Index › HR › Performance and talent management › Talent intelligence › Enterprise · November 2026 Edition
Talent intelligence for enterprise buyers
Asked as “talent intelligence platform”, and as “AI talent platform for hiring and mobility”, on behalf of an enterprise B2B company. 45 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
69%
Clear leader
69Eightfold AI07Workday Skills Cloud04SeekOut Recruit20others
69% of first choices, clear leader.
Since October 2026▲+2Since October 2026: 67% → 69%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.Eightfold AI held the lead, +2 points on 67%, inside the 13-point floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
Pin14%Contested▼−7Since October 2026: 21% → 14%, −7 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.Standing →Mid-marketSeekOut Recruit21%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: SeekOut Recruit (21%) replaces Pin (27% then, 12% now), 9 points clear, inside the 13-point floor.Standing →Enterprise
Eightfold AI69%Clear leader▲+2Since October 2026: 67% → 69%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.This page
Pin14%Contested▼−7Since October 2026: 21% → 14%, −7 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.Standing →Mid-marketSeekOut Recruit21%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: SeekOut Recruit (21%) replaces Pin (27% then, 12% now), 9 points clear, inside the 13-point floor.Standing →EnterpriseEightfold AI69%Clear leader▲+2Since October 2026: 67% → 69%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.This pageThe standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for an enterprise B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01Eightfold AI69%18%67endorsed leader▲+2Since October 2026: 67% → 69%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.67% → 69%
Eightfold AI69%18%67endorsed leader▲+2Since October 2026: 67% → 69%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.67% → 69%02
Workday Skills Cloud7%35%20criticized challenger▲+5Since October 2026: 2% → 7%, +5 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.2% → 7%
Workday Skills Cloud7%35%20criticized challenger▲+5Since October 2026: 2% → 7%, +5 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.2% → 7%03SeekOut Recruit4%13%47accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 6% → 4%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.6% → 4%
04
Gloat2%14%43accepted challenger▼−4Since October 2026: 6% → 2%, −4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.6% → 2%
Gloat2%14%43accepted challenger▼−4Since October 2026: 6% → 2%, −4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.6% → 2%05
Phenom2%17%46accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.2% → 2%
Phenom2%17%46accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.2% → 2%06
365Talents2%10%10accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.2% → 2%
365Talents2%10%10accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.2% → 2%Show the five products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
07
Beamery0%21%39accepted challenger▼−4Since October 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.4% → 0%
Beamery0%21%39accepted challenger▼−4Since October 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.4% → 0%08
LinkedIn Talent Insights0%17%24accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
LinkedIn Talent Insights0%17%24accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%10
Lightcast0%15%13accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Lightcast0%15%13accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%11
Findem0%10%10accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%
Findem0%10%10accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%09
Visier0%8%12accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Visier0%8%12accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
Head to headHead-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not enterprise.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each
SeekOut Recruit vs hireEZSeekOut Recruit vs LoxoSeekOut Recruit vs PhenomSeekOut Recruit vs GemLessie AI vs PinLessie AI vs Eightfold AILessie AI vs hireEZLessie AI vs LoxoLessie AI vs PhenomLessie AI vs GemPin vs Eightfold AIPin vs hireEZPin vs LoxoPin vs PhenomPin vs GemEightfold AI vs hireEZEightfold AI vs LoxoEightfold AI vs PhenomEightfold AI vs GemhireEZ vs LoxohireEZ vs PhenomhireEZ vs GemLoxo vs PhenomLoxo vs GemPhenom vs Gem
One product takes 69% of first choices here, so the chart would put ten markers in one corner and one at the far edge. The two measurements it plots are columns in the standing above: share, and the negative label rate. One product carries a negative rate above 25% in this category.
