Elasticsearch (ELK) read as Elastic Stack
Grafana Cloud read as Grafana Cloud Logs
Grafana Cloud (Loki) read as Grafana Cloud Logs
New Relic read as New Relic Logs
Unresolved, counted raw
ClickHouse-based architectures
IBM QRadar Log Insights
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.