Static application security testing for enterprise buyers
Asked as “SAST tool”, and as “static code security scanner”, on behalf of an enterprise B2B company. 48 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, twelve models each.
Standing · first-choice share
54%
Clear leader
54Checkmarx One15Veracode Static Analysis10SonarQube21others
54% of first choices, clear leader.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all twelve models, for an enterprise B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Show the two products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
Head to head
Semgrep AppSec Platform vs SonarQubeSemgrep AppSec Platform vs Snyk CodeSemgrep AppSec Platform vs Aikido Security
Head-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not enterprise.All fifteen head-to-head pages: the top six products, each against each
Semgrep AppSec Platform vs CodeQLSemgrep AppSec Platform vs Veracode Static AnalysisSonarQube vs Snyk CodeSonarQube vs Aikido SecuritySonarQube vs CodeQLSonarQube vs Veracode Static AnalysisSnyk Code vs Aikido SecuritySnyk Code vs CodeQLSnyk Code vs Veracode Static AnalysisAikido Security vs CodeQLAikido Security vs Veracode Static AnalysisCodeQL vs Veracode Static Analysis
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01
02S03
04S05
06
07
08C09
Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative70%
Key
01Checkmarx One54%
Checkmarx One54%02Veracode Static Analysis15%
Veracode Static Analysis15%03SonarQube10%
04Snyk Code8%
Snyk Code8%05Semgrep AppSec Platform2%
06OpenText Fortify2%
OpenText Fortify2%07GitHub Advanced Security2%
GitHub Advanced Security2%08Black Duck Coverity0%
Black Duck Coverity0%09CodeQL0%
What they warned about
Five of twelve models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Mistral Small, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash and MiniMax M2.5 changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
OpenText Fortify27%
14 of 51 labels negative · 10 of 12 models · 5 hard negative
“Verdict: Avoid unless you have a large dedicated AppSec team, a multi-week rollout plan, and compliance mandates that force its reporting format.” DeepSeek V4 Flash, negative prompt
SonarQube
29%
14 of 48 labels negative · 9 of 12 models · 4 hard negative
“Why cautious/avoid: High operational overhead for large orgs—requires significant tuning to reduce noise” Grok 4.20, negative prompt
Veracode Static Analysis20%
11 of 54 labels negative · 9 of 12 models · 3 hard negative
“Avoid for mixed-language, dynamic-language, or microservices-heavy environments where you need source-level evidence and fast feedback.” DeepSeek V4 Flash, negative prompt
Checkmarx One17%
11 of 63 labels negative · 8 of 12 models · 3 hard negative
“Avoid for Predictability ... Tools like Checkmarx, Veracode, and Fortify offer powerful enterprise features but lack transparent pricing at scale.” Claude Haiku 4.5, budget prompt
What they cite
Twelve of the twelve models returned a source list in this edition: four return the pages they cited and eight the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
67 of 72 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 12 of 12 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 908 links across 163 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page.
vendor site · Augment Code53 answers · 70 citations · 11 models
41 answers · 57 citations · 10 models
vendor site · ZeroPath36 answers · 37 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Aikido35 answers · 39 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Corgea34 answers · 37 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Checkmarx33 answers · 45 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Pixee33 answers · 39 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Cycode31 answers · 35 citations · 11 models
22 answers · 30 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Safeguard18 answers · 24 citations · 8 models
vendor site · OX18 answers · 19 citations · 9 models
14 answers · 23 citations · 9 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
50 answers · 11 models
35 answers · 11 models
34 answers · 9 models
29 answers · 10 models
28 answers · 10 models
28 answers · 10 models
26 answers · 11 models
17 answers · 9 models
16 answers · 10 models
11 answers · 7 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best sast tool”, “sast tool”, “sast tools”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Checkmarx checkmarx.com Checkmarx One 54% | 54% | 159 | 260 | 3 | 54,982 company | 61 | 8 | |
| Veracode Static Analysis veracode.com | 15% | 100 | 40 | 2 | 12,543 | 17 | ||
