Software composition analysis
Asked as “software composition analysis tool”, and as “open source dependency vulnerability scanner”, on behalf of a mid-market B2B company. 43 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, twelve models each.
Standing · first-choice share
40%
Contested · Snyk Open Source 16%
40Trivy16Snyk Open Source14Mend.io – Mend SCA30others
40% of first choices, contested.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Show the eight products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
All ten head-to-head pages: the top five products, each against each
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09G10
11
12
13Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative50%
Key
01Trivy40%
Trivy40%02Snyk Open Source16%
Snyk Open Source16%03Mend.io – Mend SCA14%
Mend.io – Mend SCA14%04OWASP Dependency-Check14%
OWASP Dependency-Check14%05OWASP Dependency-Track2%
OWASP Dependency-Track2%06Endor Labs0%
Endor Labs0%07Black Duck0%
Black Duck0%08Sonatype Lifecycle0%
Sonatype Lifecycle0%09FOSSA0%
FOSSA0%10Grype0%
11OSV-Scanner0%
OSV-Scanner0%12GitHub Advanced Security0%
GitHub Advanced Security0%13JFrog Xray0%
JFrog Xray0%What they warned about
Zero of twelve models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.20, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX and MiniMax M2.5 changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
OWASP Dependency-Check38%
12 of 32 labels negative · 7 of 12 models · 2 hard negative
“You should actively avoid using the traditional OWASP Dependency-Check” Qwen 3.7 Flash, paraphrase prompt
Snyk Open Source15%
7 of 47 labels negative · 7 of 12 models
“The industry heavyweight with top-tier developer UX, strong remediation suggestions, and a wide ecosystem, though it can be highly expensive.” Gemini 3.5 Flash, scale prompt
Black Duck18%
6 of 34 labels negative · 5 of 12 models
“like older versions of Black Duck or Sonatype Nexus IQ) can be slow to install, heavy on resources, or difficult to configure at scale” Qwen 3.7 Flash, negative prompt
Mend.io – Mend SCA15%
5 of 34 labels negative · 5 of 12 models
“reachability) works well for Java/JavaScript but poorly for Python, Go... Internal benchmarks claim "+46% better" remediation but lack external validation.” Kimi K2, negative prompt
What they cite
Twelve of the twelve models returned a source list in this edition: four return the pages they cited and eight the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
63 of 72 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 12 of 12 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 892 links across 194 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page.
vendor site · Endor Labs46 answers · 81 citations · 11 models
vendor site · OX27 answers · 28 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Guideflow27 answers · 27 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Safeguard26 answers · 56 citations · 8 models
24 answers · 44 citations · 10 models
24 answers · 24 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Aikido23 answers · 29 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Cycode19 answers · 20 citations · 9 models
17 answers · 17 citations · 9 models
17 answers · 17 citations · 7 models
vendor site · Sonatype15 answers · 28 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Mend15 answers · 19 citations · 11 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
43 answers · 11 models
28 answers · 10 models
27 answers · 9 models
23 answers · 9 models
22 answers · 9 models
17 answers · 9 models
17 answers · 7 models
16 answers · 10 models
15 answers · 7 models
13 answers · 5 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best software composition analysis tool”, “software composition analysis tool”, “software composition analysis tools”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trivy trivy.dev | 40% | 248 | 5,400 | 182 | 3,093 | |||
| Snyk snyk.io Snyk Open Source 16% | 16% | 157 | 12,100 | 581 | 61,651 company | 60 | ||
| OWASP Dependency-Check owasp.org OWASP Dependency-Check 14%, OWASP Dependency-Track 2% | 16% | 95 | 720 | 10 | 365,222 | 3 | ||
| Mend.io – Mend SCA mend.io | 14% | 106 | 15,059 | 7 | ||||
| GitHub parent site GitHub Dependabot 5%, GitHub Advanced Security 0% | 5% | 78 | 1,500,000 | 31,479 | ||||
