Background screening
Asked as “background check provider”, and as “employment screening service”, on behalf of a mid-market B2B company. 42 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, twelve models each.
Standing · first-choice share
43%
Clear leader
43Checkr14GoodHire12BackgroundChecks.com31others
43% of first choices, clear leader.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Show the four products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
All fifteen head-to-head pages: the top six products, each against each
Checkr vs Verified FirstCheckr vs Accurate BackgroundGoodHire vs CertnGoodHire vs BackgroundChecks.comGoodHire vs Verified FirstGoodHire vs Accurate BackgroundCertn vs BackgroundChecks.comCertn vs Verified FirstCertn vs Accurate BackgroundBackgroundChecks.com vs Verified FirstBackgroundChecks.com vs Accurate BackgroundVerified First vs Accurate Background
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09T10
Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative60%
Key
01Checkr43%
Checkr43%02GoodHire14%
GoodHire14%03Certn12%
Certn12%04BackgroundChecks.com12%
BackgroundChecks.com12%05Verified First7%
Verified First7%06Accurate Background2%
Accurate Background2%07First Advantage0%
First Advantage0%08HireRight0%
HireRight0%09Sterling0%
Sterling0%10TruthFinder0%
What they warned about
Four of twelve models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Perplexity Sonar, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash and Kimi K2 changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
TruthFinder
79%
11 of 14 labels negative · 8 of 12 models · 10 hard negative
“The FTC specifically took action against TruthFinder and Instant Checkmate for allegedly deceiving users about report accuracy and violating FCRA requirements” GPT-5.4 mini, negative prompt
Sterling42%
11 of 26 labels negative · 8 of 12 models · 4 hard negative
“Numerous complaints about extremely slow processing times (weeks to months), poor customer service... Many reviewers report lost job opportunities due to delays.” MiniMax M2.5, negative prompt
HireRight32%
11 of 34 labels negative · 7 of 12 models · 2 hard negative
“HireRight are massive players with deep international capabilities, they are generally a poor fit for mid-market B2B companies” Gemini 3.5 Flash, direct prompt
Instant Checkmate75%
6 of 8 labels negative · 6 of 12 models · 6 hard negative
“The FTC specifically took action against TruthFinder and Instant Checkmate for allegedly deceiving users about report accuracy and violating FCRA requirements” GPT-5.4 mini, negative prompt
What they cite
Twelve of the twelve models returned a source list in this edition: four return the pages they cited and eight the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
63 of 72 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 12 of 12 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 814 links across 209 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page.
vendor site · bib.com43 answers · 47 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Checkr41 answers · 58 citations · 12 models
24 answers · 24 citations · 11 models
vendor site · GoodHire23 answers · 27 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Vetty19 answers · 21 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Pin17 answers · 17 citations · 8 models
16 answers · 18 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Mitratech13 answers · 16 citations · 8 models
13 answers · 13 citations · 9 models
vendor site · FirstHR13 answers · 13 citations · 8 models
vendor site · HireShield12 answers · 13 citations · 6 models
12 answers · 12 citations · 8 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
41 answers · 11 models
28 answers · 12 models
24 answers · 11 models
17 answers · 8 models
17 answers · 9 models
16 answers · 9 models
14 answers · 8 models
13 answers · 9 models
13 answers · 8 models
12 answers · 7 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “background check provider”, “background check providers”, “best background check provider”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Checkr checkr.com | 43% | 183 | 74,000 | 1,214 | 498,605 | $77,362 | 85 | 4 |
| GoodHire goodhire.com | 14% | 111 | 2,400 | 45 | 219,964 | 40 | 1 | |
| Certn certn.co | 12% | 100 | 1,900 | 42 | 3,223 | $37 | 8 | |
| BackgroundChecks.com backgroundchecks.com | 12% | 55 | 1,600 | 26 | 250,895 | $5,146 | 18 | |
| Verified First verifiedfirst.com | 7% | 20 | 4,400 | 255 | 11,301 | 11 | 9 | |
| Accurate accurate.com Accurate Background 2% | 2% | 65 | 8,100 | 561 | 161,894 company | $271 | 7 | 1 |
| Mitratech mitratech.com Mitratech AssureHire 2% | 2% | 37 | 3,600 | 159 | 46,305 company | $10,768 | 106 | |
| HireShield hireshield.com | 2% | 16 | 90 | 0 | 8,493 | |||
| Background Investigation Bureau | 2% | |||||||
| EDIFY Screening edifyscreening.com | 2% | 1 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 21 sites; 3 of them are among the sites the models cited here (checkr.com, fadv.com, goodhire.com). The first result for “background check provider” is accurate.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best background check provider for a mid-market B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which employment screening service would you recommend to a mid-sized B2B company?”Comparative“What are the top background check providers and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best background check provider for a company with a limited budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 500 person company evaluating a background check provider. What should we look at?”Negative“Which background check providers should I avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5EDIFY Screeningno first choiceChangedCheckr, First AdvantageCheckrno first choiceagainst: First Advantage, HireRight, Intellicorp Records