| SonarQube | 10% | 14,800 | 1,353 | |||||
| Snyk snyk.io Snyk Code 8% | 8% | 107 | 12,100 | 581 | 61,651 company | 60 | ||
| Semgrep AppSec Platform semgrep.dev | 2% | 167 | 3,461 | 43 | ||||
| OpenText opentext.com OpenText Fortify 2% | 2% | 80 | 14,800 | 1,286 | 220,938 company | $281 | 27 | |
| GitHub parent site GitHub Advanced Security 2% | 2% | 78 | 1,500,000 | 31,479 | ||||
| ZeroPath zeropath.com | 2% | 4 | 590 | 0 | 1,258 | 0 | 3 | |
| Contrast | 2% | |||||||
| Offensive360 offensive360.com | 2% | 4 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 24 sites; 3 of them are among the sites the models cited here (checkmarx.com, safeguard.sh, zeropath.com). The first result for “best sast tool” is reddit.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best SAST tool for an enterprise B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which static code security scanner would you recommend to a large B2B company with thousands of employees?”Comparative“What are the top enterprise-grade SAST tools and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best SAST tool for a large company that needs predictable total cost across thousands of users?”Scale-constrained“We are a 5,000 person company with SSO, SOC 2 and procurement review requirements evaluating a SAST tool. What should we look at?”Negative“Which SAST tools should a large enterprise avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5Checkmarx One, OpenText Fortify, Veracode Static Analysisno first choiceChangedno first choiceSnyk Code, ZeroPathagainst: Checkmarx One, OpenText Fortify, Veracode Static Analysisno first choiceagainst: Checkmarx One, OpenText Fortify
Two alternatives
Cycode, Mend SASTSeven alternatives
Checkmarx One, CodeQL, Corgea, OpenText Fortify, Semgrep AppSec Platform, Snyk Code, Veracode Static AnalysisOne alternative
Semgrep AppSec PlatformGPT-5.4 miniCheckmarx One, Veracode Static AnalysisCheckmarx OneChangedagainst: Semgrep AppSec PlatformCheckmarx OneSonarQubeno first choicenothing named
Three alternatives
GitHub Advanced Security, OpenText Fortify, Snyk CodeTwo alternatives
CodeQL/GitHub Advanced Security, OpenText FortifySix alternatives
CodeQL, GitHub Advanced Security, OpenText Fortify, Snyk Code, SonarQube, Veracode Static AnalysisOne alternative
Checkmarx Fusion / Checkmarx OneGemini 3.5 FlashCheckmarx One, Veracode Static AnalysisSnyk CodeChangedno first choiceSonarQubeagainst: GitHub Advanced Security, Semgrep AppSec Platform, Snykno first choiceagainst: Bandit, Brakeman, ESLint-security, HCL AppScan, OpenText Fortify, SonarQube, Veracode Static Analysis, gosec
Three alternatives
GitHub Advanced Security, Semgrep AppSec Platform, Snyk CodeFour alternatives
Checkmarx One, GitHub Advanced Security (GHAS) with CodeQL, Semgrep AppSec Platform, Veracode Static AnalysisThree alternatives
Checkmarx One, OpenText Fortify, Veracode Static AnalysisPerplexity SonarCheckmarx Oneagainst: Aikido Security, CorgeaCheckmarx OneHeldno first choiceagainst: OpenText Fortify, Snyk Code, SonarQubeCheckmarx Oneno first choiceagainst: Bandit, Brakeman, CodeQL, Semgrep AppSec Platform, SonarQube
Four alternatives
GitHub Advanced Security, OpenText Fortify, Semgrep AppSec Platform, Veracode Static AnalysisFour alternatives
GitHub Advanced Security with CodeQL, OpenText Fortify, Semgrep AppSec Platform, Veracode Static AnalysisTwo alternatives
GraphNode, SonarQubeGrok 4.20Checkmarx OneCheckmarx OneHeldCheckmarx Oneagainst: Semgrep AppSec PlatformSonarQubeagainst: SnykCheckmarx Oneagainst: Checkmarx One, CodeQL, OpenText Fortify, Semgrep AppSec Platform, SonarQube, Veracode Static Analysis
Three alternatives
OpenText Fortify, Snyk Code, Veracode Static AnalysisThree alternatives
OpenText Fortify, SonarQube, Veracode Static AnalysisFour alternatives
Black Duck Coverity, OpenText Fortify, SonarQube, Veracode Static AnalysisThree alternatives
Checkmarx One, OpenText Fortify, Veracode Static AnalysisMistral SmallCheckmarx OneSonarQubeChangedCheckmarx One, Veracode Static AnalysisSemgrep AppSec Platform, Snyk Codeagainst: Checkmarx One, GitHub Advanced Security, OpenText Fortify, SonarQubeno first choiceagainst: Bandit, Checkmarx One, OpenText Fortify, Veracode Static Analysis
Three alternatives
GitLab SAST, OpenText Fortify, SonarQubeFour alternatives
Checkmarx One, CodeQL, Semgrep AppSec Platform, Veracode Static AnalysisFour alternatives
Black Duck Coverity, Cycode, OpenText Fortify, SonarQubeOne alternative
ZeroPathDeepSeek V4 FlashCheckmarx OneCheckmarx OneHeldCheckmarx Oneagainst: OpenText FortifyCheckmarx Oneagainst: Semgrep AppSec Platform, Snyk, SonarQubeno first choiceagainst: Bandit, Brakeman, Checkmarx One, OWASP Dependency-Check, OpenText Fortify, SonarQube, Veracode Static Analysis
