Index › HR › Performance and talent management › Performance management › Small business · November 2026 Edition
Performance management for small business buyers
Asked as “performance management software”, and as “performance review tool”, on behalf of a small B2B company. 56 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
25%
Contested · AssessTEAM 18%
25Lattice18AssessTEAM12Effy AI45others
25% of first choices, contested.
Since October 2026↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: Lattice (25%) replaces Zoho People (18% then, 2% now), 23 points clear, past the 13-point floor.Lattice leads at 25%, replacing Zoho People, which led at 18% and stands at 2% now: 23 points clear, past the floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
Lattice25%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: Lattice (25%) replaces Zoho People (18% then, 2% now), 23 points clear, past the 13-point floor.This pageMid-marketLattice47%Clear leader▲+4Since October 2026: 43% → 47%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.Standing →Enterprise
Betterworks33%Contested▼−4Since October 2026: 37% → 33%, −4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.Standing →
Lattice25%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: Lattice (25%) replaces Zoho People (18% then, 2% now), 23 points clear, past the 13-point floor.This pageMid-marketLattice47%Clear leader▲+4Since October 2026: 43% → 47%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.Standing →EnterpriseBetterworks33%Contested▼−4Since October 2026: 37% → 33%, −4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.Standing →The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a small B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01Lattice25%34%61criticized challenger▲+9Since October 2026: 16% → 25%, +9 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.16% → 25%
Lattice25%34%61criticized challenger▲+9Since October 2026: 16% → 25%, +9 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.16% → 25%02
AssessTEAM18%0%26accepted challenger▲+16Since October 2026: 2% → 18%, +16 points. Past the 13-point floor: movement.2% → 18%
AssessTEAM18%0%26accepted challenger▲+16Since October 2026: 2% → 18%, +16 points. Past the 13-point floor: movement.2% → 18%03
Effy AI12%0%27accepted challenger▲+3Since October 2026: 9% → 12%, +3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.9% → 12%
Effy AI12%0%27accepted challenger▲+3Since October 2026: 9% → 12%, +3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.9% → 12%04
Leapsome11%19%42accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 11% → 11%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.11% → 11%
Leapsome11%19%42accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 11% → 11%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.11% → 11%05
15Five7%4%49accepted challenger▼−7Since October 2026: 14% → 7%, −7 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.14% → 7%
15Five7%4%49accepted challenger▼−7Since October 2026: 14% → 7%, −7 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.14% → 7%06
PerformYard7%6%47accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 5% → 7%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.5% → 7%
PerformYard7%6%47accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 5% → 7%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.5% → 7%07
BambooHR4%17%47accepted challenger▼−5Since October 2026: 9% → 4%, −5 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.9% → 4%
BambooHR4%17%47accepted challenger▼−5Since October 2026: 9% → 4%, −5 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.9% → 4%08
Teamflect4%0%24accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.2% → 4%
Teamflect4%0%24accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.2% → 4%09
ThriveSparrow4%8%12accepted challenger▼−5Since October 2026: 9% → 4%, −5 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.9% → 4%
ThriveSparrow4%8%12accepted challenger▼−5Since October 2026: 9% → 4%, −5 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.9% → 4%10
Small Improvements2%11%27accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 4% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.4% → 2%
Small Improvements2%11%27accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 4% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.4% → 2%11
Zoho People2%0%16accepted challenger▼−16Since October 2026: 18% → 2%, −16 points. Past the 13-point floor: movement.18% → 2%
Zoho People2%0%16accepted challenger▼−16Since October 2026: 18% → 2%, −16 points. Past the 13-point floor: movement.18% → 2%Show the two products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
13
Workday HCM Performance Management0%100%12criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Workday HCM Performance Management0%100%12criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%12
SAP SuccessFactors0%100%11criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
SAP SuccessFactors0%100%11criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
Head to headHead-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not small business.
