Software composition analysis for small business buyers
Asked as “software composition analysis tool”, and as “open source dependency vulnerability scanner”, on behalf of a small B2B company. 42 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, twelve models each.
Standing · first-choice share
36%
Contested · Snyk Open Source 33%
36Trivy33Snyk Open Source05GitHub Dependabot26others
36% of first choices, contested.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all twelve models, for a small B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Show the five products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
Head to headHead-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not small business.
All ten head-to-head pages: the top five products, each against each
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative50%
Key
01Trivy36%
Trivy36%02Snyk Open Source33%
Snyk Open Source33%03GitHub Dependabot5%
GitHub Dependabot5%04OWASP Dependency-Check5%
OWASP Dependency-Check5%05Semgrep Supply Chain2%
Semgrep Supply Chain2%06OSV-Scanner2%
OSV-Scanner2%07Mend.io – Mend SCA2%
Mend.io – Mend SCA2%08Socket0%
Socket0%09FOSSA0%
FOSSA0%10Endor Labs0%
Endor Labs0%11Sonatype Lifecycle0%
Sonatype Lifecycle0%12Black Duck0%
Black Duck0%What they warned about
Zero of twelve models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.20, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX and MiniMax M2.5 changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Black Duck80%
16 of 20 labels negative · 8 of 12 models · 7 hard negative
“Black Duck has a high price and minimum licensing requirements that can be prohibitive for small teams or startups.” Claude Haiku 4.5, negative prompt
Sonatype Lifecycle75%
9 of 12 labels negative · 8 of 12 models · 2 hard negative
“PeerSpot users call it "high" and "suitable only for enterprises," not small businesses.” Grok 4.20, negative prompt
OWASP Dependency-Check32%
10 of 31 labels negative · 8 of 12 models
“It generally has a higher false-positive rate and a less modern user interface compared to Trivy or Semgrep.” GLM 4.7 FlashX, budget prompt
Mend.io – Mend SCA41%
9 of 22 labels negative · 7 of 12 models · 4 hard negative
“premature and pricey for a small business ... rather than locking into an enterprise contract like Black Duck or Mend prematurely” DeepSeek V4 Flash, negative prompt
What they cite
Twelve of the twelve models returned a source list in this edition: four return the pages they cited and eight the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
64 of 72 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 12 of 12 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 883 links across 174 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page.
vendor site · Endor Labs50 answers · 79 citations · 11 models
32 answers · 32 citations · 9 models
30 answers · 31 citations · 10 models
28 answers · 54 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Guideflow27 answers · 27 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Aikido24 answers · 30 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Safeguard23 answers · 47 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Cycode21 answers · 22 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Mend20 answers · 24 citations · 11 models
vendor site · OX19 answers · 20 citations · 9 models
18 answers · 18 citations · 10 models
17 answers · 17 citations · 10 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
45 answers · 11 models
32 answers · 9 models
31 answers · 11 models
29 answers · 10 models
23 answers · 10 models
19 answers · 9 models
19 answers · 9 models
19 answers · 9 models
18 answers · 10 models
17 answers · 10 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best software composition analysis tool”, “software composition analysis tool”, “software composition analysis tools”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trivy trivy.dev | 36% | 248 | 5,400 | 182 | 3,093 | |||
| Snyk snyk.io Snyk Open Source 33% | 33% | 157 | 12,100 | 581 | 61,651 company | 60 | ||
| OWASP Dependency-Check owasp.org OWASP Dependency-Check 5%, OWASP Dependency-Track 5% | 10% | 95 | 720 | 10 | 365,222 | 3 | ||
| GitHub parent site GitHub Dependabot 5%, GitHub Advanced Security 0% | 5% | 78 | 1,500,000 | 31,479 | ||||
