Software composition analysis for enterprise buyers
Asked as “software composition analysis tool”, and as “open source dependency vulnerability scanner”, on behalf of an enterprise B2B company. 42 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, twelve models each.
Standing · first-choice share
19%
Contested · Sonatype Lifecycle 19%
19Black Duck19Sonatype Lifecycle14Aikido Security48others
19% of first choices, contested.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all twelve models, for an enterprise B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Show the four products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
Head to headHead-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not enterprise.
All ten head-to-head pages: the top five products, each against each
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative30%
Key
01Black Duck19%
Black Duck19%02Sonatype Lifecycle19%
Sonatype Lifecycle19%03Aikido Security14%
Aikido Security14%04OWASP Dependency-Track14%
OWASP Dependency-Track14%05Snyk Open Source10%
Snyk Open Source10%06Mend.io – Mend SCA10%
Mend.io – Mend SCA10%07Trivy7%
Trivy7%08OWASP Dependency-Check5%
OWASP Dependency-Check5%09JFrog Xray2%
JFrog Xray2%10Endor Labs0%
Endor Labs0%11Veracode SCA0%
Veracode SCA0%12Checkmarx SCA0%
Checkmarx SCA0%13FOSSA0%
FOSSA0%What they warned about
Zero of twelve models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.20, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX and MiniMax M2.5 changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
OWASP Dependency-Check61%
11 of 18 labels negative · 7 of 12 models · 3 hard negative
“Avoid as your primary enterprise SCA; use only as a supplementary check for legacy Java-only codebases.” DeepSeek V4 Flash, negative prompt
Snyk Open Source19%
9 of 47 labels negative · 7 of 12 models · 2 hard negative
“Avoid tools like Snyk, Socket, or Semgrep if your primary goal is cost prediction” Qwen 3.7 Flash, budget prompt
Mend.io – Mend SCA17%
7 of 41 labels negative · 4 of 12 models · 1 hard negative
“Same scaling problem; thousands of users = unpredictable ballooning costs” Kimi K2, budget prompt
FOSSA19%
3 of 16 labels negative · 3 of 12 models · 1 hard negative
“What to Avoid for Your Use Case ... FOSSA | Per-project or per-developer hybrid” Kimi K2, budget prompt
What they cite
Twelve of the twelve models returned a source list in this edition: four return the pages they cited and eight the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
66 of 72 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 12 of 12 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 1105 links across 266 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page.
vendor site · Endor Labs45 answers · 66 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Guideflow39 answers · 39 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Cycode36 answers · 41 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Safeguard28 answers · 53 citations · 7 models
vendor site · Mend25 answers · 31 citations · 10 models
vendor site · OX24 answers · 26 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Aikido23 answers · 38 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Black Duck23 answers · 37 citations · 10 models
22 answers · 40 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Sonatype21 answers · 37 citations · 10 models
19 answers · 20 citations · 8 models
19 answers · 19 citations · 10 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
42 answers · 11 models
31 answers · 11 models
30 answers · 10 models
23 answers · 11 models
19 answers · 8 models
19 answers · 7 models
19 answers · 10 models
18 answers · 10 models
18 answers · 8 models
13 answers · 6 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best software composition analysis tool”, “software composition analysis tool”, “software composition analysis tools”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Black Duck blackduck.com | 19% | 114 | 33,100 | 3,087 | 76,259 | 73 | 3 | |
| Sonatype sonatype.com Sonatype Lifecycle 19% | 19% | 121 | 90 | 1 | 71,814 company | $1,879 | 7 | 8 |
| OWASP Dependency-Track owasp.org OWASP Dependency-Track 14%, OWASP Dependency-Check 5% | 19% | 95 | 720 | 10 | 365,222 | 3 | ||
| Aikido aikido.dev Aikido Security 14% | 14% | 326 | 2,400 | 51 | 6,442 company | $936 | 120 | |
| Snyk snyk.io Snyk Open Source 10% | 10% | 157 | 12,100 | 581 | 61,651 company | 60 | ||