All ten head-to-head pages: the top five products, each against each
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01020304050607080910111213Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative40%
Key
01Lattice25%
Lattice25%02AssessTEAM18%
AssessTEAM18%03Effy AI12%
Effy AI12%04Leapsome11%
Leapsome11%0515Five7%
15Five7%06PerformYard7%
PerformYard7%07BambooHR4%
BambooHR4%08Teamflect4%
Teamflect4%09ThriveSparrow4%
ThriveSparrow4%10Small Improvements2%
Small Improvements2%11Zoho People2%
Zoho People2%12SAP SuccessFactors0%
SAP SuccessFactors0%13Workday HCM Performance Management0%
Workday HCM Performance Management0%What they warned about
Three of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.20, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5, GPT-6 Luna and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Lattice34%
21 of 61 labels negative · 12 of 14 models · 3 hard negative
“Avoid higher-end tools initially: Lattice or Leapsome score high overall but often have $4,000+ annual minimums” Grok 4.20, budget prompt
Workday HCM Performance Management100%
12 of 12 labels negative · 10 of 14 models · 10 hard negative
“Enterprise tools like Workday, SAP, and Oracle require 3-6 month implementations and cost $15-30/employee/month—overkill for small businesses” Claude Haiku 4.5, negative prompt
SAP SuccessFactors100%
11 of 11 labels negative · 10 of 14 models · 8 hard negative
“Enterprise-Grade Platforms (e.g., SAP SuccessFactors, Oracle HCM, Workday) Why to avoid: These are massive overkill for small businesses.” Kimi K2, negative prompt
Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM100%
7 of 7 labels negative · 7 of 14 models · 6 hard negative
“Enterprise tools like Workday, SAP, and Oracle ... overkill for small businesses under 500 employees” Claude Haiku 4.5, negative prompt
What they cite
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
74 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 722 links across 148 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 2 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
51 answers · 70 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Effy44 answers · 53 citations · 13 models
37 answers · 42 citations · 12 models
36 answers · 40 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Lead Change Group32 answers · 37 citations · 10 models
27 answers · 30 citations · 10 models
20 answers · 29 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Betterworks19 answers · 19 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Calamari15 answers · 15 citations · 6 models
14 answers · 16 citations · 6 models
vendor site · G213 answers · 20 citations · 7 models
vendor site · PerformYard11 answers · 15 citations · 6 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
45 answers · 12 models
42 answers · 12 models
36 answers · 9 models
32 answers · 12 models
30 answers · 10 models
26 answers · 10 models
17 answers · 8 models
15 answers · 6 models
13 answers · 6 models
10 answers · 7 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best performance management software”, “performance management platforms”, “performance management software”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lattice lattice.com | 25% | 625 | 90,500 | 13,900 | 122,123 | $1,328 | 120 | |
| AssessTEAM assessteam.com | 18% | 56 | 140 | 0 | 3,097 | 5 | ||
| Effy effy.ai Effy AI 12% | 12% | 77 | 140 | 3 | 40,950 company | |||
| Leapsome leapsome.com | 11% | 378 | 2,900 | 32 | 51,450 | $18,531 | 60 | |
| 15Five 15five.com | 7% | 352 | 6,600 | 32 | 32,362 | 22 | ||
| PerformYard performyard.com | 7% | 217 | 9,900 | 34 | 58,643 | $25 | 47 | |
| BambooHR bamboohr.com | 4% | 1074 | 90,500 | 551 | 1,055,247 | $44,698 | 106 | 1 |
| Teamflect teamflect.com | 4% | 136 | 880 | 12 | 12,592 | 30 | ||
| ThriveSparrow thrivesparrow.com | 4% | 63 | 110 | 1 | 24,978 | 2 | ||
| Profit.co profit.co | 4% | 129 | 590 | 0 | 28,000 | 26 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 18 sites; 1 of them are among the sites the models cited here (forbes.com). The first result for “best performance management software” is learn.g2.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best performance management software for a small B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which performance review tool would you recommend to a small business that sells to other businesses?”Comparative“What are the top performance management platforms for a small team and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best performance management software for a small company with a tight budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 30 person company evaluating a performance management software. What should we look at?”Negative“Which performance management platforms should a small business avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5BambooHR, PerformYardBambooHRChangedSmall ImprovementsSmall Improvementsno first choiceagainst: BambooHR, Deel, Homebase, Lattice, Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM, Paycom, SAP, Workday HCM Performance Management
