CI/CD platforms for enterprise buyers
Asked as “CI/CD platform”, and as “continuous integration and delivery tool”, on behalf of an enterprise B2B company. 50 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, twelve models each.
Standing · first-choice share
44%
Clear leader
44GitLab CI/CD16GitHub Actions12GitHub28others
44% of first choices, clear leader.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all twelve models, for an enterprise B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Show the three products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
Head to headHead-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not enterprise.
All six head-to-head pages: the top four products, each against each
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative60%
Key
01GitLab CI/CD44%
GitLab CI/CD44%02GitHub Actions16%
GitHub Actions16%03GitHub12%
GitHub12%04Azure DevOps8%
Azure DevOps8%05Jenkins8%
Jenkins8%06Buildkite6%
Buildkite6%07CloudBees CI2%
CloudBees CI2%08CircleCI2%
CircleCI2%09Harness0%
Harness0%10JetBrains TeamCity0%
JetBrains TeamCity0%11Octopus Deploy0%
Octopus Deploy0%What they warned about
Two of twelve models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Grok 4.20, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, GLM 4.7 FlashX and MiniMax M2.5 changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Jenkins51%
27 of 53 labels negative · 12 of 12 models · 8 hard negative
“If you are still on Jenkins, make a migration plan to GitHub, GitLab, or Harness your priority.” Gemini 3.5 Flash, direct prompt
CircleCI32%
14 of 44 labels negative · 10 of 12 models · 5 hard negative
“GitHub Actions (hosted) and CircleCI (cloud) — per-minute/credit billing that scales linearly and sometimes super-linearly” DeepSeek V4 Flash, budget prompt
GitHub Actions24%
11 of 46 labels negative · 7 of 12 models · 3 hard negative
“What to avoid for this requirement - GitHub Actions (hosted) and CircleCI (cloud) — per-minute/credit billing that scales linearly” DeepSeek V4 Flash, budget prompt
Atlassian Bamboo67%
6 of 9 labels negative · 5 of 12 models · 4 hard negative
“Why to Avoid: Atlassian announced a firm timeline to phase out its Data Center product line.” Gemini 3.5 Flash, negative prompt
What they cite
Twelve of the twelve models returned a source list in this edition: four return the pages they cited and eight the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
62 of 72 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 12 of 12 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 937 links across 271 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page.
36 answers · 40 citations · 10 models
32 answers · 38 citations · 11 models
26 answers · 28 citations · 9 models
vendor site · DeployHQ20 answers · 20 citations · 9 models
17 answers · 20 citations · 7 models
17 answers · 17 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Augment Code15 answers · 18 citations · 8 models
vendor site · CircleCI14 answers · 24 citations · 7 models
14 answers · 19 citations · 6 models
vendor site · Harness14 answers · 18 citations · 8 models
14 answers · 14 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Semaphore13 answers · 16 citations · 9 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
35 answers · 10 models
28 answers · 11 models
25 answers · 9 models
17 answers · 9 models
17 answers · 10 models
14 answers · 6 models
13 answers · 8 models
12 answers · 8 models
10 answers · 9 models
10 answers · 5 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best ci/cd platform”, “ci/cd platform”, “ci/cd platforms”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GitLab gitlab.com GitLab CI/CD 44% | 44% | 186 | 90,500 | 4,844 | 603,028 company | $884 | 66 | 5 |
| GitHub parent site GitHub Actions 16%, GitHub Enterprise Server 2% | 18% | 181 | 1,500,000 | 31,479 | ||||
| GitHub github.com | 12% | 216 | 1,500,000 | 31,479 | 42,019,137 | $81 | 14 | 5 |
| Azure parent site Azure DevOps 8% | 8% | 162 | 301,000 | 47,904 | ||||
| Jenkins jenkins.io Jenkins 8%, Jenkins X 0% | 8% | 151 | 33,100 | 22,088 | 182,143 | |||
| Buildkite buildkite.com | 6% | 57 | 3,600 | 98 | 3,563 | $477 | 0 | |
| CloudBees cloudbees.com CloudBees CI 2% | 2% | 11 | 90 | 3 | 128,700 company | $67 | 13 | |
| CircleCI circleci.com | 2% | 140 | 4,400 | 207 | 133,932 | 24 | ||
| Harness harness.io | 0% | 83 | 60,500 | 55,100 | 86,302 | 6 | 1 | |
| JetBrains TeamCity jetbrains.com | 0% | 34 | 140 | 7 | 485,270 | 120 | 2 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 16 sites; 3 of them are among the sites the models cited here (blog.jetbrains.com, harness.io, octopus.com). The first result for “best ci/cd platform” is reddit.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best CI/CD platform for an enterprise B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which continuous integration and delivery tool would you recommend to a large B2B company with thousands of employees?”Comparative“What are the top enterprise-grade CI/CD platforms and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best CI/CD platform for a large company that needs predictable total cost across thousands of users?”Scale-constrained“We are a 5,000 person company with SSO, SOC 2 and procurement review requirements evaluating a CI/CD platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which CI/CD platforms should a large enterprise avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5Azure DevOps, GitHub Actionsno first choiceChangedno first choiceagainst: JenkinsCircleCI, GitHub Actionsagainst: Buildkiteno first choiceagainst: Jenkins, JetBrains TeamCity