| Mend.io – Mend SCA mend.io | 10% | 106 | 15,059 | 7 | ||||
| Trivy trivy.dev | 7% | 248 | 5,400 | 182 | 3,093 | |||
| JFrog Xray jfrog.com | 2% | 42 | 590 | 37 | 38,697 | $37 | 120 | |
| Endor Labs endorlabs.com | 0% | 47 | 2,400 | 28 | 16,338 | 4 | 1 | |
| Veracode SCA veracode.com | 0% | 33 | 50 | 2 | 12,543 | 17 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 22 sites; 5 of them are among the sites the models cited here (blackduck.com, cycode.com, endorlabs.com, ox.security, sonatype.com). The first result for “best software composition analysis tool” is endorlabs.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best software composition analysis tool for an enterprise B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which open source dependency vulnerability scanner would you recommend to a large B2B company with thousands of employees?”Comparative“What are the top enterprise-grade software composition analysis tools and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best software composition analysis tool for a large company that needs predictable total cost across thousands of users?”Scale-constrained“We are a 5,000 person company with SSO, SOC 2 and procurement review requirements evaluating a software composition analysis tool. What should we look at?”Negative“Which software composition analysis tools should a large enterprise avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5Mend.io – Mend SCA, Sonatype LifecycleOWASP Dependency-CheckChangedBlack DuckMend.io – Mend SCAno first choicenothing named
Three alternatives
Black Duck, Checkmarx SCA, Snyk Open SourceThree alternatives
Mend.io – Mend SCA, Snyk Open Source, TrivyFour alternatives
FOSSA, JFrog Xray, Snyk Open Source, Veracode SCAOne alternative
Black DuckGPT-5.4 miniSonatype LifecycleOWASP Dependency-TrackChangedno first choiceSonatype Lifecycleno first choicenothing named
Four alternatives
Black Duck, Palo Alto Networks Cortex Cloud SCA, Snyk Open Source, Veracode SCATwo alternatives
OSS Review Toolkit, OWASP Dependency-CheckOne alternative
Black DuckGemini 3.5 FlashBlack DuckOWASP Dependency-TrackChangedagainst: OWASP Dependency-CheckBlack Duck, Snyk Open SourceAikido Security, JFrog Xrayagainst: GitHub Advanced Security, Semgrep, Snyk Open Sourceno first choiceagainst: GitHub Dependabot, GitLab Dependency Scanning, OWASP Dependency-Check
Five alternatives
FOSSA, GitHub Advanced Security, GitLab Dependency Scanning, Snyk Open Source, Sonatype LifecycleThree alternatives
Grype, Syft, TrivyFive alternatives
Endor Labs, GitHub Advanced Security, GitLab Dependency Scanning, Mend.io – Mend SCA, Sonatype LifecycleFive alternatives
Grype, HCL AppScan, OWASP Dependency-Track, Trivy, Veracode SCAPerplexity SonarSonatype LifecycleAikido SecurityChangedagainst: OWASP Dependency-CheckBlack DuckOWASP Dependency-Trackno first choiceagainst: GitHub, JFrog, OWASP Dependency-Check, Retire.js, Safety, Sonatype Lifecycle, bundler-audit
Four alternatives
Black Duck, Checkmarx SCA, Mend.io – Mend SCA, Snyk Open SourceTwo alternatives
OSV-Scanner, TrivyFive alternatives
Endor Labs, FOSSA, Mend.io – Mend SCA, Snyk Open Source, Sonatype LifecycleTwo alternatives
Black Duck, Sonatype LifecycleGrok 4.20Black Duck, Sonatype Lifecycleagainst: Checkmarx SCA, Endor Labs, JFrog XrayOWASP Dependency-TrackChangedagainst: OWASP Dependency-CheckSnyk Open Source, Sonatype LifecycleBlack Duck, Sonatype Lifecycleagainst: Mend.io – Mend SCA, Snyk Open Sourceno first choiceagainst: Black Duck, GitHub Advanced Security, JFrog Xray, Mend.io – Mend SCA, OWASP Dependency-Check, Retire.js, Snyk Open Source, Sonatype Lifecycle
One alternative
Snyk Open SourceTwo alternatives
Syft/Grype, TrivyThree alternatives
Black Duck, Mend.io – Mend SCA, Veracode SCASix alternatives
Black Duck, Cycode, Endor Labs, Mend.io – Mend SCA, Snyk Open Source, Sonatype LifecycleMistral SmallSnyk Open Source, Sonatype LifecycleOWASP Dependency-TrackChangedno first choiceBlack Duck, Mend.io – Mend SCAagainst: Checkmarx One, FOSSAno first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
Black Duck, Mend.io – Mend SCATwo alternatives
Grype, TrivyDeepSeek V4 FlashBlack Duck, Snyk Open SourceTrivyChangedagainst: OWASP Dependency-CheckSonatype LifecycleAikido Securityagainst: Mend.io – Mend SCA, Snyk Open SourceSnyk Open Sourceagainst: Black Duck, Bumblebee, CodeQL, GitHub Dependabot, Mend.io – Mend SCA, OWASP Dependency-Check, Retire.js, Snyk Open Source, Sonatype Lifecycle, npm audit