| Semgrep semgrep.dev Semgrep Supply Chain 2%, Semgrep 0% | 2% | 36 | 8,100 | 191 | 3,461 | 43 | ||
| OSV-Scanner osv.dev | 2% | 37 | 390 | 22 | 749 | |||
| Aikido aikido.dev Aikido Security 2% | 2% | 326 | 2,400 | 51 | 6,442 company | $936 | 120 | |
| SOOS | 2% | |||||||
| SonarQube | 2% | 14,800 | 1,353 | |||||
| Meterian meterian.io | 2% |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 22 sites; 3 of them are among the sites the models cited here (cycode.com, endorlabs.com, ox.security). The first result for “best software composition analysis tool” is endorlabs.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best software composition analysis tool for a small B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which open source dependency vulnerability scanner would you recommend to a small business that sells to other businesses?”Comparative“What are the top software composition analysis tools for a small team and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best software composition analysis tool for a small company with a tight budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 30 person company evaluating a software composition analysis tool. What should we look at?”Negative“Which software composition analysis tools should a small business avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5SonarQubeOWASP Dependency-Check, Snyk Open SourceChangedSyft/Grype, TrivySemgrep Supply Chainno first choiceagainst: Black Duck, Checkmarx SCA, Endor Labs
One alternative
Libraries.ioTwo alternatives
Grype, TrivyFour alternatives
GitHub Dependabot, Mend.io – Mend SCA, Semgrep Supply Chain, Snyk Open SourceThree alternatives
FOSSA, OSS Review Toolkit, OWASP Dependency-CheckGPT-5.4 miniSnyk Open SourceGitHub DependabotChangedagainst: Snyk Open SourceGitHub Dependabotagainst: Mend.io – Mend SCA, Sonatype LifecycleOWASP Dependency-Checkno first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
OWASP Dependency-Track, TrivyOne alternative
OWASP Dependency-CheckThree alternatives
OWASP Dependency-Check, OWASP Dependency-Track, Snyk Open SourceTwo alternatives
FOSSA, Snyk Open SourceGemini 3.5 FlashAikido Securityagainst: Black Duck, GitHub Dependabot, GitLab Dependency Scanning, Sonatype LifecycleTrivyChangedSemgrep Supply Chainagainst: GitHub DependabotGitHub Dependabot, SOOSagainst: Black Duck, Sonatype LifecycleSnyk Open Sourceagainst: Black Duck, Veracode SCAagainst: Black Duck, Checkmarx SCA, Mend.io – Mend SCA, OWASP Dependency-Check, Veracode SCA
Four alternatives
FOSSA, Jit, Semgrep Supply Chain, Snyk Open SourceTwo alternatives
OSV-Scanner, Syft/GrypeThree alternatives
Aikido Security, Snyk Open Source, TrivyFour alternatives
Aikido Security, Snyk Open Source, Syft/Grype, TrivySix alternatives
Debricked, GitHub Dependabot, GitLab Dependency Scanning, Renovate, Semgrep, SocketPerplexity SonarSnyk Open SourceOSV-ScannerChangedSnyk Open SourceTrivyno first choiceagainst: Black Duck, Checkmarx SCA, OWASP Dependency-Check, Sonatype Lifecycle, Trivy
Three alternatives
FOSSA, Mend.io – Mend SCA, TrivyThree alternatives
Grype, OWASP Dependency-Check, TrivyFour alternatives
FOSSA, Semgrep Supply Chain, Socket, TrivyTwo alternatives
OWASP Dependency-Check, Snyk Open SourceGrok 4.20Snyk Open Sourceagainst: Black Duck, Mend.io – Mend SCATrivyChangedagainst: OWASP Dependency-CheckSnyk Open Source, TrivyTrivyagainst: OWASP Dependency-CheckMend.io – Mend SCA, Snyk Open Sourceagainst: Black Duck, Checkmarx SCA, JFrog Xray, Mend.io – Mend SCA, Sonatype Lifecycle
Three alternatives
GitHub Dependabot, OWASP Dependency-Check, TrivyOne alternative
OSV-ScannerThree alternatives
FOSSA, OWASP Dependency-Check, Semgrep Supply ChainFour alternatives
GitHub Dependabot, Grype + Syft, OSV-Scanner, Snyk Open SourceMistral SmallSnyk Open SourceTrivyChangedagainst: OWASP Dependency-CheckGitHub Advanced Security + Dependabot, Snyk Open SourceTrivyno first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
Semgrep, TrivyOne alternative
OSV-ScannerThree alternatives
FOSSA, Socket, TrivyThree alternatives
Semgrep Supply Chain, Snyk Open Source, SocketDeepSeek V4 FlashSnyk Open Sourceagainst: OWASP Dependency-CheckOWASP Dependency-TrackChangedagainst: Anchore, Sonatype OSS IndexGitHub Dependabotagainst: Endor Labs, Semgrep Supply ChainSnyk Open Source, Trivyno first choiceagainst: Black Duck, Endor Labs, Mend.io – Mend SCA, OWASP Dependency-Check, Sonatype Lifecycle
