Static application security testing for small business buyers
Asked as “SAST tool”, and as “static code security scanner”, on behalf of a small B2B company. 47 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, twelve models each.
Standing · first-choice share
70%
Clear leader
70Semgrep AppSec Platform09Aikido Security09Snyk Code13others
70% of first choices, clear leader.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all twelve models, for a small B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Show the seven products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
Head to head
Semgrep AppSec Platform vs SonarQubeSemgrep AppSec Platform vs Snyk CodeSemgrep AppSec Platform vs Aikido Security
Head-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not small business.All fifteen head-to-head pages: the top six products, each against each
Semgrep AppSec Platform vs CodeQLSemgrep AppSec Platform vs Veracode Static AnalysisSonarQube vs Snyk CodeSonarQube vs Aikido SecuritySonarQube vs CodeQLSonarQube vs Veracode Static AnalysisSnyk Code vs Aikido SecuritySnyk Code vs CodeQLSnyk Code vs Veracode Static AnalysisAikido Security vs CodeQLAikido Security vs Veracode Static AnalysisCodeQL vs Veracode Static Analysis
One product takes 70% of first choices here, so the chart would put eleven markers in one corner and one at the far edge. The two measurements it plots are columns in the standing above: share, and the negative label rate. Three products carry a negative rate above 25% in this category.
What they warned about
Eight of twelve models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2 and MiniMax M2.5 changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Checkmarx One77%
23 of 30 labels negative · 11 of 12 models · 14 hard negative
“Why Avoid: These are built for large teams with dedicated AppSec specialists. (e.g., older versions of Checkmarx One, Fortify, Veracode enterprise plans)” Qwen 3.7 Flash, negative prompt
Veracode Static Analysis78%
18 of 23 labels negative · 10 of 12 models · 12 hard negative
“Veracode | Enterprise‑focused, complex workflow, no transparent pricing; typically sold via long sales cycles and annual contracts.” GLM 4.7 FlashX, negative prompt
OpenText Fortify89%
16 of 18 labels negative · 10 of 12 models · 9 hard negative
“e.g., older versions of Checkmarx One, Fortify, Veracode enterprise plans ... Why Avoid: These are built for large teams” Qwen 3.7 Flash, negative prompt
SonarQube
21%
11 of 52 labels negative · 8 of 12 models · 1 hard negative
“Defaults to high false positives (40–60% untuned ...), demanding custom rules and maintenance that small businesses often can't sustain” Grok 4.20, negative prompt
What they cite
Twelve of the twelve models returned a source list in this edition: four return the pages they cited and eight the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
65 of 72 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 12 of 12 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 905 links across 152 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page.
43 answers · 78 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Corgea33 answers · 37 citations · 11 models
vendor site · ZeroPath32 answers · 33 citations · 11 models
30 answers · 41 citations · 10 models
vendor site · OX29 answers · 32 citations · 11 models
vendor site · G228 answers · 36 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Safeguard25 answers · 36 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Pixee24 answers · 26 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Endor Labs19 answers · 22 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Checkmarx17 answers · 23 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Jit17 answers · 18 citations · 9 models
16 answers · 20 citations · 9 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
37 answers · 9 models
30 answers · 11 models
29 answers · 11 models
25 answers · 11 models
23 answers · 9 models
22 answers · 9 models
19 answers · 8 models
17 answers · 9 models
16 answers · 9 models
16 answers · 7 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best sast tool”, “sast tool”, “sast tools”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Semgrep AppSec Platform semgrep.dev | 70% | 167 | 3,461 | 43 | |||
| Snyk snyk.io Snyk Code 9%, Snyk 4% | 13% | 150 | 12,100 | 581 | 61,651 company | 60 | |