Three alternatives
Endor Labs, Mend.io – Mend SCA, Sonatype LifecycleTwo alternatives
Grype, OWASP Dependency-TrackSix alternatives
Black Duck, Endor Labs, FOSSA, JFrog Xray, Mend.io – Mend SCA, Snyk Open SourceThree alternatives
Black Duck, DeepSource, Sonatype LifecycleSeven alternatives
Black Duck, Endor Labs, FOSSA, GitHub Advanced Security, GitLab Dependency Scanning, Mend.io – Mend SCA, Sonatype LifecycleLlama 4 Maverickno first choiceAikido SecurityChangedCycodeno first choiceno first choiceagainst: Snyk Open Source
Four alternatives
Anchore Open Source Dependency Scanner, FOSSA, OWASP Dependency-Check, Snyk Open SourceTwo alternatives
Snyk Open Source, Veracode SCAFour alternatives
Black Duck, Endor Labs, Mend.io – Mend SCA, Snyk Open SourceQwen 3.7 FlashMend.io – Mend SCATrivyChangedBlack DuckAikido Securityagainst: Mend.io – Mend SCA, Semgrep, Snyk Open Source, Socketno first choiceagainst: Mend.io – Mend SCA
Three alternatives
Black Duck, Snyk Open Source, Sonatype LifecycleSix alternatives
Black Duck, Endor Labs, Grype, OSV-Scanner, Snyk Open Source, SyftFive alternatives
Endor Labs, FOSSA, Mend.io – Mend SCA, Snyk Open Source, Sonatype LifecycleThree alternatives
Black Duck, DeepSource, TrivyKimi K2Black DuckTrivyChangedagainst: OWASP Dependency-CheckBlack DuckSonatype Lifecycleagainst: FOSSA, Mend.io – Mend SCA, Snyk Open Sourceno first choiceagainst: Debricked, OpenText Core SCAnothing named
Two alternatives
Snyk Open Source, Sonatype LifecycleThree alternatives
Black Duck, Endor Labs, Snyk Open SourceFour alternatives
Endor Labs, Mend.io – Mend SCA, Snyk Open Source, Sonatype LifecycleOne alternative
Black DuckGLM 4.7 FlashXBlack DuckOWASP Dependency-CheckChangedBlack Duck, Sonatype LifecycleSnyk Open Sourceagainst: Black Duck, JFrog Xrayno first choiceagainst: OWASP Dependency-Checknothing named
Four alternatives
Endor Labs, Mend.io – Mend SCA, Snyk Open Source, Sonatype LifecycleThree alternatives
Aikido Security, OSV-Scanner, TrivyFour alternatives
Aikido Security, Endor Labs, Mend.io – Mend SCA, Snyk Open SourceOne alternative
Sonatype LifecycleMiniMax M2.5Black DuckOWASP Dependency-TrackChangedBlack Duck, Sonatype LifecycleAikido Securityagainst: FOSSA, Snyk Open Source, Veracode SCAno first choiceagainst: OWASP Dependency-Check
Two alternatives
Mend.io – Mend SCA, Snyk Open SourceFour alternatives
Anchore, GitLab Dependency Scanning, OWASP Dependency-Check, TrivyFive alternatives
Checkmarx SCA, Endor Labs, JFrog Xray, Mend.io – Mend SCA, Snyk Open SourceOne alternative
Black DuckBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Seventy-two rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 11:41 | yes | 16 | 10 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 12:31 | yes | 5 | 7 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 09:24 | yes | 12 | 26 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 11:34 | yes | 19 | 6 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 11:58 | yes | 37 | 16 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 10:53 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 10:51 | yes | 13 | 16 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 09:35 | yes | 5 | 8 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 11:35 | yes | 9 | 46 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 10:06 | yes | 14 | 32 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 11:48 | yes | 12 | 72 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 10:30 | yes | 15 | 26 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 13:15 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 09:56 | yes | 3 | 6 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 12:20 | yes | 16 | 24 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 12:00 | yes | 20 | 6 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 11:25 | yes | 34 | 19 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 13:17 | yes | 20 | 14 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 13:58 | yes | 19 | 20 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 12:11 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 12:00 | yes | 19 | 72 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 13:53 | yes | 17 | 36 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 11:16 | yes | 29 | 59 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 09:46 | yes | 10 | 