| Aikido aikido.dev Aikido Security 5% | 5% | 326 | 2,400 | 51 | 6,442 company | $936 | 120 | |
| Cycode cycode.com | 2% | 3 | 880 | 4 | 17,954 | 4 | 9 | |
| OSS Review Toolkit | 2% | |||||||
| Endor Labs endorlabs.com | 0% | 47 | 2,400 | 28 | 16,338 | 4 | 1 | |
| Black Duck blackduck.com | 0% | 114 | 33,100 | 3,087 | 76,259 | 73 | 3 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 22 sites; 4 of them are among the sites the models cited here (cycode.com, endorlabs.com, ox.security, sonatype.com). The first result for “best software composition analysis tool” is endorlabs.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best software composition analysis tool for a mid-market B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which open source dependency vulnerability scanner would you recommend to a mid-sized B2B company?”Comparative“What are the top software composition analysis tools and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best software composition analysis tool for a company with a limited budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 500 person company evaluating a software composition analysis tool. What should we look at?”Negative“Which software composition analysis tools should I avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5no first choiceOWASP Dependency-CheckChangedno first choiceOSS Review Toolkit, OWASP Dependency-Checkno first choiceagainst: GitHub Advanced Security, JFrog Xray
Two alternatives
OWASP Dependency-Track, TrivyTwo alternatives
DeepSCA, Snyk Open SourceGPT-5.4 miniMend.io – Mend SCA, Snyk Open SourceOWASP Dependency-CheckChangedSnyk Open SourceGitHub Dependabotagainst: Mend.io – Mend SCA, Snyk Open Source, Sonatype Lifecycleno first choicenothing named
Three alternatives
Black Duck, GitHub Advanced Security, Sonatype LifecycleThree alternatives
Grype, OWASP Dependency-Track, TrivyFive alternatives
Black Duck, GitHub Advanced Security, Mend.io – Mend SCA, Sonatype Lifecycle, TrivyOne alternative
OWASP Dependency-CheckGemini 3.5 FlashAikido SecurityTrivyChangedagainst: OWASP Dependency-CheckSnyk Open SourceGitHub Dependabot, Trivyagainst: OWASP Dependency-CheckAikido Security, Cycodeagainst: Snyk Open Sourceagainst: OWASP Dependency-Check
Three alternatives
Mend.io – Mend SCA, Semgrep Supply Chain, Snyk Open SourceTwo alternatives
GitHub Dependabot, OSV-ScannerFour alternatives
Black Duck, Endor Labs, Socket, Sonatype LifecycleFour alternatives
Aikido Security, FOSSA, Grype + Syft, Snyk Open SourceFour alternatives
Black Duck, Endor Labs, GitHub Advanced Security, Mend.io – Mend SCAPerplexity SonarMend.io – Mend SCATrivyChangedno first choiceTrivyagainst: GitHub Advanced Security + Dependabot, Snyk Open Sourceno first choiceagainst: OWASP Dependency-Check, Retire.js, Safety, bundler-audit
Four alternatives
Black Duck, Endor Labs, Snyk Open Source, Sonatype LifecycleOne alternative
OWASP Dependency-CheckOne alternative
Semgrep Supply ChainGrok 4.20Snyk Open SourceTrivyChangedSonatype LifecycleTrivyagainst: Grype, OWASP Dependency-Check, Semgrep, SocketSnyk Open Sourceagainst: Black Duck, Mend.io – Mend SCA, Snyk Open Source, Sonatype Lifecycle, Trivy
Five alternatives
Aikido Security, Black Duck, Mend.io – Mend SCA, SOOS, Sonatype LifecycleFour alternatives
Grype, OSV-Scanner, OWASP Dependency-Check, OWASP Dependency-TrackTwo alternatives
Black Duck, Snyk Open SourceTwo alternatives
GitHub Dependabot, Snyk Open SourceFour alternatives
Black Duck, Endor Labs, Mend.io – Mend SCA, Sonatype LifecycleMistral SmallMend.io – Mend SCAOWASP Dependency-CheckChangedEndor Labsagainst: SonarQubeOWASP Dependency-Track, Trivyno first choiceagainst: Black Duck, Sonatype Lifecycle
Two alternatives
OX Security, Sonatype LifecycleTwo alternatives
Grype, TrivyNine alternatives
Black Duck, Cycode, FOSSA, GitLab Dependency Scanning, Mend.io – Mend SCA, Semgrep Supply Chain, Snyk Open Source, Sonatype Lifecycle, Wiz CodeTwo alternatives
Snyk Open Source, SocketDeepSeek V4 FlashSnyk Open SourceTrivyChangedagainst: OWASP Dependency-CheckSnyk Open Sourceagainst: OWASP Dependency-CheckSnyk Open Source, Trivyagainst: OWASP Dependency-Checkno first choiceagainst: Black Duck, Mend.io – Mend SCA, OWASP Dependency-Check, Retire.js, Snyk Open Source, Sonatype Lifecycle, Tenable Legacy Container Security's SCA feature
Two alternatives
