Clockify vs Toggl Track
Zero of fourteen models named Clockify first on the direct prompt; zero named Toggl Track. Clockify was named by thirteen of the fourteen models and Toggl Track by nine and Clockify carries 28 labels and Toggl Track 10, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in six categories this edition.
Named in two categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the time and attendance page.
By framing
ClockifyFirst choices, of fourteen modelsToggl Track
Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Clockify and Toggl Track were named in the same answer thirty-nine times, of the 150 answers naming Clockify and the 54 naming Toggl Track. In those answers Toggl Track took the first choice nine times and Clockify three.
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | ||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | ||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | |||
| Perplexity Sonar | | | ||||
| Grok 4.20 | | | ||||
| Mistral Small | ||||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | ||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | ||||
| Kimi K2 | | | | |||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | |||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | | |||
| GPT-6 Luna | | |||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | |
Clockify Toggl Track first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Clockify on the left and Toggl Track on the right.The direct prompt
Neither was named
14 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
Clockify15%#2 of 17Toggl Track11%#4 of 17Clockify12%#2 of 17Toggl Track12%#4 of 17Clockify0%#– of 13Toggl Track0%#– of 13What the models said about Clockify
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of five in this category shown.
“Avoid basic time trackers like Clockify unless your needs are simple” MiniMax M2.5 · direct prompt · hard negative
“I wouldn't choose Clockify just because its free plan is generous: its attendance and overtime reporting are on a paid tier” GPT-6 Luna · budget prompt · soft negative
“Clockify / Toggl (more basic, free tier available)” MiniMax M2.5 · scale prompt · soft negative
“Clockify's unlimited free plan makes it the go-to time and attendance solution for bootstrapped teams” Claude Haiku 4.5 · budget prompt · first choice
“Homebase (free tier) or Clockify (free up to 5 users) are excellent starting points” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
What the models said about Toggl Track
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.
“Clockify / Toggl (more basic, free tier available)” MiniMax M2.5 · scale prompt · soft negative
“Toggl is widely considered the industry leader for mid-sized consultancies, dev shops, and agencies.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“I'd suggest starting with ClickTime or Toggl Track as your primary options” Kimi K2 · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“For most mid-sized B2B companies ... Toggl Track offers the best balance” DeepSeek V4 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.