Four alternatives
Accurate Background, First Advantage, HireRight, iprospectcheckFour alternatives
Bchex, GoodHire, HireShield, VettyTwo alternatives
First Advantage, HireRightGPT-5.4 miniCheckrCheckrHeldCheckr, GoodHireagainst: Intelius, PeopleFinders, TruthFinderCheckr, GoodHireno first choiceagainst: Instant Checkmate, TruthFinder
Three alternatives
GoodHire, HireRight, SterlingFive alternatives
Atlantic Employee Screening, Cisive, GoodHire, HireRight, SterlingTwo alternatives
Accurate Background, First AdvantageGemini 3.5 FlashVerified Firstagainst: First Advantage, HireRight, SterlingCheckrChangedagainst: First Advantage, HireRight, SterlingCheckrCertnagainst: BeenVerified, ShareAble for Hires, TruthFinderVerified Firstagainst: BeenVerified, HireRight, Instant Checkmate, Radaris, RentGrow, Spokeo, TransUnion Rental Screening Solutions, TruthFinder, Whitepages
Three alternatives
Accurate Background, Checkr, iprospectcheckThree alternatives
Accurate Background, Certn, Verified FirstFive alternatives
First Advantage, HireRight, Social Catfish, TruthFinder, VettyTwo alternatives
Checkr, ClearChecksFour alternatives
Checkr, First Advantage, HireRight, SterlingPerplexity SonarMitratech AssureHireCheckrChangedno first choiceBackgroundChecks.comno first choiceagainst: HireRight, Intelius, Social Catfish, Sterling, TruthFinder
Four alternatives
Bchex, Checkr, GoodHire, Verified FirstTwo alternatives
GoodHire, Mitratech AssureHireTwo alternatives
Certn, GoodHireGrok 4.20CheckrCheckrHeldCheckragainst: BeenVerified, TruthFinderCertnno first choiceagainst: ADP Screening and Selection Services, General Information Services, Instant Checkmate, MyLife.com, TruthFinder
Four alternatives
Accurate Background, Bchex, GoodHire, Verified FirstFour alternatives
BackgroundChecks.com, GoodHire, HireRight, SterlingSix alternatives
Accurate Background, First Advantage, GoodHire, HireRight, TransUnion SmartMove, Verified FirstThree alternatives
BackgroundChecks.com, Checkr, GoodHireFive alternatives
Checkr, First Advantage, GoodHire, HireRight, Mitratech AssureHireMistral SmallCheckr, GoodHireBackground Investigation BureauChangedno first choiceBackgroundChecks.comno first choiceagainst: Sterling
One alternative
CertnTwo alternatives
Accurate Background, CheckrTwo alternatives
GCheck, HireShieldDeepSeek V4 FlashVerified Firstagainst: First Advantage, HireRight, SterlingCheckrChangedCheckrCertn, GoodHireno first choiceagainst: Accurate Background, BackgroundChecks.com, BeenVerified, Checkr, First Advantage, General Information Services, HireRight, Instant Checkmate, Sterling, TruthFinder, e-Background-checks.com
Three alternatives
Certn, Checkr, Orange TreeSix alternatives
Accurate Background, Certn, First Advantage, GoodHire, HireRight, Verified FirstSix alternatives
Certn, First Advantage, GoodHire, HireRight, Instant Checkmate, SterlingThree alternatives
BackgroundChecks.com, Checkr, GCheckLlama 4 MaverickBackgroundChecks.comno first choiceChangedno first choiceBackgroundChecks.comno first choiceagainst: Intelius, TruthFinder
Three alternatives
Bchex, GoodHire, Mitratech AssureHireTwo alternatives
Checkr, GoodHireQwen 3.7 FlashCheckrGoodHireChangedagainst: SterlingCheckrCheckrno first choiceagainst: Accurate Background, First Advantage, HireRight, Sterling, The PeopleDataLabs
Three alternatives
Certn, First Advantage, GoodHireTwo alternatives
Checkster, HireRightSix alternatives
Accurate Background, Certn, First Advantage, GoodHire, HireRight, SterlingFour alternatives
Accurate Background, Certn, GoodHire, ShareAble for HiresKimi K2Accurate Background, Checkragainst: GoodHire, HireRight, SterlingCheckr, GoodHireChangedCheckrBackgroundChecks.com, Certnno first choiceagainst: Everify, Inc., InfoPay, Inc., Instant Checkmate, Intelligator, Inc., MyLife.com, TruthFinder
Four alternatives
Bchex, Certn, Mitratech AssureHire, Verified FirstOne alternative
Accurate BackgroundFour alternatives
Certn, GoodHire, HireRight, SterlingTwo alternatives
Checkr, GoodHireGLM 4.7 FlashXCheckragainst: HireRight, SterlingCheckrHeldagainst: First Advantage, HireRightCheckrCertn, HireShieldagainst: Checkrno first choiceagainst: ADP Screening and Selection Services, Creative Services Inc., DISA Global Solutions, General Information Services, Instant Checkmate, Mercor, National Public Data, TruthFinder, e-Background-checks.com
Four alternatives
Accurate Background, Certn, GoodHire, Verified FirstTwo alternatives
GoodHire, SterlingSix alternatives
Accurate Background, Certn, First Advantage, GoodHire, HireRight, IntelifiThree alternatives
BackgroundChecks.com, GoodHire, Verified CredentialsMiniMax M2.5CheckrCheckrHeldno first choiceGoodHireno first choiceagainst: Checkr, First Advantage, Sterling
Two alternatives
Certn, GoodHireThree alternatives
Accurate Background, BackgroundChecks.com, First AdvantageFour alternatives
