360 feedback for enterprise buyers
Asked as “360-degree feedback tool”, and as “multi-rater feedback software”, on behalf of an enterprise B2B company. 53 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
51%
Clear leader
51Culture Amp09Lattice09Qualtrics EmployeeXM30others
51% of first choices, clear leader.
Since October 2026▲+18Since October 2026: 33% → 51%, +18 points. Past the 13-point floor: movement.Culture Amp held the lead, +18 points on 33%, past the floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
Spidergap40%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: Spidergap (40%) replaces Effy AI (24% then, 4% now), 36 points clear, past the 13-point floor.Standing →Mid-market
Lattice38%Contested▲+4Since October 2026: 34% → 38%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.Standing →Enterprise
Culture Amp51%Clear leader▲+18Since October 2026: 33% → 51%, +18 points. Past the 13-point floor: movement.This page
Spidergap40%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: Spidergap (40%) replaces Effy AI (24% then, 4% now), 36 points clear, past the 13-point floor.Standing →Mid-marketLattice38%Contested▲+4Since October 2026: 34% → 38%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.Standing →EnterpriseCulture Amp51%Clear leader▲+18Since October 2026: 33% → 51%, +18 points. Past the 13-point floor: movement.This pageThe standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for an enterprise B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01Culture Amp51%6%62endorsed leader▲+18Since October 2026: 33% → 51%, +18 points. Past the 13-point floor: movement.33% → 51%
Culture Amp51%6%62endorsed leader▲+18Since October 2026: 33% → 51%, +18 points. Past the 13-point floor: movement.33% → 51%02Lattice9%14%57accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 11% → 9%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.11% → 9%
Lattice9%14%57accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 11% → 9%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.11% → 9%03
Qualtrics EmployeeXM9%7%15accepted challenger▲+3Since October 2026: 6% → 9%, +3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.6% → 9%
Qualtrics EmployeeXM9%7%15accepted challenger▲+3Since October 2026: 6% → 9%, +3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.6% → 9%04Spidergap8%22%41accepted challenger▲+4Since October 2026: 4% → 8%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.4% → 8%
Spidergap8%22%41accepted challenger▲+4Since October 2026: 4% → 8%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.4% → 8%05
Qualtrics 360 Development6%21%33accepted challenger▼−11Since October 2026: 17% → 6%, −11 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.17% → 6%
Qualtrics 360 Development6%21%33accepted challenger▼−11Since October 2026: 17% → 6%, −11 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.17% → 6%06
Betterworks4%0%24accepted challenger▼−7Since October 2026: 11% → 4%, −7 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.11% → 4%
Betterworks4%0%24accepted challenger▼−7Since October 2026: 11% → 4%, −7 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.11% → 4%07
Workday Talent Management2%5%20accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.2% → 2%
Workday Talent Management2%5%20accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.2% → 2%Show the four products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
11
EchoSpan0%29%17criticized challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%
EchoSpan0%29%17criticized challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%10
15Five0%26%19criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
15Five0%26%19criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%08
Leapsome0%5%20accepted challenger▼−4Since October 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.4% → 0%
Leapsome0%5%20accepted challenger▼−4Since October 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.4% → 0%09
SAP SuccessFactors0%0%11accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
SAP SuccessFactors0%0%11accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
For buyers
Head to headHead-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not enterprise.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each
Lattice vs FeedbackPulseLattice vs LeapsomeLattice vs TeamflectLattice vs 15FiveSpidergap vs Culture AmpSpidergap vs Effy AISpidergap vs FeedbackPulseSpidergap vs LeapsomeSpidergap vs TeamflectSpidergap vs 15FiveCulture Amp vs Effy AICulture Amp vs FeedbackPulseCulture Amp vs LeapsomeCulture Amp vs TeamflectCulture Amp vs 15FiveEffy AI vs FeedbackPulseEffy AI vs LeapsomeEffy AI vs TeamflectEffy AI vs 15FiveFeedbackPulse vs LeapsomeFeedbackPulse vs TeamflectFeedbackPulse vs 15FiveLeapsome vs TeamflectLeapsome vs 15FiveTeamflect vs 15Five
One product takes 51% of first choices here, so the chart would put ten markers in one corner and one at the far edge. The two measurements it plots are columns in the standing above: share, and the negative label rate. Two products carry a negative rate above 25% in this category.