Three alternatives
15Five, PeopleGoal, Small ImprovementsTwo alternatives
PerformYard, Small ImprovementsThree alternatives
15Five, BambooHR, ThriveSparrowThree alternatives
BambooHR, Express Evaluations, Zoho PeopleGPT-5.4 miniLeapsomeLeapsome, TeamflectChangedSmall Improvementsagainst: LatticeAssessTEAM, Teamflectagainst: Leapsomeno first choiceagainst: Lattice, Leapsome, Quantum Workplace
Three alternatives
Hrider, PerformYard, TeamflectTwo alternatives
Trakstar, Zoho PeopleFour alternatives
15Five, BambooHR, PerformYard, TeamflectGemini 3.5 FlashPerformYardagainst: LatticeLatticeChanged15FiveProfit.co, Zoho Peopleagainst: BambooHR, LatticeLatticeagainst: SuccessFactors, Workday HCM Performance Managementagainst: ADP Workforce Now, Betterworks, Cornerstone OnDemand, Lattice, Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM, Paychex, Quantive, SAP SuccessFactors, Workday HCM Performance Management
Three alternatives
15Five, BambooHR, Peoplebox.aiFive alternatives
15Five, BambooHR, Leapsome, PerformYard, Small ImprovementsSix alternatives
Lattice, Leapsome, Peoplebox, PerformYard, Small Improvements, TeamflectFour alternatives
Effy AI, PerformYard, Small Improvements, ThriveSparrowFour alternatives
15Five, Leapsome, PerformYard, Small ImprovementsPerplexity SonarLatticeCalamari PerformanceChanged15Five, BambooHRagainst: LeapsomeThriveSparrowno first choiceagainst: BambooHR, Deel, Lattice, Leapsome, PerformYard, SAP SuccessFactors, Trakstar, Workday HCM Performance Management, Workleap Officevibe
Six alternatives
15Five, BambooHR, Effy AI, Primalogik, Small Improvements, TeamflectThree alternatives
15Five, BambooHR, TrakstarFour alternatives
Lattice, PerformYard, Rippling, Small ImprovementsThree alternatives
AssessTEAM, Connecteam, Express EvaluationsGrok 4.2015Fiveagainst: Workday HCM Performance ManagementLatticeChangedLattice, LeapsomeAssessTEAMagainst: BambooHR, Lattice, Leapsomeno first choiceagainst: Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM, SAPagainst: 15Five, Betterworks, Factorial, Lattice, PerformYard
Three alternatives
Lattice, Leapsome, PerformYardThree alternatives
15Five, Leapsome, PerformYardThree alternatives
15Five, BambooHR, PerformYardFour alternatives
Effy AI, Small Improvements, Teamflect, Zoho PeopleFour alternatives
15Five, BambooHR, Lattice, LeapsomeMistral SmallAssessTEAMLattice, LeapsomeChangedLattice, LeapsomeAssessTEAM, Profit.coagainst: LatticeLatticeagainst: Engage, Jupiter, Keka, Leapsome, Profit.co
Four alternatives
15Five, Lattice, Leapsome, Quantum WorkplaceFour alternatives
15Five, BambooHR, PerformYard, TeamflectFive alternatives
15Five, AssessTEAM, Hrider, Quantum Workplace, TeamflectTwo alternatives
PerformYard, Small ImprovementsFour alternatives
15Five, BambooHR, Leapsome, Small ImprovementsDeepSeek V4 FlashAssessTEAMLatticeChangedLatticeEffy AIagainst: BambooHR, Keka HR, LatticeEffy AI, Leapsomeagainst: Lattice, Small Improvements, Workleap Officevibeagainst: Betterworks, Lattice, Microsoft Dynamics 365 HR, SAP SuccessFactors, Workday HCM Performance Management
Four alternatives
15Five, Effy AI, Lattice, PerformYardTwo alternatives
15Five, LeapsomeSix alternatives
15Five, AssessTEAM, BambooHR, Leapsome, PerformYard, Zoho PeopleThree alternatives
15Five, Small Improvements, Zoho PeopleTwo alternatives
15Five, Profit.coLlama 4 Maverickno first choiceno first choiceHeldno first choiceno first choiceno first choiceagainst: Lattice, Leapsome, PerformYard, SAP SuccessFactors
Qwen 3.7 FlashLatticeLatticeHeldLatticeLatticeno first choiceagainst: SAP SuccessFactors, Workday HCM Performance Managementagainst: 15Five, Lattice, Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM, Qualtrics EmployeeXM, SAP SuccessFactors, Workday HCM Performance Management
Three alternatives
15Five, BambooHR, ConnecteamFour alternatives
15Five, AssessTEAM, BambooHR, PerformYardFour alternatives
AssessTEAM, BambooHR, Leapsome, PerformYardFour alternatives
BambooHR, PerformYard, Profit.co, Zoho PeopleKimi K2AssessTEAMagainst: Lattice, Small ImprovementsAssessTEAMHeldEffy AIAssessTEAM, Effy AIagainst: BambooHR, Lattice15Fiveagainst: BambooHR, Culture Amp, Dynamics 365, Lattice, Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM, SAP SuccessFactors, Workday HCM Performance Management
