Gane Index
All indexesEvery index and its categoriesGTMMarketing, sales, customer and revenue operations softwareITSecurity, IT operations, cloud, developer and data softwareHRHR, payroll, recruiting, performance and learning softwareFinanceAccounting, planning, spend, billing and treasury software
Claim your listing
September 2026 Edition, published · The permanent record of that edition, superseded since. The current standing is on the category page →
Index › HR › Talent acquisition › Applicant tracking syste › Enterprise · September 2026 Edition

Applicant tracking systems for enterprise buyers

Asked as “applicant tracking system”, and as “ATS”, on behalf of an enterprise B2B company. 43 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, twelve models each.
Standing · first-choice share
47%
Greenhouse
Clear leader
47Greenhouse19iCIMS12Workday Recruiting23others

47% of first choices, clear leader.

ShowinginAll 58 categories in the September 2026 Edition →

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small businessBreezy HR41%Clear leaderStanding →Mid-marketGreenhouse47%Clear leaderStanding →EnterpriseGreenhouse47%Clear leaderThis page

The standing

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all twelve models, for an enterprise B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
01Greenhouse47%11%55endorsed leader
02iCIMS19%21%56accepted challenger
03Workday Recruiting12%38%48criticized challenger
04Pinpoint7%7%14accepted challenger
05SmartRecruiters2%4%25accepted challenger
06Oracle Taleo2%58%26criticized challenger
Show the two products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
08SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting0%43%30criticized challenger
07Lever0%16%31accepted challenger
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
Head to head
Greenhouse vs Breezy HRGreenhouse vs Zoho RecruitGreenhouse vs Lever
Head-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not enterprise.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each
Greenhouse vs AshbyGreenhouse vs WorkableGreenhouse vs PinpointGreenhouse vs ManatalBreezy HR vs Zoho RecruitBreezy HR vs LeverBreezy HR vs AshbyBreezy HR vs WorkableBreezy HR vs PinpointBreezy HR vs ManatalZoho Recruit vs LeverZoho Recruit vs AshbyZoho Recruit vs WorkableZoho Recruit vs PinpointZoho Recruit vs ManatalLever vs AshbyLever vs WorkableLever vs PinpointLever vs ManatalAshby vs WorkableAshby vs PinpointAshby vs ManatalWorkable vs PinpointWorkable vs ManatalPinpoint vs Manatal

Recommended versus criticized

Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.

Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative60%
Key
01Greenhouse47%
02iCIMS19%
03Workday Recruiting12%
04Pinpoint7%
05SmartRecruiters2%
06Oracle Taleo2%
07Lever0%
08SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting0%

What they warned about

Three of twelve models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Grok 4.20, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, GLM 4.7 FlashX and MiniMax M2.5 changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Workday Recruiting
38%
18 of 48 labels negative · 12 of 12 models · 7 hard negative
“Clunky UI, overwhelming workflows, poor mobile experience, limited sourcing and automation, and high drop-off rates for candidates” Mistral Small, negative prompt
Oracle Taleo
58%
15 of 26 labels negative · 10 of 12 models · 9 hard negative
“they have quietly transitioned it to a legacy offering with no more major updates... Taleo is not the answer” Claude Haiku 4.5, negative prompt
SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting
43%
13 of 30 labels negative · 10 of 12 models · 5 hard negative
“Overly rigid processes, poor recruiter and hiring manager experience, and customization often requires expensive consulting support” Mistral Small, negative prompt
iCIMS
21%
12 of 56 labels negative · 9 of 12 models · 4 hard negative
“High costs for "basic" features; subpar customer support; over-customization leads to maintenance nightmares.” Grok 4.20, negative prompt

What they cite

Twelve of the twelve models returned a source list in this edition: four return the pages they cited and eight the search results they consulted.

Sites the answers cite

65 of 72 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 12 of 12 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 989 links across 256 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page.

darwinbox.com
vendor site · Darwinbox38 answers · 39 citations · 10 models
selectsoftwarereviews.com
34 answers · 40 citations · 11 models
greenhouse.com
vendor site · Greenhouse32 answers · 49 citations · 12 models
pinpointhq.com
32 answers · 33 citations · 11 models
peoplemanagingpeople.com
30 answers · 31 citations · 11 models
pin.com
vendor site · Pin28 answers · 41 citations · 11 models
bestrecruitingtools.com
22 answers · 29 citations · 10 models
theundercoverrecruiter.com
16 answers · 16 citations · 8 models
lever.co
vendor site · Lever15 answers · 18 citations · 7 models
gem.com
vendor site · Gem15 answers · 15 citations · 6 models
hrstechspace.com
12 answers · 13 citations · 7 models
reddit.com
vendor site · Reddit11 answers · 20 citations · 9 models

