360 feedback
Asked as “360-degree feedback tool”, and as “multi-rater feedback software”, on behalf of a mid-market B2B company. 58 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
38%
Contested · Spidergap 19%
38Lattice19Spidergap09Culture Amp34others
38% of first choices, contested.
Since October 2026▲+4Since October 2026: 34% → 38%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.Lattice held the lead, +4 points on 34%, inside the 13-point floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
Spidergap40%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: Spidergap (40%) replaces Effy AI (24% then, 4% now), 36 points clear, past the 13-point floor.Standing →Mid-market
Lattice38%Contested▲+4Since October 2026: 34% → 38%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.This pageEnterprise
Culture Amp51%Clear leader▲+18Since October 2026: 33% → 51%, +18 points. Past the 13-point floor: movement.Standing →
Spidergap40%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: Spidergap (40%) replaces Effy AI (24% then, 4% now), 36 points clear, past the 13-point floor.Standing →Mid-marketLattice38%Contested▲+4Since October 2026: 34% → 38%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.This pageEnterpriseCulture Amp51%Clear leader▲+18Since October 2026: 33% → 51%, +18 points. Past the 13-point floor: movement.Standing →The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01Lattice38%11%57endorsed leader▲+4Since October 2026: 34% → 38%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.34% → 38%
Lattice38%11%57endorsed leader▲+4Since October 2026: 34% → 38%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.34% → 38%02Spidergap19%10%48accepted challenger▲+13Since October 2026: 6% → 19%, +13 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.6% → 19%
Spidergap19%10%48accepted challenger▲+13Since October 2026: 6% → 19%, +13 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.6% → 19%03Culture Amp9%17%54accepted challenger▲+3Since October 2026: 6% → 9%, +3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.6% → 9%
Culture Amp9%17%54accepted challenger▲+3Since October 2026: 6% → 9%, +3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.6% → 9%04
Effy AI9%0%14accepted challenger▼−8Since October 2026: 17% → 9%, −8 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.17% → 9%
Effy AI9%0%14accepted challenger▼−8Since October 2026: 17% → 9%, −8 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.17% → 9%05
FeedbackPulse7%0%18accepted challenger▲+1Since October 2026: 6% → 7%, +1 point. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.6% → 7%
FeedbackPulse7%0%18accepted challenger▲+1Since October 2026: 6% → 7%, +1 point. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.6% → 7%06
Leapsome3%3%33accepted challenger▼−8Since October 2026: 11% → 3%, −8 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.11% → 3%
Leapsome3%3%33accepted challenger▼−8Since October 2026: 11% → 3%, −8 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.11% → 3%07
Teamflect3%0%16accepted challenger▲+1Since October 2026: 2% → 3%, +1 point. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.2% → 3%
Teamflect3%0%16accepted challenger▲+1Since October 2026: 2% → 3%, +1 point. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.2% → 3%08
15Five2%12%40accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 4% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.4% → 2%
15Five2%12%40accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 4% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.4% → 2%09
PerformYard2%0%20accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 4% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.4% → 2%
PerformYard2%0%20accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 4% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.4% → 2%10
SurveyMonkey2%38%16criticized challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%
SurveyMonkey2%38%16criticized challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%11
Google Forms Lab in the set2%50%10criticized challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%
Google Forms Lab in the set2%50%10criticized challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%Show the seven products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
18
Qualtrics 360 Development0%39%18criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Qualtrics 360 Development0%39%18criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%13
Primalogik0%20%20accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%
Primalogik0%20%20accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%16
BambooHR0%18%11accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
