Performance management
Asked as “performance management software”, and as “performance review tool”, on behalf of a mid-market B2B company. 51 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
47%
Clear leader
47Lattice1615Five16AssessTEAM22others
47% of first choices, clear leader.
Since October 2026▲+4Since October 2026: 43% → 47%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.Lattice held the lead, +4 points on 43%, inside the 13-point floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
Lattice25%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: Lattice (25%) replaces Zoho People (18% then, 2% now), 23 points clear, past the 13-point floor.Standing →Mid-marketLattice47%Clear leader▲+4Since October 2026: 43% → 47%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.This pageEnterprise
Betterworks33%Contested▼−4Since October 2026: 37% → 33%, −4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.Standing →
Lattice25%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: Lattice (25%) replaces Zoho People (18% then, 2% now), 23 points clear, past the 13-point floor.Standing →Mid-marketLattice47%Clear leader▲+4Since October 2026: 43% → 47%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.This pageEnterpriseBetterworks33%Contested▼−4Since October 2026: 37% → 33%, −4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.Standing →The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01Lattice47%12%59endorsed leader▲+4Since October 2026: 43% → 47%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.43% → 47%
Lattice47%12%59endorsed leader▲+4Since October 2026: 43% → 47%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.43% → 47%02
15Five16%9%57accepted challenger▲+7Since October 2026: 9% → 16%, +7 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.9% → 16%
15Five16%9%57accepted challenger▲+7Since October 2026: 9% → 16%, +7 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.9% → 16%03
AssessTEAM16%7%15accepted challenger▲+14Since October 2026: 2% → 16%, +14 points. Past the 13-point floor: movement.2% → 16%
AssessTEAM16%7%15accepted challenger▲+14Since October 2026: 2% → 16%, +14 points. Past the 13-point floor: movement.2% → 16%04
Small Improvements4%0%13accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.2% → 4%
Small Improvements4%0%13accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.2% → 4%05
Zoho People4%0%12accepted challenger▼−7Since October 2026: 11% → 4%, −7 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.11% → 4%
Zoho People4%0%12accepted challenger▼−7Since October 2026: 11% → 4%, −7 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.11% → 4%Show the eight products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
13
Workday HCM Performance Management0%46%28criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Workday HCM Performance Management0%46%28criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%12
SAP SuccessFactors0%46%24criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
SAP SuccessFactors0%46%24criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%10
BambooHR0%34%35criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
BambooHR0%34%35criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%11
HiBob0%9%11accepted challenger▼−4Since October 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.4% → 0%
HiBob0%9%11accepted challenger▼−4Since October 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.4% → 0%09Betterworks0%8%24accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Betterworks0%8%24accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%08
Culture Amp0%7%30accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Culture Amp0%7%30accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%07
PerformYard0%5%41accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
PerformYard0%5%41accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%06
Leapsome0%4%47accepted challenger▼−5Since October 2026: 5% → 0%, −5 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.5% → 0%
Leapsome0%4%47accepted challenger▼−5Since October 2026: 5% → 0%, −5 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.5% → 0%The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
All ten head-to-head pages: the top five products, each against each
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01020304050607080910111213Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative60%
Key
01Lattice47%
Lattice47%0215Five16%
15Five16%03AssessTEAM16%
AssessTEAM16%04Small Improvements4%
Small Improvements4%05Zoho People4%
Zoho People4%06Leapsome0%
Leapsome0%07PerformYard0%
PerformYard0%08Culture Amp0%
Culture Amp0%09Betterworks0%
Betterworks0%10BambooHR0%
BambooHR0%11HiBob0%
HiBob0%12SAP SuccessFactors0%
SAP SuccessFactors0%13Workday HCM Performance Management0%
Workday HCM Performance Management0%What they warned about
Nine of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, Grok 4.20, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5 and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Workday HCM Performance Management46%
13 of 28 labels negative · 9 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“Avoid enterprise-heavy tools like Workday or SuccessFactors unless you're scaling rapidly” Grok 4.20, direct prompt
SAP SuccessFactors46%
11 of 24 labels negative · 8 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“I couldn't recommend the Performance module — too complicated and not liked amongst users” DeepSeek V4 Flash, negative prompt
BambooHR34%
12 of 35 labels negative · 8 of 14 models