| Aikido aikido.dev Aikido Security 9% | 9% | 326 | 2,400 | 51 | 6,442 company | $936 | 120 |
| SonarQube | 2% | 14,800 | 1,353 | ||||
| GitHub parent site GitHub Advanced Security 2% | 2% | 78 | 1,500,000 | 31,479 | |||
| DeepSource deepsource.com | 2% | 8 | 320 | 3 | 7,847 | 0 | |
| GitLab parent site GitLab SAST 2% | 2% | 24 | 90,500 | 4,844 | |||
| CodeQL | 0% | 2,900 | 81 | ||||
| Bandit | 0% | 110,000 | 23,958 | ||||
| CodeAnt AI codeant.ai | 0% | 18 | 260 | 9 | 2,282 | $472 | 56 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 24 sites; 4 of them are among the sites the models cited here (checkmarx.com, endorlabs.com, safeguard.sh, zeropath.com). The first result for “best sast tool” is reddit.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best SAST tool for a small B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which static code security scanner would you recommend to a small business that sells to other businesses?”Comparative“What are the top SAST tools for a small team and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best SAST tool for a small company with a tight budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 30 person company evaluating a SAST tool. What should we look at?”Negative“Which SAST tools should a small business avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5Aikido Security, Semgrep AppSec Platformagainst: Checkmarx OneSnyk CodeChangedAikido Security, Semgrep AppSec PlatformSemgrep AppSec Platformno first choiceagainst: Checkmarx One, OpenText Fortify, Veracode Static Analysis
One alternative
GitLab SASTThree alternatives
Aikido Security, Kiuwan, Semgrep AppSec PlatformThree alternatives
GitHub Advanced Security, Snyk Code, SonarQubeTwo alternatives
CodeQL, SonarQubeGPT-5.4 miniSemgrep AppSec Platformagainst: SonarQubeSemgrep AppSec PlatformHeldagainst: SonarQubeSemgrep AppSec Platformagainst: Checkmarx OneSemgrep AppSec Platformagainst: AppThreat/sast-scanno first choicenothing named
One alternative
GitHub Advanced SecurityThree alternatives
Checkmarx One, OpenText Fortify, Snyk CodeTwo alternatives
CodeQL, SonarQubeTwo alternatives
CodeQL, GitHub Advanced SecurityGemini 3.5 FlashAikido Securityagainst: Snyk, SonarQubeAikido SecurityHeldSemgrep AppSec Platformagainst: CodeQL, SonarQubeSemgrep AppSec Platformagainst: CodeQLAikido Securityagainst: Checkmarx One, GitHub Advanced Security, OpenText Fortify, Veracode Static Analysisagainst: Bandit, Black Duck Coverity, Checkmarx One, CodeQL, OpenText Fortify, PMD, SpotBugs, Veracode Static Analysis
One alternative
Semgrep AppSec PlatformTwo alternatives
Semgrep AppSec Platform, SnykThree alternatives
Aikido Security, GitLab SAST, Snyk CodeThree alternatives
Opengrep, Snyk Code, SonarQubeTwo alternatives
Semgrep AppSec Platform, SnykPerplexity SonarSemgrep AppSec Platformagainst: Aikido Security, CodeAnt AI, ZeroPathSemgrep AppSec PlatformHeldSemgrep AppSec PlatformSemgrep AppSec Platformno first choiceagainst: Black Duck Coverity, Checkmarx One, CodeQL, GitLab SAST, OpenText Fortify, Perforce Klocwork, SonarQube, Veracode Static Analysis
Three alternatives
Checkmarx One, GitHub Advanced Security, Veracode Static AnalysisThree alternatives
CodeQL, Snyk Code, SonarQubeFive alternatives
Aikido Security, CodeQL/GitHub Advanced Security, GitLab SAST, Snyk Code, SonarQubeFour alternatives
Aikido Security, CodeAnt AI, CodeQL, SnykGrok 4.20Semgrep AppSec PlatformSemgrep AppSec PlatformHeldagainst: Checkmarx One, Veracode Static AnalysisSemgrep AppSec Platform, SonarQubeagainst: Checkmarx OneSemgrep AppSec PlatformSemgrep AppSec Platformagainst: Checkmarx One, OpenText Fortify, SonarQube, Veracode Static Analysis
Two alternatives
Snyk Code, SonarQubeTwo alternatives
Snyk, SonarQubeFour alternatives
Aikido Security, CodeQL, Codiga, Snyk CodeThree alternatives
Bandit, CodeQL, SonarQubeFour alternatives
Checkmarx One, CodeQL, Snyk Code, SonarQubeMistral SmallSemgrep AppSec PlatformSemgrep AppSec PlatformHeldCodeQL, Semgrep AppSec PlatformSemgrep AppSec Platformno first choiceagainst: Checkmarx One, OpenText Fortify, Veracode Static Analysis
Two alternatives
Codacy, CodeAnt AIOne alternative
Aikido SecurityThree alternatives
Bandit, Codiga, SonarQubeOne alternative
SonarQubeDeepSeek V4 FlashSemgrep AppSec PlatformSemgrep AppSec PlatformHeldagainst: Checkmarx One, OpenText Fortify, Veracode Static AnalysisSemgrep AppSec Platformagainst: Checkmarx One, OpenText FortifySemgrep AppSec Platformagainst: Checkmarx One, Veracode Static Analysisno first choiceagainst: Black Duck Coverity, Checkmarx One, HCL AppScan, OpenText Fortify, SonarQube, Veracode Static Analysis
