Aeqium is compensation planning software that configures cycles, surfaces insights, and executes changes in plain language · aeqium.com ↗
The standing depends on who is buying. Every model is asked the same questions for each company size.
Pave is first at 27%.
Pave is first at 25%. 3 of 14 models made it the first choice when asked directly.
beqom is first at 25%.
“Best for mid-sized organizations (200 to 6,000 employees) replacing spreadsheet merit planning and prioritizing fast implementation”Claude Haiku 4.5 · Paraphrase question · first choice
“Aeqium, Pave, and Lattice are the top recommendations due to their balance of features, scalability, and user-friendliness”Mistral Small · Paraphrase question · first choice
“Start with SalaryCube or Aeqium for dedicated compensation management with strong mid-market capabilities.”GLM 4.7 FlashX · Paraphrase question · first choice
“Aeqium for a collaborative total rewards platform that is top-rated for mid-market consistency.”Muse Glimmer 30B · Paraphrase question · first choice
No model argued against it.
The products named in the same answers as Aeqium, over the 77 answers that named it, and how often each was the first choice instead.
| Product | Named together | Picked instead | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 42 | 9 | Compare → | |
| 34 | 5 | View → | |
| 29 | 4 | View → | |
| 27 | 0 | Compare → | |
| 26 | 0 | View → | |
| 21 | 2 | Compare → | |
| 20 | 2 | View → | |
| 20 | 0 | View → | |
| 18 | 1 | Compare → | |
| 18 | 0 | View → |
What the models named instead of Aeqium →
A side-by-side page exists where both products are among a category's top eight.
Stated on Aeqium's own site, not checked by Gane.
Fourteen AI models from 12 labs are asked the same buying questions six ways, for three company sizes. Standings refresh every edition.
Gane sells AI visibility software. No company can pay to change a result.
Read the method →Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted. These counts come from 77 of the 77 answers that named Aeqium and are not a share of its labels.
233 of the 250 domain citations in answers naming Aeqium came from a third party's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Warning | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| Mistral Small | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 5 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 1 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 5 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 6 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 75 | undated | Compensation management, Pay equity | ||
| Case study | 15 | undated | |||
| Glossary or explainer | 5 | undated | Compensation management | ||
| Comparison | 4 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 1 | undated |
Every page aeqium.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.