Index › HR › Performance and talent management › 360 feedback › Small business · November 2026 Edition
360 feedback for small business buyers
Asked as “360-degree feedback tool”, and as “multi-rater feedback software”, on behalf of a small B2B company. 55 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
40%
Contested · FeedbackPulse 16%
40Spidergap16FeedbackPulse09Small Improvements35others
40% of first choices, contested.
Since October 2026↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: Spidergap (40%) replaces Effy AI (24% then, 4% now), 36 points clear, past the 13-point floor.Spidergap leads at 40%, replacing Effy AI, which led at 24% and stands at 4% now: 36 points clear, past the floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
Spidergap40%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: Spidergap (40%) replaces Effy AI (24% then, 4% now), 36 points clear, past the 13-point floor.This pageMid-market
Lattice38%Contested▲+4Since October 2026: 34% → 38%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.Standing →Enterprise
Culture Amp51%Clear leader▲+18Since October 2026: 33% → 51%, +18 points. Past the 13-point floor: movement.Standing →
Spidergap40%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: Spidergap (40%) replaces Effy AI (24% then, 4% now), 36 points clear, past the 13-point floor.This pageMid-marketLattice38%Contested▲+4Since October 2026: 34% → 38%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.Standing →EnterpriseCulture Amp51%Clear leader▲+18Since October 2026: 33% → 51%, +18 points. Past the 13-point floor: movement.Standing →The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a small B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01Spidergap40%2%52endorsed leader▲+18Since October 2026: 22% → 40%, +18 points. Past the 13-point floor: movement.22% → 40%
Spidergap40%2%52endorsed leader▲+18Since October 2026: 22% → 40%, +18 points. Past the 13-point floor: movement.22% → 40%02
FeedbackPulse16%0%31accepted challenger▲+11Since October 2026: 5% → 16%, +11 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.5% → 16%
FeedbackPulse16%0%31accepted challenger▲+11Since October 2026: 5% → 16%, +11 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.5% → 16%03
Small Improvements9%0%32accepted challenger▼−7Since October 2026: 16% → 9%, −7 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.16% → 9%
Small Improvements9%0%32accepted challenger▼−7Since October 2026: 16% → 9%, −7 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.16% → 9%04
Primalogik7%7%28accepted challenger▼−6Since October 2026: 13% → 7%, −6 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.13% → 7%
Primalogik7%7%28accepted challenger▼−6Since October 2026: 13% → 7%, −6 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.13% → 7%05Lattice7%38%50criticized challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 5% → 7%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.5% → 7%
Lattice7%38%50criticized challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 5% → 7%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.5% → 7%06
Effy AI4%0%17accepted challenger▼−20Since October 2026: 24% → 4%, −20 points. Past the 13-point floor: movement.24% → 4%
Effy AI4%0%17accepted challenger▼−20Since October 2026: 24% → 4%, −20 points. Past the 13-point floor: movement.24% → 4%07
Google Forms Lab in the set4%58%12criticized challenger▲+4Since October 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 4%
Google Forms Lab in the set4%58%12criticized challenger▲+4Since October 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 4%08
Leapsome2%5%19accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.2% → 2%
Leapsome2%5%19accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.2% → 2%09
Teamflect2%0%14accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%
Teamflect2%0%14accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%Show the five products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
14
SurveyMonkey0%55%20criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
SurveyMonkey0%55%20criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%13Culture Amp0%50%28criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Culture Amp0%50%28criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%12
BambooHR0%25%12criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
BambooHR0%25%12criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%10
15Five0%18%22accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%
15Five0%18%22accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%11
EchoSpan0%10%10accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
EchoSpan0%10%10accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
Google Forms is made by Google, whose model Gemini 3.5 Flash is in the set. On the four share prompts that model made it the first choice one time of 4; the other thirteen models one time of 52. Lab treatment is defined on the method page; the row is marked, not excluded.
