Veracode Static Analysis is a static application security testing (SAST) product from Veracode · veracode.com ↗
The standing depends on who is buying. Every model is asked the same questions for each company size.
Semgrep AppSec Platform is first at 82%.
Semgrep AppSec Platform is first at 71%. 0 of 14 models made it the first choice when asked directly.
Checkmarx One is first at 53%.
“Cloud-native leader with fast scanning and comprehensive reporting.”Grok 4.20 · Comparative question · first choice
“Premium. Flexible scanning of source and binary, scalable for large apps. May require tuning for optimal workflows.”Muse Glimmer 30B · Comparative question · alternative
“Choose Checkmarx, Veracode, or Fortify if you are an enterprise needing strict regulatory compliance”Gemini 3.5 Flash · Comparative question · alternative
“Veracode excels in enterprises with diverse codebases, including older languages and compiled binaries”MiniMax M2.5 · Comparative question · alternative
“avoid commercial tools like Checkmarx, Veracode, or Snyk's full SAST”Grok 4.20 · Budget-constrained question · warning
“Veracode is announcing the end of life for Discovery scans. Discovery scans will no longer be available or supported.”Muse Glimmer 30B · Negative question · warning
“Legacy tools like *Checkmarx* or *Veracode* are often too heavy, expensive, and noisy for mid-market companies”Gemini 3.5 Flash · Paraphrase question · warning
“Cons: Expensive, heavier setup, historically harder for developers to integrate into CI/CD without friction.”Qwen 3.7 Flash · Paraphrase question · warning
The products named in the same answers as Veracode Static Analysis, over the 126 answers that named it, and how often each was the first choice instead.
| Product | Named together | Picked instead | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 123 | 28 | View → | |
| 114 | 13 | View → | |
| 103 | 36 | View → | |
| 81 | 1 | View → | |
| 74 | 3 | View → | |
| 49 | 0 | View → | |
| 31 | 2 | View → | |
| 28 | 1 | View → | |
| 20 | 2 | View → | |
| 18 | 2 | View → |
What the models named instead of Veracode Static Analysis →
A side-by-side page exists where both products are among a category's top eight.
Stated on Veracode Static Analysis's own site, not checked by Gane.
Fourteen AI models from 12 labs are asked the same buying questions six ways, for three company sizes. Standings refresh every edition.
Gane sells AI visibility software. No company can pay to change a result.
Read the method →Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted. These counts come from 100 of the 126 answers that named Veracode Static Analysis and are not a share of its labels.
297 of the 316 domain citations in answers naming Veracode Static Analysis came from a third party's page. Nineteen were to the publisher's own pages (the Gane Index), which the models cite like any other source; they are not counted as a third party.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Warning | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| Grok 4.20 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 6 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 464 | 16 | 2026-09-23 | SAST, SCA | |
| Report or ebook | 66 | 6 | 2026-09-08 | SAST, SCA | |
| Conference or event | 55 | 1 | 2026-08-04 | ||
| Case study | 29 | 1 | 2026-09-08 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 28 | 1 | 2026-08-11 | SAST | |
| Glossary or explainer | 11 | 0 | 2025-12-29 | SCA, SAST | |
| Comparison | 10 | 1 | 2026-08-18 | SCA, SAST | |
| Podcast or video | 2 | 0 | 2024-11-04 | ||
| News or press | 2 | 0 | 2024-10-25 | ||
| Template or tool | 1 | undated |
As the event pages on veracode.com state them, read September 28, 2026.
Every page veracode.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.