BambooHR0%18%11accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%17
SurveySparrow0%18%11accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
SurveySparrow0%18%11accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%15
Betterworks0%10%10accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Betterworks0%10%10accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%12
EchoSpan0%5%19accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
EchoSpan0%5%19accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%14
Small Improvements0%0%13accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Small Improvements0%0%13accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
Google Forms is made by Google, whose model Gemini 3.5 Flash is in the set. On the four share prompts that model made it the first choice zero times of 4; the other thirteen models one time of 52. Lab treatment is defined on the method page; the row is marked, not excluded.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each
Lattice vs FeedbackPulseLattice vs LeapsomeLattice vs TeamflectLattice vs 15FiveSpidergap vs Culture AmpSpidergap vs Effy AISpidergap vs FeedbackPulseSpidergap vs LeapsomeSpidergap vs TeamflectSpidergap vs 15FiveCulture Amp vs Effy AICulture Amp vs FeedbackPulseCulture Amp vs LeapsomeCulture Amp vs TeamflectCulture Amp vs 15FiveEffy AI vs FeedbackPulseEffy AI vs LeapsomeEffy AI vs TeamflectEffy AI vs 15FiveFeedbackPulse vs LeapsomeFeedbackPulse vs TeamflectFeedbackPulse vs 15FiveLeapsome vs TeamflectLeapsome vs 15FiveTeamflect vs 15Five
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
010203040506070809101112131415161718Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative50%
Key
01Lattice38%
Lattice38%02Spidergap19%
Spidergap19%03Culture Amp9%
Culture Amp9%04Effy AI9%
Effy AI9%05FeedbackPulse7%
FeedbackPulse7%06Leapsome3%
Leapsome3%07Teamflect3%
Teamflect3%0815Five2%
15Five2%09PerformYard2%
PerformYard2%10SurveyMonkey2%
SurveyMonkey2%11Google Forms2%
Google Forms2%12EchoSpan0%
EchoSpan0%13Primalogik0%
Primalogik0%14Small Improvements0%
Small Improvements0%15Betterworks0%
Betterworks0%16BambooHR0%
BambooHR0%17SurveySparrow0%
SurveySparrow0%18Qualtrics 360 Development0%
Qualtrics 360 Development0%What they warned about
Eight of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5 and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Culture Amp17%
9 of 54 labels negative · 6 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“Avoid enterprise tools like Lattice, 15Five, or Culture Amp” Grok 4.20, budget prompt
Spidergap10%
5 of 48 labels negative · 5 of 14 models
“multiple reviews complain about admins being able to view individual responses ... Use only if you have an external facilitator” Grok 4.20, negative prompt
Google Forms50%
5 of 10 labels negative · 4 of 14 models · 3 hard negative
“Avoid "Jack-of-All-Trades" General Survey Tools (e.g., SurveyMonkey, Google Forms)” DeepSeek V4 Flash, negative prompt
SurveyMonkey38%
6 of 16 labels negative · 4 of 14 models · 3 hard negative
“Avoid "Jack-of-All-Trades" General Survey Tools (e.g., SurveyMonkey, Google Forms)” DeepSeek V4 Flash, negative prompt
What they cite
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
73 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 739 links across 186 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 4 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
34 answers · 45 citations · 11 models
32 answers · 55 citations · 11 models
vendor site · FeedbackPulse30 answers · 36 citations · 12 models
30 answers · 30 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Teamflect24 answers · 26 citations · 11 models
24 answers · 24 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Effy18 answers · 18 citations · 10 models
16 answers · 16 citations · 9 models
16 answers · 16 citations · 9 models
vendor site · ThriveSparrow16 answers · 16 citations · 8 models
14 answers · 16 citations · 7 models
vendor site · Betterworks14 answers · 14 citations · 7 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
30 answers · 11 models
28 answers · 11 models
24 answers · 8 models
22 answers · 12 models
21 answers · 8 models
16 answers · 9 models
15 answers · 9 models
15 answers · 9 models
15 answers · 9 models
12 answers · 6 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “360 feedback tools”, “360-degree feedback tool”, “best 360-degree feedback tool”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lattice lattice.com | 38% | 625 | 90,500 | 13,900 | 122,123 | $1,328 | 120 | |
| Spidergap spidergap.com | 19% | 140 | 260 | 1 | 97 | 11 | ||
| Culture Amp cultureamp.com | 9% | 354 | 14,800 | 121 | 174,918 | 35 | 4 | |