Mend.io – Mend SCA, Sonatype LifecycleFour alternatives
GitHub Dependabot, Grype, OSV-Scanner, OWASP Dependency-TrackEight alternatives
Black Duck, Endor Labs, Grype, JFrog Xray, Socket, Sonatype Lifecycle, Syft, TrivyThree alternatives
FOSSA, OWASP Dependency-Track, SocketLlama 4 MaverickMend.io – Mend SCAno first choiceChangedno first choiceTrivyno first choicenothing named
One alternative
Sonatype LifecycleFour alternatives
OWASP Dependency-Check, Semgrep, Snyk Open Source, SocketQwen 3.7 FlashMend.io – Mend SCAagainst: Sonatype LifecycleTrivyChangedagainst: OWASP Dependency-CheckSnyk Open SourceOWASP Dependency-Check, Trivyagainst: Black Duck, Mend.io – Mend SCAno first choiceagainst: Black Duck, Sonatype Lifecycle
Two alternatives
Renovate, Snyk Open SourceOne alternative
OSV-ScannerFour alternatives
Black Duck, GitHub Advanced Security (GHAS) / Dependabot, Mend.io – Mend SCA, Sonatype LifecycleThree alternatives
FOSSA, SOOS, Snyk Open SourceThree alternatives
JFrog, Snyk Open Source, Sonatype LifecycleKimi K2Snyk Open SourceTrivyChangedagainst: OWASP Dependency-CheckSnyk Open SourceTrivyno first choiceagainst: Black Duck, Mend.io – Mend SCA, Snyk Open Source
Two alternatives
Mend.io – Mend SCA, Sonatype LifecycleOne alternative
Grype + SyftSix alternatives
Black Duck, FOSSA, GitHub Advanced Security, JFrog Xray, Mend.io – Mend SCA, Sonatype LifecycleFour alternatives
Grype, OSV-Scanner, OWASP Dependency-Check, SyftGLM 4.7 FlashXMend.io – Mend SCAOWASP Dependency-CheckChangedSnyk Open Sourceagainst: GitHub Advanced SecurityTrivyno first choiceagainst: OWASP Dependency-Check, Snyk Open Source
Three alternatives
Black Duck, Snyk Open Source, Sonatype LifecycleFour alternatives
Grype, OSV-Scanner, Syft, TrivySix alternatives
Aikido Security, Black Duck, Endor Labs, Mend.io – Mend SCA, OWASP Dependency-Check, Sonatype LifecycleTwo alternatives
GitHub Dependabot, OWASP Dependency-CheckMiniMax M2.5Snyk Open SourceTrivyChangedEndor Labs, Snyk Open SourceTrivyno first choicenothing named
Three alternatives
Black Duck, GitLab Dependency Scanning, Mend.io – Mend SCAThree alternatives
Grype, OSV-Scanner, OWASP Dependency-CheckSix alternatives
Black Duck, Checkmarx SCA, FOSSA, Mend.io – Mend SCA, Semgrep Supply Chain, Sonatype LifecycleThree alternatives
Black Duck, OWASP Dependency-Track, Snyk Open SourceBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Seventy-two rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 14:08 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 14:02 | yes | 5 | 10 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 10:23 | yes | 22 | 27 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 09:59 | yes | 20 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 12:20 | yes | 35 | 17 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 13:13 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 13:45 | yes | 17 | 20 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 14:04 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 13:07 | yes | 24 | 89 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 13:45 | yes | 9 | 29 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 11:25 | yes | 29 | 79 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 13:36 | no | 0 | 45 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 10:52 | yes | 17 | 9 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 10:48 | yes | 3 | 7 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 13:59 | yes | 11 | 22 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 13:46 | yes | 20 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 11:44 | yes | 28 | 14 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 11:51 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 13:06 | yes | 9 | 18 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 11:21 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 12:50 | yes | 5 | 31 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 12:26 | yes | 12 | 41 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 11:33 | yes | 10 | 93 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 11:35 | yes | 9 | 59 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 12:47 | yes | 10 | 7 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 13:52 | yes | 9 | 14 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 11:02 | yes | 19 | 31 