Three alternatives
CodeQL, Snyk Code, SonarQubeOne alternative
Snyk CodeFour alternatives
Aikido Security, CodeQL, Snyk Code, SonarQubeEight alternatives
Bandit, Brakeman, CodeAnt AI, CodeQL, Qodana, Snyk Code, SonarQube, gosecLlama 4 MaverickSemgrep AppSec PlatformSemgrep AppSec PlatformHeldno first choiceSemgrep AppSec Platformno first choiceagainst: Semgrep AppSec Platform, Snyk Code, SonarQube
Two alternatives
Snyk, SonarQubeTwo alternatives
Codacy, CodeAnt AIQwen 3.7 FlashSnykSemgrep AppSec PlatformChangedagainst: Checkmarx One, Veracode Static AnalysisSemgrep AppSec Platformagainst: SonarQubeSemgrep AppSec Platformagainst: Checkmarx One, OpenText Fortify, Snyk Code, Veracode Static AnalysisGitHub Advanced Security, GitLab SASTagainst: Checkmarx One, OpenText Fortify, Veracode Static Analysis
Two alternatives
Semgrep AppSec Platform, SonarQubeOne alternative
SonarQubeThree alternatives
Aikido Security, CodeAnt AI, Snyk CodeThree alternatives
Bandit, SonarQube, gosecKimi K2Snyk Codeagainst: Checkmarx One, Veracode Static AnalysisSemgrep AppSec PlatformChangedagainst: Checkmarx OneSemgrep AppSec Platform, Snyk CodeSemgrep AppSec PlatformDeepSource, Semgrep AppSec Platform, Snyk Codeagainst: Checkmarx One, OpenText Fortify, Veracode Static Analysisagainst: Checkmarx One, OpenText Fortify, Veracode Static Analysis
Two alternatives
Semgrep AppSec Platform, SonarQubeOne alternative
GitHub Advanced SecurityThree alternatives
Codacy, CodeQL, SonarQubeFour alternatives
Bandit, CodeQL, SonarQube, gosecTwo alternatives
Aikido Security, SonarQubeGLM 4.7 FlashXSemgrep AppSec Platformagainst: Aikido SecuritySemgrep AppSec PlatformHeldagainst: SonarQubeSemgrep AppSec Platform, SonarQubeagainst: Pixee, ZeroPathSemgrep AppSec Platformno first choiceagainst: Aikido Security, Black Duck Coverity, Checkmarx One, OpenText Fortify, SonarQube, Veracode Static Analysis, ZeroPath
Two alternatives
Snyk Code, SonarQubeOne alternative
Snyk CodeFive alternatives
Aikido Security, CodeQL, DeepSource, GitLab SAST, Snyk CodeThree alternatives
Codacy, Qodana, SonarQubeOne alternative
Semgrep AppSec PlatformMiniMax M2.5Semgrep AppSec Platform, Snyk CodeSemgrep AppSec Platform, SnykChangedSemgrep AppSec PlatformSemgrep AppSec Platform, SonarQubeno first choiceagainst: Black Duck Coverity, Checkmarx One, OpenText Fortify, Veracode Static Analysis
Three alternatives
Codiga, Corgea, GitHub Advanced SecurityOne alternative
SonarQubeFive alternatives
Aikido Security, Codacy, DeepSource, Snyk Code, SonarQubeTwo alternatives
CodeAnt AI, QodanaBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Seventy-two rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 11:54 | yes | 9 | 7 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 10:08 | yes | 4 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 12:42 | yes | 15 | 27 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 11:05 | yes | 18 | 7 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 09:42 | yes | 35 | 18 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 11:06 | yes | 9 | 8 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 13:35 | yes | 17 | 16 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 13:04 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 11:13 | no | 0 | 35 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 12:45 | yes | 14 | 32 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 13:55 | yes | 12 | 28 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 11:12 | yes | 8 | 36 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 10:29 | yes | 9 | 8 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 09:53 | yes | 2 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 11:37 | yes | 16 | 25 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 12:20 | yes | 20 | 6 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 09:59 | yes | 41 | 15 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 09:49 | yes | 9 | 6 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 10:18 | yes | 23 | 19 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 14:04 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 11:45 | yes | 5 | 39 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 13:11 | yes | 15 | 27 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 