| Effy effy.ai Effy AI 9% | 9% | 77 | 140 | 3 | 40,950 company | |||
| FeedbackPulse feedbackpulse.com | 7% | 83 | 20 | 0 | 21,184 | 4 | ||
| Leapsome leapsome.com | 3% | 378 | 2,900 | 32 | 51,450 | $18,531 | 60 | |
| Teamflect teamflect.com | 3% | 136 | 880 | 12 | 12,592 | 30 | ||
| 15Five 15five.com | 2% | 352 | 6,600 | 32 | 32,362 | 22 | ||
| PerformYard performyard.com | 2% | 217 | 9,900 | 34 | 58,643 | $25 | 47 | |
| BRAVO getbravo.io | 2% | 34 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 20 sites; 0 of them are among the sites the models cited here. The first result for “360 feedback tools” is vimeo.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best 360-degree feedback tool for a mid-market B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which multi-rater feedback software would you recommend to a mid-sized B2B company?”Comparative“What are the top 360 feedback tools and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best 360-degree feedback tool for a company with a limited budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 500 person company evaluating a 360-degree feedback tool. What should we look at?”Negative“Which 360 feedback tools should I avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5LatticeLatticeHeldagainst: Qualtrics EmployeeXMEchoSpan, SpidergapEffy AI, Google Formsno first choiceagainst: Engagedly, Jotform, Reflektive, Spidergap
Five alternatives
15Five, Leapsome, People Element, Primalogik, SpidergapFour alternatives
15Five, Betterworks, Culture Amp, ReflektiveSeven alternatives
15Five, Betterworks, Culture Amp, Deel HR, Lattice, Leapsome, PrimalogikThree alternatives
AssessTEAM, Primalogik, SurveyMonkeyGPT-5.4 miniCulture Ampagainst: AchieversCulture AmpHeldCulture Ampagainst: BambooHR, Deel HR, HiBob, PersonioBRAVOagainst: Spidergapno first choicenothing named
Three alternatives
CR360, EchoSpan, HiBobTwo alternatives
Lattice, LeapsomeSix alternatives
15Five, EchoSpan, Lattice, Leapsome, PerformYard, SpidergapOne alternative
EchoSpanGemini 3.5 FlashLatticeLatticeHeldLattice, Leapsome360Feedbacks / G360 Surveys, Spidergapagainst: 15Five, Culture Amp, Lattice15Five, Culture Amp, Lattice, Leapsomenothing named
Four alternatives
Culture Amp, Leapsome, PerformYard, SpidergapFour alternatives
15Five, Culture Amp, Leapsome, PerformYardSeven alternatives
15Five, BambooHR, Culture Amp, EchoSpan, Qualtrics 360 Development, Rippling, SpidergapFour alternatives
Google Forms, Microsoft Forms, Primalogik, Small ImprovementsThree alternatives
CultureORCA, Qualtrics 360 Development, SurveySparrowPerplexity SonarLatticeLatticeHeldagainst: Culture AmpCulture Amp, LatticeFeedbackPulseno first choiceagainst: Google Forms, Microsoft Forms, SurveyMonkey, SurveySparrow, Typeform
Four alternatives
Leapsome, Questback, Small Improvements, SpidergapThree alternatives
15Five, FeedbackPulse, PrimalogikEight alternatives
15Five, EchoSpan, FeedbackPulse, Leapsome, PerformYard, Primalogik, Qualtrics 360 Development, SpidergapFour alternatives
Effy AI, Primalogik, Small Improvements, SurveyMonkeyGrok 4.20LatticeLatticeHeldagainst: Culture Amp, Qualtrics 360 Development, Workday Talent ManagementLattice, SurveySparrowEffy AIagainst: 15Five, Culture Amp, LatticeLatticeagainst: Qualtrics 360 Development, SurveyMonkeyagainst: 15Five, BambooHR, Click-360, Culture Amp, Google Forms, Lattice, Namely, Oracle HCM Cloud, Primalogik, SAP SuccessFactors, Spidergap, SurveyMonkey, Workday Talent Management
Three alternatives
Culture Amp, Leapsome, SpidergapThree alternatives
15Five, Leapsome, SpidergapNine alternatives
Alchemer, BambooHR, Betterworks, Effy AI, Namely, PerformYard, Synergita, Typeform, Workday Talent ManagementThree alternatives
Primalogik, Spidergap, TeamflectFive alternatives
15Five, Culture Amp, Effy AI, PerformYard, SynergitaMistral SmallSpidergapCulture Amp, LatticeChangedno first choiceSpidergapno first choiceagainst: TriNet
Three alternatives
FeedbackPulse, Lattice, Synergita PerformTwo alternatives
Peoplebox, TeamflectOne alternative
TeamflectDeepSeek V4 FlashLattice, SpidergapSpidergapChangedEffy AI, Spidergapagainst: SurveyMonkeySpidergapLatticeagainst: EchoSpan, Google Forms, Insights, Jotform, Primalogik, Reflektive, Spidergap, SurveyMonkey, Talent Performance
One alternative
Culture AmpTwo alternatives
Lattice, LeapsomeFive alternatives
15Five, Culture Amp, Lattice, Leapsome, Qualtrics 360 DevelopmentFive alternatives
15Five, BRAVO, FeedbackPulse, Primalogik, TeamflectFour alternatives
15Five, Culture Amp, Leapsome, SpidergapLlama 4 MaverickSpidergapLatticeChangedno first choiceEffy AIno first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
Culture Amp, LatticeFour alternatives
