5 categories · RankedOpenText Fortify
OpenText Fortify is an application security testing product from OpenText that covers static (SAST) and dynamic (DAST) analysis · opentext.com ↗
Why models recommend it
“Fortify is a long-standing enterprise solution with deep analysis capabilities and extensive compliance reporting.”MiniMax M2.5 · Comparative question · alternative
“Offers deep analysis and broad language/framework support, making it suitable for complex enterprise environments.”Mistral Small · Comparative question · alternative
“Best For: Strict compliance, highly regulated industries (finance, defense), and complex legacy applications.”Gemini 3.5 Flash · Comparative question · alternative
“long-established enterprise tool, often chosen for regulated environments and large organizations”GPT-5.4 mini · Comparative question · alternative
What gives them pause
“Legacy enterprise SAST tools (like Micro Focus Fortify or Checkmarx CxSAST) often fail in modern mid-market environments due to high noise, heavy management overhead, and steep pricing.”Gemini 3.5 Flash · Direct question · warning
“Enterprise DAST platforms (like Veracode, Rapid7 InsightAppSec, or Fortify) often cost tens of thousands of dollars per year.”Gemini 3.5 Flash · Budget-constrained question · warning
“Premium tools (older versions of Fortify, Checkmarx, Coverity) aren't inherently bad but cause failure when”Qwen 3.7 Flash · Negative question · warning
“considered by some researchers to be a "legacy enterprise SAST" that's falling behind modern alternatives”DeepSeek V4 Flash · Negative question · warning
Also on the shortlist
The products named in the same answers as OpenText Fortify, over the 98 answers that named it, and how often each was the first choice instead.
| Product | Named together | Picked instead | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 90 | 28 | View → | |
| 81 | 8 | View → | |
| 81 | 6 | View → | |
| 71 | 22 | View → | |
| 52 | 4 | View → | |
| 31 | 0 | View → | |
| 26 | 3 | View → | |
| 26 | 1 | View → | |
| 13 | 1 | View → | |
| 12 | 1 | View → |
What the models named instead of OpenText Fortify →
A side-by-side page exists where both products are among a category's top eight.
At a glance
Stated on OpenText Fortify's own site, not checked by Gane.
- For
- strategic customers
- Integrations
- 4
How this is measured
Fourteen AI models from 12 labs are asked the same buying questions six ways, for three company sizes. Standings refresh every edition.
Gane sells AI visibility software. No company can pay to change a result.
Read the method →Sources returned with these answers
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted. These counts come from 80 of the 98 answers that named OpenText Fortify and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
242 of the 262 domain citations in answers naming OpenText Fortify came from a third party's page. Twenty were to the publisher's own pages (the Gane Index), which the models cite like any other source; they are not counted as a third party.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Warning | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 5 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |