Compensation management
Asked as “compensation management software”, and as “salary planning and compensation review software”, on behalf of a mid-market B2B company. 111 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, twelve models each.
Standing · first-choice share
18%
Contested · Comprehensive.io 15%
18Pave15Comprehensive.io06Aeqium60others
18% of first choices, contested.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Show the eleven products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each
Pave vs Salary.com CompAnalystPave vs CompLogixPave vs Payscale AscentPave vs RavioComprehensive.io vs AeqiumComprehensive.io vs HiBobComprehensive.io vs Salary.com CompAnalystComprehensive.io vs CompLogixComprehensive.io vs Payscale AscentComprehensive.io vs RavioAeqium vs HiBobAeqium vs Salary.com CompAnalystAeqium vs CompLogixAeqium vs Payscale AscentAeqium vs RavioHiBob vs Salary.com CompAnalystHiBob vs CompLogixHiBob vs Payscale AscentHiBob vs RavioSalary.com CompAnalyst vs CompLogixSalary.com CompAnalyst vs Payscale AscentSalary.com CompAnalyst vs RavioCompLogix vs Payscale AscentCompLogix vs RavioPayscale Ascent vs Ravio
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative30%
Key
01Pave18%
Pave18%02Comprehensive.io15%
Comprehensive.io15%03Aeqium6%
Aeqium6%04HiBob6%
HiBob6%05Salary.com CompAnalyst5%
Salary.com CompAnalyst5%06CompLogix5%
CompLogix5%07Payscale Ascent5%
Payscale Ascent5%08Ravio4%
Ravio4%09Lattice Compensation4%
Lattice Compensation4%10QuotaPath4%
QuotaPath4%11CaptivateIQ3%
CaptivateIQ3%12SalaryCube Comp Planning3%
SalaryCube Comp Planning3%13Everstage3%
Everstage3%14Paylocity2%
Paylocity2%15BambooHR Compensation1%
BambooHR Compensation1%16Deel1%
Deel1%17Compport1%
Compport1%18OpenComp1%
OpenComp1%19Payscale0%
Payscale0%20Figures0%
Figures0%21beqom0%
beqom0%22Mercer IBE0%
Mercer IBE0%23Qobra0%
Qobra0%24Rippling0%
Rippling0%25HRSoft Compensation Management0%
HRSoft Compensation Management0%26Xactly0%
Xactly0%27SAP SuccessFactors Compensation0%
SAP SuccessFactors Compensation0%28Glassdoor0%
Glassdoor0%29Workday Compensation0%
Workday Compensation0%What they warned about
Zero of twelve models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.20, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX and MiniMax M2.5 changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Workday Compensation59%
19 of 32 labels negative · 7 of 12 models · 4 hard negative
“Avoid legacy tools designed for enterprises with 5,000+ employees (like *Varicent*, *Xactly*, or *Workday Comp*)” Gemini 3.5 Flash, paraphrase prompt
Glassdoor82%
9 of 11 labels negative · 6 of 12 models · 4 hard negative
“compensation platforms that are mentioned as being potentially problematic include: Salary calculators, recruiter guides, and employee-reported tools (e.g. Glassdoor, Hays)” Llama 4 Maverick, negative prompt
Payscale19%
6 of 32 labels negative · 5 of 12 models · 2 hard negative
“Avoid Payscale and Salary.com if you need modern UX and self-service” DeepSeek V4 Flash, negative prompt
Salary.com CompAnalyst18%
8 of 45 labels negative · 5 of 12 models · 2 hard negative
“Dated, Excel-heavy interface requiring vendor dependency for basic changes; Costly paywalls that frustrate users” Kimi K2, negative prompt
What they cite
Twelve of the twelve models returned a source list in this edition: four return the pages they cited and eight the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
132 of 144 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 12 of 12 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 1798 links across 306 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page.
vendor site · Comprehensive96 answers · 115 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Gartner89 answers · 95 citations · 12 models
vendor site · HiBob66 answers · 66 citations · 11 models
vendor site · G261 answers · 66 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Ravio56 answers · 89 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Deel50 answers · 54 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Guideflow47 answers · 57 citations · 11 models
42 answers · 50 citations · 10 models
vendor site · G233 answers · 59 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Aeqium33 answers · 43 citations · 10 models
vendor site · CaptivateIQ32 answers · 43 citations · 8 models
30 answers · 44 citations · 9 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
89 answers · 11 models
85 answers · 12 models
66 answers · 11 models
57 answers · 12 models
48 answers · 11 models
40 answers · 9 models
35 answers · 11 models
25 answers · 8 models
24 answers · 8 models
23 answers · 10 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best compensation management software”, “compensation management software”, “compensation platforms”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pave pave.com | 18% | 191 | 27,100 | 28,423 | 7,645 | $91 | 7 | |
| Comprehensive.io comprehensive.io | 15% | 60 | 50 | 0 | 2,021 | 4 | ||
| Aeqium aeqium.com | 6% | 77 | 260 | 0 | 366 | 7 | 6 | |
| HiBob hibob.com | 6% | 354 | 14,800 | 154 | 266,143 | $54 | 120 | |
| Salary.com CompAnalyst salary.com | 5% | 148 | 260 | 3 | 1,069,118 | $1,642 | 70 | 1 |
| CompLogix complogix.io | 5% | 12 | 70 | 0 | 966 | 8 | ||
| Payscale Ascent payscale.com | 5% | 26 | 10 | 0 | 1,408,989 | $26 | 33 | |
| Ravio ravio.com | 4% | 119 | 1,900 | 181 | 8,419 | 3 | ||
| Lattice lattice.com Lattice Compensation 4% | 4% | 58 | 90,500 | 13,900 | 122,123 company | $1,328 | 120 | |
| QuotaPath quotapath.com | 4% | 41 | 1,600 | 5 | 21,168 | $1,546 | 34 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 23 sites; 7 of them are among the sites the models cited here (aeqium.com, captivateiq.com, comprehensive.io, g2.com, gartner.com, peoplemanagingpeople.com, ravio.com). The first result for “best compensation management software” is gartner.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best compensation management software for a mid-market B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which salary planning and compensation review software would you recommend to a mid-sized B2B company?”Comparative“What are the top compensation platforms and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best compensation management software for a company with a limited budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 500 person company evaluating a compensation management software. What should we look at?”Negative“Which compensation platforms should I avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5HiBob, Payscale Ascent, QuotaPathCompportChangedPayscaleagainst: HiBob, Personio, Workday CompensationComprehensive.io, PromptPayPlanner, QuotaPath, SimplyMeritno first choiceagainst: Claimmoney, Compensation Claims GB, DoorDash, Uber
Six alternatives
Everstage, Lattice Compensation, Paycom, Paylocity, Payscale, XactlyTwo alternatives
Comprehensive.io, OpenCompSix alternatives
CaptivateIQ, CompLogix, Complete, Compport, HRSoft Compensation Management, beqomOne alternative
CompeaseGPT-5.4 miniCaptivateIQ, Lattice CompensationLattice Compensation, Payfactors, Payscale AscentChangedno first choiceCompUp, Gustoagainst: Payscale Ascentno first choicenothing named
Seven alternatives
HRSoft Compensation Management, Payscale, SAP SuccessFactors Compensation, Varicent, Xactly, Xactly Incent, beqomThree alternatives
CaptivateIQ, Salary.com CompAnalyst, beqomFive alternatives
CaptivateIQ, Oracle Fusion Cloud Compensation, Payscale, Salary.com CompAnalyst, Workday CompensationFour alternatives
CompLogix, Deel, Salary.com CompAnalyst, SalaryCube Comp PlanningGemini 3.5 FlashCaptivateIQ, Everstage, Paveagainst: HiBob, RipplingCaptivateIQ, PaveChangedagainst: SAP SuccessFactors Compensation, Varicent, Workday Compensation, Xactly, beqomPaveagainst: ADP Workforce Now, CompLogix, HRSoft Compensation Management, Rippling, SAP SuccessFactors Compensation, Workday CompensationAeqium, BambooHR Compensationagainst: CaptivateIQ, HRSoft Compensation Management, Payscale, Spiff, Workday Compensation, Xactly, beqomPaveagainst: Carta, ChatGPT, Glassdoor, Neevo, Workday Compensation
Eight alternatives
Aeqium, CompLogix, Compport, Comprehensive.io, Pequity, Performio, Qobra, QuotaPathFive alternatives
Aeqium, Comprehensive.io, Everstage, QuotaPath, Workleap CompensationSeven alternatives
CaptivateIQ, CompUp, Deel, Payscale, Pequity, QuotaPath, VaricentSeven alternatives
ClearOffer, Compport, Comprehensive.io, Deel, OpenComp, QuotaPath, RipplingFour alternatives
Aeqium, Barley, CompUp, Comprehensive.ioPerplexity SonarComprehensive.io, HiBobComprehensive.io, DealHub CPQ, Payscale AscentChangedno first choiceQuotaPath, Salary.com CompAnalystno first choiceagainst: Glassdoor
Six alternatives
CaptivateIQ, CompLogix, Payscale Ascent, Performio, QuotaPath, SalaryCube Comp PlanningFive alternatives
Conga CPQ, HiBob, Ravio, SalaryCube Comp Planning, Salesforce CPQ / Revenue CloudEleven alternatives
Aeqium, CaptivateIQ, CompLogix, HiBob, Lattice Compensation, Mercer IBE, Payscale, Ravio, Salary.com CompAnalyst, Workday Compensation, beqomThree alternatives
BambooHR Compensation, Compease, Comprehensive.ioGrok 4.20CompLogixComprehensive.io, Pave, SimplyMeritChangedagainst: Workday CompensationPavePaveagainst: Salary.com CompAnalystComprehensive.ioagainst: Oracle Fusion Cloud Compensation, SAP SuccessFactors Compensationagainst: BambooHR Compensation, Glassdoor, HiBob, Indeed Salary, Levels.fyi, Payscale, Salary.com CompAnalyst
Six alternatives
Comprehensive.io, HiBob, Paylocity, Payscale Ascent, Salary.com CompAnalyst, SimplyMeritOne alternative
PayscaleSix alternatives
Comprehensive.io, Figures, Lattice Compensation, Payscale, Ravio, Salary.com CompAnalystSix alternatives
BambooHR Compensation, Comprehensive.io, Deel HR, Empxtrack, Ravio, Salary.com CompAnalystEight alternatives
Darwinbox Compensation Management, Deel, Figures, Payscale, Ravio, Salary.com CompAnalyst, SalaryCube Comp Planning, beqomMistral SmallEverstage, HiBob, Payscale AscentComprehensive.io, SalaryCube Comp PlanningChangedagainst: Pave, SAP SuccessFactors Compensation, Workday Compensationno first choicePave, Salary.com CompAnalystno first choiceagainst: Glassdoor, Indeed, Levels.fyi, LinkedIn Salary Insights, Payscale, Salary.com CompAnalyst
Four alternatives
CompLogix, Compport, Paylocity, QuotaPathFour alternatives
Barley, CompLogix, Compease, HiBobFive alternatives
Comprehensive.io, Deel HR, Lattice Compensate, OpenComp, RavioDeepSeek V4 FlashLattice Compensation, Pave, QuotaPathOpenComp, PaveChangedagainst: beqomAeqiumagainst: Brightmine, HiBob, Mercer IBE, Pave, Personio, Radford, Rippling, Varicent, WTW, Workday Compensation, Xactly, beqomAeqium, Comprehensive.io, HR Performance Solutions, Pave, Ravioagainst: OpenComp, PayScale/Payfactors, Workday Compensation, Xactly, beqomComprehensive.io, Pave, Ravio, SalaryCube Comp Planning, Stello AIagainst: HRSoft Compensation Management, SAP SuccessFactors Compensation, Workday Compensation, beqomagainst: Payscale, Salary.com CompAnalyst, Workday Compensation, Xactly, beqom
Six alternatives
CaptivateIQ, CompLogix, Compport, Everstage, HiBob, PayscaleTwo alternatives
Aeqium, Lattice CompensationTwelve alternatives
CaptivateIQ, CompAnalyst, CompLogix, Compport, Comprehensive.io, Lattice Compensate, Lattice Compensation, Pave, Radford, Ravio, Varicent, beqomThree alternatives
Deel HR, Lattice Compensate, Salary.com CompAnalystLlama 4 MaverickEverstageCompUp, Comprehensive.ioChangedno first choiceSalary.com CompAnalystno first choiceagainst: Glassdoor, Hays, Ravio
Two alternatives
HiBob, Payscale AscentFive alternatives
Aeqium, Deel, Figures, HRSoft Compensation Management, SalaryCube Comp PlanningSix alternatives
Assemble, CompAnalyst, Lattice Compensation, Mercer IBE, Pave, PayscaleOne alternative
HiBobQwen 3.7 FlashDeel, HiBobagainst: beqomChartHop, CompLogixChangedPaveEmpxtrack, Pave, Salary.com CompAnalystagainst: Lattice Compensate, SAP SuccessFactors Compensation, Salary.com CompAnalyst, Workday Compensationno first choiceagainst: Oracle Fusion Cloud Compensation, SAP SuccessFactors Compensationagainst: ADP Workforce Now, Alignerr, Angell, Appen, Carta, Clickworker, Gusto, Labelbox, Oracle Fusion Cloud Compensation, Paycor, QuickBooks Live Payroll, Rippling, SAP SuccessFactors Compensation, Workday Compensation
Six alternatives
Figures, Lattice Compensation, Payfactors, Payscale Ascent, Qommet, Salary.com CompAnalystFive alternatives
Aeqium, Paycor, Payscale Ascent, Salary.co, XactlySix alternatives
CompAnalyst, Comprehensive.io, Figures, HiBob, Workday HCM, beqomSix alternatives
BambooHR Compensation, Google Sheets / Excel, Gusto, OpenComp, Ravio, RipplingKimi K2CompLogix, Comprehensive.io, Pave, PequityAeqium, Carta Total Comp, CompaChangedPaveComprehensive.io, Pave, Raviono first choiceagainst: Alignerr, Amazon Flex, DoorDash, Favor, Glassdoor, Grubhub, Instacart, Lyft, Monster, Payscale, Salary.com CompAnalyst, Scale AI / Outlier AI / Remotasks, Shipt, Uber, Workday Compensation
Six alternatives
Aeqium, CompUp, Compport, Everstage, HiBob, Lattice CompensationFive alternatives
Comprehensive.io, Pave, Payscale, Pequity, SalaryCube Comp PlanningNine alternatives
Aeqium, Barley, Carta Total Comp, Compa, Comprehensive.io, Figures, Payfactors, Syndio PayEQ, beqomSeven alternatives
BambooHR Compensation, Compease, HR Performance Solutions, Lattice Compensate, Payscale, Salary.com CompAnalyst, ZenefitsGLM 4.7 FlashXAeqium, CompLogix, SalaryCube Comp PlanningAeqium, Comprehensive.ioChangedSalary.com CompAnalystAeqium, Comprehensive.io, Empxtrack, Pave, Ravioagainst: Lattice Compensateno first choiceagainst: Benjamin, FreeCash, Gusto, Paycor, Paylocity, UKG Ready
Three alternatives
HiBob, Pave, Payscale AscentNine alternatives
ADP Workforce Now, CompLogix, Compport, Dayforce, HiBob, Pave, SalaryCube Comp Planning, Workday Compensation, beqomEleven alternatives
BambooHR Compensation, Carta Total Comp, Comprehensive.io, Figures, Lattice Compensate, Mercer IBE, OpenComp, Pave, Payscale, Qobra, RavioSix alternatives
BambooHR Compensation, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Deel HR, OpenComp, QuotaPath, RipplingMiniMax M2.5CompLogix, HiBob, Paylocity, Payscale AscentComprehensive.io, HiBob, PaylocityChangedagainst: Workday HCMno first choiceComprehensive.io, Pave, Salary.com CompAnalystComprehensive.io, Paveagainst: Amazon Flex, Amazon Mechanical Turk, Bolt, Droppa, Fiverr, Freelancer.com, Gig Wage, InDriver, Ola, PeoplePerHour, PicUp, Rev, SecretAgent, Stripe, Uber, Upwork
One alternative
PaveFive alternatives
BambooHR Compensation, CompAnalyst, Deel, Pave, RipplingTwelve alternatives
CompAnalyst, Compa, Comprehensive.io, Figures, Pave, Payfactors, Qobra, Ravio, Syndio PayEQ, Visdum, Workday Compensation, beqomFive alternatives
BambooHR Compensation, Gusto, Paycom, Pick, RavioFour alternatives
15Five, HRSoft Compensation Management, Workday Compensation, beqomBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Seventy-two rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 17:54 | yes | 9 | 7 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 18:47 | yes | 4 | 7 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 22:08 | yes | 19 | 52 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 17:54 | yes | 20 | 6 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 21:21 | yes | 16 | 14 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 21:40 | yes | 7 | 8 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-09-17 19:03 | yes | 16 | 41 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 21:31 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 21:18 | yes | 5 | 18 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 18:01 | yes | 8 | 36 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 17:54 | yes | 23 | 100 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 18:35 | yes | 5 | 27 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 18:17 | yes | 9 | 8 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 21:41 | yes | 2 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 18:24 | yes | 20 | 23 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 21:17 | yes | 20 | 14 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 21:07 | yes | 27 | 18 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 20:23 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-09-17 21:43 | yes | 23 | 65 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 21:29 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 18:27 | yes | 16 | 52 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 21:01 | yes | 24 | 47 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 21:06 | yes | 14 | 76 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 20:50 | yes | 14 | 28 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 19:56 | yes | 9 | 10 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 20:30 | yes | 4 | 6 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 20:04 | yes | 18 | 23 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 21:00 | yes | 20 | 9 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 21:38 | yes | 23 | 13 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 21:38 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 19:43 | yes | 18 | 25 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 20:56 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 21:13 | yes | 5 | 18 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 20:24 | yes | 17 | 30 