Index › HR › Core HR and payroll › Time and attendance › Small business · November 2026 Edition

Time and attendance for small business buyers

Asked as “time and attendance system”, and as “employee time tracking software”, on behalf of a small B2B company. 54 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
22%
Contested · Clockify 15%
22Homebase15Clockify15Harvest48others

22% of first choices, contested.

Since October 2026↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: Homebase (22%) replaces Harvest (23% then, 15% now), 7 points clear, inside the 13-point floor.Homebase leads at 22%, replacing Harvest, which led at 23% and stands at 15% now: 7 points clear, inside the floor, so the swap reads as unsettled.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.

The standing

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a small B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01Homebase22%2%49accepted challenger▲+9Since October 2026: 13% → 22%, +9 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.13% → 22%
02Clockify15%4%49accepted challenger▼−4Since October 2026: 19% → 15%, −4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.19% → 15%
03Harvest15%0%16accepted challenger▼−8Since October 2026: 23% → 15%, −8 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.23% → 15%
04Toggl Track11%0%17accepted challenger▲+9Since October 2026: 2% → 11%, +9 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.2% → 11%
05QuickBooks Time6%9%46accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 4% → 6%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.4% → 6%
06Buddy Punch6%3%33accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 6% → 6%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.6% → 6%
07Gusto6%8%12accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 6% → 6%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.6% → 6%
08Deputy4%6%36accepted challenger▲+4Since October 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 4%
09Rippling4%6%17accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.2% → 4%
10Jibble4%8%13accepted challenger▼−4Since October 2026: 8% → 4%, −4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.8% → 4%
11TimeCamp4%14%14accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.2% → 4%
12Connecteam2%0%31accepted challenger▼−4Since October 2026: 6% → 2%, −4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.6% → 2%
Show the five products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
17UKG Pro Workforce Management0%73%11criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
16Hubstaff0%30%10criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
15ClockShark0%17%12accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
14BambooHR Time Tracking0%8%12accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
13When I Work0%0%17accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%

The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured

Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
Head to headHead-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not small business.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each

Recommended versus criticized

Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.

Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01
02
03
04
Q05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
B14
15
16
17
Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative40%
Key
01Homebase22%
02Clockify15%
03Harvest15%
04Toggl Track11%
05QuickBooks Time6%
06Buddy Punch6%
07Gusto6%
08Deputy4%
09Rippling4%
10Jibble4%
11TimeCamp4%
12Connecteam2%
13When I Work0%
14BambooHR Time Tracking0%
15ClockShark0%
16Hubstaff0%
17UKG Pro Workforce Management0%

What they warned about

One of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. GPT-5.4 mini, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.20, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5, GPT-6 Luna and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
UKG Pro Workforce Management
73%
8 of 11 labels negative · 4 of 14 models · 3 hard negative
“Overly Complex Enterprise-Grade Systems * Examples: UKG Pro, Workday, SAP SuccessFactors, Oracle Workforce Management.” Gemini 3.5 Flash, negative prompt
ADP Workforce Now
83%
5 of 6 labels negative · 4 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“enterprise-grade platforms like ADP Workforce Now or TimeClock Plus that come with bloated pricing and complexity” DeepSeek V4 Flash, negative prompt
QuickBooks Time
9%
4 of 46 labels negative · 3 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“limited free plans like some TSheets/QuickBooks Time tiers: Prone to human error” Grok 4.20, negative prompt
Time Doctor
100%
3 of 3 labels negative · 3 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“Time Doctor has an outdated UI, Linux and macOS issues, and spotty customer support” Claude Haiku 4.5, negative prompt

What they cite

Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.

Sites the answers cite

70 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 729 links across 191 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 2 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.

36 answers · 41 citations · 11 models
35 answers · 44 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Lead Change Group28 answers · 32 citations · 10 models
19 answers · 22 citations · 11 models
18 answers · 38 citations · 8 models
18 answers · 33 citations · 8 models
vendor site · G214 answers · 18 citations · 9 models
14 answers · 14 citations · 7 models
12 answers · 12 citations · 9 models
vendor site · TrackingTime11 answers · 11 citations · 6 models
vendor site · My Hours10 answers · 10 citations · 7 models
vendor site · TMetric8 answers · 9 citations · 6 models

Pages the answers cite

The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.