11:55 | yes | 25 | 90 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 12:12 | yes | 5 | 38 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 12:50 | yes | 16 | 10 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 12:44 | yes | 4 | 8 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 11:01 | yes | 14 | 34 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 11:21 | yes | 20 | 7 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 12:36 | yes | 35 | 16 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 12:55 | yes | 29 | 18 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 14:06 | yes | 16 | 36 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 09:27 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 14:16 | yes | 26 | 62 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 12:14 | yes | 14 | 57 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 09:41 | yes | 9 | 120 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 11:19 | yes | 5 | 18 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 12:51 | yes | 9 | 7 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 12:30 | yes | 4 | 7 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 12:27 | yes | 9 | 20 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 09:27 | yes | 20 | 6 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 13:43 | yes | 12 | 7 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 12:26 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 13:08 | yes | 11 | 12 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 12:10 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 12:19 | yes | 10 | 21 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 13:09 | yes | 5 | 38 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 10:53 | yes | 19 | 54 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 13:10 | yes | 5 | 19 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 11:34 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 14:02 | no | 0 | 13 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 10:06 | yes | 9 | 28 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 13:36 | yes | 20 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 10:26 | yes | 16 | 11 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 13:36 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 10:58 | yes | 9 | 16 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 11:58 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 13:45 | yes | 5 | 36 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 13:18 | yes | 14 | 27 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 13:20 | yes | 10 | 174 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 13:14 | no | 0 | 13 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 13:14 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 10:47 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 11:12 | yes | 14 | 30 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 09:52 | yes | 20 | 7 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 10:58 | yes | 36 | 15 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 12:38 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 10:23 | yes | 17 | 22 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 13:45 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 12:25 | yes | 20 | 79 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 11:09 | yes | 28 | 33 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 10:55 | yes | 23 | 70 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 09:23 | yes | 21 | 44 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Aikido read as Aikido Security
Checkmarx read as Checkmarx One
Checkmarx (Checkmarx One) read as Checkmarx One
Checkmarx (CxSAST) read as Checkmarx One
GitHub Advanced Security / CodeQL read as GitHub Advanced Security
GitLab Ultimate read as GitLab SAST
Mend read as Mend SAST
Semgrep read as Semgrep AppSec Platform
Semgrep (Community Edition / Opengrep) read as Semgrep AppSec Platform
Semgrep Community Edition read as Semgrep AppSec Platform
Semgrep Community Edition (CE) read as Semgrep AppSec Platform
Semgrep Community Edition (Semgrep OSS) read as Semgrep AppSec Platform
Semgrep OSS read as Semgrep AppSec Platform
Veracode read as Veracode Static Analysis
Unresolved, counted raw
AppThreat/sast-scan
Kiuwan
Open-source linters / language-specific analyzers
ZeriFlow
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.