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 18:11 | yes | 12 | 136 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 19:00 | yes | 9 | 25 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 21:30 | yes | 15 | 9 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 21:22 | yes | 3 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 21:56 | yes | 20 | 54 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 20:04 | yes | 20 | 6 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 20:59 | yes | 37 | 17 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 20:02 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 21:28 | yes | 9 | 12 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 21:39 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 21:20 | yes | 8 | 21 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 18:41 | yes | 12 | 59 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 20:56 | yes | 21 | 70 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 19:24 | yes | 5 | 11 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 19:51 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 21:38 | no | 0 | 10 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 21:56 | yes | 11 | 37 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 20:35 | yes | 20 | 10 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 21:10 | yes | 13 | 10 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 20:04 | no | 0 | 10 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-09-17 18:44 | yes | 23 | 70 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 21:32 | yes | 5 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 19:54 | no | 0 | 27 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 21:36 | yes | 13 | 27 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 20:33 | no | 0 | 13 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 19:55 | yes | 5 | 13 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 20:48 | yes | 18 | 8 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 18:22 | no | 0 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 22:06 | yes | 18 | 57 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 19:48 | yes | 20 | 7 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 20:02 | yes | 25 | 15 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 20:11 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 20:42 | yes | 20 | 36 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 17:54 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 21:05 | no | 0 | 32 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 20:56 | yes | 20 | 32 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 18:55 | yes | 28 | 34 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 19:07 | yes | 5 | 21 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
ADP read as ADP Workforce Now
ADP (specifically RUN for small businesses) read as ADP Workforce Now
BambooHR read as BambooHR Compensation
BambooHR Elite read as BambooHR Compensation
Carta Total Compensation read as Carta Total Comp
Comprehensive read as Comprehensive.io
Darwinbox read as Darwinbox Compensation Management
HRSoft read as HRSoft Compensation Management
HRSoft (COMPview) read as HRSoft Compensation Management
HRsoft read as HRSoft Compensation Management
Lattice read as Lattice Compensation
Mercer read as Mercer IBE
Oracle read as Oracle Fusion Cloud Compensation
Oracle Compensation read as Oracle Fusion Cloud Compensation
Oracle HCM (PeopleSoft) read as Oracle Fusion Cloud Compensation
Patriot read as Patriot Software
SAP read as SAP SuccessFactors Compensation
SAP SuccessFactors read as SAP SuccessFactors Compensation
Salary.com read as Salary.com CompAnalyst
Salary.com (CompAnalyst) read as Salary.com CompAnalyst
Salary.com Compensation Management read as Salary.com CompAnalyst
SalaryCube read as SalaryCube Comp Planning
Syndio read as Syndio PayEQ
UKG Pro read as UKG Pro Compensation
Workday read as Workday Compensation
Workleap read as Workleap Compensation
Workleap Barley read as Workleap Compensation
Unresolved, counted raw
Advanced-HR's Option Impact
Angell
Benjamin
Bolt
Cedar Compensation
Claimmoney
ClearOffer
Compensation Claims GB
Conga CPQ
DealHub CPQ
Droppa
FreeCash
Gig Wage
HubSpot CPQ
InDriver
Indeed Salary
Labelbox
Neevo
OptionImpact
Orcharstrata
PicUp
Pick
Prolific
PromptPayPlanner
Qommet
QuickBooks Live Payroll
Respondent.io
Rev
Salary.co
Salesforce CPQ / Revenue Cloud
Scale AI / Outlier AI / Remotasks
SecretAgent
Swagbucks
TailoredPay
Team Ohana
UserInterviews
Visier Compensation
Welcome
Workday modules
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.