November 2026 Edition · The permanent record of this edition. The unqualified address always carries the latest edition.
Index › HR › Performance and talent management › Goals and OKRs › Enterprise · November 2026 Edition

Goals and OKRs for enterprise buyers

Asked as “OKR software”, and as “goal management platform”, on behalf of an enterprise B2B company. 51 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
37%
Contested · OKRs Tool 18%
37WorkBoard18OKRs Tool16Betterworks29others

37% of first choices, contested.

Since October 2026=heldSince October 2026: 37% → 37%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.WorkBoard held the lead, ±0 points on 37%, inside the 13-point floor.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.

The standing

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for an enterprise B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01WorkBoard37%15%66endorsed leader=heldSince October 2026: 37% → 37%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.37% → 37%
02OKRs Tool18%20%15accepted challenger▲+5Since October 2026: 13% → 18%, +5 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.13% → 18%
03Betterworks16%21%62accepted challenger▼−7Since October 2026: 23% → 16%, −7 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.23% → 16%
04Tability12%12%26accepted challenger▲+6Since October 2026: 6% → 12%, +6 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.6% → 12%
05Profit.co4%18%49accepted challenger▼−9Since October 2026: 13% → 4%, −9 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.13% → 4%
06Quantive4%27%33criticized challenger▲+4Since October 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 4%
07Lattice2%16%50accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.2% → 2%
08Mooncamp2%11%18accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%
09Microsoft Viva Goals2%46%26criticized challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%
Show the two products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
1115Five0%40%20criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
10Perdoo0%23%22accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%

The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured

Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
Head to headHead-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not enterprise.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each

Recommended versus criticized

Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.

Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative50%
Key
01WorkBoard37%
02OKRs Tool18%
03Betterworks16%
04Tability12%
05Profit.co4%
06Quantive4%
07Lattice2%
08Mooncamp2%
09Microsoft Viva Goals2%
10Perdoo0%
1115Five0%

What they warned about

Two of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Perplexity Sonar, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5 and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Microsoft Viva Goals
46%
12 of 26 labels negative · 8 of 14 models · 10 hard negative
“You should avoid committing long-term roadmaps to tools that are nearing the end of their lifecycle... has announced the retirement of Viva Goals” Qwen 3.7 Flash, negative prompt
15Five
40%
8 of 20 labels negative · 8 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“Frequently cited in failures for mid-to-large transitions—over-engineered for governance but poor signal/adoption” Grok 4.20, negative prompt
Profit.co
18%
9 of 49 labels negative · 8 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“reports of it becoming a "ghost town" in 50–200 person teams... governance gaps and middle-management resistance often cause Year 2 failures” Grok 4.20, negative prompt
Betterworks
21%
13 of 62 labels negative · 8 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“Profit.co, 15Five, Betterworks (when used as a pure OKR solution)” GLM 4.7 FlashX, negative prompt

What they cite

Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.

Sites the answers cite

75 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 843 links across 128 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 2 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.

vendor site · Tability52 answers · 107 citations · 13 models
vendor site · Profit.co44 answers · 68 citations · 14 models
vendor site · OKRs Tool41 answers · 89 citations · 13 models
vendor site · Mooncamp29 answers · 38 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Worxmate27 answers · 48 citations · 11 models
vendor site · ONES.com25 answers · 50 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Rework18 answers · 22 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Planisware16 answers · 19 citations · 10 models
15 answers · 17 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Betterworks14 answers · 23 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Workpath14 answers · 19 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Guideflow14 answers · 14 citations · 8 models

Pages the answers cite

The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.

Search against answers

Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best okr software”, “okr software”, “okr tools”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Company and productsShareOwn site citedName searches, GoogleAI search demand, est.Organic visitsPaid search a month, est.Google ads, last 30 daysBest Google position
WorkBoard workboard.com37%1041,9001966,805$5615
OKRs Tool okrstool.com18%58260206,73811
Betterworks betterworks.com16%2203,6002112,3790
Tability tability.io12%1183201439,8043
Profit.co profit.co4%129590028,00026
Quantive quantive.com4%6149,5006
Lattice lattice.com2%62590,50013,900122,123$1,3281207
Mooncamp mooncamp.com2%68720058,6781
Workpath workpath.com2%9
SimpleOKR simpleokr.com2%1410083

Google's top ten for the three searches hold 12 sites; 3 of them are among the sites the models cited here (mooncamp.com, okrstool.com, tability.io). The first result for “best okr software” is okrstool.com.