Head to headHead-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not small business.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each
Lattice vs FeedbackPulseLattice vs LeapsomeLattice vs TeamflectLattice vs 15FiveSpidergap vs Culture AmpSpidergap vs Effy AISpidergap vs FeedbackPulseSpidergap vs LeapsomeSpidergap vs TeamflectSpidergap vs 15FiveCulture Amp vs Effy AICulture Amp vs FeedbackPulseCulture Amp vs LeapsomeCulture Amp vs TeamflectCulture Amp vs 15FiveEffy AI vs FeedbackPulseEffy AI vs LeapsomeEffy AI vs TeamflectEffy AI vs 15FiveFeedbackPulse vs LeapsomeFeedbackPulse vs TeamflectFeedbackPulse vs 15FiveLeapsome vs TeamflectLeapsome vs 15FiveTeamflect vs 15Five
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
0102030405060708091011121314Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative60%
Key
01Spidergap40%
Spidergap40%02FeedbackPulse16%
FeedbackPulse16%03Small Improvements9%
Small Improvements9%04Primalogik7%
Primalogik7%05Lattice7%
Lattice7%06Effy AI4%
Effy AI4%07Google Forms4%
Google Forms4%08Leapsome2%
Leapsome2%09Teamflect2%
Teamflect2%1015Five0%
15Five0%11EchoSpan0%
EchoSpan0%12BambooHR0%
BambooHR0%13Culture Amp0%
Culture Amp0%14SurveyMonkey0%
SurveyMonkey0%What they warned about
Five of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.20, Mistral Small, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash and MiniMax M2.5 changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Culture Amp50%
14 of 28 labels negative · 9 of 14 models · 4 hard negative
“Tools to Avoid (or Use with Major Caution) ... Culture Amp, for example, typically requires a minimum of ~$4,500/year” DeepSeek V4 Flash, negative prompt
SurveyMonkey55%
11 of 20 labels negative · 9 of 14 models · 4 hard negative
“Generic Survey Platforms (e.g., Microsoft Forms, Google Forms, Basic SurveyMonkey) ... fundamentally unsafe for 360-degree feedback in small teams.” Qwen 3.7 Flash, negative prompt
Lattice38%
19 of 50 labels negative · 9 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“Small businesses should avoid or use cautiously: - Enterprise‑seat‑priced HR platforms (Lattice, Culture Amp, etc.)” GLM 4.7 FlashX, negative prompt
Qualtrics 360 Development100%
7 of 7 labels negative · 7 of 14 models · 5 hard negative
“Heavy Enterprise Suites (e.g., Qualtrics, Large HRIS Modules) ... engineered for thousands of employees with dedicated HR departments.” Qwen 3.7 Flash, negative prompt
What they cite
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
74 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 795 links across 156 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 4 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
49 answers · 49 citations · 12 models
vendor site · FeedbackPulse42 answers · 65 citations · 12 models
32 answers · 71 citations · 11 models
31 answers · 46 citations · 10 models
27 answers · 29 citations · 14 models
vendor site · FirstHR25 answers · 34 citations · 12 models
vendor site · G222 answers · 29 citations · 12 models
21 answers · 21 citations · 8 models
17 answers · 25 citations · 8 models
17 answers · 17 citations · 9 models
16 answers · 18 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Effy13 answers · 16 citations · 8 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
49 answers · 12 models
28 answers · 12 models
26 answers · 11 models
23 answers · 13 models
21 answers · 8 models
20 answers · 11 models
16 answers · 9 models
16 answers · 9 models
15 answers · 7 models
13 answers · 11 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “360 feedback tools”, “360-degree feedback tool”, “best 360-degree feedback tool”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spidergap spidergap.com | 40% | 140 | 260 | 1 | 97 | 11 | |
| FeedbackPulse feedbackpulse.com | 16% | 83 | 20 | 0 | 21,184 | 4 | |
| Small Improvements small-improvements.com | 9% | 92 | 1,000 | 137 | 43,657 | 1 | |
| Primalogik primalogik.com | 7% | 63 | 260 | 0 | 8,664 | ||
| Lattice lattice.com | 7% | 625 | 90,500 | 13,900 | 122,123 | $1,328 | 120 |
| Effy effy.ai Effy AI 4% | 4% | 77 | 140 | 3 | 40,950 company | ||
| Google Forms google.com | 4% | 67 | 1,830,000 | 15,495 | 1,800,358,416 | $465,944 | 5 |
| Leapsome leapsome.com | 2% | 378 | 2,900 | 32 | 51,450 | $18,531 | 60 |
| Teamflect teamflect.com | 2% | 136 | 880 | 12 | 12,592 | 30 | |