One alternative
GitLab CI/CDOne alternative
GitLab CI/CDGPT-5.4 miniGitHub Actionsagainst: JenkinsGitLab CI/CDChangedagainst: Jenkinsno first choiceagainst: Atlassian BambooGitLab CI/CDagainst: CircleCI, GitHub Actions, Jenkinsno first choicenothing named
Three alternatives
AWS CodePipeline, Azure DevOps, GitLab CI/CDTwo alternatives
CircleCI, GitHub ActionsGemini 3.5 FlashGitHub, GitLab CI/CDagainst: JenkinsGitHubChangedagainst: JenkinsGitHub, GitLab CI/CDagainst: Jenkins / CloudBees EnterpriseBuildkiteagainst: Atlassian Bamboo, Jenkins, JetBrains TeamCityGitHubagainst: AWS CodePipeline, Atlassian Bamboo, Azure DevOps, Azure Pipelines, Bitbucket Pipelines, CircleCI, GCP Cloud Build, Jenkins, Travis CI
Four alternatives
Argo CD, Azure DevOps, Buildkite, HarnessThree alternatives
Argo CD, GitLab CI/CD, HarnessThree alternatives
Argo CD, Azure DevOps, HarnessFive alternatives
Argo CD, GitHub, GitLab CI/CD, JetBrains TeamCity, TektonTwo alternatives
GitLab CI/CD, HarnessPerplexity SonarGitLab CI/CDGitLab CI/CDHeldGitLab CI/CDGitLab CI/CD, Jenkinsagainst: GitHub Actionsno first choiceagainst: CircleCI, GitHub Actions, Jenkins
Four alternatives
Azure Pipelines, CircleCI, Harness, JenkinsFour alternatives
Harness, Jenkins, Octopus Deploy, SpinnakerEight alternatives
Azure DevOps, CircleCI, GitHub, GitHub Actions, Harness, Jenkins, JetBrains TeamCity, Octopus DeployGrok 4.20GitHub Actions, GitLab CI/CDJenkinsChangedagainst: CircleCIno first choiceGitHub Enterprise Serveragainst: Azure Pipelines, CircleCI, GitHub ActionsGitHub Actions, GitLab CI/CDagainst: Jenkinsagainst: Atlassian Bamboo, CircleCI, Drone CI, Jenkins, Travis CI
Five alternatives
Atlassian, Azure DevOps, CircleCI, CloudBees CI, JenkinsThree alternatives
Azure Pipelines, GitHub Actions, GitLab CI/CDThree alternatives
Argo CD, GitLab CI/CD, JenkinsFour alternatives
Buildkite, CircleCI, Harness, SemaphoreMistral SmallGitLab CI/CDAzure DevOps, GitLab CI/CDChangedno first choiceGitHub Actionsno first choiceagainst: CircleCI, Jenkins, JetBrains TeamCity
Three alternatives
Buildkite, GitHub Actions, JenkinsThree alternatives
CircleCI, Jenkins, JetBrains TeamCityTwo alternatives
CloudBees CI, GitLab CI/CDDeepSeek V4 FlashGitHub Actions, GitLab CI/CDGitLab CI/CDChangedagainst: GitHub Actions, Jenkinsno first choiceBuildkiteagainst: CircleCI, GitHub Actions, GitLab CI/CDGitLab CI/CDagainst: Jenkinsagainst: Argo Workflows, Buildbot, Buildkite, CircleCI, Concourse CI, Drone CI, GitLab CI/CD, GoCD, Jenkins, JetBrains TeamCity
Three alternatives
Azure DevOps, CircleCI, JenkinsThree alternatives
Azure DevOps, Harness, Octopus DeployThree alternatives
Azure DevOps, CloudBees CI, GitLab CI/CDOne alternative
GitHubLlama 4 Maverickno first choiceGitLab CI/CDChangedno first choiceno first choiceno first choiceagainst: CircleCI, GitLab CI/CD, Jenkins
Three alternatives
Buildkite, CircleCI, Octopus DeployQwen 3.7 FlashGitLab CI/CDagainst: JenkinsGitHubChangedagainst: Jenkins, JetBrains TeamCityGitHub Actions, GitLab CI/CDagainst: Atlassian BambooGitLab CI/CDagainst: GitHub Actionsno first choiceagainst: Azure Pipelines, Buildbot, GitHub Actions, HP ALM, IBM UrbanCode, Jenkins, Travis CI
Three alternatives
CircleCI, CloudBees CI, GitHub ActionsTwo alternatives
Azure DevOps, HarnessFour alternatives
Azure DevOps, CircleCI, Jenkins, JetBrains TeamCityOne alternative
BuildkiteKimi K2GitLab CI/CDagainst: JenkinsGitLab CI/CDHeldGitHub ActionsCloudBees CI, GitLab CI/CD, Jenkinsagainst: Buildkite, CircleCI, GitHub Actions, GitLab CI/CDGitHub, GitLab CI/CDagainst: Atlassian Bamboo, Jenkins, Travis CI
Four alternatives
Azure DevOps, Buildkite, GitHub Actions, HarnessOne alternative
GitHubFive alternatives
Azure DevOps, CircleCI, GitLab CI/CD, Harness, JenkinsThree alternatives
Azure DevOps, GitHub Enterprise Server, SemaphoreOne alternative
Azure DevOpsGLM 4.7 FlashXGitHub Actionsagainst: JenkinsAzure DevOpsChangedno first choiceJenkinsagainst: Azure DevOps, CircleCI, GitHub Actions, GitLab CI/CDno first choiceagainst: AWS CodeBuild, Azure DevOps, CircleCI, GitHub Actions, GitLab CI/CD, Jenkins
Four alternatives
Azure DevOps, CircleCI, GitLab CI/CD, JetBrains TeamCityTwo alternatives
GitLab CI/CD, JenkinsOne alternative
GitHub Enterprise ServerMiniMax M2.5Azure DevOps, GitLab CI/CDagainst: Jenkinsno first choiceChangedno first choiceBuildkite, GitHubagainst: CircleCIGitLab CI/CDagainst: Jenkinsagainst: Jenkins
Four alternatives
Azure DevOps, GitLab CI/CD, Jenkins, JetBrains TeamCityOne alternative
Azure DevOpsThree alternatives