Pages the answers cite

The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.

darwinbox.com/blog/best-applicant-tracking-systems-enterprise
38 answers · 10 models
selectsoftwarereviews.com/buyer-guide/applicant-tracking-systems
32 answers · 11 models
peoplemanagingpeople.com/tools/best-applicant-tracking-systems
29 answers · 10 models
pinpointhq.com/insights/best-applicant-tracking-system
28 answers · 11 models
pin.com/blog/best-applicant-tracking-systems
23 answers · 10 models
theundercoverrecruiter.com/best-applicant-tracking-systems-ats-in-2026-comp…
16 answers · 8 models
gem.com/blog/best-applicant-tracking-system
15 answers · 6 models
greenhouse.com/blog/best-ats-software
14 answers · 7 models
greenhouse.com/blog/enterprise-applicant-tracking-systems
14 answers · 8 models
bestrecruitingtools.com/blog/best-ats-for-enterprise-2026
13 answers · 9 models

Search against answers

Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “applicant tracking system”, “applicant tracking systems”, “best applicant tracking system”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Company and productsShareOwn site citedName searches, GoogleAI search demand, est.Organic visitsPaid search a month, est.Google ads, last 30 days
Greenhouse greenhouse.com47%401301,00052,27362,551$5,54574
iCIMS icims.com19%14327,1006671,165,712$5,67426
Workday parent site
Workday Recruiting 12%		12%1841,220,00023,848
Pinpoint pinpointhq.com7%3227,1003,146118,5271
Workable workable.com7%33214,800520698,499$14,56277
SmartRecruiters smartrecruiters.com2%1689,900194272,0940
Ashby ashbyhq.com2%21749,5003,112216,82016
JazzHR jazzhr.com2%14114,8007011,75419
Oracle parent site
Oracle Taleo 2%, Oracle Recruiting 0%		2%50450,00066,611
Lever lever.co0%22160,50024,663189,552$6577

Google's top ten for the three searches hold 14 sites; 3 of them are among the sites the models cited here (peoplemanagingpeople.com, pin.com, reddit.com). The first result for “applicant tracking system” is technologyadvice.com.