What they warned about
Three of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Perplexity Sonar, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX, GPT-6 Luna and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Google Forms100%
7 of 7 labels negative · 6 of 14 models · 7 hard negative
“Generic survey tools such as SurveyMonkey or Google Forms: ... creating substantial operational and confidentiality risk at enterprise scale.” Perplexity Sonar, negative prompt
SurveyMonkey100%
7 of 7 labels negative · 6 of 14 models · 7 hard negative
“Generic survey tools such as SurveyMonkey or Google Forms: ... creating substantial operational and confidentiality risk at enterprise scale.” Perplexity Sonar, negative prompt
Lattice14%
8 of 57 labels negative · 6 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“Avoid: Per-user/month tools like Lattice ($10+/user/month)” Kimi K2, budget prompt
Spidergap22%
9 of 41 labels negative · 6 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“a survey-only product does not feed results directly into the performance system teams already use, and it lacks the reviewer assignment, automated reminders, confidentiality controls and role-based reporting” Muse Glimmer 30B, negative prompt
What they cite
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
75 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 910 links across 205 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 4 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
vendor site · FeedbackPulse38 answers · 50 citations · 12 models
38 answers · 38 citations · 11 models
36 answers · 40 citations · 10 models
27 answers · 38 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Betterworks25 answers · 25 citations · 12 models
21 answers · 30 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Guideflow20 answers · 23 citations · 9 models
18 answers · 18 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Engagedly17 answers · 21 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Workhuman17 answers · 18 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Teamflect16 answers · 18 citations · 11 models
vendor site · ThriveSparrow16 answers · 17 citations · 8 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
38 answers · 11 models
31 answers · 10 models
21 answers · 10 models
19 answers · 10 models
17 answers · 8 models
16 answers · 11 models
16 answers · 8 models
16 answers · 8 models
16 answers · 10 models
16 answers · 8 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “360 feedback tools”, “360-degree feedback tool”, “best 360-degree feedback tool”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Culture Amp cultureamp.com | 51% | 354 | 14,800 | 121 | 174,918 | 35 | 4 | |
| Qualtrics qualtrics.com Qualtrics EmployeeXM 9%, Qualtrics 360 Development 6%, Qualtrics XM 2% | 17% | 96 | 135,000 | 4,637 | 1,028,410 company | $21 | 66 | 5 |
| Lattice lattice.com | 9% | 625 | 90,500 | 13,900 | 122,123 | $1,328 | 120 | |
| Spidergap spidergap.com | 8% | 140 | 260 | 1 | 97 | 11 | ||
| Betterworks betterworks.com | 4% | 220 | 3,600 | 21 | 12,379 | 0 | ||
| Workday parent site Workday Talent Management 2% | 2% | 36 | 1,220,000 | 23,848 | ||||
| CustomInsight custominsight.com | 2% | 3 | ||||||
| SogoEx | 2% | |||||||
| 360 Unlimited Feedback | 2% | |||||||
| KS-Agents 360° Unlimited ks-agents.com | 2% | 1 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 20 sites; 2 of them are among the sites the models cited here (engagedly.com, peoplemanagingpeople.com). The first result for “360 feedback tools” is vimeo.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best 360-degree feedback tool for an enterprise B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which multi-rater feedback software would you recommend to a large B2B company with thousands of employees?”Comparative“What are the top enterprise-grade 360 feedback tools and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best 360-degree feedback tool for a large company that needs predictable total cost across thousands of users?”Scale-constrained“We are a 5,000 person company with SSO, SOC 2 and procurement review requirements evaluating a 360-degree feedback tool. What should we look at?”Negative“Which 360 feedback tools should a large enterprise avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5no first choiceBetterworks, Culture AmpChangedagainst: Qualtrics EmployeeXMCulture AmpSpidergapno first choiceagainst: EchoSpan, Lattice 360 Feedback, Primalogik 360 Feedback, Qualtrics 360 Development, ThriveSparrow 360 Feedback
Two alternatives
PerformYard, WorkhumanFour alternatives
Lattice, Leapsome, Qualtrics EmployeeXM, SpidergapTwo alternatives
Betterworks, LatticeGPT-5.4 miniQualtrics EmployeeXMCulture AmpChangedCulture AmpCustomInsightagainst: 15Five, Lattice, Panoramic Feedback Enterpriseno first choiceagainst: Asana, Deel HR
Three alternatives
Achievers, Leapsome, TruScoreTwo alternatives
Lattice, Qualtrics EmployeeXMFour alternatives
Lattice, Leapsome, PerformYard, Qualtrics 360 DevelopmentOne alternative
Appraisal360 / Custom360Gemini 3.5 FlashCulture AmpQualtrics EmployeeXMChangedQualtrics EmployeeXMCulture Amp, Latticeno first choiceagainst: Google Forms, SurveyMonkey, Typeform
Four alternatives
Betterworks, Lattice, Leapsome, Qualtrics EmployeeXMFive alternatives
Betterworks, Culture Amp, Lattice, SAP SuccessFactors, Workday Talent ManagementFive alternatives
Betterworks, Culture Amp, Lattice, Leapsome, TeamflectTwo alternatives
EchoSpan, SpidergapPerplexity SonarCulture AmpBetterworksChangedCulture AmpPorslineno first choiceagainst: Google Forms, Qualtrics 360 Development, Spidergap, SurveyMonkey
Five alternatives
Betterworks, Lattice, Qualtrics 360 Development, Questback, SpidergapFour alternatives
Culture Amp, Lattice, Leapsome, Qualtrics EmployeeXMSix alternatives
15Five, Betterworks, Lattice, Leapsome, Qualtrics 360 Development, SpidergapTwo alternatives
Culture Amp, Qualtrics 360 DevelopmentGrok 4.20Culture Ampagainst: SpidergapCulture AmpHeldagainst: Small ImprovementsCulture Ampagainst: ADPQualtrics EmployeeXMagainst: EchoSpan, Spidergap, ThriveSparrowQualtrics 360 Developmentagainst: 15Five, EchoSpan, Google Forms, Lattice, Qualtrics 360 Development, Spidergap, SurveyMonkey, Typeform
Two alternatives
Lattice, Qualtrics 360 DevelopmentThree alternatives
15Five, Lattice, SpidergapSeven alternatives
15Five, Betterworks, Lattice, Leapsome, Qualtrics 360 Development, Spidergap, Workday Talent ManagementFour alternatives
Culture Amp, Lattice, SAP SuccessFactors, Workday Talent ManagementFour alternatives
15Five, Betterworks, Culture Amp, LatticeMistral SmallCulture Amp, LatticeCulture AmpChangedBetterworksCulture Amp, Latticeagainst: Spidergapno first choiceagainst: EchoSpan, Spidergap
Two alternatives
Qualtrics 360 Development, SpidergapThree alternatives
FeedbackPulse, Lattice, Qualtrics 360 DevelopmentFour alternatives
Culture Amp, EchoSpan, Lattice, SpidergapDeepSeek V4 FlashCulture Amp, Qualtrics 360 DevelopmentQualtrics EmployeeXMChangedCulture Amp, Qualtrics EmployeeXMSpidergapagainst: Lattice, Qualtrics 360 Development, ThriveSparrowno first choiceagainst: Google Forms, Microsoft Teams, SurveyMonkeyagainst: Culture Amp, Google Forms, Lattice, Leapsome, Microsoft Forms, Personio, Qualtrics 360 Development, SurveyMonkey, Typeform
Two alternatives
Betterworks, SpidergapTwo alternatives
Culture Amp, LatticeFive alternatives
15Five, Betterworks, Lattice, Leapsome, SpidergapOne alternative
Culture AmpSix alternatives
Culture Amp, Lattice, Leapsome, Qualtrics 360 Development, Sogolytics, SparidgapLlama 4 MaverickCulture Ampno first choiceChangedno first choiceCulture AmpSogoExagainst: Lattice, Qualtrics 360 Development
Three alternatives
EchoSpan, Lattice, SpidergapThree alternatives
Effy AI, FeedbackPulse, Qualtrics 360 DevelopmentThree alternatives
Primalogik, Spidergap, Workday Talent ManagementQwen 3.7 FlashCulture AmpCulture AmpHeldagainst: FeedbackFruits, SpidergapCulture Ampagainst: Workday Talent ManagementCulture Amp, Qualtrics XMCulture Ampagainst: BambooHR, Google Forms, Gusto, Microsoft Forms, Microsoft SharePoint, PowerApps, Rippling, SurveyMonkey, Typeform
Three alternatives
Lattice, Spidergap, Workday Talent ManagementFour alternatives
Cornerstone OnDemand, Lattice, Qualtrics Employee XM, SAP SuccessFactorsFour alternatives
Lattice, Leapsome, Qualtrics XM, SpidergapThree alternatives
CustomInsight, QuestionPro, SpidergapThree alternatives
15Five, Lattice, Microsoft Viva GlintKimi K2Culture Amp, LatticeCulture AmpChangedagainst: SpidergapCulture Amp, Qualtrics EmployeeXMagainst: 15FiveCulture Ampagainst: 15Five, Latticeno first choiceagainst: Qualtrics 360 Developmentagainst: Google Forms, Gusto, Microsoft Forms, Rippling, SurveyMonkey, Typeform, UKG Pro
Two alternatives
Betterworks, Workday Talent ManagementFour alternatives
Betterworks, Lattice, SAP SuccessFactors, Workday Talent ManagementSix alternatives