| Bonusly bonusly.com | 2% | 200 | 14,800 | 75 | 44,595 | 21 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 20 sites; 1 of them are among the sites the models cited here (peoplemanagingpeople.com). The first result for “360 feedback tools” is vimeo.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best 360-degree feedback tool for a small B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which multi-rater feedback software would you recommend to a small business that sells to other businesses?”Comparative“What are the top 360 feedback tools for a small team and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best 360-degree feedback tool for a small company with a tight budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 30 person company evaluating a 360-degree feedback tool. What should we look at?”Negative“Which 360 feedback tools should a small business avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5PrimalogikEngagedly, Express EvaluationsChangedno first choiceagainst: SurveyMonkeyGoogle Formsno first choicenothing named
Three alternatives
BambooHR, Effy AI, Small ImprovementsOne alternative
BambooHRSeven alternatives
FeedbackPulse, Google Forms, Lattice, Primalogik, Small Improvements, Spidergap, WorkleapFour alternatives
AssessTEAM, EchoSpan, Effy AI, SurveyMonkeyGPT-5.4 miniSpidergapTrakstarChangedSpidergapagainst: Betterworks, Culture Amp, PerformYardSmall Improvementsno first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
AssessTEAM, LeapsomeTwo alternatives
Culture Amp, LatticeFour alternatives
15Five, Lattice, Leapsome, TeamflectThree alternatives
Jotform, Leapsome, Your360 AIGemini 3.5 FlashLatticeSpidergapChangedPrimalogik, Small Improvementsagainst: Culture Amp, LatticeGoogle Forms, PrimalogikSmall Improvementsagainst: Google Forms, Mercer | Mettl, Microsoft Forms, Qualtrics 360 Development, SAP SuccessFactors, SurveyMonkey, Workday Talent Management
Four alternatives
15Five, Leapsome, PerformYard, Small ImprovementsThree alternatives
Leapsome, Primalogik, Small ImprovementsFour alternatives
15Five, Leapsome, Spidergap, TeamflectFive alternatives
360Feedbacks, Effy AI, Small Improvements, Spidergap, TeamflectFour alternatives
15Five, Lattice, Leapsome, PerformYardPerplexity SonarSpidergapagainst: LatticeSmall ImprovementsChangedagainst: SurveySparrowSmall Improvementsagainst: Culture Amp, Lattice, SurveyMonkeySmall Improvementsno first choiceagainst: Culture Amp, Engagedly, Google Forms, Lattice, Qualtrics 360 Development, SurveyMonkey, SurveySparrow
Three alternatives
FeedbackPulse, Primalogik, Small ImprovementsFour alternatives
AssessTEAM, PerformYard, SurveyMonkey, ThriveSparrowThree alternatives
Effy AI, Spidergap, TeamflectTwo alternatives
FeedbackPulse, PrimalogikGrok 4.20SpidergapLattice, SpidergapChangedagainst: BambooHR, NamelySpidergapagainst: Culture Amp, Qualtrics 360 DevelopmentFeedbackPulse, Teamflectagainst: Culture Amp, Latticeno first choiceagainst: Workday Talent Managementagainst: 15Five, BambooHR, Culture Amp, Facto, Google Forms, Insights, Lattice, Oracle HCM Cloud, SAP, SAP SuccessFactors, SurveyMonkey, TriNet, Typeform, Workday Talent Management, isolved
Three alternatives
BRAVO, Lattice, LeapsomeTwo alternatives
BRAVO, PrimalogikFive alternatives
HiBob, Lattice, Primalogik, Teamflect, ThriveSparrowTwo alternatives
Primalogik, SpidergapMistral SmallSpidergapFeedbackPulse, LatticeChangedFeedbackPulse, Small Improvements, Spidergapagainst: SurveyMonkeyPrimalogik, Spidergapno first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
Lattice, LeapsomeThree alternatives
15Five, Culture Amp, LatticeTwo alternatives
FeedbackPulse, SurveyMonkeyDeepSeek V4 FlashSpidergapSpidergapHeldagainst: BambooHR, Latticeno first choiceEffy AISpidergapagainst: Latticeagainst: 15Five, Betterworks, Culture Amp, Google Forms, Jotform, Lattice, Leapsome, Microsoft Forms, Primalogik, Qualtrics 360 Development, SurveyMonkey, Typeform
One alternative
LatticeTwo alternatives
Engagedly, Synergita PerformThree alternatives
FeedbackPulse, Primalogik, SpidergapFour alternatives
15Five, FeedbackPulse, Leapsome, Small ImprovementsLlama 4 Maverickno first choiceMultiRater SurveysChangedFeedbackPulseFeedbackPulseLeapsomenothing named
Nine alternatives
Deel HR, Express Evaluations, Folks Performance, Mitratech Perform, PerformYard, Performance Pro, Primalogik, Teamflect, ThriveSparrowThree alternatives
Culture Amp, Lattice, Small ImprovementsThree alternatives
15Five, Culture Amp, LatticeFour alternatives