Culture Amp, Leapsome, Peoplebox, SpidergapTwo alternatives
FeedbackPulse, PrimalogikQwen 3.7 FlashLatticeLatticeHeldCulture Amp, HiBobagainst: Flex Surveys, PrimalogikFeedbackPulse, Spidergapagainst: Culture Amp, LatticeCulture Amp, Lattice, SurveyMonkey, Vantage Circleagainst: Oracle HCM Cloud, SAP SuccessFactors, Workday Talent Management
Three alternatives
15Five, Betterworks, Culture AmpThree alternatives
Culture Amp, PerformYard, SpidergapFive alternatives
15Five, Fast Mirror, Leapsome, Spidergap, TeamflectThree alternatives
Empuls, Lumus360, ThriveSparrowKimi K2LatticeLatticeHeldCulture Amp, Latticeagainst: Qualtrics 360 Development, Workday Talent ManagementFeedbackPulse, Teamflectagainst: 15Five, Culture Amp, Google Forms, Lattice, Qualtrics 360 Development, Typeformno first choiceagainst: Culture Amp, Google Forms, Lattice, Leapsome, Microsoft Forms, Qualtrics 360 Development, SurveyMonkey, SurveySparrow, Typeform
Three alternatives
15Five, Culture Amp, SpidergapFour alternatives
15Five, Culture Amp, Small Improvements, SpidergapFive alternatives
CharlieHR, EchoSpan, Leapsome, Small Improvements, SpidergapThree alternatives
Effy AI, Primalogik, SpidergapFive alternatives
Betterworks, Culture Amp, Lattice, Leapsome, SpidergapGLM 4.7 FlashXSpidergapLatticeChangedLatticeFeedbackPulseno first choiceagainst: 360 Feedback, Personify360, Primalogik, Spidergap
Three alternatives
Culture Amp, EchoSpan, LatticeOne alternative
SpidergapFive alternatives
Culture Amp, EchoSpan, Namely, Small Improvements, SpidergapThree alternatives
Effy AI, Primalogik, SurveySparrowMiniMax M2.5Spidergapagainst: Betterworks, Qualtrics 360 DevelopmentPerformYardChangedagainst: Workday Talent Managementno first choiceEffy AIno first choicenothing named
Four alternatives
Culture Amp, EchoSpan, Lattice, LeapsomeTwo alternatives
Lattice, Synergita PerformFour alternatives
FeedbackPulse, Primalogik, Spidergap, TeamflectGPT-6 LunaLatticeLatticeHeldSpidergapEffy AIno first choiceagainst: 360feedback.app, Microsoft Viva Glint
Three alternatives
15Five, Culture Amp, LeapsomeTwo alternatives
15Five, Culture AmpSeven alternatives
15Five, Betterworks, Culture Amp, Lattice, Leapsome, PerformYard, Qualtrics 360 DevelopmentTwo alternatives
Small Improvements, TeamflectMuse Glimmer 30BSpidergapLeapsomeChangedLatticeTeamflectagainst: 15Five, Lattice Performance moduleno first choiceagainst: Culture Amp, Qualtrics 360 Development
Four alternatives
BambooHR, Culture Amp, Lattice, LeapsomeFour alternatives
BambooHR, FeedbackPulse, Lattice, SpidergapEight alternatives
15Five, Culture Amp, EchoSpan, FeedbackPulse, Leapsome, Qualtrics 360 Development, Small Improvements, SpidergapSix alternatives
EchoSpan, Effy AI, FeedbackPulse, Primalogik, Spidergap, SurveyMonkeyBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 09:13 | yes | 9 | 8 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 12:12 | yes | 3 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 08:57 | yes | 12 | 25 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 08:52 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:16 | yes | 13 | 30 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 11:12 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 11:05 | yes | 15 | 17 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 10:39 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 08:39 | no | 0 | 28 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 12:04 | yes | 10 | 28 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 10:34 | yes | 12 | 79 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 10:02 | yes | 5 | 133 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 08:40 | yes | 4 | 18 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 10:23 | yes | 12 | 19 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 10:39 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 11:00 | yes | 3 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 09:28 | no | 0 | 14 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 09:25 | yes | 10 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:17 | yes | 5 | 31 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 11:10 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 11:05 | yes | 21 | 35 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 08:51 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 08:50 | yes | 5 | 26 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 08:38 | yes | 10 | 40 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 10:40 | yes | 10 | 71 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 12:07 | yes | 10 | 37 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 12:02 | yes | 4 | 16 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 11:08 | yes | 12 | 23 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 10:33 | yes | 14 | 10 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 11:10 | yes | 6 | 11 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 10:00 | no | 0 | 17 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 11:08 | yes | 10 | 6 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:23 | yes | 5 | 42 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 09:53 | yes | 5 | 8 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 09:39 | yes | 21 | 58 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 09:00 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 08:56 | yes | 5 | 24 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 11:36 | yes | 15 | 59 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 11:13 | yes | 22 | 45 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 12:07 | yes | 5 | 16 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 12:41 | yes | 9 | 24 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 11:21 | yes | 13 | 35 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 10:30 | yes | 9 | 9 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 11:19 | yes | 2 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 12:45 | yes | 9 | 17 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 11:50 | yes | 10 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:09 | yes | 5 | 25 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 09:25 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 10:41 | yes | 8 | 23 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 10:06 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 10:13 | yes | 5 | 16 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 11:46 | yes | 9 | 27 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 10:02 | yes | 9 | 59 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 12:03 | yes | 5 | 26 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 10:16 | yes | 3 | 12 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 12:22 | yes | 13 | 18 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 12:09 | no | 0 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 11:53 | no | 0 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 08:55 | no | 0 | 20 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 11:35 | yes | 10 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:20 | yes | 10 | 38 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 12:10 | no | 0 | 9 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 12:06 | yes | 24 | 34 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 09:24 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 10:30 | no | 0 | 26 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 09:28 | yes | 9 | 32 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 10:48 | yes | 15 | 148 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 10:48 | no | 0 | 23 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 10:23 | yes | 3 | 24 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 09:53 | yes | 14 | 22 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 09:24 | yes | 19 | 9 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 08:58 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 12:52 | yes | 10 | 25 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 09:54 | yes | 10 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:14 | yes | 20 | 37 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 12:21 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 12:04 | yes | 25 | 39 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 11:33 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 09:06 | no | 0 | 29 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 10:52 | yes | 25 | 26 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 08:57 | yes | 24 | 38 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 09:18 | yes | 22 | 71 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 09:42 | yes | 2 | 16 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 10:24 | yes | 25 | 28 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Deel read as Deel HR
Effy read as Effy AI
G360 read as G360 Surveys
Oracle read as Oracle HCM Cloud
Qualtrics read as Qualtrics 360 Development
Qualtrics 360 read as Qualtrics 360 Development
Qualtrics 360 (EmployeeXM) read as Qualtrics 360 Development
Workday read as Workday Talent Management
Unresolved, counted raw
360 Feedback (generic tool)
360Feedbacks / G360 Surveys
BambooHR or HiBob
CCL's 360s
CR360
Click-360
CultureORCA
LEADBeyond 360°
Lattice Performance module
Personify360 (ThreeSixty)
Sogo/FeedbackPulse
Talent Performance
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.