Azure DevOps, CircleCI, GitHubBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Seventy-two rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 07:24 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 07:46 | yes | 3 | 6 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 07:22 | yes | 10 | 26 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 07:23 | yes | 20 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 07:22 | yes | 33 | 21 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 07:25 | yes | 10 | 10 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 07:45 | yes | 15 | 15 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 07:21 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 07:31 | no | 0 | 36 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 07:32 | yes | 15 | 50 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 07:24 | yes | 19 | 90 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 07:46 | yes | 5 | 31 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 07:44 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 07:30 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 07:37 | no | 0 | 16 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 07:32 | yes | 20 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 07:24 | yes | 29 | 16 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 07:24 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 07:38 | yes | 10 | 14 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 07:27 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 07:37 | yes | 20 | 49 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 07:35 | yes | 15 | 38 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 07:46 | yes | 10 | 26 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 07:35 | yes | 5 | 16 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 07:35 | yes | 9 | 9 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 07:22 | yes | 5 | 10 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 07:35 | yes | 22 | 29 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 07:27 | yes | 20 | 13 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 07:29 | yes | 22 | 15 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 07:33 | yes | 13 | 12 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 07:26 | yes | 14 | 18 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 07:33 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 07:30 | no | 0 | 36 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 07:31 | yes | 15 | 50 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 07:35 | yes | 25 | 66 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 07:31 | yes | 5 | 23 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 07:34 | yes | 18 | 10 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 07:41 | yes | 4 | 7 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 07:39 | yes | 17 | 33 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 07:45 | yes | 20 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 07:27 | yes | 31 | 19 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 07:36 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 07:28 | yes | 22 | 23 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 07:22 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 07:24 | yes | 10 | 59 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 07:25 | yes | 17 | 95 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 07:41 | yes | 28 | 55 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 07:25 | yes | 16 | 58 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 07:23 | yes | 18 | 9 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 07:31 | no | 0 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 07:23 | no | 0 | 17 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 07:46 | yes | 20 | 12 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 07:21 | yes | 17 | 15 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 07:42 | no | 0 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 07:29 | yes | 15 | 21 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 07:43 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 07:45 | yes | 5 | 42 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 07:48 | yes | 29 | 89 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 07:34 | yes | 15 | 39 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 07:27 | no | 0 | 15 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 07:31 | yes | 18 | 9 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 07:43 | yes | 5 | 9 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 07:25 | yes | 9 | 24 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 07:30 | yes | 18 | 7 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 07:31 | yes | 42 | 17 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 07:40 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 07:22 | yes | 30 | 33 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 07:38 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 07:30 | yes | 12 | 36 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 07:26 | yes | 24 | 48 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 07:24 | yes | 24 | 40 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 07:47 | yes | 19 | 61 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
AWS CodePipeline/CodeBuild read as AWS CodePipeline
CloudBees read as CloudBees CI
Drone read as Drone CI
GitLab read as GitLab CI/CD
GitLab (CE & EE) read as GitLab CI/CD
GitLab (Self-Managed / Ultimate) read as GitLab CI/CD
GitLab CI read as GitLab CI/CD
GitLab CI (cloud) read as GitLab CI/CD
GitLab SaaS (Premium/Ultimate) read as GitLab CI/CD
GitLab Self-Managed read as GitLab CI/CD
GitLab Self-Managed (Ultimate tier) read as GitLab CI/CD
GitLab Ultimate read as GitLab CI/CD
GitLab Ultimate (GitLab CI/CD) read as GitLab CI/CD
GitLab Ultimate / Premium read as GitLab CI/CD
GitLab self-managed read as GitLab CI/CD
Self-Hosted GitLab (CE or Ultimate Self-Managed) read as GitLab CI/CD
Unresolved, counted raw
Concourse CI
GitLab Roles
HP ALM
Octopus
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.