Three alternatives
GitHub Dependabot, Mend.io – Mend SCA, SOOSOne alternative
OWASP Dependency-CheckFour alternatives
FOSSA, Snyk Open Source, Socket, TrivyFour alternatives
Grype, Semgrep Supply Chain, Socket, SyftSix alternatives
FOSSA, OWASP Dependency-Check, Semgrep, Snyk Open Source, Socket, TrivyLlama 4 Maverickno first choiceMeterianChangedSnyk Open SourceTrivyno first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
Aikido Security, OSV-ScannerTwo alternatives
Socket, TrivyThree alternatives
Semgrep, Snyk Open Source, SocketQwen 3.7 FlashSnyk Open SourceTrivyChangedSnyk Open Sourceagainst: Black Duck, Checkmarx SCASnyk Open Source, Trivyagainst: OWASP Dependency-Checkno first choiceagainst: Black Duck, Sonatype Lifecycle
Two alternatives
GitHub Dependabot, TrivyTwo alternatives
LicenseScanner, OWASP Dependency-TrackFive alternatives
FOSSA, Mend.io – Mend SCA, OWASP Dependency-Check, OWASP Dependency-Track, Semgrep Supply ChainTwo alternatives
Semgrep, SocketKimi K2Snyk Open SourceTrivyChangedSnyk Open Source, TrivyTrivyagainst: OWASP Dependency-Checkno first choiceagainst: Black Duck, Mend.io – Mend SCA, Sonatype Lifecycle
Two alternatives
GitHub Dependabot, TrivyThree alternatives
Grype, OSV-Scanner, OWASP Dependency-CheckTwo alternatives
Semgrep Supply Chain, SocketThree alternatives
FOSSA, Semgrep, Snyk Open SourceThree alternatives
Aikido Security, GitHub Dependabot, Snyk Open SourceGLM 4.7 FlashXSnyk Open Sourceagainst: Black DuckOWASP Dependency-TrackChangedSnyk Open Sourceagainst: Black DuckTrivyagainst: Black Duck, Mend.io – Mend SCA, OWASP Dependency-Check, Snyk Open Sourceno first choiceagainst: Black Duck, Checkmarx SCA, Endor Labs, Mend.io – Mend SCA, Sonatype Lifecycle
Five alternatives
GitHub Advanced Security, Mend.io – Mend SCA, Semgrep Supply Chain, Socket, Sonatype LifecycleFive alternatives
Grype, OSV-Scanner, OWASP Dependency-Check, Syft, TrivyEight alternatives
Aikido Security, FOSSA, Jit, OWASP Dependency-Check, Semgrep Supply Chain, Socket, SonarQube, TrivyTwo alternatives
SOOS, Semgrep Supply ChainMiniMax M2.5Snyk Open Sourceagainst: Mend.io – Mend SCATrivyChangedSnyk Open SourceTrivyno first choicenothing named
One alternative
FOSSAThree alternatives
Grype, OWASP Dependency-Check, SyftFour alternatives
FOSSA, Semgrep Supply Chain, Socket, TrivyThree alternatives
Semgrep, Snyk Open Source, SocketBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Seventy-two rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 12:07 | yes | 21 | 44 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 12:19 | yes | 2 | 7 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 11:51 | yes | 10 | 25 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 12:38 | yes | 20 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 09:37 | yes | 35 | 20 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 09:40 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 11:25 | yes | 13 | 16 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 12:12 | yes | 7 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 13:07 | yes | 10 | 38 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 13:17 | yes | 15 | 23 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 10:53 | yes | 20 | 68 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 10:28 | yes | 5 | 18 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 11:39 | no | 0 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 10:23 | yes | 3 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 13:14 | yes | 11 | 22 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 10:40 | yes | 20 | 6 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 09:39 | yes | 28 | 12 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 13:22 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 10:45 | yes | 19 | 20 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 11:05 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 10:20 | no | 0 | 42 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 10:26 | yes | 13 | 24 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 11:16 | yes | 18 | 73 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 10:41 | yes | 12 | 29 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 12:56 | yes | 15 | 9 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 