How they answered

Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHide
ModelDirect“What is the best OKR software for an enterprise B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which goal management platform would you recommend to a large B2B company with thousands of employees?”Comparative“What are the top enterprise-grade OKR tools and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best OKR software for a large company that needs predictable total cost across thousands of users?”Scale-constrained“We are a 5,000 person company with SSO, SOC 2 and procurement review requirements evaluating a OKR software. What should we look at?”Negative“Which OKR tools should a large enterprise avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5Mooncamp, Tability
Five alternativesBetterworks, Perdoo, Profit.co, Quantive, WorkBoard
BetterworksChanged
Two alternativesLattice, WorkBoard
Tability
Four alternativesBetterworks, Perdoo, Profit.co, WorkBoard
OKRs Tool
Two alternativesMooncamp, Synergita OKR
no first choiceagainst: Atlassian Goals, Betterworks, Coda, Microsoft Viva Goals, Notion, WorkBoard
GPT-5.4 miniWorkBoard
Two alternativesBetterworks, Profit.co
Betterworks, WorkBoardChangedWorkBoard
Two alternativesBetterworks, Perdoo
OKRs Tool
One alternativeStrategyWorks
against: Profit.co
no first choicenothing named
Gemini 3.5 FlashQuantive
Four alternativesBetterworks, Microsoft Viva Goals, Profit.co, WorkBoard
Microsoft Viva GoalsChanged
Five alternativesAdobe Workfront, Asana, Betterworks, Quantive, WorkBoard
WorkBoard
Four alternativesBetterworks, Profit.co, Quantive, Workpath
against: Microsoft Viva Goals
Betterworks, WorkBoard
Three alternativesOboard, Profit.co, Workpath
Quantive
Six alternativesBetterworks, Lattice, Leapsome, Microsoft Viva Goals, Profit.co, WorkBoard
against: 15Five, Asana, ClickUp, Culture Amp, Google Sheets, Jira Align, Lattice, Microsoft Viva Goals, Monday.com, Notion OKR Templates, Perdoo, Planview, Rally, Reflektive, Standalone Quantive, Tability, Trello
Perplexity SonarProfit.co
Two alternativesQuantive, WorkBoard
WorkBoardChanged
Four alternativesAsana, Betterworks, Lattice, Profit.co
WorkBoard
Seven alternativesBetterworks, Jira Align, Lattice, Microsoft Viva Goals, Mooncamp, Perdoo, Profit.co
SimpleOKR
Two alternativesOKRs Tool, Profit.co
against: Betterworks, WorkBoard
no first choiceagainst: Betterworks, Profit.co, Quantive
Grok 4.20WorkBoard
Two alternativesProfit.co, Tability
against: Asana, Betterworks, Leapsome, Monday.com, Perdoo
WorkBoardHeld
Four alternativesLattice, Perdoo, Profit.co, Tability
Quantive, WorkBoard
Four alternativesBetterworks, Lattice, Perdoo, Profit.co
against: Microsoft Viva Goals
WorkBoard
Five alternativesBetterworks, Lattice, Perdoo, Profit.co, Tability
no first choiceagainst: 15Five, Betterworks, Businessmap, Lattice, Microsoft Viva Goals, Perdoo, Profit.co, Quantive, Tability
Mistral SmallTability, WorkBoard
Two alternativesLattice, Quantive
Betterworks, WorkBoardChangedTability
Four alternativesLattice, Mooncamp, Profit.co, WorkBoard
OKRs Tool
One alternativeSynergita OKR
against: Profit.co, Quantive
no first choiceagainst: 15Five, Betterworks, Profit.co
DeepSeek V4 FlashProfit.co
Four alternativesMooncamp, Perdoo, Quantive, Workpath
