Time and attendance · November 2026 Edition
Toggl Track vs TimeCamp
Zero of fourteen models named Toggl Track first on the direct prompt; zero named TimeCamp. Toggl Track was named by nine of the fourteen models and TimeCamp by nine and Toggl Track carries 10 labels and TimeCamp 14, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in two categories this edition.
Named in two categories this edition.
First-choice share12%4%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate10%0%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#4#7A position in a field of 17; printed, not drawn.
Labels1014A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Toggl Track reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Rippling was named alongside these two in ten of the fourteen direct answers. Rippling vs Toggl Track · Rippling vs TimeCamp · Clockify vs Toggl Track
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the time and attendance page.
By framing
How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
Toggl TrackFirst choices, of fourteen modelsTimeCamp
Direct00
Paraphrase60
Comparative00
Budget-constrained02
Scale-constrained001 against Toggl Track
Negative00
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.
Every model, every framing
The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Toggl Track and TimeCamp stood in it.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | |||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | |||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | |||||
| Perplexity Sonar | | |||||
| Grok 4.20 | | | ||||
| Mistral Small | | | ||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | ||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | | |||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | |||||
| Kimi K2 | | | | |||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | ||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | ||||
| GPT-6 Luna | ||||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | |
Toggl Track TimeCamp first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Toggl Track on the left and TimeCamp on the right.The direct prompt
The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Toggl Track and TimeCamp stood in it.
Neither was the first choice, one was named
1 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.GLM 4.7 FlashXDeputy, Rippling alternatives: Connecteam, QuickBooks Time, Synerion, TimeCamp
Neither was named
13 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Claude Haiku 4.5Paycom alternatives: ADP Workforce Now, Connecteam, Paylocity, Rippling
GPT-5.4 miniUKG Ready alternatives: Connecteam, Gusto, QuickBooks Time, Rippling
Gemini 3.5 FlashRippling alternatives: ADP Workforce Now, ClickTime, Paylocity, Replicon, UKG Ready
Perplexity SonarRippling alternatives: BambooHR Time Tracking, Connecteam, Deputy, Paycor, Synerion, UKG Ready
Grok 4.20Rippling alternatives: Paycom, UKG Ready
Mistral SmallSynerion alternatives: Factorial, Microsoft Teams, isolved Time
DeepSeek V4 FlashTCP Humanity alternatives: Buddy Punch, Connecteam, Deputy, Rippling, UKG Ready
Llama 4 MaverickSynerion alternatives: Factorial, Microsoft Teams, isolved Time
Qwen 3.7 FlashDeputy alternatives: OnTheClock, QuickBooks Time, Synerion
Kimi K2Rippling alternatives: Paylocity, Synerion, UKG Ready
MiniMax M2.5Deputy, Rippling alternatives: Connecteam, Paylocity, UKG Ready
GPT-6 LunaRippling alternatives: ADP Workforce Now, UKG Ready
Muse Glimmer 30BDeputy, Synerion alternatives: ADP Workforce Now, Connecteam, TimeClock Plus, UKG Pro Workforce Management
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Toggl Track leads by seven points.
Toggl Track11%#4 of 17TimeCamp4%#11 of 17Mid-marketThe figures above
Toggl Track leads by eight points.
Toggl Track12%#4 of 17TimeCamp4%#7 of 17Enterprise
The order flips: TimeCamp leads at enterprise.
TimeCamp2%#– of 13Toggl Track0%#– of 13What the models said about Toggl Track
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.
“Clockify / Toggl (more basic, free tier available)” MiniMax M2.5 · scale prompt · soft negative
“Toggl is widely considered the industry leader for mid-sized consultancies, dev shops, and agencies.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“I'd suggest starting with ClickTime or Toggl Track as your primary options” Kimi K2 · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“For most mid-sized B2B companies ... Toggl Track offers the best balance” DeepSeek V4 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice
What the models said about TimeCamp
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of three in this category shown.
“The best time and attendance system for a company with a limited budget is TimeCamp, which is extremely affordable” Llama 4 Maverick · budget prompt · first choice
“For the lowest-cost paid option, TimeCamp's $3.99 per user plan is hard to beat.” Mistral Small · budget prompt · first choice
“suitable for mid-sized B2B companies looking to optimize workflow and track billable hours” Mistral Small · paraphrase prompt · alternative
Also compared
Rippling vs Toggl TrackRippling vs TimeCampClockify vs Toggl TrackClockify vs TimeCampHomebase vs Toggl TrackHomebase vs TimeCampToggl Track vs DeputyToggl Track vs JibbleToggl Track vs ConnecteamDeputy vs TimeCampJibble vs TimeCampTimeCamp vs ConnecteamAll twenty-eight head-to-head pages and the full time and attendance standing
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.