BackgroundChecks.com, Checkr, First Advantage, SterlingBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Seventy-two rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 20:00 | yes | 9 | 10 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 19:25 | yes | 4 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 18:54 | yes | 21 | 27 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 20:12 | yes | 20 | 9 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 18:01 | yes | 35 | 19 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 19:19 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 19:26 | yes | 14 | 21 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 21:18 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 19:41 | yes | 5 | 29 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 21:28 | yes | 9 | 55 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 21:55 | yes | 14 | 250 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 21:25 | yes | 8 | 26 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 17:57 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 21:04 | yes | 4 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 21:54 | yes | 8 | 36 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 19:20 | yes | 15 | 6 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 19:37 | yes | 23 | 14 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 18:23 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 20:17 | yes | 15 | 18 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 21:25 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 19:21 | no | 0 | 30 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 18:11 | yes | 15 | 36 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 21:12 | yes | 10 | 67 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 20:59 | yes | 5 | 15 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 20:24 | yes | 9 | 8 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 21:06 | yes | 4 | 8 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 22:05 | yes | 14 | 56 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 21:07 | yes | 20 | 8 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 21:32 | yes | 24 | 15 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 21:16 | yes | 9 | 9 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 18:55 | yes | 23 | 20 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 19:18 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 18:52 | yes | 19 | 61 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 21:17 | yes | 10 | 32 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 18:58 | yes | 24 | 59 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 21:35 | yes | 5 | 11 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 21:19 | yes | 9 | 7 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 20:38 | yes | 3 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 18:11 | yes | 18 | 18 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 21:32 | yes | 20 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 21:40 | yes | 25 | 12 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 19:24 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 21:06 | yes | 9 | 14 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 18:34 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 21:34 | yes | 5 | 13 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 19:42 | yes | 5 | 19 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 19:44 | yes | 13 | 27 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 19:32 | no | 0 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 18:07 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 20:44 | no | 0 | 11 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 18:49 | yes | 14 | 24 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 20:48 | yes | 20 | 11 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 19:49 | yes | 14 | 10 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 20:53 | no | 0 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-09-17 20:19 | yes | 24 | 45 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 20:53 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 18:01 | yes | 5 | 27 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 20:06 | yes | 10 | 26 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 21:38 | no | 0 | 154 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 20:19 | no | 0 | 61 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 19:11 | yes | 17 | 9 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 21:02 | yes | 4 | 8 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 21:54 | yes | 14 | 41 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 18:40 | yes | 20 | 7 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 20:43 | yes | 41 | 17 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 21:31 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-09-17 20:21 | yes | 29 | 72 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 19:33 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 21:17 | no | 0 | 29 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 19:11 | yes | 15 | 21 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 21:32 | yes | 20 | 166 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 19:21 | yes | 15 | 20 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Accurate read as Accurate Background
Unresolved, counted raw
Clerify/Certn
Everify, Inc.
Google Social Search
InfoPay, Inc.
Intelifi
Intellicorp Records
Intelligator, Inc.
My Trusted Vendor (MTV)
Radaris
The PeopleDataLabs (PDL)
VerifiedReports
VerifyMinds
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.