EchoSpan, Korn Ferry, Lattice, SAP SuccessFactors, Spidergap, Workday Talent ManagementTwo alternatives
Workday Talent Management, WorkleapFive alternatives
15Five, Culture Amp, Lattice, Leapsome, PerceptyxGLM 4.7 FlashXCulture Amp, Workday Talent ManagementCulture AmpChangedCulture AmpLattice, Spidergapagainst: Culture Ampno first choiceagainst: Excel, Google Sheets
Three alternatives
Achievers, Lattice, SpidergapThree alternatives
Lattice, Leapsome, Qualtrics EmployeeXMFive alternatives
15Five, Lattice, Leapsome, Qualtrics 360 Development, SpidergapOne alternative
EchoSpanMiniMax M2.5Culture AmpCulture AmpHeldno first choice360 Unlimited Feedbackno first choicenothing named
Three alternatives
15Five, Betterworks, LatticeThree alternatives
Lattice, Qualtrics 360 Development, Workday Talent ManagementEight alternatives
CCL Benchmarks, Culture Amp, Hogan, Korn Ferry, LAK Group 360, Lattice, Qualtrics 360 Development, SpidergapTwo alternatives
Culture Amp, FeedbackPulseGPT-6 LunaCulture AmpQualtrics 360 DevelopmentChangedno first choiceSpidergapno first choiceagainst: Culture Amp
Two alternatives
Lattice, Qualtrics 360 DevelopmentThree alternatives
Betterworks, Culture Amp, Workday Talent ManagementEight alternatives
15Five, Betterworks, CCL Benchmarks® / Korn Ferry 360, Culture Amp, Lattice, Qualtrics 360 Development, SAP SuccessFactors 360 Reviews, SpidergapOne alternative
LatticeMuse Glimmer 30BCulture AmpCulture Amp, Qualtrics EmployeeXMChangedCulture Amp, Qualtrics 360 DevelopmentKS-Agents 360° Unlimitedagainst: Culture Amp, Latticeno first choiceagainst: 15Five, EchoSpan, Effy AI, Lattice, Primalogik, Small Improvements, Spidergap, ThriveSparrow, easyfeedback
Two alternatives
Lattice, Qualtrics 360 DevelopmentFour alternatives
Centranum, Darwinbox, Lattice, LeapsomeFour alternatives
Betterworks, EchoSpan, Lattice, SpidergapOne alternative
SpidergapBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 12:39 | no | 0 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 08:51 | yes | 2 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 12:18 | no | 0 | 16 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 09:35 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:20 | yes | 12 | 33 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 10:35 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 09:51 | yes | 21 | 28 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 12:21 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 11:24 | yes | 8 | 29 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 12:48 | yes | 15 | 32 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 09:45 | yes | 24 | 91 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 10:27 | yes | 9 | 48 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 10:40 | yes | 4 | 16 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 09:11 | yes | 12 | 19 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 12:09 | yes | 19 | 10 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 12:09 | yes | 3 | 6 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 12:35 | no | 0 | 17 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 11:21 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:31 | yes | 9 | 40 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 11:23 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 10:26 | yes | 24 | 21 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 11:13 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 11:02 | yes | 5 | 19 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 09:45 | yes | 19 | 69 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 12:57 | yes | 24 | 45 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 12:45 | yes | 5 | 30 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 10:24 | yes | 4 | 13 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 10:11 | yes | 14 | 20 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 09:22 | yes | 9 | 10 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 11:57 | yes | 8 | 8 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 09:17 | yes | 11 | 20 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 11:11 | yes | 10 | 6 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:10 | yes | 10 | 40 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 11:35 | yes | 5 | 8 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 08:41 | yes | 22 | 39 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 10:32 