Figures is pay transparency and compensation management software for HR teams and managers · figures.hr ↗
The standing depends on who is buying. Every model is asked the same questions for each company size.
Gusto is first at 30%.
Ranked first, contested: Payscale has 12%. 3 of 14 models made it the first choice when asked directly.
Syndio is first at 56%.
“That makes Figures a good fit for a mid-sized B2B company with US + EU exposure that wants market data, pay bands and reporting in one system.”Muse Glimmer 30B · Paraphrase question · first choice
“Figures (from figures.hr) stands out as the best pay equity analysis software for a mid-market B2B company.”Grok 4.20 · Direct question · first choice
“Figures and Ravio are the most recommended due to their focus on mid-market needs”Mistral Small · Paraphrase question · first choice
“the recommended pay transparency compliance tool for a mid-sized B2B company is Figures”Llama 4 Maverick · Paraphrase question · first choice
“some tools are noted as not suitable for companies under 150 employees (e.g., Figures)”DeepSeek V4 Flash · Negative question · warning
“Niche tools like Figures or Ravio are emerging but less proven for B2B.”Grok 4.20 · Paraphrase question · warning
The products named in the same answers as Figures, over the 57 answers that named it, and how often each was the first choice instead.
| Product | Named together | Picked instead | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 28 | 9 | View → | |
| 26 | 10 | Compare → | |
| 23 | 1 | View → | |
| 22 | 3 | Compare → | |
| 21 | 1 | Compare → | |
| 16 | 2 | Compare → | |
| 15 | 3 | Compare → | |
| 14 | 1 | View → | |
| 12 | 0 | View → | |
| 11 | 1 | View → |
What the models named instead of Figures →
A side-by-side page exists where both products are among a category's top eight.
Stated on Figures's own site, not checked by Gane.
Fourteen AI models from 12 labs are asked the same buying questions six ways, for three company sizes. Standings refresh every edition.
Gane sells AI visibility software. No company can pay to change a result.
Read the method →Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted. These counts come from 54 of the 57 answers that named Figures and are not a share of its labels.
149 of the 172 domain citations in answers naming Figures came from a third party's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Warning | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Grok 4.20 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 6 |
| Mistral Small | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 2 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 6 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 319 | undated | Pay equity, Compensation management | ||
| Case study | 18 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 11 | undated | HRIS and HCM platforms, Pay equity | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 11 | undated | Compensation management | ||
| Report or ebook | 9 | undated | |||
| Webinar or virtual event | 7 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 4 | undated | Pay equity |
Every page figures.hr exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.