How they answered

Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHide
ModelDirect“What is the best applicant tracking system for an enterprise B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which ATS would you recommend to a large B2B company with thousands of employees?”Comparative“What are the top enterprise-grade applicant tracking systems and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best applicant tracking system for a large company that needs predictable total cost across thousands of users?”Scale-constrained“We are a 5,000 person company with SSO, SOC 2 and procurement review requirements evaluating an applicant tracking system. What should we look at?”Negative“Which applicant tracking systems should a large enterprise avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5no first choiceGreenhouseChanged
Two alternativesWorkday Recruiting, iCIMS
SmartRecruiters
Two alternativesGreenhouse, Lever
against: iCIMSWorkable
One alternativeiCIMS
against: Greenhouseno first choiceagainst: Oracle Taleo, SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting, Workday Recruiting, iCIMS
GPT-5.4 miniGreenhouse
Three alternativesSAP SuccessFactors Recruiting, Workday Recruiting, iCIMS
GreenhouseHeld
Two alternativesWorkday Recruiting, iCIMS
no first choice
Seven alternativesAvature, Greenhouse, Lever, Oracle Recruiting, Oracle Taleo, SmartRecruiters, iCIMS
against: SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting, Workday RecruitingSmartRecruiters
Two alternativesGreenhouse, iCIMS
no first choiceagainst: Lever, TalentReef, Workable
Gemini 3.5 FlashAshby, Greenhouse
One alternativeLever
against: Workday Recruiting, iCIMSGreenhouseChanged
Three alternativesSmartRecruiters, Workday Recruiting, iCIMS
no first choice
Six alternativesAshby, Greenhouse, Lever, Pinpoint, Workday Recruiting, iCIMS
against: SAP SuccessFactors RecruitingGreenhouse
Two alternativesLever, Pinpoint
Greenhouse
Three alternativesSmartRecruiters, Workday Recruiting, iCIMS
against: Ashbyagainst: BambooHR, Breezy HR, Bullhorn, JazzHR, Loxo, Oracle Taleo, PCR, Recruitee, SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting, Workable, Workday Recruiting, legacy IBM Kenexa
Perplexity SonarGreenhouse
Five alternativesAvature, Oracle Taleo, SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting, Workday Recruiting, iCIMS
GreenhouseHeld
Four alternativesSAP SuccessFactors Recruiting, SmartRecruiters, Workday Recruiting, iCIMS
no first choice
Nine alternativesAvature, Darwinbox, Greenhouse, Oracle Taleo, Phenom, SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting, SmartRecruiters, Workday Recruiting, iCIMS
against: LeverWorkable
One alternativeSmartRecruiters
against: Greenhouseno first choiceagainst: AvaHR, Trakstar Hire, Workday Recruiting, iCIMS
Grok 4.20Greenhouse
Two alternativesWorkday Recruiting, iCIMS
against: Oracle TaleoWorkday RecruitingChanged
Two alternativesGreenhouse, iCIMS
no first choiceWorkday Recruiting
Three alternativesGreenhouse, SmartRecruiters, iCIMS
against: JazzHR, Lever, Oracle Taleo, RecruitisiCIMS
Three alternativesGreenhouse, Lever, Pinpoint
against: Cornerstone OnDemand, Oracle Taleo, SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting, Workday Recruiting, iCIMS
Mistral SmallGreenhouse
Two alternativesLever, Pinpoint
iCIMSChanged
Five alternativesAvature, Greenhouse, Oracle Taleo, SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting, Workday Recruiting
Greenhouse
Two alternativesDarwinbox, iCIMS
Greenhouse, Workable
Two alternativesWorkday Recruiting, iCIMS
no first choiceagainst: Cornerstone OnDemand, Oracle Taleo, SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting, Workday Recruiting, iCIMS
DeepSeek V4 FlashGreenhouse
Three alternativesAshby, Workday Recruiting, iCIMS
iCIMSChanged
Two alternativesGreenhouse, Workday Recruiting
Greenhouse, iCIMS
Six alternativesAshby, Darwinbox, Lever, SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting, SmartRecruiters, Workday Recruiting
iCIMS
One alternativeWorkable
against: Ashby, Greenhouse, Leverno first choiceagainst: Cornerstone OnDemand, IBM Kenexa / BrassRing, Oracle Taleo, SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting, Workday Recruiting, iCIMS
Llama 4 MaverickPinpoint
Two alternativesDarwinbox, Pin
Workday RecruitingChanged
Three alternativesGreenhouse, Pinpoint, iCIMS
no first choiceGreenhouse, Oracle Taleo, iCIMSPinpoint
Three alternativesJazzHR, Manatal, Personio
against: Oracle Taleo, Workday Recruiting
Qwen 3.7 FlashGreenhouse
Two alternativesSmartRecruiters, iCIMS
against: Workday RecruitingiCIMSChanged
Five alternativesGreenhouse, Oracle Taleo, Rippling, SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting, Workday Recruiting
Workday Recruiting
Four alternativesGreenhouse, Lever, SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting, iCIMS
against: Oracle TaleoJazzHR
Three alternativesGreenhouse, Lever, SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting
no first choiceagainst: Breezy HR, JazzHR, Oracle Taleo, SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting, Workday Recruiting, ZipRecruiter
Kimi K2Greenhouse
Three alternativesPinpoint, SmartRecruiters, iCIMS
GreenhouseHeld
Four alternativesLever, SmartRecruiters, Workday Recruiting, iCIMS
Greenhouse
Three alternativesLever, SmartRecruiters, iCIMS
against: Oracle Taleo, SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting, Workday RecruitingiCIMS
One alternativeSmartRecruiters
against: Greenhouse, Lever, Workday Recruitingno first choiceagainst: Workday Recruitingagainst: Oracle Taleo, SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting, Workday Recruiting, iCIMS
GLM 4.7 FlashXGreenhouse
Six alternativesDarwinbox, Lever, Oracle Taleo, SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting, Workday Recruiting, iCIMS
Workday RecruitingChanged
One alternativeGreenhouse
against: iCIMSGreenhouse, iCIMS
Four alternativesAshby, Darwinbox, Gem, SmartRecruiters
against: Oracle Taleo, SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting, Workday RecruitingWorkday Recruiting
Three alternativesAvature, Lever, Workable
against: Greenhouse, Pinpoint, SmartRecruiters, iCIMSno first choiceagainst: Greenhouse, Oracle Taleo, SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting, Workday Recruiting, iCIMS
MiniMax M2.5Greenhouse, Pinpoint
Three alternativesDarwinbox, Gem, iCIMS
Greenhouse, iCIMSChanged
One alternativeWorkday Recruiting
iCIMS
Six alternativesGreenhouse, Lever, Oracle Taleo, SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting, SmartRecruiters, Workday Recruiting
no first choiceno first choiceagainst: Oracle Taleo, SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting, UKG Pro, Workday Recruiting, iCIMS
Bold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against