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 11:30 | yes | 10 | 38 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 10:59 | yes | 19 | 36 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 11:12 | yes | 24 | 63 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 12:46 | yes | 9 | 71 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 12:39 | yes | 8 | 22 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 12:13 | yes | 13 | 23 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 12:44 | yes | 15 | 10 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 08:37 | yes | 4 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 10:40 | yes | 10 | 19 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 10:39 | yes | 10 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:30 | yes | 17 | 40 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 08:54 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 11:39 | yes | 24 | 20 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 11:51 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 10:19 | yes | 10 | 50 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 10:06 | yes | 22 | 45 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 08:54 | yes | 24 | 74 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 12:11 | yes | 21 | 72 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 09:40 | yes | 2 | 19 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 11:58 | yes | 22 | 23 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 11:32 | no | 0 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 10:38 | no | 0 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 09:27 | no | 0 | 20 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 09:41 | yes | 10 | 9 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:11 | yes | 14 | 35 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 10:48 | no | 0 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 12:48 | yes | 17 | 22 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 12:27 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 08:46 | yes | 19 | 38 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 10:36 | yes | 10 | 26 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 11:04 | yes | 14 | 21 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 12:31 | no | 0 | 34 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 11:01 | yes | 4 | 20 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 11:06 | yes | 13 | 29 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 10:51 | yes | 16 | 10 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 10:04 | yes | 3 | 6 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 12:15 | no | 0 | 19 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 08:51 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:29 | yes | 14 | 34 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 12:36 | yes | 13 | 10 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 10:13 | yes | 22 | 44 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 12:19 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 09:34 | yes | 10 | 43 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 10:45 | yes | 22 | 25 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 09:32 | yes | 15 | 48 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 09:56 | yes | 24 | 91 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 09:00 | yes | 3 | 18 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 10:11 | yes | 20 | 36 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Deel read as Deel HR
Oracle read as Oracle HCM Cloud
Qualtrics read as Qualtrics 360 Development
Qualtrics 360 read as Qualtrics 360 Development
SuccessFactors read as SAP SuccessFactors
Workday read as Workday Talent Management
Workday (HCM Module) read as Workday Talent Management
Workday Performance read as Workday Talent Management
Workday Performance Management read as Workday Talent Management
Workday Talent read as Workday Talent Management
Unresolved, counted raw
360 Unlimited Feedback
Appraisal360 / Custom360
CCL (Center for Creative Leadership)
CCL Benchmarks
CCL Benchmarks® / Korn Ferry 360
CEB/Gartner
LAK Group
LAK Group 360
Lattice 360 Feedback
Panoramic Feedback Enterprise
PowerApps
Primalogik 360 Feedback
Qualtrics Employee XM
Resonate CX
SAP SuccessFactors 360 Reviews
SogoEx
Sparidgap
ThriveSparrow 360 Feedback
UserVoice
easyfeedback
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.