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 11:24 | yes | 20 | 7 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 12:55 | yes | 27 | 17 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 14:14 | yes | 5 | 9 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-09-17 13:08 | yes | 22 | 51 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 12:15 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 13:31 | no | 0 | 43 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 12:54 | yes | 12 | 46 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 09:41 | yes | 24 | 119 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 12:42 | yes | 5 | 11 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 11:08 | yes | 9 | 7 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 13:04 | yes | 2 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 13:07 | yes | 9 | 24 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 12:43 | yes | 20 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 12:23 | yes | 32 | 17 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 11:59 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 11:08 | yes | 8 | 12 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 10:45 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 12:51 | yes | 9 | 23 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 12:28 | yes | 9 | 23 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 12:31 | yes | 21 | 63 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 10:41 | yes | 14 | 36 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 14:08 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 11:23 | no | 0 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 13:41 | yes | 7 | 256 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 14:05 | yes | 20 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 10:39 | yes | 13 | 13 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 13:39 | no | 0 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 13:58 | yes | 18 | 24 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 13:50 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 10:12 | no | 0 | 47 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 10:42 | yes | 10 | 27 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 10:48 | yes | 15 | 90 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 14:09 | no | 0 | 14 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 10:12 | yes | 17 | 8 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 14:00 | yes | 6 | 8 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 13:19 | yes | 25 | 23 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 11:08 | yes | 20 | 6 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 11:39 | yes | 36 | 18 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 10:23 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 09:38 | yes | 29 | 21 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 12:25 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 10:18 | yes | 5 | 25 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 10:10 | yes | 24 | 45 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 09:25 | yes | 26 | 111 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 13:13 | no | 0 | 14 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Aikido read as Aikido Security
Broadcom Mend (formerly WhiteSource) read as Mend.io – Mend SCA
Checkmarx read as Checkmarx SCA
GitLab read as GitLab Dependency Scanning
GitLab (Dependency Scanning) read as GitLab Dependency Scanning
GitLab Ultimate read as GitLab Dependency Scanning
Mend read as Mend.io – Mend SCA
Mend (formerly WhiteSource) read as Mend.io – Mend SCA
Mend.io read as Mend.io – Mend SCA
Mend.io (formerly WhiteSource) read as Mend.io – Mend SCA
Snyk read as Snyk Open Source
Snyk (Free Tier) read as Snyk Open Source
Snyk (commercial) read as Snyk Open Source
Snyk Free Tier read as Snyk Open Source
Snyk Team read as Snyk Open Source
Sonatype read as Sonatype Lifecycle
Sonatype (Lifecycle & Nexus) read as Sonatype Lifecycle
Sonatype (Nexus Intelligence) read as Sonatype Lifecycle
Veracode read as Veracode SCA
WhiteSource read as Mend.io – Mend SCA
WhiteSource (now Mend) read as Mend.io – Mend SCA
Unresolved, counted raw
DeepSCA
Tenable Legacy Container Security's SCA feature
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.