Four alternatives
BambooHR, Effy AI, Leapsome, PerformYardTwo alternatives
Lattice, PerformYardSix alternatives
15Five, Lattice, Leapsome, PerformYard, Small Improvements, TeamflectThree alternatives
Leapsome, Small Improvements, TeamflectThree alternatives
BambooHR, Lattice, LeapsomeGLM 4.7 FlashXLattice, ThriveSparrowLatticeChangedno first choice15Fiveno first choiceagainst: ADP Workforce Now, Paycor Perform, Rippling, SAP SuccessFactors, ThriveSparrow, Workday HCM Performance Management, Zenefits
Three alternatives
15Five, Leapsome, PerformYardThree alternatives
15Five, BambooHR, PerformYardTwelve alternatives
15Five, AssessTEAM, BambooHR, Effy AI, Lattice, Leapsome, PerformYard, Quantum Workplace, Teamflect, ThriveSparrow, WorkStory, Zoho PeopleFive alternatives
AssessTEAM, PerformYard, Profit.co, Teamflect, ThriveSparrowMiniMax M2.5Lattice, LeapsomeLeapsome, PerformYardChangedLatticeAssessTEAM, Effy AIagainst: BambooHRLatticeagainst: Cornerstone OnDemand, Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM, SAP SuccessFactors, Workday HCM Performance Management
Three alternatives
BambooHR, Effy AI, PerformYardTwo alternatives
BambooHR, Effy AIFour alternatives
AssessTEAM, BambooHR, Effy AI, PerformYardFive alternatives
Deel Engage, Express Evaluations, PeopleGoal, PerformYard, ThriveSparrowThree alternatives
15Five, Culture Amp, ReflektiveGPT-6 Luna15FivePerformYardChangedTeamflectagainst: LatticeEffy AIagainst: Small Improvementsno first choiceagainst: Betterworks, Lattice, Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM Performance Management, SAP SuccessFactors
One alternative
LatticeOne alternative
15FiveFour alternatives
15Five, BambooHR, PerformYard, Small ImprovementsOne alternative
Zoho PeopleMuse Glimmer 30BAssessTEAMEffy AIChangedLattice, LeapsomeEffy AIno first choiceagainst: Culture Amp, Engagedly, Lattice, Leapsome, Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM, Reflektive, SAP SuccessFactors, Workday HCM Performance Management, Workleap Officevibe
Six alternatives
15Five, Effy AI, Lattice, Leapsome, PerformYard, ThriveSparrowFour alternatives
AssessTEAM, BambooHR, Lattice, LeapsomeSeven alternatives
15Five, AssessTEAM, Culture Amp, FeedbackPulse, PeopleGoal, Teamflect, ThriveSparrowThree alternatives
AssessTEAM, Synergita PMS, ThriveSparrowBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 08:41 | yes | 10 | 8 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 11:14 | yes | 2 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 11:35 | yes | 12 | 21 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 10:37 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:06 | yes | 9 | 40 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 10:35 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 10:26 | yes | 21 | 25 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 12:46 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 09:43 | no | 0 | 30 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 08:58 | yes | 11 | 45 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 12:36 | yes | 8 | 25 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 12:01 | yes | 5 | 29 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 11:34 | yes | 2 | 12 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 11:52 | yes | 13 | 19 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 11:52 | yes | 10 | 7 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 09:33 | yes | 2 | 6 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 12:03 | no | 0 | 16 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 12:11 | yes | 10 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:24 | yes | 5 | 29 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 11:33 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 12:09 | yes | 23 | 26 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 11:05 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 12:36 | yes | 5 | 27 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 11:10 | yes | 9 | 20 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 09:42 | yes | 22 | 82 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 10:05 | yes | 13 | 84 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 12:20 | yes | 2 | 10 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 10:05 | yes | 9 | 17 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 12:23 | yes | 10 | 9 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 12:01 | yes | 4 | 11 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 