What they warned about
Eight of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. GPT-5.4 mini, Mistral Small, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, GLM 4.7 FlashX and MiniMax M2.5 changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Eightfold AI18%
12 of 67 labels negative · 10 of 14 models · 4 hard negative
“allegations that Eightfold's hiring tools secretly scored job applicants and generated candidate reports without proper notice or dispute rights” Mistral Small, negative prompt
Phenom17%
8 of 46 labels negative · 8 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“What to Avoid for Your Use Case | Phenom | No public pricing; custom quotes that vary widely” DeepSeek V4 Flash, budget prompt
Beamery21%
8 of 39 labels negative · 7 of 14 models
“Validate carefully for adoption, integration depth, and total cost. It is enterprise-oriented, has a steep learning curve” Perplexity Sonar, negative prompt
Workday Skills Cloud35%
7 of 20 labels negative · 6 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“A high-profile class action (*Mobley v. Workday*) alleges that Workday's algorithmic screening tools discriminate against protected groups” DeepSeek V4 Flash, negative prompt
What they cite
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
74 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 965 links across 300 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 13 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
vendor site · Eightfold31 answers · 54 citations · 11 models
vendor site · G229 answers · 63 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Guideflow25 answers · 30 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Sapia.ai25 answers · 30 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Pin22 answers · 31 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Xobin22 answers · 22 citations · 11 models
20 answers · 22 citations · 11 models
18 answers · 19 citations · 10 models
15 answers · 17 citations · 10 models
vendor site · SeekOut13 answers · 14 citations · 7 models
11 answers · 14 citations · 7 models
11 answers · 12 citations · 7 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
24 answers · 10 models
22 answers · 11 models
21 answers · 10 models
20 answers · 10 models
19 answers · 11 models
17 answers · 9 models
15 answers · 10 models
11 answers · 6 models
10 answers · 6 models
10 answers · 8 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best talent intelligence platform”, “talent intelligence platform”, “talent intelligence platforms”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eightfold eightfold.ai Eightfold AI 69%, Eightfold AI – Talent Intelligence 2% | 71% | 520 | 4,400 | 187 | 53,360 company | 17 | 1 |
| Workday parent site Workday Skills Cloud 7% | 7% | 97 | 1,220,000 | 23,848 | |||
| SeekOut Recruit seekout.com | 4% | 121 | 5,796 | 1 | 9 | ||
| Gloat gloat.com | 2% | 287 | 27,100 | 359 | 22,734 | 0 | |
| Phenom phenom.com | 2% | 331 | 18,100 | 2,229 | 24,487 | 0 | |
| 365Talents 365talents.com | 2% | 100 | 90 | 1 | 2,859 | 25 | |
| Ashby ashbyhq.com | 2% | 217 | 49,500 | 3,112 | 216,820 | 16 | |
| Phenom Applied AI | Talent Intelligence Platform | 2% | ||||||
| Skills Cloud | 2% | ||||||
| TALY | 2% |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 17 sites; 3 of them are among the sites the models cited here (eightfold.ai, pin.com, seekout.com). The first result for “best talent intelligence platform” is rollingarrays.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best talent intelligence platform for an enterprise B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which AI talent platform for hiring and mobility would you recommend to a large B2B company with thousands of employees?”Comparative“What are the top enterprise-grade talent intelligence platforms and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best talent intelligence platform for a large company that needs predictable total cost across thousands of users?”Scale-constrained“We are a 5,000 person company with SSO, SOC 2 and procurement review requirements evaluating a talent intelligence platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which talent intelligence platforms should a large enterprise avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5Eightfold AIEightfold AIHeldEightfold AIPhenomagainst: Beamery, Eightfold AI, SeekOut Recruitno first choiceagainst: Eightfold AI, HireVue Inc., Workday Skills Cloud