Search against answers

Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best time and attendance system”, “time and attendance system”, “time and attendance systems”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Company and productsShareOwn site citedName searches, GoogleAI search demand, est.Organic visitsPaid search a month, est.Google ads, last 30 daysBest Google position
Homebase joinhomebase.com22%353201,0003,839472,253$793120
Clockify clockify.me15%13360,5001,0932,084,74940
Harvest getharvest.com15%21135,00089,364711,23446
Toggl toggl.com
Toggl Track 11%
11%4012,10089257,259 company30
QuickBooks Time6%1,000,00054,681
Buddy Punch buddypunch.com6%729,9004839,2505
Gusto gusto.com6%742673,00010,5601,629,483118
Deputy deputy.com4%35640,50017,00045,127$3,22232
Rippling rippling.com4%1438301,00017,886712,399$42,0131159
Jibble jibble.io4%579,90010867,2111

Google's top ten for the three searches hold 20 sites; 2 of them are among the sites the models cited here (g2.com, tmetric.com). The first result for “best time and attendance system” is reddit.com.

How they answered

Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHide
ModelDirect“What is the best time and attendance system for a small B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which employee time tracking software would you recommend to a small business that sells to other businesses?”Comparative“What are the top time and attendance systems for a small team and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best time and attendance system for a small company with a tight budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 30 person company evaluating a time and attendance system. What should we look at?”Negative“Which time and attendance systems should a small business avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5no first choiceno first choiceHeldClockify, Homebase
Two alternativesQuickBooks Time, When I Work
Homebase
Two alternativesClockify, Connecteam
no first choiceagainst: Asana, Basecamp, Buddy Punch, ClockShark, Clockify, Hubstaff, Time Doctor, TimeCamp, Trello
GPT-5.4 miniRippling
Three alternativesBuddy Punch, Connecteam, Gusto
Clockify, QuickBooks TimeChanged
Two alternativesBuddy Punch, Homebase
no first choice
Six alternativesADP RUN, Buddy Punch, Connecteam, Gusto, QuickBooks Time, Rippling
Buddy Punch, Homebase
Two alternativesConnecteam, OnTheClock
no first choicenothing named
Gemini 3.5 FlashGusto
Seven alternativesBuddy Punch, Clockify, Connecteam, Harvest, QuickBooks Time, Rippling, Toggl Track
HarvestChanged
Four alternativesClockify, Everhour, QuickBooks Time, Toggl Track
Homebase
Five alternativesClockify, Connecteam, Gusto, QuickBooks Time, When I Work
Jibble
Four alternativesClockify, Connecteam, Homebase, OnTheClock
Gusto, Rippling
Six alternativesBuddy Punch, Clockify, Connecteam, Deputy, Homebase, QuickBooks Time
against: SAP SuccessFactors Time Management, UKG Pro Workforce Management
against: Acroprint, Oracle Workforce Management, Pyramid paper clocks, SAP SuccessFactors Time Management, UKG Pro Workforce Management, Workday Time Tracking
Perplexity SonarTrackingTime
Five alternativesBuddy Punch, Clockify, Connecteam, Homebase, QuickBooks Time
HarvestChanged
Two alternativesToggl Track, actiTIME
Clockify
Seven alternativesBambooHR Time Tracking, Connecteam, Deputy, Homebase, Jibble, QuickBooks Time, When I Work
Homebase
Three alternativesBuddy Punch, Connecteam, TrackingTime
no first choicenothing named
Grok 4.20Homebase
Four alternativesBambooHR Time Tracking, Buddy Punch, Clockify, QuickBooks Time
ClockifyChanged
Four alternativesHarvest, QuickBooks Time, TimeCamp, Toggl Track
Homebase
Three alternativesBuddy Punch, Connecteam, Deputy
against: Sling, TCP Humanity
Clockify
Four alternativesBuddy Punch, Homebase, QuickBooks Time, TimeTrex
against: BambooHR Time Tracking
no first choice
Eight alternatives7shifts, BambooHR Time, Clockify, Deputy, Homebase, Paychex Time & Attendance, PeopleHR, When I Work
