Background screening for enterprise buyers
Asked as “background check provider”, and as “employment screening service”, on behalf of an enterprise B2B company. 45 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, twelve models each.
Standing · first-choice share
38%
Contested · HireRight 27%
38First Advantage27HireRight18Checkr18others
38% of first choices, contested.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all twelve models, for an enterprise B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Show the two products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
Head to headHead-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not enterprise.
All fifteen head-to-head pages: the top six products, each against each
Checkr vs Verified FirstCheckr vs Accurate BackgroundGoodHire vs CertnGoodHire vs BackgroundChecks.comGoodHire vs Verified FirstGoodHire vs Accurate BackgroundCertn vs BackgroundChecks.comCertn vs Verified FirstCertn vs Accurate BackgroundBackgroundChecks.com vs Verified FirstBackgroundChecks.com vs Accurate BackgroundVerified First vs Accurate Background
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative50%
Key
01First Advantage38%
First Advantage38%02HireRight27%
HireRight27%03Checkr18%
Checkr18%04Accurate Background4%
Accurate Background4%05Sterling2%
Sterling2%06Mitratech AssureHire2%
Mitratech AssureHire2%07GoodHire0%
GoodHire0%08ScoutLogic0%
ScoutLogic0%What they warned about
Three of twelve models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.20, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2 and MiniMax M2.5 changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
HireRight19%
10 of 53 labels negative · 8 of 12 models · 4 hard negative
“Paid $2.6 million in 2012 for failing to ensure accuracy, not providing consumers copies of reports, and failing to reinvestigate disputes” MiniMax M2.5, negative prompt
Sterling24%
8 of 34 labels negative · 8 of 12 models · 4 hard negative
“A lead plaintiff sued Sterling BackCheck ... for systematically failing to use reasonable procedures to ensure accuracy” GLM 4.7 FlashX, negative prompt
Instant Checkmate100%
5 of 5 labels negative · 5 of 12 models · 5 hard negative
“Be cautious of any "instant" or "consumer self-service" background check platforms (e.g., Instant Checkmate, BeenVerified)... not designed for employment screening” DeepSeek V4 Flash, negative prompt
TruthFinder
100%
4 of 4 labels negative · 4 of 12 models · 4 hard negative
“Paid $5.8 million in 2023 settlement for deceiving consumers about criminal record accuracy and failing to comply with FCRA requirements” MiniMax M2.5, negative prompt
What they cite
Twelve of the twelve models returned a source list in this edition: four return the pages they cited and eight the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
65 of 72 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 12 of 12 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 1083 links across 290 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page.
vendor site · Checkr46 answers · 67 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Vetty38 answers · 44 citations · 9 models
vendor site · bib.com34 answers · 36 citations · 10 models
25 answers · 25 citations · 10 models
23 answers · 28 citations · 9 models
20 answers · 20 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Mitratech18 answers · 19 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Pin17 answers · 18 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Verified First16 answers · 16 citations · 9 models
vendor site · GoodHire14 answers · 16 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Gartner13 answers · 16 citations · 9 models
12 answers · 19 citations · 6 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
38 answers · 10 models
36 answers · 9 models
34 answers · 10 models
25 answers · 10 models
20 answers · 8 models
18 answers · 9 models
17 answers · 9 models
16 answers · 8 models
13 answers · 9 models
12 answers · 4 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “background check provider”, “background check providers”, “best background check provider”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| First Advantage fadv.com | 38% | 98 | 74,000 | 1,820 | 128,337 | $1,781 | 28 | 6 |
| HireRight hireright.com | 27% | 110 | 74,000 | 1,249 | 65,054 | 12 | ||
| Checkr checkr.com | 18% | 183 | 74,000 | 1,214 | 498,605 | $77,362 | 85 | 4 |
| Accurate accurate.com Accurate Background 4% | 4% | 65 | 8,100 | 561 | 161,894 company | $271 | 7 | 1 |
| Sterling sterlingcheck.com | 2% | 81 | 135,000 | 69,113 | 92,645 | 3 | ||
| Mitratech mitratech.com Mitratech AssureHire 2% | 2% | 37 | 3,600 | 159 | 46,305 company | $10,768 | 106 | |
| Checkster harver.com | 2% | 8,635 | $1,218 | 6 | ||||
| BackgroundChecker.com | 2% | |||||||
| First Advantage + Sterling | 2% | |||||||
| DISA disa.com DISA Global Solutions 2% | 2% | 13 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 21 sites; 4 of them are among the sites the models cited here (checkr.com, fadv.com, goodhire.com, verifiedfirst.com). The first result for “background check provider” is accurate.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best background check provider for an enterprise B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which employment screening service would you recommend to a large B2B company with thousands of employees?”Comparative“What are the top enterprise-grade background check providers and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best background check provider for a large company that needs predictable total cost across thousands of users?”Scale-constrained“We are a 5,000 person company with SSO, SOC 2 and procurement review requirements evaluating a background check provider. What should we look at?”Negative“Which background check providers should a large enterprise avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5CheckrHireRightChangedCheckrCheckrno first choiceagainst: ADP Screening and Selection Services, First Advantage, HireRight, Spokeo, US Search