Three alternatives
Beamery, Gloat, PhenomOne alternative
GloatFive alternatives
Beamery, Gloat, LinkedIn Talent Insights, Phenom, SeekOut RecruitTwo alternatives
Gloat, Workday Skills CloudGPT-5.4 miniEightfold AISkills Cloud, Workday Skills CloudChangedEightfold AI365Talentsagainst: TalentNeuron Workforce Intelligenceno first choicenothing named
Four alternatives
Fuel50, Gloat, SeekOut Recruit, TalentNeuronOne alternative
Eightfold AIFive alternatives
Lightcast, LinkedIn Talent Insights, Phenom, SeekOut Recruit, TalentNeuronTwo alternatives
Eightfold AI, SeekOut RecruitGemini 3.5 FlashEightfold AIEightfold AIHeldEightfold AIagainst: SAP Talent Intelligence Hub, Workday Skills CloudEightfold AIagainst: LinkedIn Recruiter, SeekOut Recruit, hireEZno first choiceagainst: Eightfold AI, Gloat, HireVue, Phenom, SeekOut Recruit
Five alternatives
Beamery, Gloat, LinkedIn Talent Insights, Phenom, SeekOut RecruitFour alternatives
Gloat, Phenom Talent Experience Platform, SAP SuccessFactors Talent Intelligence Hub, Workday Skills CloudFour alternatives
Beamery, Findem, Phenom, SeekOut RecruitThree alternatives
Beamery, Phenom, Workday Skills CloudPerplexity SonarEightfold AIEightfold AIHeldEightfold AIWorkday Skills Cloudagainst: Eightfold AIno first choiceagainst: Beamery, Eightfold AI, Findem, Gloat, Loxo, Metaview, SeekOut Recruit, hireEZ
Five alternatives
Gem, Gloat, Phenom, SeekOut Recruit, VisierFive alternatives
Findem, Gloat, Phenom, SeekOut Recruit, Workday Recruiting with HiredScoreNine alternatives
365Talents, Beamery, Gem, Gloat, Lightcast, Phenom, SeekOut Recruit, Visier, hireEZTwo alternatives
Oracle HCM Cloud, SAP SuccessFactorsGrok 4.20Eightfold AIEightfold AIHeldagainst: HireVueEightfold AIEightfold AIagainst: Beamery, Gloat, Lightcast, LinkedIn Recruiter, LinkedIn Talent Insights, Phenom, SeekOut Recruit, Visier, Workday Skills Cloudno first choiceagainst: Beamery, Crystal, Entelo, Humantic AI, Infor Talent Science, Workday Skills Cloud
Six alternatives
Beamery, Gloat, LinkedIn Talent Insights, Phenom, SeekOut Recruit, VisierThree alternatives
Beamery, Phenom, Workday Skills CloudSeven alternatives
Beamery, Findem, Gloat, LinkedIn Talent Insights, Phenom, SeekOut Recruit, VisierMistral SmallEightfold AI, SeekOut RecruitEightfold AIChangedEightfold AIEightfold AIagainst: Saavvi, SeekOut Recruitno first choiceagainst: Alignerr, Eightfold AI, Handshake, HireVue, Keystone Recruitment, Mercor, Micro1, Scale AI, Surge AI, Tekshopers, Truelancer, Workday Skills Cloud
Two alternatives
Loxo, PhenomTwo alternatives
LinkedIn Talent Insights, PeopleScoutFour alternatives
Beamery, Gloat, HiredScore, SeekOut RecruitDeepSeek V4 FlashEightfold AIEightfold AIHeldagainst: GloatEightfold AIEightfold AIagainst: 365Talents, Gloat, Phenomno first choiceagainst: LinkedIn Talent Insightsagainst: Eightfold AI, Infor Talent Science, Oracle HCM Cloud, Workday Skills Cloud
Four alternatives
Beamery, Gem, Phenom, SeekOut RecruitOne alternative
SeekOut RecruitSeven alternatives
Beamery, Findem, Gloat, LinkedIn Talent Insights, Phenom, SeekOut Recruit, Workday Skills CloudOne alternative
SeekOut RecruitFive alternatives
Beamery, Eightfold AI, Gloat, Phenom, SeekOut RecruitLlama 4 MaverickEightfold AIPhenom Applied AI | Talent Intelligence PlatformChangedno first choiceEightfold AIagainst: Beamery, Phenom, iCIMS Talent Cloudno first choicenothing named
Three alternatives
Phenom, Revelio Labs, SeekOut RecruitThree alternatives
Eightfold Talent Intelligence, Juicebox, RecruiterflowTwo alternatives
Pin, XobinQwen 3.7 FlashEightfold AIEightfold AI, GloatChangedagainst: Workday Talent ManagementEightfold AIEightfold AIagainst: Phenomno first choiceagainst: Eightfold AI
Three alternatives
HireVue, Phenom, SeekOut RecruitOne alternative
PhenomNine alternatives
Fuel50, Gloat, Lightcast, LinkedIn Talent Insights, Oracle HCM Cloud, SAP SuccessFactors, SeekOut Recruit, Visier, Workday Skills CloudTwo alternatives
Gloat, SeekOut RecruitKimi K2Eightfold AIEightfold AIHeldEightfold AIAshbyno first choiceagainst: Beamery, Eightfold AI, Gloat, HiredScore, LinkedIn Talent Insights, Phenom
Five alternatives
Beamery, Fuel50, Gloat, Phenom, SeekOut RecruitTwo alternatives
Gloat, PhenomTen alternatives