“BambooHR for complex, large-scale performance processes... its performance capabilities may be too basic for complex requirements” GPT-6 Luna, negative prompt
15Five9%
5 of 57 labels negative · 5 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“you should approach with caution or avoid due to notable drawbacks... overwhelmed by excessive notifications, a steep learning curve, and limited customization options” Mistral Small, negative prompt
What they cite
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
73 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 746 links across 194 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 2 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
vendor site · Betterworks37 answers · 51 citations · 13 models
vendor site · Lead Change Group34 answers · 46 citations · 11 models
22 answers · 40 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Calamari22 answers · 22 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Engagedly21 answers · 24 citations · 9 models
21 answers · 21 citations · 11 models
vendor site · ThriveSparrow19 answers · 20 citations · 11 models
vendor site · G218 answers · 27 citations · 11 models
17 answers · 21 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Rework16 answers · 17 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Effy12 answers · 18 citations · 10 models
12 answers · 12 citations · 8 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
29 answers · 12 models
22 answers · 10 models
20 answers · 11 models
18 answers · 11 models
14 answers · 7 models
13 answers · 10 models
12 answers · 8 models
12 answers · 7 models
11 answers · 8 models
11 answers · 6 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best performance management software”, “performance management platforms”, “performance management software”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lattice lattice.com | 47% | 625 | 90,500 | 13,900 | 122,123 | $1,328 | 120 |
| 15Five 15five.com | 16% | 352 | 6,600 | 32 | 32,362 | 22 | |
| AssessTEAM assessteam.com | 16% | 56 | 140 | 0 | 3,097 | 5 | |
| Effy effy.ai Effy AI 8% | 8% | 77 | 140 | 3 | 40,950 company | ||
| Small Improvements small-improvements.com | 4% | 92 | 1,000 | 137 | 43,657 | 1 | |
| Zoho parent site Zoho People 4% | 4% | 309 | 6,600 | 50 | |||
| Teamflect teamflect.com | 4% | 136 | 880 | 12 | 12,592 | 30 | |
| ThriveSparrow thrivesparrow.com | 2% | 63 | 110 | 1 | 24,978 | 2 | |
| Leapsome leapsome.com | 0% | 378 | 2,900 | 32 | 51,450 | $18,531 | 60 |
| PerformYard performyard.com | 0% | 217 | 9,900 | 34 | 58,643 | $25 | 47 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 18 sites; 2 of them are among the sites the models cited here (engagedly.com, forbes.com). The first result for “best performance management software” is learn.g2.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best performance management software for a mid-market B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which performance review tool would you recommend to a mid-sized B2B company?”Comparative“What are the top performance management platforms and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best performance management software for a company with a limited budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 500 person company evaluating a performance management software. What should we look at?”Negative“Which performance management platforms should I avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5Latticeno first choiceChangedLatticeAssessTEAM, Small Improvementsno first choiceagainst: 15Five, Lattice, Microsoft Viva, PerformYard, SAP SuccessFactors, Workday HCM Performance Management
Four alternatives
15Five, Betterworks, Leapsome, PerformYardFive alternatives
15Five, Betterworks, Leapsome, PerformYard, SAP SuccessFactorsThree alternatives
15Five, BambooHR, Zoho PeopleGPT-5.4 miniLatticeLatticeHeld15Five, Lattice, LeapsomeAssessTEAM, Teamflectno first choiceagainst: ADP Workforce Now
Three alternatives
CaptivateIQ, Leapsome, RipplingOne alternative
15FiveNine alternatives
ADP Workforce Now, BambooHR, Betterworks, HiBob, Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM, PerformYard, Rippling, SAP SuccessFactors, Workday HCM Performance ManagementGemini 3.5 FlashLatticeLatticeHeldLattice, LeapsomeThriveSparrowno first choiceagainst: Hubstaff, Litera Top Performance, Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM, SAP SuccessFactors, Teramind, Time Doctor
Six alternatives
15Five, Culture Amp, HiBob, Leapsome, PerformYard, RipplingFour alternatives
15Five, Culture Amp, Leapsome, PerformYardSix alternatives
15Five, BambooHR, Betterworks, Culture Amp, HiBob, RipplingSix alternatives
15Five, BuddiesHR (SimplePerf) / Evalflow, Leapsome, PerformYard, Teamflect, Zoho PeoplePerplexity SonarLatticeLatticeHeldagainst: Culture Amp, HiBobLattice, LeapsomeZoho Peopleno first choiceagainst: Profit.co, SAP SuccessFactors, Workday HCM Performance Management
Two alternatives
15Five, PerformYardTwo alternatives
15Five, PerformYardSeven alternatives
15Five, BambooHR, Betterworks, Culture Amp, PerformYard, SAP SuccessFactors, Workday HCM Performance ManagementTwo alternatives
AssessTEAM, PerformYardGrok 4.2015Five, Latticeagainst: SuccessFactors, Workday HCM Performance ManagementLatticeChanged15Five, LatticeEffy AIagainst: Lattice, Leapsome, OrangeHRM, Teamflectno first choiceagainst: 15Five, BambooHR, Culture Amp, Deel, Hubstaff, Lattice, Microsoft Dynamics 365, NICE CXone, Rippling, Trakstar, Workday HCM Performance Management
Three alternatives
BambooHR, HiBob, LeapsomeThree alternatives
15Five, Leapsome, PerformYardFive alternatives
