360 feedback · RankedSpidergap
Spidergap is a 360 feedback tool that lets organizations create and run 360° feedback assessments to help employees act on personal development · spidergap.com ↗
Strongest at small business, contested with FeedbackPulse. Ranked 4 of 90 for enterprise buyers.
The standing depends on who is buying. Every model is asked the same questions for each company size.
Ranked first, contested: FeedbackPulse has 16%.
Lattice is first at 38%. 6 of 14 models made it the first choice when asked directly.
Culture Amp is first at 51%.
Why models recommend it
“Best for a standalone, highly configurable 360 program: Spidergap. Reviewers favor it for customization, anonymity controls and low-friction administration.”Muse Glimmer 30B · Direct question · first choice
“Spidergap is a dedicated 360 feedback tool that is priced per-person reviewed, making it a good option for smaller teams.”Llama 4 Maverick · Direct question · first choice
“If you want a focused, cost-effective 360 solution: Go with Spidergap. It's the top-rated, no-nonsense option”DeepSeek V4 Flash · Paraphrase question · first choice
“If you review under 15 people or run reviews once a year: Go with Spidergap or G360 Surveys”Gemini 3.5 Flash · Budget-constrained question · first choice
What gives them pause
“multiple reviews complain about admins being able to view individual responses ... Use only if you have an external facilitator”Grok 4.20 · Negative question · warning
“some users noted "inability of the software to keep participants data completely confidential"”GLM 4.7 FlashX · Negative question · warning
“SpiderGap has been criticized for unreliable survey delivery and basic survey reporting.”Claude Haiku 4.5 · Negative question · warning
“Spidergap (fine for most, but verify) | Admin can possibly view individual responses”DeepSeek V4 Flash · Negative question · warning
Also on the shortlist
The products named in the same answers as Spidergap, over the 142 answers that named it, and how often each was the first choice instead.
| Product | Named together | Picked instead | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 112 | 19 | Compare → | |
| 93 | 28 | Compare → | |
| 57 | 0 | Compare → | |
| 50 | 3 | Compare → | |
| 44 | 10 | Compare → | |
| 41 | 3 | View → | |
| 41 | 0 | View → | |
| 35 | 3 | View → | |
| 34 | 3 | View → | |
| 26 | 3 | Compare → |
What the models named instead of Spidergap →
A side-by-side page exists where both products are among a category's top eight.
At a glance
Stated on Spidergap's own site, not checked by Gane.
- For
- organizations
- Price stated
- Starter £899 per year; Pro £1749 per year; Enterprise Talk to us
- Starting price
- £899
- Free plan or trial
- Free trial; Your first 360° Feedback assessment is completely free!
- Certifications
- SSAE 16, SOC 1 Type II, SOC 2, SOC 3, ISO 27001
- Hosting
- Europe
- Customers named
- Marin Clean Energy, New Look
How this is measured
Fourteen AI models from 12 labs are asked the same buying questions six ways, for three company sizes. Standings refresh every edition.
Gane sells AI visibility software. No company can pay to change a result.
Read the method →Sources returned with these answers
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted. These counts come from 140 of the 142 answers that named Spidergap and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
547 of the 547 domain citations in answers naming Spidergap came from a third party's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Warning | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| Mistral Small | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 4 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 6 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 6 |
What it publishes
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 1 | undated | 360 feedback | ||
| Template or tool | 1 | undated | 360 feedback |
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page spidergap.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.