Five alternatives
OpenText Fortify, Semgrep AppSec Platform, Snyk Code, SonarQube, Veracode Static AnalysisFour alternatives
GitHub Advanced Security, OpenText Fortify, Semgrep AppSec Platform, Veracode Static AnalysisSix alternatives
Black Duck Coverity, GitHub Advanced Security, Semgrep AppSec Platform, Snyk Code, SonarQube, Veracode Static AnalysisThree alternatives
Black Duck Coverity, OpenText Fortify, Veracode Static AnalysisLlama 4 MaverickCheckmarx Oneno first choiceChangedno first choiceno first choiceno first choiceagainst: Checkmarx One, OpenText Fortify, Semgrep AppSec Platform, Snyk Code, SonarQube, Veracode Static Analysis
Qwen 3.7 FlashCheckmarx One, Veracode Static Analysisagainst: SonarQubeCheckmarx OneChangedCheckmarx OneGitHub Advanced SecurityCheckmarx One, Contrast, SonarQube, Veracode Static Analysisagainst: Checkmarx One, OpenText Fortify, SonarQube
Two alternatives
Black Duck Coverity, Snyk CodeThree alternatives
GitHub Advanced Security, OpenText Fortify, SonarQubeFive alternatives
Black Duck Coverity, OpenText Fortify, Semgrep AppSec Platform, Snyk Code, Veracode Static AnalysisFour alternatives
Checkmarx One, Semgrep AppSec Platform, Snyk Code, SonarQubeKimi K2Checkmarx Oneagainst: SonarQubeCheckmarx OneHeldCheckmarx OneCheckmarx Oneagainst: OpenText Fortify, Snyk, Veracode Static AnalysisCheckmarx One, Veracode Static Analysisagainst: Bandit, Basic SAST in GitLab/GitHub, Brakeman, HCL AppScan, OpenText Fortify, SonarQube, SpotBugs, Veracode Static Analysis, gosec
Two alternatives
Snyk Code, Veracode Static AnalysisFour alternatives
OpenText Fortify, Semgrep AppSec Platform, SonarQube, Veracode Static AnalysisFour alternatives
Black Duck Coverity, OpenText Fortify, SonarQube, Veracode Static AnalysisTwo alternatives
Semgrep AppSec Platform, SonarQubeThree alternatives
Semgrep AppSec Platform, Snyk, SonarQubeGLM 4.7 FlashXCheckmarx OneCheckmarx OneHeldCheckmarx OneSnyk Codeagainst: Checkmarx One, SonarQube, Veracode Static Analysisno first choiceagainst: Checkmarx One, OpenText Fortify, SonarQube, Veracode Static Analysis
Three alternatives
Semgrep AppSec Platform, Snyk Code, Veracode Static AnalysisFour alternatives
GitHub Advanced Security, OpenText Fortify, SonarQube, Veracode Static AnalysisFour alternatives
Black Duck Coverity, OpenText Fortify, SonarQube, Veracode Static AnalysisOne alternative
Semgrep AppSec PlatformMiniMax M2.5Checkmarx One, Veracode Static AnalysisCheckmarx OneChangedno first choiceOffensive360against: Checkmarx One, Semgrep AppSec Platform, Snyk, Veracode Static Analysisno first choicenothing named
Three alternatives
GitHub Advanced Security, OpenText Fortify, Veracode Static AnalysisEleven alternatives
Aikido Security, Black Duck Coverity, Checkmarx One, Corgea, GitHub Advanced Security, OpenText Fortify, Perforce Klocwork, Semgrep AppSec Platform, Snyk Code, Veracode Static Analysis, ZeroPathOne alternative
StaticCodeAuditBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Seventy-two rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 14:02 | yes | 14 | 10 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 11:32 | no | 0 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 11:50 | yes | 12 | 28 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 10:09 | yes | 18 | 7 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 10:21 | yes | 31 | 16 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 13:21 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 10:37 | yes | 9 | 19 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 13:48 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 09:34 | yes | 5 | 25 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 10:39 | yes | 9 | 26 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 10:40 | yes | 6 | 79 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 14:03 | yes | 5 | 24 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 10:51 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 13:10 | yes | 3 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 11:59 | yes | 9 | 25 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 14:12 | yes | 20 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 14:13 | yes | 31 | 19 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 10:37 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-09-17 13:35 | yes | 16 | 34 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 12:49 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 11:56 | yes | 15 | 66 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 10:47 | yes | 19 | 30 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 