against: ADP Workforce Now, UKG Pro Workforce Management
against: ADP Workforce Now, Bambee, ClockShark, Deputy, Factorial, Google Sheets, Gusto, QuickBooks Time, UKG Pro Workforce Management, WorkforceHub
Mistral SmallConnecteam
Three alternativesBuddy Punch, Gusto, Homebase
Toggl TrackChanged
Four alternativesClockify, Harvest, QuickBooks Time, actiTIME
Homebase
Six alternativesBambooHR Time Tracking, Buddy Punch, Clockify, Deputy, QuickBooks Time, TimeTrex
against: Rippling
TimeCamp
Three alternativesBuddy Punch, Clockify, Homebase
no first choiceagainst: Jupiter, QGenda, UKG Pro Workforce Management
DeepSeek V4 FlashClockify, Harvest, Toggl Track
Three alternativesDeputy, Homebase, QuickBooks Time
HarvestChanged
Three alternativesClockify, QuickBooks Time, Toggl Track
Buddy Punch
Six alternativesClockShark, Clockify, Deputy, Homebase, Jibble, QuickBooks Time
Clockify
Two alternativesHomebase, TimeCamp
against: QuickBooks Time
Deputy
Four alternativesBuddy Punch, Connecteam, Homebase, OnTheClock
against: ADP Workforce Now, Jibble, NovaTime, TimeClock Plus, uAttend/Workwell
Llama 4 MaverickHomebase
Nine alternativesBambooHR Time Tracking, Buddy Punch, ClockShark, Deputy, QuickBooks Time, TimeCamp, TimeTrex, TrackingTime, ZoomShift
no first choiceChangedno first choiceTimeCamp
Three alternativesConnecteam, Deputy, Homebase
no first choicenothing named
Qwen 3.7 FlashGusto, QuickBooks Time
Two alternativesClockify, Deputy
Harvest, Toggl TrackChanged
One alternativeClockify
against: Hubstaff, Time Doctor
ClockShopper
Four alternativesDeputy, Hubstaff, QuickBooks Time, When I Work
Homebase
Three alternativesBuddy Punch, Clockify, Connecteam
no first choiceagainst: Oracle Time and Labor, SAP SuccessFactors Time Managementagainst: Oracle Workforce Central, UKG Pro Workforce Management
Kimi K2Buddy Punch, Homebase
Four alternativesClockify, Deputy, QuickBooks Time, TimeCamp
Clockify, Toggl TrackChanged
Two alternativesBigTime, Harvest
Clockify
Eleven alternativesBuddy Punch, Connecteam, Deputy, Gusto, Harvest, HiveDesk, Homebase, QuickBooks Time, Toggl Track, When I Work, actiTIME
against: Hubstaff, Time Doctor, Timely
Homebase
Four alternativesBuddy Punch, Clockify, OnTheClock, TimeCamp
no first choiceagainst: ADP Workforce Now, BigTime, Paychex Time & Attendance, TimeCamp, TimeSource from Icon Time
GLM 4.7 FlashXHomebase
Four alternativesConnecteam, Deputy, QuickBooks Time, Rippling
Harvest, Toggl TrackChanged
Two alternativesBigTime, Connecteam
Homebase, Rippling
Five alternativesBuddy Punch, ClockShark, Clockify, Deputy, QuickBooks Time
Homebase
Two alternativesBuddy Punch, Jibble
no first choicenothing named
MiniMax M2.5Buddy Punch, Deputy
One alternativeHomebase
Toggl TrackChanged
Four alternativesClockify, Harvest, Paymo, actiTIME
Homebase
Four alternativesBuddy Punch, ClockShark, Deputy, Jibble
Clockify
Three alternativesBuddy Punch, Homebase, TimeCamp
no first choiceagainst: ADP Workforce Now, SAP SuccessFactors Time Managementagainst: Excel, Google Sheets
GPT-6 LunaQuickBooks Time
Two alternativesConnecteam, Deputy
HarvestChanged
Three alternativesClockify, QuickBooks Time, Toggl Track
Homebase
Four alternativesConnecteam, Deputy, QuickBooks Time, When I Work
Homebase
Two alternativesConnecteam, Jibble
no first choiceagainst: Clockify, Deputy, Homebase, QuickBooks Time
Muse Glimmer 30BHomebase
Eight alternativesBambooHR Time Tracking, Buddy Punch, Connecteam, Deputy, Hubstaff, QuickBooks Time, formerly TSheets / QuickBooks Workforce, Rippling, TrackingTime
Harvest, PlutioChanged
Two alternativesEverhour, Paymo
Buddy Punch
Seven alternativesClockify, Connecteam, Deputy, Homebase, Jibble, QuickBooks Time, TCP Humanity
Clockify, Jibble
Three alternativesConnecteam, Homebase, When I Work
no first choiceagainst: BigTime, Icon Time / Timesource, Paychex Time in a Box, TimeClock 365
Bold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against