The record

One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Seventy-two rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
PromptModelVersion stringTime (UTC)SearchedSourcesLatency
Direct recommendationClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-09-17 17:22no04 s
Direct recommendationGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-09-17 17:06yes25 s
Direct recommendationGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-09-17 17:06yes1826 s
Direct recommendationPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-09-17 17:05yes206 s
Direct recommendationGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version)2026-09-17 17:11yes3318 s
Direct recommendationMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-09-17 17:22yes109 s
Direct recommendationDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks2026-09-17 17:17yes2019 s
Direct recommendationLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-09-17 17:21yes53 s
Direct recommendationQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-09-17 16:57yes928 s
Direct recommendationKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-09-17 17:13yes1235 s
Direct recommendationGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-09-17 17:09yes1491 s
Direct recommendationMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-09-17 17:10yes737 s
ParaphraseClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-09-17 17:00yes1510 s
ParaphraseGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-09-17 17:12yes36 s
ParaphraseGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-09-17 17:22yes721 s
ParaphrasePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-09-17 17:07yes2018 s
ParaphraseGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version)2026-09-17 17:17yes3418 s
ParaphraseMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-09-17 17:07yes56 s
ParaphraseDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks2026-09-17 17:05yes1421 s
ParaphraseLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-09-17 17:06yes53 s
ParaphraseQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-09-17 17:16yes531 s
ParaphraseKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-09-17 17:13yes1021 s
ParaphraseGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-09-17 17:07yes1459 s
ParaphraseMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-09-17 17:14yes516 s
ComparativeClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-09-17 17:00yes99 s
ComparativeGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-09-17 17:08yes58 s
ComparativeGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-09-17 17:17yes1530 s
ComparativePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-09-17 17:20yes209 s
ComparativeGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version)2026-09-17 17:14yes2817 s
ComparativeMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-09-17 16:57yes1913 s
ComparativeDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks2026-09-17 16:59yes2325 s
ComparativeLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-09-17 16:59yes52 s
ComparativeQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-09-17 17:03no041 s
ComparativeKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-09-17 17:16yes1530 s
ComparativeGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-09-17 17:02yes2276 s
ComparativeMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-09-17 17:01yes1564 s
Budget constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-09-17 17:06yes1710 s
Budget constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-09-17 17:05yes46 s
Budget constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-09-17 17:24yes2528 s
Budget constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-09-17 17:21yes208 s
Budget constrainedGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version)2026-09-17 17:08yes3820 s
Budget constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-09-17 17:07yes56 s
Budget constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-09-17 16:58yes2157 s
Budget constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-09-17 17:11yes54 s
Budget constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-09-17 17:09yes22162 s
Budget constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-09-17 17:19yes1529 s
Budget constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-09-17 17:16yes28246 s
Budget constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-09-17 17:07yes1893 s
Scale constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-09-17 17:01yes1815 s
Scale constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-09-17 17:08no010 s
Scale constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-09-17 17:13no019 s
Scale constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-09-17 17:08yes2022 s
Scale constrainedGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version)2026-09-17 17:08yes1919 s
Scale constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-09-17 17:04no07 s
Scale constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks2026-09-17 17:06yes1931 s
Scale constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-09-17 17:17yes54 s
Scale constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-09-17 17:01no032 s
Scale constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-09-17 17:11yes1086 s
Scale constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-09-17 17:21yes1524 s
Scale constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-09-17 16:58no09 s
Negative framingClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-09-17 17:11yes2615 s
Negative framingGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-09-17 17:19yes68 s
Negative framingGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-09-17 17:10yes1927 s
Negative framingPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-09-17 17:06yes208 s
Negative framingGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version)2026-09-17 17:13yes2214 s
Negative framingMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-09-17 17:10yes149 s
Negative framingDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks2026-09-17 17:20yes2626 s
Negative framingLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-09-17 17:05yes64 s
Negative framingQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-09-17 16:58yes1471 s
Negative framingKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-09-17 17:00yes2676 s
Negative framingGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-09-17 17:03yes1461 s
Negative framingMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-09-17 16:58yes923 s

Normalization in this category

Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.

ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
ADP Recruiting Management read as ADP
Cornerstone read as Cornerstone OnDemand
LeverTRM read as Lever
LeverTRM Enterprise read as Lever
SAP SuccessFactors read as SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting
SAP SuccessFactors (Recruiting) read as SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting
UKG Pro Recruiting read as UKG Pro
Workday read as Workday Recruiting
Workday (Recruiting module) read as Workday Recruiting
Workday Talent Acquisition read as Workday Recruiting
Zoho read as Zoho Recruit
iCIMS Talent Cloud read as iCIMS
Unresolved, counted raw
IBM Kenexa / BrassRing
PCR (PCRecruiter)
TalentReef
legacy IBM Kenexa
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.

Also in talent acquisition

The other categories of this function, with the leader in each.
← AI recruiting assistantsBackground screening →