AssessTEAM, BambooHR, Betterworks, Leapsome, Workday HCM Performance ManagementThree alternatives
AssessTEAM, Small Improvements, Zoho PeopleMistral SmallLatticeLatticeHeldClearCompanyAssessTEAMno first choiceagainst: 15Five, AssessTEAM, PerformYard, Workday HCM Performance Management
Four alternatives
15Five, BambooHR, Leapsome, PerformYardTwo alternatives
15Five, PerformYardSeven alternatives
BambooHR, Culture Amp, Engagedly, Keka HR, Lattice, SAP SuccessFactors, Workday HCM Performance ManagementThree alternatives
15Five, PerformYard, Small ImprovementsDeepSeek V4 FlashLatticeLatticeHeldLatticeAssessTEAM, Effy AIagainst: BambooHR, LatticeLatticeagainst: Betterworks, SAP, Workday HCM Performance Managementagainst: 15Five, Dynamics 365, PeopleCues, SAP SuccessFactors, ThriveSparrow, Workday HCM Performance Management, Workzoom
Three alternatives
15Five, Leapsome, PerformYardThree alternatives
15Five, Leapsome, PerformYardFour alternatives
15Five, Betterworks, Culture Amp, LeapsomeThree alternatives
PerformYard, Small Improvements, Zoho PeopleFour alternatives
15Five, Culture Amp, Leapsome, PerformYardLlama 4 Maverickno first choiceno first choiceHeldno first choiceagainst: BambooHRSmall Improvementsno first choiceagainst: Asana, Eightfold
Two alternatives
Effy AI, PerformYardQwen 3.7 FlashLatticeLatticeHeldLatticeagainst: SAP SuccessFactors, Workday HCM Performance ManagementTeamflectagainst: BambooHR, Workday HCM Performance ManagementLatticeagainst: Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM, SAP SuccessFactorsagainst: BambooHR, Oracle Talent Management Cloud, Oracle Taleo, SAP SuccessFactors, Workday HCM Performance Management
Three alternatives
15Five, Betterworks, Culture AmpTwo alternatives
15Five, LeapsomeFour alternatives
15Five, BambooHR, Betterworks, LeapsomeFive alternatives
AssessTEAM, Effy AI, Leapsome, PeopleHum, Profit.coThree alternatives
BetterPT, BetterUp, Culture AmpKimi K215Five, Latticeagainst: BambooHR15Five, LatticeHeld15Five, LatticeEffy AI, Zoho Peopleagainst: BambooHR, Latticeno first choiceagainst: BambooHR, Lattice, SAP SuccessFactors, Workday HCM Performance Management
One alternative
LeapsomeTwo alternatives
Leapsome, PerformYardSix alternatives
Betterworks, ClearCompany, Engagedly, Leapsome, SAP SuccessFactors, Workday HCM Performance ManagementThree alternatives
AssessTEAM, Small Improvements, TeamflectGLM 4.7 FlashX15Five, Latticeagainst: BambooHR15FiveChanged15Five, Latticeagainst: Keka HRAssessTEAMno first choiceagainst: 15Five, Darwinbox, Factorial, FlowyTeam, Microsoft Viva Goals, NetProbe Analytics, Observer Probes, Paycor Perform
One alternative
LeapsomeFour alternatives
BambooHR, Lattice, Leapsome, PerformYardNine alternatives
BambooHR, Betterworks, Culture Amp, Engagedly, GFoundry, Leapsome, SAP SuccessFactors, Workday HCM Performance Management, Zoho PeopleThree alternatives
Effy AI, PerformYard, Zoho PeopleMiniMax M2.515FiveLatticeChangedLatticeAssessTEAM, Effy AIno first choicenothing named
Four alternatives
Betterworks, Lattice, Leapsome, PerformYardFour alternatives
15Five, Culture Amp, Leapsome, PerformYardSix alternatives
15Five, Betterworks, Culture Amp, Leapsome, SAP SuccessFactors, Workday HCM Performance ManagementThree alternatives
BambooHR, PerformYard, Small ImprovementsGPT-6 LunaLatticeLatticeHeldLatticeagainst: BambooHR, SAP SuccessFactors, Workday HCM Performance ManagementAssessTEAMno first choiceagainst: BambooHR, Betterworks, Lattice, Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM, SAP SuccessFactors
Four alternatives
15Five, Culture Amp, Leapsome, PerformYardOne alternative
15FiveFive alternatives
15Five, Betterworks, Culture Amp, Leapsome, PerformYardOne alternative
Zoho PeopleMuse Glimmer 30B15Five, Lattice15FiveChangedagainst: BambooHRno first choiceAssessTEAMagainst: Leapsomeno first choiceagainst: Lattice Performanceagainst: Apploye, Buddy Punch, Deputy, Desklog, Hubstaff, Monitask, SAP SuccessFactors, Time Doctor, UKG Pro, Vericlock, When I Work, Workday HCM Performance Management
Three alternatives
Culture Amp, Leapsome, PerformYardTwo alternatives
Lattice, LeapsomeSix alternatives
PerformYard, Primalogik, Profit.co, Small Improvements, Synergita, TeamflectBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 11:58 | yes | 10 | 9 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 11:51 | yes | 3 | 6 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 12:56 | yes | 10 | 24 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 11:06 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:31 | yes | 9 | 39 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 09:47 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 11:37 | yes | 20 | 23 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 09:54 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 12:15 | no | 0 | 24 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 12:53 | yes | 13 | 47 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 08:47 | yes | 21 | 23 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 09:53 | yes | 5 | 26 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 09:47 | yes | 4 | 43 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 12:41 | yes | 12 | 17 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 11:20 | no | 0 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 09:43 | yes | 3 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 11:04 | no | 0 | 12 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 10:15 | yes | 10 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:05 | yes | 5 | 28 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 