09:24 | yes | 6 | 11 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 12:28 | yes | 23 | 32 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 10:19 | yes | 20 | 8 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 13:49 | yes | 39 | 20 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 12:33 | yes | 5 | 7 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 09:44 | yes | 19 | 22 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 13:17 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 10:39 | yes | 5 | 22 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 12:57 | yes | 15 | 47 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 14:07 | yes | 9 | 39 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 14:04 | yes | 11 | 30 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 12:54 | yes | 16 | 9 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 09:38 | yes | 3 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 12:18 | yes | 17 | 23 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 12:49 | yes | 20 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 14:15 | yes | 34 | 18 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 14:09 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 10:33 | yes | 9 | 13 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 13:23 | yes | 6 | 10 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 12:55 | yes | 5 | 31 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 11:37 | yes | 5 | 16 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 10:17 | yes | 27 | 111 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 14:07 | yes | 5 | 42 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 11:33 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 11:36 | no | 0 | 10 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 09:50 | no | 0 | 16 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 12:31 | yes | 20 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 13:11 | yes | 13 | 13 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 12:03 | no | 0 | 9 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 09:55 | yes | 18 | 22 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 13:26 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 12:10 | no | 0 | 34 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 12:35 | yes | 10 | 20 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 13:52 | no | 0 | 17 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 11:11 | yes | 5 | 24 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 13:15 | yes | 16 | 9 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 13:33 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 13:42 | yes | 10 | 22 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 09:42 | yes | 20 | 7 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 10:25 | yes | 45 | 18 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 13:15 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 09:47 | yes | 25 | 22 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 11:15 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 11:53 | yes | 5 | 33 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 12:44 | yes | 26 | 63 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 11:17 | yes | 21 | 50 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 11:44 | yes | 8 | 31 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Aikido read as Aikido Security
Checkmarx read as Checkmarx SCA
GitLab read as GitLab Dependency Scanning
Mend read as Mend.io – Mend SCA
Mend (WhiteSource) read as Mend.io – Mend SCA
Mend (formerly WhiteSource) read as Mend.io – Mend SCA
Mend SCA read as Mend.io – Mend SCA
Mend SCA (formerly WhiteSource) read as Mend.io – Mend SCA
Mend.io read as Mend.io – Mend SCA
Mend.io (formerly WhiteSource) read as Mend.io – Mend SCA
Snyk read as Snyk Open Source
Snyk (Free Tier) read as Snyk Open Source
Snyk (Open Source) read as Snyk Open Source
Snyk Free Tier read as Snyk Open Source
Snyk Team read as Snyk Open Source
Sonatype read as Sonatype Lifecycle
Veracode read as Veracode SCA
WhiteSource read as Mend.io – Mend SCA
Unresolved, counted raw
Black Duck Binary Analysis (formerly Protecode)
GitLab Auto-DevSecOps
Libraries.io
LicenseScanner
Sonatype OSS Index
Vulert
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.