against: Betterworks
BetterworksChanged
Two alternativesProfit.co, WorkBoard
Profit.co
Five alternativesBetterworks, Lattice, Perdoo, Tability, WorkBoard
OKRs Toolagainst: Betterworks, Lattice, Mooncamp, Quantive, SimpleOKR, WorkBoardno first choiceagainst: ClickUp, Fitbots, Jira Align, Koan, Perdoo, Profit.co, Weekdone
Llama 4 Maverickno first choiceBetterworksChanged
Four alternativesLattice, OKRs Tool, Profit.co, WorkBoard
no first choiceWorkBoard
Three alternativesBetterworks, Lattice, Mooncamp
Tability
Four alternativesBusinessmap, Lattice, OKRs Tool, Profit.co
against: 15Five, Employment Hero, Microsoft Viva Goals, Profit.co
Qwen 3.7 FlashWorkBoard
Four alternativesBetterworks, Lattice, Profit.co, Tability
LatticeChanged
Three alternatives7taps, Microsoft Viva Goals, Quantive
15Five, Lattice
Three alternativesBetterworks, Leapsight, Microsoft Viva Goals
WorkBoard
Three alternativesMonday.com, Pingboard, Quantive
no first choiceagainst: OKRs Tool, Profit.co, Quantiveagainst: Asana, Jira, Microsoft Viva Goals, Quantive, Trello, WorkBoard
Kimi K2Betterworks, Workpath
Three alternativesProfit.co, Teamflect, WorkBoard
against: Microsoft Viva Goals, Quantive
WorkBoardChanged
Two alternativesBetterworks, Lattice
WorkBoard
Four alternativesBetterworks, Lattice, Quantive Results, Tability
against: Microsoft Viva Goals
OKRs Tool
One alternativeOKR Dash
against: Betterworks, Lattice, Mooncamp, WorkBoard
WorkBoard
Four alternativesBetterworks, Lattice, Profit.co, Tability
against: OKRs Tool
against: 15Five, Betterworks, Koan, Lattice, Microsoft Viva Goals, Quantive
GLM 4.7 FlashXTability
Eight alternatives15Five, Betterworks, Lattice, ONES.com, Profit.co, Quantive, Weekdone, WorkBoard
WorkBoardChanged
Four alternativesBetterworks, Lattice, Microsoft Viva Goals, Profit.co
Tability
Nine alternatives15Five, Betterworks, Jira Align, Lattice, Mooncamp, Perdoo, Rhythms, Teamflect, WorkBoard
OKRs Tool
Two alternativesOKR Dash, Operately
against: Betterworks, Lattice, WorkBoard
no first choiceagainst: 15Five, Betterworks, Generic Google Sheets/Excel templates, Miro, Profit.co, Weekdone
MiniMax M2.5Tability
Three alternativesBusinessmap, Microsoft Viva Goals, Quantive StrategyAI
WorkBoardChanged
Three alternativesBetterworks, Engagedly, Lattice
Tability
Five alternativesBetterworks, Lattice, Mooncamp, Profit.co, WorkBoard
against: Microsoft Viva Goals, Quantive Results
OKRs Tool
Two alternativesOKR Dash, OKR Software Tools
no first choiceagainst: WorkBoardagainst: 15Five, Betterworks, Perdoo, Quantive, WorkBoard
GPT-6 LunaWorkBoard
Two alternativesBetterworks, Profit.co
against: Lattice
WorkBoardHeld
One alternativeBetterworks
Profit.co, WorkBoard, Workpath
Three alternativesBetterworks, Lattice, Perdoo
OKRs Tool
Two alternativesProfit.co, WorkBoard
no first choiceagainst: Microsoft Viva Goals
Muse Glimmer 30BTability, WorkBoard
Three alternativesLattice, Perdoo, Profit.co
BetterworksChanged
Two alternativesLattice, WorkBoard
Profit.co
Six alternativesBetterworks, Lattice, Mooncamp, Perdoo, Tability, WorkBoard
OKRs Toolagainst: WorkBoardno first choiceagainst: 15Five, Asana, ClickUp, Engagedly, Koan, Lattice, Leapsome, OKRs Tool, Tability, Weekdone, WorkBoard, Worxmate
Bold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against