FeedbackPulse, Lattice, Small Improvements, SpidergapQwen 3.7 FlashSpidergapagainst: Google Forms, SurveyMonkeyLatticeChangedFeedbackPulseFeedbackPulseagainst: Latticeno first choiceagainst: Google Forms, Microsoft Forms, Qualtrics 360 Development, SurveyMonkey
Two alternatives
Charlie, LatticeFour alternatives
Culture Amp, Protrac, SurveyMonkey, TrakstarFour alternatives
Culture Amp, Lattice, Small Improvements, SpidergapTwo alternatives
Effy AI, SpidergapKimi K2Spidergapagainst: Culture AmpSpidergapHeldSpidergapagainst: Lattice, PrimalogikFeedbackPulseSpidergapagainst: Latticeagainst: 15Five, Culture Amp, EchoSpan, G360 Surveys, Lattice, Qualtrics 360 Development, SAP SuccessFactors, Workday Talent Management
Two alternatives
CharlieHR, LatticeThree alternatives
15Five, BambooHR, PerformYardFour alternatives
15Five, Effy AI, FeedbackPulse, Small ImprovementsFour alternatives
Effy AI, Google Forms, Primalogik, SpidergapOne alternative
Small ImprovementsGLM 4.7 FlashXSpidergapSpidergapHeldCharlieHRFeedbackPulseno first choiceagainst: Culture Amp, Lattice, Qualtrics 360 Development, SurveySparrow
Three alternatives
BRAVO, FeedbackPulse, LatticeFour alternatives
CharlieHR, Culture Amp, FeedbackPulse, LatticeSix alternatives
Culture Amp, Lattice, Primalogik, Small Improvements, SurveyMonkey, ThriveSparrowTwo alternatives
Effy AI, TeamflectMiniMax M2.5SpidergapBonusly, FeedbackPulseChangedno first choiceagainst: LatticeFeedbackPulse, Primalogikagainst: SurveyMonkeySpidergapagainst: Culture Ampnothing named
Four alternatives
15Five, BambooHR, Lattice, PrimalogikTwo alternatives
15Five, SpidergapTen alternatives
AssessTEAM, BambooHR, Bonusly, Effy AI, Peoplebox, Primalogik, Small Improvements, Spidergap, Teamflect, ThriveSparrowTwo alternatives
Effy AI, TeamflectThree alternatives
15Five, FeedbackPulse, LatticeGPT-6 LunaSpidergapSpidergapHeldEffy AIagainst: SpidergapSmall Improvementsno first choiceagainst: 360feedback.app, Google Forms, SurveyMonkey
One alternative
Small ImprovementsTwo alternatives
Primalogik, TeamflectTwo alternatives
Small Improvements, TeamflectMuse Glimmer 30BSpidergapagainst: LatticeSpidergapHeldagainst: LatticeFeedbackPulseagainst: Culture Amp, LatticeEffy AI, FeedbackPulseno first choiceagainst: 15Five, Culture Amp, Lattice, Qualtrics EmployeeXM
Two alternatives
FeedbackPulse, Small ImprovementsFive alternatives
CustomerGauge, FeedbackPulse, HubSpot, Leapsome, TypeformFive alternatives
15Five, EchoSpan, G360 Surveys, Small Improvements, SpidergapThree alternatives
BRAVO, Primalogik, SpidergapBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 10:26 | yes | 10 | 8 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 10:06 | yes | 3 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 12:09 | no | 0 | 13 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 12:21 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:12 | yes | 18 | 34 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 12:18 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 11:46 | yes | 20 | 27 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 10:54 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 11:53 | yes | 9 | 30 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 10:26 | yes | 20 | 25 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 12:21 | yes | 8 | 29 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 12:31 | yes | 10 | 22 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 10:50 | yes | 3 | 14 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 09:52 | yes | 12 | 18 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 11:26 | yes | 9 | 8 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 12:00 | yes | 2 | 16 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 10:48 | no | 0 | 11 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 09:21 | yes | 10 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:10 | yes | 5 | 32 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 09:39 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 09:10 | yes | 24 | 25 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 08:53 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 12:59 | no | 0 | 27 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 11:40 | yes | 15 | 25 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 09:35 | yes | 24 | 60 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 09:45 | yes | 10 | 39 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 11:56 | yes | 4 | 20 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 08:51 | yes | 18 | 26 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 