11:56 | yes | 14 | 26 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 10:41 | yes | 9 | 32 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 11:53 | yes | 9 | 10 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 12:46 | yes | 7 | 10 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 13:09 | yes | 21 | 35 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 11:03 | yes | 20 | 13 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 14:15 | yes | 26 | 17 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 10:14 | yes | 5 | 8 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 12:22 | yes | 15 | 20 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 11:32 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 09:31 | yes | 5 | 30 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 11:20 | yes | 10 | 122 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 11:48 | yes | 29 | 94 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 11:09 | yes | 5 | 18 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 10:17 | yes | 12 | 10 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 12:32 | yes | 3 | 7 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 13:12 | yes | 22 | 28 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 10:48 | yes | 19 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 12:03 | yes | 34 | 19 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 09:43 | yes | 5 | 8 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 12:27 | yes | 16 | 22 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 09:59 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 12:36 | yes | 5 | 30 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 14:07 | yes | 9 | 21 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 12:45 | yes | 28 | 79 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 09:55 | yes | 15 | 81 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 12:20 | yes | 16 | 14 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 09:30 | no | 0 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 11:48 | yes | 6 | 29 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 10:48 | yes | 17 | 10 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 11:42 | yes | 12 | 10 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 14:12 | no | 0 | 10 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 10:50 | yes | 22 | 27 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 10:14 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 11:20 | no | 0 | 40 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 13:44 | yes | 21 | 55 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 11:36 | yes | 20 | 175 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 13:17 | yes | 5 | 24 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 11:47 | yes | 18 | 8 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 11:03 | yes | 3 | 8 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 13:07 | yes | 18 | 29 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 14:14 | yes | 20 | 8 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 13:51 | yes | 21 | 16 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 14:01 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 11:54 | yes | 27 | 45 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 13:30 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 10:17 | yes | 17 | 92 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 12:38 | yes | 26 | 47 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 12:47 | yes | 22 | 54 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 10:44 | yes | 7 | 31 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Aikido read as Aikido Security
Checkmarx read as Checkmarx One
GitHub Advanced Security / CodeQL read as GitHub Advanced Security
GitHub Advanced Security — CodeQL read as GitHub Advanced Security
GitLab Ultimate read as GitLab SAST
GitLab Ultimate (with SAST built-in) read as GitLab SAST
Mend (formerly Synopsys SAST) read as Mend SAST
Semgrep read as Semgrep AppSec Platform
Semgrep (Enterprise) read as Semgrep AppSec Platform
Semgrep CE read as Semgrep AppSec Platform
Semgrep Enterprise read as Semgrep AppSec Platform
Semgrep OSS (CLI) read as Semgrep AppSec Platform
Veracode read as Veracode Static Analysis
Veracode (using legacy compilation workflows) read as Veracode Static Analysis
Unresolved, counted raw
Basic SAST in GitLab/GitHub (without Advanced Security)
Checkmarx Fusion / Checkmarx One
ESLint-security
GitHub Advanced Security (GHAS) with CodeQL
GitHub Advanced Security with CodeQL
GraphNode
StaticCodeAudit
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.