11:32 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 10:58 | yes | 17 | 20 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 08:52 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 12:48 | yes | 5 | 30 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 10:48 | yes | 9 | 15 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 10:45 | yes | 22 | 58 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 09:37 | yes | 5 | 48 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 09:37 | yes | 2 | 11 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 11:48 | yes | 13 | 20 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 09:18 | yes | 10 | 7 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 12:46 | yes | 3 | 8 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 11:51 | no | 0 | 17 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 09:33 | yes | 10 | 6 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:20 | yes | 5 | 37 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 08:48 | yes | 5 | 7 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 09:37 | yes | 23 | 35 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 11:00 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 08:39 | yes | 5 | 24 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 11:30 | yes | 16 | 33 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 09:43 | yes | 14 | 57 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 11:52 | yes | 20 | 32 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 11:25 | yes | 7 | 25 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 09:31 | yes | 14 | 28 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 09:56 | yes | 9 | 7 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 11:28 | yes | 1 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 09:42 | yes | 10 | 19 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 10:41 | yes | 10 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:30 | yes | 5 | 27 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 09:23 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 09:51 | yes | 24 | 21 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 11:50 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 09:31 | yes | 5 | 21 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 11:49 | yes | 11 | 24 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 10:54 | yes | 13 | 59 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 11:34 | yes | 5 | 14 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 09:25 | yes | 2 | 10 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 11:38 | yes | 12 | 17 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 09:24 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 11:35 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 09:47 | no | 0 | 14 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 12:29 | yes | 10 | 9 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:25 | yes | 10 | 33 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 12:16 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 08:54 | yes | 19 | 37 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 12:03 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 11:46 | no | 0 | 27 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 12:42 | yes | 10 | 18 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 09:24 | yes | 14 | 15 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 11:29 | no | 0 | 23 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 11:12 | yes | 2 | 14 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 08:58 | yes | 15 | 24 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 11:46 | yes | 19 | 10 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 12:37 | yes | 5 | 7 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 10:40 | yes | 6 | 22 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 12:14 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:31 | yes | 15 | 35 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 10:24 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 09:43 | yes | 25 | 32 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 12:31 | yes | 9 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 09:02 | yes | 10 | 42 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 11:27 | yes | 24 | 60 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 10:33 | yes | 24 | 52 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 11:39 | no | 0 | 15 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 10:55 | yes | 3 | 16 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 10:42 | yes | 24 | 31 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
ADP read as ADP Workforce Now
Oracle read as Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM
Oracle Cloud HCM read as Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM
Oracle HCM read as Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM
Workday read as Workday HCM Performance Management
Workday (Standalone Performance Module) read as Workday HCM Performance Management
Workday HCM read as Workday HCM Performance Management
Workday Performance read as Workday HCM Performance Management
Workday Performance & Talent Management read as Workday HCM Performance Management
Workday Performance Management read as Workday HCM Performance Management
Unresolved, counted raw
AnotherCo
BetterPT (formerly Betterworks)
BuddiesHR (SimplePerf) / Evalflow
ExampleCo
GFoundry
Lattice Performance
Litera Top Performance
NetProbe Analytics
Observer Probes
PeopleCues
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.