The record

One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
PromptModelVersion stringTime (UTC)SearchedSourcesLatency
Direct recommendationClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 11:14no05 s
Direct recommendationGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 08:46yes15 s
Direct recommendationGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 10:44yes1422 s
Direct recommendationPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 10:31yes103 s
Direct recommendationGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 13:12yes528 s
Direct recommendationMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 12:38yes54 s
Direct recommendationDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 12:14yes2426 s
Direct recommendationLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 11:56yes53 s
Direct recommendationQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 09:58no026 s
Direct recommendationKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 09:39yes1037 s
Direct recommendationGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 10:48yes2020 s
Direct recommendationMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 10:04yes528 s
Direct recommendationGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 09:31yes313 s
Direct recommendationMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 09:22yes1119 s
ParaphraseClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 11:12no05 s
ParaphraseGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 12:44yes36 s
ParaphraseGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 08:41no013 s
ParaphrasePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 12:14yes103 s
ParaphraseGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 13:07yes527 s
ParaphraseMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 10:20yes55 s
ParaphraseDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 09:30yes2430 s
ParaphraseLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 11:43yes53 s
ParaphraseQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 08:40yes523 s
ParaphraseKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 10:03yes1018 s
ParaphraseGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 11:57yes1072 s
ParaphraseMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 11:34yes526 s
ParaphraseGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 08:52yes411 s
ParaphraseMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 11:14yes1527 s
ComparativeClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 10:21yes108 s
ComparativeGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 11:09yes46 s
ComparativeGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 09:01no013 s
ComparativePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 10:15yes106 s
ComparativeGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 13:09yes937 s
ComparativeMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 12:01yes510 s
ComparativeDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 11:35yes2230 s
ComparativeLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 09:48yes54 s
ComparativeQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 11:17no027 s
ComparativeKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 12:06yes1052 s
ComparativeGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 12:15yes2540 s
ComparativeMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 10:40yes936 s
ComparativeGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 10:57yes517 s
ComparativeMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 12:00yes1123 s
Budget constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 10:13yes108 s
Budget constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 10:18yes14 s
Budget constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 11:39yes918 s
Budget constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 09:24yes103 s
Budget constrainedGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 13:26yes528 s
Budget constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 10:42yes54 s
Budget constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 09:29yes2417 s
Budget constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 10:39yes52 s
Budget constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 12:57yes532 s
Budget constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 08:52yes918 s
Budget constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 12:20yes816 s
Budget constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 11:30yes520 s
Budget constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 12:16yes312 s
Budget constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 12:42yes1519 s
Scale constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 09:05no06 s
Scale constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 11:12no06 s
Scale constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 11:33no013 s
Scale constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 12:55yes105 s
Scale constrainedGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 13:22yes536 s
Scale constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 11:55no010 s
Scale constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 10:53yes2035 s
Scale constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 11:46yes53 s
Scale constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 11:43no025 s
Scale constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 09:09yes1431 s
Scale constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 09:22yes1988 s
Scale constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 09:07no011 s
Scale constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 11:01yes313 s
Scale constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 10:28yes1425 s
Negative framingClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 08:51yes209 s
Negative framingGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 11:20no04 s
Negative framingGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 08:39no018 s
Negative framingPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 12:41yes104 s
Negative framingGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 13:25yes1538 s
Negative framingMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 08:52yes107 s
Negative framingDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 11:55yes2533 s
Negative framingLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 12:36yes52 s
Negative framingQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 09:00yes1533 s
Negative framingKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 12:28yes2524 s
Negative framingGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 10:13yes1980 s
Negative framingMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 08:43yes1470 s
Negative framingGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 10:33yes530 s
Negative framingMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 11:58yes2330 s

Normalization in this category

Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.

ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
ADP read as ADP Workforce Now
ADP Time & Attendance read as ADP Workforce Now
BambooHR read as BambooHR Time Tracking
Kronos read as UKG Pro Workforce Management
Oracle read as Oracle Time and Labor
Paychex read as Paychex Time & Attendance
QuickBooks Workforce read as QuickBooks Time
RUN Powered by ADP read as ADP RUN
SAP read as SAP SuccessFactors Time Management
SAP SuccessFactors read as SAP SuccessFactors Time Management
UKG read as UKG Pro Workforce Management
UKG (formerly Kronos) read as UKG Pro Workforce Management
UKG Pro read as UKG Pro Workforce Management
Workday read as Workday Time Tracking
Unresolved, counted raw
Acroprint
Asure Time & Attendance
BambooHR Time
ClockOut
ClockShopper
ConnectWise
ConnectWise Automate
NovaTime
Oracle Workforce Central
Pyramid paper clocks
QuickBooks Time, formerly TSheets / QuickBooks Workforce
TimeSource from Icon Time
uAttend/Workwell
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.
← PEOsWhistleblowing →