Three alternatives
Accurate Background, First Advantage, HireRightTwo alternatives
Accurate Background, First AdvantageFour alternatives
Accurate Background, First Advantage + Sterling, HireRight, ScoutLogicTwo alternatives
First Advantage, HireRightGPT-5.4 miniFirst AdvantageFirst AdvantageHeldno first choiceCheckrno first choiceagainst: AppFolio\u2019s tenant screening service, Instant Checkmate, RentGrow, TruthFinder
Three alternatives
Accurate Background, Checkr, HireRightTwo alternatives
Checkr, HireRightOne alternative
GoodHireGemini 3.5 FlashCheckr, First AdvantageCheckr, First AdvantageHeldFirst AdvantageFirst Advantageno first choiceagainst: BeenVerified, First Advantage, General Information Services (GIS) / e-Background-checks.com, HireRight, Instant Checkmate, Spokeo, Sterling, TruthFinder, Whitepages
Two alternatives
HireRight, Verified FirstTwo alternatives
Accurate Background, HireRightFour alternatives
Accurate Background, Checkr, Cisive, HireRightThree alternatives
ADP Screening and Selection Services, Checkr, VettyPerplexity SonarHireRightFirst AdvantageChangedCheckrFirst Advantage, Mitratech AssureHireno first choiceagainst: Bchex, Checkr, GoodHire, Sterling, Verified First
Five alternatives
Accurate Background, Checkr, First Advantage, Mitratech AssureHire, SterlingThree alternatives
Checkr, HireRight, SterlingSix alternatives
Accurate Background, Certn, First Advantage, HireRight, Mitratech AssureHire, SterlingGrok 4.20SterlingFirst AdvantageChangedCheckrHireRightno first choiceagainst: Accurate Background, Cisive, Creative Services Inc., First Advantage, General Information Services, HireRight, National Public Data, Sterling, e-Background-checks.com
Six alternatives
Accurate Background, Checkr, First Advantage, HireRight, Mitratech AssureHire, ScoutLogicThree alternatives
Accurate Background, Checkr, HireRightThree alternatives
Accurate Background, First Advantage, HireRightTwo alternatives
Checkr, First AdvantageMistral SmallFirst Advantage, HireRightHireRightChangedCheckrFirst Advantage, HireRightno first choiceagainst: General Information Services (GIS) / e-Background-checks.com, HireRight, IDScan.net, Instant Checkmate, Sterling, TruthFinder
One alternative
CheckrTwo alternatives
First Advantage, SterlingFour alternatives
First Advantage, HireRight, Mitratech AssureHire, SterlingDeepSeek V4 FlashCheckr, First AdvantageFirst AdvantageChangedCheckr, First AdvantageAccurate Backgroundagainst: First Advantage + Sterling, SmartFastBackgroundChecksno first choiceagainst: HireRight, Sterling/First Advantageagainst: Accurate Background, BeenVerified, Checkr, First Advantage, HireRight, InfoTrack, Instant Checkmate, National Public Data, Sterling
Two alternatives
HireRight, ScoutLogicFour alternatives
Accurate Background, Checkr, HireRight, ScoutLogicThree alternatives
Accurate Background, HireRight, ScoutLogicOne alternative
CheckrLlama 4 Maverickno first choiceCheckrChangedno first choiceCheckrno first choicenothing named
Four alternatives
Accurate Background, Certn, First Advantage, HireRightTwo alternatives
ClearChecks, GoodHireQwen 3.7 FlashChecksterFirst Advantage, HireRightChangedFirst Advantageagainst: Accurate BackgroundAccurate Backgroundno first choiceagainst: BackgroundChecks.com, Checkr, GoodHire, PublicDataResources / BackgroundCheck.info, Sterling
Two alternatives
GoodHire, SterlingOne alternative
ScoutLogicFour alternatives
Checkr, GoodHire, HireRight, SterlingTwo alternatives
GoodHire, SterlingKimi K2First Advantage, HireRightFirst Advantage + SterlingChangedFirst AdvantageBackgroundChecker.comagainst: Accurate Background, HireRight, Sterling/First Advantageno first choiceagainst: General Information Services (GIS) / e-Background-checks.com, HireRight, Sterling
Two alternatives
Checkr, SterlingTwo alternatives
Checkr, HireRightFour alternatives
Accurate Background, Checkr, HireRight, SterlingTwo alternatives
Checkr, GoodHireGLM 4.7 FlashXHireRightHireRightHeldFirst Advantage, HireRightFirst Advantageno first choiceagainst: DISA Global Solutions, General Information Services (GIS) / e-Background-checks.com, HR‑Revolution LLC, HireRight, National Public Data, Sterling
Three alternatives
Accurate Background, Checkr, First AdvantageThree alternatives
First Advantage, ScoutLogic, SterlingFive alternatives
Certn, Checkr, DISA Global Solutions, Mitratech AssureHire, ScoutLogicOne alternative
HireRightMiniMax M2.5DISA Global Solutions, First AdvantageHireRightChangedCheckrFirst Advantage, HireRightno first choiceagainst: ADP Screening and Selection Services, Advanced Background Check Inc., HireRight, Instant Checkmate, TruthFinder
Three alternatives
Accurate Background, Checkr, HireRightTwo alternatives
ADP Screening and Selection Services, SterlingSix alternatives
Accurate Background, First Advantage, HireRight, Mitratech AssureHire, ScoutLogic, SterlingOne alternative
CheckrBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Seventy-two rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 19:31 | yes | 9 | 8 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 20:47 | yes | 3 | 6 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 19:38 | yes | 15 | 23 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 20:01 | yes | 20 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 19:17 | yes | 33 | 29 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 19:02 | yes | 9 | 9 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 19:01 | yes | 27 | 30 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 21:24 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 20:17 | no | 0 | 24 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 21:26 | yes | 9 | 18 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 19:31 | yes | 8 | 47 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 20:33 | yes | 7 | 18 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 20:52 | yes | 15 | 11 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 21:01 | yes | 3 | 6 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 21:55 | yes | 12 | 48 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 19:31 | yes | 20 | 6 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 18:59 | yes | 43 | 18 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 18:30 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 21:12 | yes | 24 | 22 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 18:48 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 20:35 | yes | 5 | 16 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 20:39 | yes | 15 | 36 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 21:40 | yes | 24 | 101 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 18:29 | no | 0 | 36 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 18:17 | yes | 16 | 9 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 20:12 | yes | 6 | 10 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 22:07 | yes | 16 | 53 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 19:58 | yes | 20 | 9 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 21:14 | yes | 18 | 16 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 20:16 | yes | 8 | 7 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 20:36 | yes | 13 | 28 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 20:43 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 18:47 | no | 0 | 35 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 19:55 | yes | 19 | 34 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 21:02 | yes | 30 | 57 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 21:00 | yes | 5 | 18 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 18:07 | yes | 18 | 9 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 20:49 | yes | 3 | 7 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 22:07 | yes | 28 | 59 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 21:45 | yes | 20 | 6 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 19:52 | yes | 42 | 20 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 18:50 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 18:35 | yes | 27 | 31 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 20:34 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 19:15 | no | 0 | 34 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 18:19 | yes | 27 | 36 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 21:30 | yes | 23 | 30 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 19:46 | yes | 21 | 45 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 21:46 | yes | 18 | 12 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 19:37 | no | 0 | 9 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 19:02 | yes | 11 | 28 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 20:48 | yes | 20 | 12 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 20:49 | yes | 19 | 13 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 19:33 | no | 0 | 9 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 19:44 | yes | 20 | 28 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 20:50 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 20:50 | yes | 10 | 38 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 21:26 | yes | 29 | 41 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 21:01 | yes | 29 | 74 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 19:37 | yes | 14 | 18 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 19:17 | yes | 28 | 13 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 21:35 | yes | 2 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 18:06 | yes | 12 | 24 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 19:59 | yes | 20 | 8 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 18:14 | yes | 46 | 22 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 21:14 | yes | 13 | 10 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 20:43 | yes | 29 | 31 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 18:46 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 20:12 | no | 0 | 18 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 20:01 | yes | 15 | 27 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 21:26 | yes | 25 | 44 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 20:38 | yes | 22 | 46 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
ADP read as ADP Screening and Selection Services
Accurate read as Accurate Background
Unresolved, counted raw
Advanced Background Check Inc.
AppFolio\u2019s tenant screening service
AuthBridge
BackgroundChecker.com
Equifax
Experian
HR‑Revolution LLC
IDScan.net
InfoTrack
PublicDataResources / BackgroundCheck.info
SmartFastBackgroundChecks
Tech Mahindra
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.