09:43 | yes | 17 | 10 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 11:30 | yes | 8 | 11 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 11:47 | yes | 14 | 23 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 08:50 | yes | 10 | 5 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:14 | yes | 5 | 26 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 08:53 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 10:56 | yes | 21 | 14 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 10:12 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 12:42 | yes | 5 | 17 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 12:39 | yes | 14 | 79 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 11:43 | yes | 10 | 79 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 09:44 | yes | 9 | 28 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 09:30 | yes | 5 | 19 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 10:50 | yes | 14 | 27 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 12:26 | yes | 10 | 9 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 09:06 | yes | 6 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 09:06 | yes | 8 | 15 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 10:55 | yes | 10 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:03 | yes | 20 | 38 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 11:48 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 09:25 | yes | 21 | 20 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 12:22 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 12:00 | yes | 14 | 33 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 10:57 | yes | 13 | 23 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 12:06 | yes | 14 | 109 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 12:49 | yes | 9 | 17 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 10:20 | yes | 1 | 16 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 11:16 | yes | 13 | 17 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 09:42 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 11:29 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 09:37 | no | 0 | 14 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 12:52 | yes | 10 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:11 | yes | 5 | 34 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 09:51 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 12:11 | yes | 24 | 32 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 09:29 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 09:33 | no | 0 | 31 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 11:38 | yes | 8 | 23 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 12:07 | yes | 10 | 14 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 10:57 | yes | 5 | 33 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 10:40 | yes | 3 | 12 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 12:16 | no | 0 | 1 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 11:23 | yes | 18 | 9 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 09:56 | yes | 4 | 6 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 12:39 | no | 0 | 17 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 12:57 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:16 | yes | 14 | 36 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 11:43 | yes | 12 | 9 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 10:01 | yes | 21 | 27 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 10:27 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 12:38 | yes | 13 | 43 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 10:46 | yes | 22 | 33 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 09:39 | yes | 22 | 37 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 12:52 | yes | 13 | 69 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 12:22 | yes | 3 | 21 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 09:54 | yes | 13 | 24 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Deel read as Deel HR
Effy read as Effy AI
G360 read as G360 Surveys
Qualtrics read as Qualtrics 360 Development
Qualtrics 360 read as Qualtrics 360 Development
Workday read as Workday Talent Management
Workday Performance Management read as Workday Talent Management
Unresolved, counted raw
360Feedbacks
Charlie
CustomerGauge
Facto
Folks Performance
Gusto Add-ons
Protrac
Your360 AI
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.