08:47 | yes | 9 | 24 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 10:54 | yes | 10 | 5 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:14 | yes | 9 | 31 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 10:54 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 08:46 | yes | 23 | 29 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 11:09 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 12:34 | yes | 5 | 20 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 08:39 | yes | 14 | 50 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 08:55 | yes | 8 | 40 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 11:03 | yes | 25 | 55 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 12:41 | yes | 6 | 16 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 09:25 | yes | 14 | 29 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 12:11 | yes | 10 | 8 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 12:53 | yes | 1 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 09:23 | yes | 3 | 18 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 09:53 | yes | 10 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:17 | yes | 6 | 27 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 10:23 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 09:15 | yes | 24 | 20 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 08:49 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 09:25 | yes | 5 | 15 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 11:28 | yes | 8 | 18 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 09:20 | yes | 12 | 88 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 10:18 | yes | 7 | 27 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 11:31 | yes | 3 | 15 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 09:33 | yes | 13 | 30 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 11:07 | no | 0 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 11:03 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 12:17 | no | 0 | 18 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 10:44 | yes | 10 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:24 | yes | 5 | 30 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 10:40 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 09:35 | yes | 8 | 17 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 08:36 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 11:55 | no | 0 | 27 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 09:26 | yes | 8 | 48 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 11:24 | yes | 13 | 74 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 12:14 | no | 0 | 12 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 11:26 | yes | 3 | 12 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 09:53 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 08:59 | yes | 17 | 9 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 10:52 | yes | 1 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 12:30 | yes | 10 | 25 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 09:54 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:26 | yes | 13 | 31 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 09:10 | yes | 15 | 8 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 09:36 | yes | 21 | 24 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 11:15 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 11:56 | yes | 15 | 43 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 10:32 | yes | 23 | 39 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 10:14 | yes | 20 | 88 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 10:14 | no | 0 | 27 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 08:56 | yes | 4 | 21 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 09:37 | yes | 24 | 42 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
ADP read as ADP Workforce Now
Oracle read as Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM
Oracle Cloud HCM read as Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM
Oracle HCM read as Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM
Oracle HCM Cloud read as Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM
Workday read as Workday HCM Performance Management
Workday HCM read as Workday HCM Performance Management
Workday Performance read as Workday HCM Performance Management
Workleap read as Workleap Officevibe
Unresolved, counted raw
Calamari Performance
Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM Performance Management
Synergita PMS
perform.ly
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.