The record

One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
PromptModelVersion stringTime (UTC)SearchedSourcesLatency
Direct recommendationClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 10:54yes139 s
Direct recommendationGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 10:35yes35 s
Direct recommendationGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 10:59no013 s
Direct recommendationPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 10:04yes104 s
Direct recommendationGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 13:08yes1737 s
Direct recommendationMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 11:08yes54 s
Direct recommendationDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 11:28yes2528 s
Direct recommendationLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 09:31yes53 s
Direct recommendationQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 12:18yes1445 s
Direct recommendationKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 12:52yes1560 s
Direct recommendationGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 09:33yes1430 s
Direct recommendationMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 12:22yes520 s
Direct recommendationGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 11:57yes420 s
Direct recommendationMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 12:47yes1316 s
ParaphraseClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 10:04yes108 s
ParaphraseGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 10:23yes35 s
ParaphraseGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 09:41no015 s
ParaphrasePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 12:05yes104 s
ParaphraseGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 13:31yes528 s
ParaphraseMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 12:38yes54 s
ParaphraseDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 11:41yes2428 s
ParaphraseLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 10:14yes53 s
ParaphraseQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 10:05no026 s
ParaphraseKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 09:19yes936 s
ParaphraseGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 11:18yes1413 s
ParaphraseMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 12:41yes519 s
ParaphraseGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 11:16yes413 s
ParaphraseMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 12:04yes1419 s
ComparativeClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 11:43yes99 s
ComparativeGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 09:12yes67 s
ComparativeGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 10:46yes1121 s
ComparativePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 10:24yes106 s
ComparativeGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 13:30yes1441 s
ComparativeMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 09:43yes98 s
ComparativeDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 11:39yes2027 s
ComparativeLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 09:16yes53 s
ComparativeQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 12:46no032 s
ComparativeKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 10:22yes1835 s
ComparativeGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 12:02yes1958 s
ComparativeMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 10:08yes2347 s
ComparativeGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 11:54yes731 s
ComparativeMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 09:58yes1125 s
Budget constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 11:20yes179 s
Budget constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 11:15yes34 s
Budget constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 09:38yes1125 s
Budget constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 10:48yes104 s
Budget constrainedGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 13:21yes2041 s
Budget constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 12:30yes55 s
Budget constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 11:03yes1921 s
Budget constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 10:40yes52 s
Budget constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 10:26no034 s
Budget constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 10:36yes2349 s
Budget constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 09:40yes1977 s
Budget constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 10:43yes547 s
Budget constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 11:24yes319 s
Budget constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 09:24yes1226 s
Scale constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 11:09yes1513 s
Scale constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 11:50no08 s
Scale constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 12:43no020 s
Scale constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 09:44yes109 s
Scale constrainedGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 13:05yes536 s
Scale constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 09:29no09 s
Scale constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 10:24yes1938 s
Scale constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 09:39yes55 s
Scale constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 09:59yes727 s
Scale constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 11:38yes1329 s
Scale constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 12:34yes1392 s
Scale constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 10:53no016 s
Scale constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 09:23yes318 s
Scale constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 11:53yes1024 s
Negative framingClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 08:44yes179 s
Negative framingGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 09:29yes26 s
Negative framingGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 09:19yes1323 s
Negative framingPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 08:53yes104 s
Negative framingGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 13:14yes1334 s
Negative framingMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 12:35yes58 s
Negative framingDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 11:39yes2429 s
Negative framingLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 10:06yes53 s
Negative framingQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 10:04yes546 s
Negative framingKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 12:14yes1531 s
Negative framingGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 11:40yes2274 s
Negative framingMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 08:44yes2378 s
Negative framingGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 10:43yes420 s
Negative framingMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 10:55yes2041 s

Normalization in this category

Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.

ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Ally (formerly Ally.io) read as Microsoft Viva Goals
Ally.io read as Microsoft Viva Goals
Ally.io (Microsoft Viva Goals) read as Microsoft Viva Goals
Cascade read as Cascade Strategy
Gtmhub read as Quantive
Gtmhub (Quantive Results) read as Quantive
Synergita read as Synergita OKR
gtmhub read as Quantive
Unresolved, counted raw
Adobe Workfront
Fitbots
Generic Google Sheets/Excel templates
Leapsight
OKR Software Tools
Operately
Quantive StrategyAI
Standalone Quantive (formerly Gtmhub)
StrategyWorks
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.
← 360 feedbackInternal talent marketpl →