50 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 12:06 | yes | 0 | 25 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 13:34 | yes | 5 | 8 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 13:13 | yes | 12 | 33 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 12:51 | yes | 20 | 10 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 12:20 | yes | 31 | 16 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 10:54 | yes | 5 | 8 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 10:06 | yes | 18 | 24 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 11:10 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 12:37 | yes | 5 | 34 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 09:36 | yes | 14 | 37 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 10:42 | yes | 28 | 130 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 09:29 | yes | 12 | 38 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 14:03 | yes | 16 | 9 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 11:55 | yes | 4 | 6 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 12:29 | yes | 23 | 28 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 13:47 | yes | 20 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 13:50 | yes | 39 | 20 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 12:51 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 10:09 | yes | 26 | 26 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 12:25 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 13:42 | yes | 24 | 135 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 13:16 | yes | 25 | 48 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 10:25 | yes | 27 | 129 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 13:37 | yes | 18 | 74 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 14:11 | yes | 18 | 12 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 10:39 | no | 0 | 11 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 12:10 | yes | 7 | 26 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 14:06 | yes | 20 | 11 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 13:27 | yes | 18 | 12 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 10:18 | no | 0 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 09:53 | yes | 30 | 28 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 12:00 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 13:43 | no | 0 | 35 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 11:47 | yes | 30 | 68 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 12:39 | yes | 29 | 124 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 10:04 | no | 0 | 86 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 13:52 | yes | 34 | 14 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 12:10 | yes | 4 | 6 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 11:26 | yes | 15 | 28 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 12:14 | yes | 20 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 11:21 | yes | 21 | 15 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 12:55 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 12:48 | yes | 27 | 49 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 12:19 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 13:17 | yes | 14 | 53 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 12:35 | yes | 27 | 50 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 12:00 | yes | 12 | 59 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 12:00 | yes | 23 | 78 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Aikido read as Aikido Security
GitLab Ultimate read as GitLab Dependency Scanning
Mend read as Mend.io – Mend SCA
Mend (Formerly WhiteSource) read as Mend.io – Mend SCA
Mend (Fortify) read as Mend.io – Mend SCA
Mend (formerly WhiteSource) read as Mend.io – Mend SCA
Mend.io read as Mend.io – Mend SCA
Mend.io (Codacy) read as Mend.io – Mend SCA
Mend.io (formerly WhiteSource) read as Mend.io – Mend SCA
Snyk read as Snyk Open Source
Sonatype read as Sonatype Lifecycle
Sonatype (Nexus Lifecycle) read as Sonatype Lifecycle
Veracode read as Veracode SCA
WhiteSource (now JFrog) read as Mend.io – Mend SCA
WhiteSource (now part of Snyk) read as Mend.io – Mend SCA
Unresolved, counted raw
Anchore Open Source Dependency Scanner
Bumblebee
CyberArk CyberArk OSA
OpenText Core SCA
Palo Alto Networks Cortex Cloud SCA
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.