Beamery, Fuel50, Gloat, Lightcast, LinkedIn Talent Insights, Phenom, SeekOut Recruit, TalentNeuron, TechWolf, Workday Skills CloudTwo alternatives
Beamery, Eightfold AIGLM 4.7 FlashXEightfold AIEightfold AI – Talent IntelligenceChangedEightfold AIEightfold AIno first choicenothing named
Three alternatives
Beamery, Phenom, SeekOut RecruitOne alternative
Workday Talent ManagementSix alternatives
Beamery, Findem, Gloat, LinkedIn Talent Insights, SeekOut Recruit, Workday Skills CloudTwo alternatives
Beamery, GloatMiniMax M2.5Eightfold AI, SeekOut Recruitno first choiceChangedEightfold AITALYagainst: Beamery, Eightfold AI, Phenomno first choicenothing named
One alternative
BeameryTwelve alternatives
Ashby, Beamery, Draup, Gloat, Greenhouse, Lightcast, LinkedIn Talent Insights, Phenom, SeekOut Recruit, TechWolf, Visier, Workday Skills CloudTwo alternatives
365Talents, TalentQuestGPT-6 LunaEightfold AIEightfold AIHeldEightfold AIagainst: Workday Skills CloudWorkday Skills Cloudno first choiceagainst: Eightfold AI, Lightcast, LinkedIn Talent Insights
Two alternatives
LinkedIn Talent Insights, SeekOut RecruitTwo alternatives
Gloat, PhenomEight alternatives
Beamery, Draup, Gloat, Lightcast, LinkedIn Talent Insights, Phenom, SeekOut Recruit, TalentNeuronOne alternative
365TalentsMuse Glimmer 30BEightfold AIEightfold AIHeldEightfold AIThe Predictive Indexagainst: Beamery, Phenom, iCIMS Talent Cloudno first choiceagainst: Crosschq, Eightfold AI, Infor Talent Science, ZoomInfo Talent
Three alternatives
365Talents, Beamery, GloatOne alternative
GloatFour alternatives
Beamery, Gloat, Lightcast, formerly Emsi Burning Glass, SeekOut RecruitOne alternative
Eightfold AIBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 10:33 | yes | 10 | 7 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 09:11 | yes | 3 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 10:20 | no | 0 | 12 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 12:41 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:17 | yes | 14 | 33 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 10:46 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 09:35 | yes | 23 | 22 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 11:11 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 09:15 | no | 0 | 30 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 08:53 | yes | 14 | 20 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 11:12 | yes | 24 | 33 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 11:22 | yes | 5 | 20 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 12:59 | yes | 3 | 12 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 08:50 | yes | 14 | 18 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 09:34 | yes | 18 | 8 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 11:13 | yes | 3 | 7 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 10:32 | no | 0 | 14 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 09:52 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:05 | yes | 5 | 30 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 12:29 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 08:48 | yes | 23 | 18 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 09:33 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 10:29 | yes | 10 | 41 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 10:00 | yes | 14 | 20 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 09:58 | yes | 21 | 67 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 10:54 | no | 0 | 9 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 10:55 | yes | 3 | 16 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 09:51 | yes | 15 | 18 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 12:15 | yes | 16 | 11 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 10:16 | yes | 5 | 9 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 12:30 | yes | 14 | 33 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 11:31 | yes | 10 | 7 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:13 | yes | 5 | 37 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 12:57 | yes | 13 | 11 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 08:46 | yes | 23 | 32 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 10:07 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 09:35 | yes | 10 | 29 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 09:17 | yes | 20 | 42 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 10:01 | yes | 19 | 63 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 11:03 | yes | 9 | 51 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 11:11 | yes | 10 | 25 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 11:16 | yes | 22 | 40 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 12:04 | yes | 16 | 8 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 09:57 | yes | 3 | 6 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 12:22 | yes | 10 | 25 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 12:21 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:26 | yes | 19 | 33 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 10:47 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 09:30 | yes | 25 | 34 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 09:11 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 11:05 | yes | 14 | 114 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 10:31 | yes | 25 | 148 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 11:14 | yes | 23 | 103 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 09:33 | yes | 25 | 86 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 09:34 | yes | 2 | 17 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 10:57 | yes | 22 | 33 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 11:15 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 10:57 | no | 0 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 09:20 | no | 0 | 17 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 10:04 | yes | 10 | 11 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:25 | yes | 10 | 36 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 10:32 | no | 0 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 11:00 | yes | 23 | 40 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 12:53 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 11:19 | yes | 5 | 32 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 11:19 | yes | 23 | 30 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 09:08 | yes | 14 | 104 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 10:55 | no | 0 | 12 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 11:11 | yes | 5 | 29 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 12:59 | yes | 14 | 22 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 11:40 | yes | 18 | 11 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 11:34 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 11:56 | yes | 5 | 22 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 12:46 | yes | 10 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:27 | yes | 20 | 38 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 10:39 | yes | 15 | 10 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 11:18 | yes | 23 | 29 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 12:32 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 10:58 | yes | 24 | 69 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 09:18 | yes | 24 | 63 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 08:53 | yes | 23 | 124 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 10:14 | yes | 13 | 64 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 09:40 | yes | 4 | 24 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 12:50 | yes | 25 | 34 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Eightfold read as Eightfold AI
Noon read as Noon AI
Oracle read as Oracle HCM Cloud
SAP read as SAP SuccessFactors
SeekOut read as SeekOut Recruit
Workday read as Workday Skills Cloud
Workday (Skills Cloud / HiredScore) read as Workday Skills Cloud
Workday (with HiredScore or native AI) read as Workday Skills Cloud
Workday (with HiredScore) read as Workday Skills Cloud
ZoomInfo Talent - Powered by ZoomInfo read as ZoomInfo Talent
ZoomInfo Talent, powered by ZoomInfo read as ZoomInfo Talent
iCIMS read as iCIMS Talent Cloud
Unresolved, counted raw
Avrio
HireVue Inc.
HiredScore AI (by Workday)
Keystone Recruitment
Lightcast, formerly Emsi Burning Glass
Phenom Applied AI | Talent Intelligence Platform
Scale AI
Social Talent
Surge AI
TALY
TalentNeuron Workforce Intelligence
Talr
Tanca
Tekshopers
Truelancer
Workday Recruiting with HiredScore
ZoomInfo Talent – Powered by ZoomInfo, hireEZ, Findem, Wrangle
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.